Search

Leukemic stem cells (LSCs) are implicated in the initiation, maintenance, and relapse of leukemia. The failure of current standard induction chemotherapy, which primarily targets dividing cells, has been linked to the quiescence of LSCs, leading to resistance to treatment. Consequently, there is an urgent need for novel therapies specifically aimed at eradicating LSCs to achieve more effective and durable treatment responses.

Proteolytic cascades are deeply involved in critical stages of cancer progression. During the course of peptide-wise analysis of shotgun proteomic data sets representative of colon adenocarcinoma (AC) and ulcerative colitis (UC), we detected a cancer-specific proteolytic fingerprint composed of a set of numerous protein fragments cleaved C-terminally to V, I, A, T, or C residues, significantly overrepresented in AC. A peptide set linked by a common VIATC cleavage consensus was the only prominent cancer-specific proteolytic fingerprint detected. This sequence consensus indicated neutrophil elastase as a source of the fingerprint. We also found that a large fraction of affected proteins are RNA processing proteins associated with the nuclear fraction and mostly cleaved within their functionally important RNA-binding domains. Thus, we detected a new class of cancer-specific peptides that are possible markers of tumor-infiltrating neutrophil activity, which often correlates with the clinical outcome. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifiers: PXD005274 (Data set 1) and PXD004249 (Data set 2). Our results indicate the value of peptide-wise analysis of large global proteomic analysis data sets as opposed to protein-wise analysis, in which outlier differential peptides are usually neglected.

Proteasome machinery is a major proteostasis control system in human cells, actively compensated upon its inhibition. To understand this compensation, we compared global protein landscapes upon the proteasome inhibition with carfilzomib, in normal fibroblasts, cells of multiple myeloma, and cancers of lung, colon, and pancreas. Molecular chaperones, autophagy, and endocytosis-related proteins are the most prominent vulnerabilities in combination with carfilzomib, while targeting of the HSP70 family chaperones HSPA1A/B most specifically sensitizes cancer cells to the proteasome inhibition. This suggests a central role of HSP70 in the suppression of the proteasome downregulation, allowing to identify pathways impinging on HSP70 upon the proteasome inhibition. HSPA1A/B indeed controls proteasome-inhibition-induced autophagy, unfolded protein response, and endocytic flux, and directly chaperones the proteasome machinery. However, it does not control the NRF1/2-driven proteasome subunit transcriptional bounce-back. Consequently, targeting of NRF1 proves effective in decreasing the viability of cancer cells with the inhibited proteasome and HSP70.

R-CHOP immunochemotherapy remains standard frontline therapy for newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. However, this therapy is ineffective in approximately 1/3 of patients, underscoring the need for better treatment modalities. Targeting DLBCL oncogenic drivers is a promising strategy to improve the treatment efficacy and outcome. Although MYC transcription factor is one of the key oncogenes in DLBCL development, direct MYC targeting strategies have been largely ineffective, highlighting the need for other, indirect approaches. For example, MYC expression is stabilized by PIM serine-threonine kinases, indicating that PIM inhibition might be a rational approach to indirectly target MYC. In this study, we assessed the PIM-MYC relationship and the consequences of PIM inhibition in DLBCL. We first evaluated the expression of PIM1-3 and MYC proteins in 57 DLBCL diagnostic sections by immunohistochemistry. In this series, 70.17% of specimens were positive for at least one PIM isoform and 84.22% cases were MYC-positive. 100% of cases with high MYC expression (MYC present in ≥30% of the cells, n=35) were PIM-positive, whereas 86,36% of cases with undetectable or low MYC expression (MYC detected in ≤20% of cells, n= 22) were PIM-negative (Fisher’s exact test, p<0.0001). Since the coexpression of MYC and PIMs highlights the functional link between these proteins in DLBCLs, we evaluated the expression of PIM kinases in cell lines following siRNA-mediated MYC knockdown or treatment with MYC-MAX dimerization inhibitor, 10058F4. The genetic or chemical MYC inhibition markedly decreased PIM1-3 expression in six GCB and ABC cell lines. Likewise, knockdown of all three PIM isoforms decreased MYC levels, attenuated proliferation and induced apoptosis. Similarly, PIM blockade with SEL24/MEN1703, a novel pan-PIM/FLT3 inhibitor tested currently in clinical trial in AML patients and exhibiting favorable safety profile, decreased the expression of multiple MYC-dependent genes. To assess the MYC role in PIM inhibitor-mediated toxicity, we generated DHL4 cells expressing degradation-resistant MYC_T58A mutant. MYC_T58A expression partially protected cells from PIM inhibitor-induced proliferation arrest and apoptosis, indicating that the inhibitor’s toxicity is at least partially mediated by MYC depletion.