Search

Background Patients with refractory angina (RA) have poor quality of life and new therapies are needed. XC001 is a novel adenoviral vector expressing multiple isoforms of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promoting an enhanced local angiogenic effect. Methods The E picardial Delivery of X C001 Gene Therapy for Refractory A ngina C oronary T reatment (EXACT) trial is a 6-month (with 6-month extension) phase 1/2, first-in-human, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of XC001 in patients with RA. The trial will enroll 33 patients in an initial (n = 12) ascending dose-escalation phase (1 × 109, 1 × 1010, 4 × 1010, and 1 × 1011 viral particles), followed by phase 2 (n = 21) assessing the highest tolerated dose. Patients must have stable Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class II–IV angina on maximally tolerated medical therapy without options for conventional revascularization, demonstrable ischemia on stress testing, and angina limiting exercise tolerance. XC001 will be delivered directly to ischemic myocardium via surgical transthoracic epi c ardial access. The primary outcome is safety via adverse event monitoring through 6 months. Efficacy assessments include difference from baseline to month 6 in time to 1 mm of ST segment depression, time to angina, and total exercise duration; myocardial blood flow at rest, and stress and coronary flow reserve by positron emission tomography; quality of life; CCS functional class; and angina frequency. Conclusions The EXACT trial will determine whether direct intramyocardial administration of XC001 in patients with RA is safe and evaluate its effect on exercise tolerance, myocardial perfusion, angina and physical activity, informing future clinical investigation. Clinical trial registration NCT04125732

The five-stage Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) cardiogenic shock classification scheme can stratify hospital mortality risk in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). We sought to evaluate the SCAI shock classification for prediction of post-discharge mortality in CICU survivors.We retrospectively analyzed hospital survivors admitted to a single CICU between 2007 and 2015. SCAI CS stages A through E were classified using CICU admission data using a previously published algorithm. All-cause post-discharge mortality was compared across SCAI stages using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.Among 9096 unique hospital survivors, 43.2% had acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 44.6% had heart failure (HF), and 8.7% had cardiac arrest (CA) on admission. The proportion of patients in each SCAI shock stage was: A, 49.1%; B, 30.6%; C, 15.2; D/E 5.2%. Kaplan-Meier survival at 5 years in each SCAI shock stage was: A, 88.2%; B, 81.6%; C, 76.7%; D/E, 71.7% (P .001 by log-rank). Each higher SCAI shock stage was associated with increased adjusted post-discharge mortality compared to SCAI shock stage A (all P .001); results were consistent among patients with ACS or HF. Late hemodynamic deterioration after 24 hours, but not an admission diagnosis of CA, was associated with higher post-discharge mortality.The SCAI shock classification assessed at the time of CICU admission was predictive of post-discharge mortality risk among hospital survivors, although an admission diagnosis of CA was not. The SCAI shock classification can be used for post-discharge mortality risk stratification.

Background The novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has resulted in a global pandemic. Patients with cardiovascular risk factors or established cardiovascular disease are more likely to experience severe or critical COVID-19 illness and myocardial injury is a key extra-pulmonary manifestation. These patients frequently present with ST-elevation on an electrocardiogram (ECG) due to multiple etiologies including obstructive, non-obstructive, and/or angiographically normal coronary arteries. The incidence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) mimics in COVID-19 positive hospitalized patients, and the association with morbidity and mortality is unknown. Understanding the natural history and appropriate management of COVID-19 patients presenting with ST elevation is essential to inform patient management decisions and protect healthcare workers. Methods The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) and The Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology (CAIC) in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Interventional Council have collaborated to create a multi-center observational registry, North American COVID-19 ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NACMI). This registry will enroll confirmed COVID-19 patients and persons under investigation (PUI) with new ST-segment elevation or new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) on the ECG with clinical suspicion of myocardial ischemia. We will compare demographics, clinical findings, outcomes and management of these patients with a historical control group of over 15,000 consecutive STEMI activation patients from the Midwest STEMI Consortium using propensity matching. The primary clinical outcome will be in- hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, recurrent MI, and repeat unplanned revascularization in COVID-19 confirmed or PUI. Secondary outcomes will include the following: reporting of etiologies of ST Elevation; cardiovascular mortality due to myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest and /or shock; individual components of the primary outcome; composite primary outcome at one year; as well as ECG and angiographic characteristics. Conclusion The multicenter NACMI registry will collect data regarding ST elevation on ECG in COVID-19 patients to determine the etiology and associated clinical outcomes. The collaboration and speed with which this registry has been created, refined, and promoted serves as a template for future research endeavors.

Background Whether high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) confers an increased risk of adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. We sought to examine the specific relationship between HAPR and clinical outcomes in ADAPT-DES. Methods A total of 8,526 “all-comer” patients in the ADAPT-DES registry who underwent placement of drug-eluting stents (DES) and were treated with aspirin and clopidogrel were assessed to measure platelet reactivity. HAPR was characterized as ≥550 aspirin reaction units and high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity as >208 P2Y12 reaction units. Univariable and propensity-adjusted multivariable analyses were used to assess the relationship between HAPR and clinical outcomes. Results HAPR was present in 478 (5.6%) patients. Patients with HAPR were older and had more comorbid illnesses and more complex coronary anatomy. During 2-year follow-up, HAPR was not associated with increased rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, or all-cause mortality. In propensity-adjusted multivariable analyses, HAPR was not an independent predictor of MACE after successful PCI (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio: 1.04; 95% CI 0.64-1.69, P = .87). Nor was HAPR associated with reduced bleeding. Even among patients with concomitant high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity, HAPR was not associated with worse ischemic outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio for 2-year MACE: 1.06; 95% CI 0.55-2.00, P = .87). Conclusions HAPR was infrequently present in a large registry of patients undergoing PCI. There was no clear relationship between HAPR and 2-year clinical outcomes. Investigations of antiplatelet regimens without aspirin after DES implantation are ongoing and should inform future management of patients undergoing PCI.

Background Assessing hospital-related network-level primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performance for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is challenging due to differential time-to-treatment metrics based on location of diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG) for STEMI. Methods STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI at 588 PCI-capable hospitals in AHA Mission: Lifeline (2008–2013) were categorized by initial STEMI identification location: PCI-capable hospitals (Group 1); pre-hospital setting (Group 2); and non–PCI-capable hospitals (Group 3). Patient-specific time-to-treatment categories were converted to minutes ahead of or behind their group-specific mean; average time-to-treatment difference for all patients at a given hospital was termed comprehensive ECG-to-device time. Hospitals were then stratified into tertiles based on their comprehensive ECG-to-device times with negative values below the mean representing shorter (faster) time intervals. Results Of 117,857 patients, the proportion in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 42%, 33%, and 25%, respectively. Lower rates of heart failure and cardiac arrest at presentation are noted within patients presenting to high-performing hospitals. Median comprehensive ECG-to-device time was shortest at −9 minutes (25th, 75th percentiles: −13, −6) for the high-performing hospital tertile, 1 minute (−1, 3) for middle-performing, and 11 minutes (7, 16) for low-performing. Unadjusted rates of in-hospital mortality were 2.3%, 2.6%, and 2.7%, respectively, but the adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality was similar across tertiles. Conclusions Comprehensive ECG-to-device time provides an integrated hospital-related network-level assessment of reperfusion timing metrics for primary PCI, regardless of the location for STEMI identification; further validation will delineate how this metric can be used to facilitate STEMI care improvements.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the frequency of use and association between prasugrel and outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in clinical practice. METHODS: PROMETHEUS was a multicenter observational registry of acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing PCI from 8 centers in the United States that maintained a prospective PCI registry for patient outcomes. The primary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events at 90days, a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned revascularization. Major bleeding was defined as any bleeding requiring hospitalization or blood transfusion. Hazard ratios (HRs) were generated using multivariable Cox regression and stratified by the propensity to treat with prasugrel. RESULTS: Of 19,914 patients (mean age 64.4years, 32% female), 4,058 received prasugrel (20%) and 15,856 received clopidogrel (80%). Prasugrel-treated patients were younger with fewer comorbid risk factors compared with their counterparts receiving clopidogrel. At 90days, there was a significant association between prasugrel use and lower major adverse cardiovascular event (5.7% vs 9.6%, HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.50-0.67, P

Background Little is known about the use of platelet function testing to guide choice of P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor therapy in routine clinical practice. Methods We studied 671 myocardial infarction (MI) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in the TRANSLATE-ACS Registry who had VerifyNow platelet function testing performed while on clopidogrel treatment during their index hospitalization (April 2010–October 2012). Results High platelet reactivity (>208 platelet reactivity units [PRU]) was present in 261 (38.9%) patients. Clopidogrel was switched in-hospital to prasugrel in 80 (30.7%) patients with high platelet reactivity and 18 (4.4%) patients with therapeutic platelet reactivity (≤208 PRU). Among high platelet reactivity patients, switch to prasugrel was associated with lower major adverse cardiovascular events (death, MI, stroke, or unplanned revascularization) at 1year (10.0% vs 22.7%, P =.02; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.39, 95% CI 0.18-0.85, P =.02) and no significant difference in Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 or higher bleeding (23.8% vs 22.1%, P =.77; adjusted OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.48-1.7, P =.77) compared with patients continued on clopidogrel. No significant differences in major adverse cardiovascular event (22.2% vs 12.8%, P =.25; adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.47-7.3, P =.38) or bleeding (22.2% vs 19.4%, P =.77; adjusted OR 1.3, 95% CI 0.27-6.8, P =.72) were observed among therapeutic platelet reactivity patients between switching and continuation on clopidogrel. Conclusions Only one-third of percutaneous coronary intervention–treated MI patients with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity were switched to a more potent P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor. Intensification of antiplatelet therapy was associated with lower risk of ischemic events at 1year among HPR patients.

BACKGROUND: Mononuclear cells (MNCs) have been tested in clinical trials across multiple cardiovascular pathologies with mixed results. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and markers of cardiovascular capacity have been particularly challenging to interpret due to small size. This meta-analysis is aimed to assess the efficacy of MNC therapy in randomized clinical trials to identify the markers of efficiency that could influence future trial design. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception through November 8, 2018. Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and infarct size (IS) from baseline to follow-up were selected as primary outcomes. Changes in the left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), BNP/NT-proBNP, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), NYHA class and MACE incidences were considered secondary outcomes. RESULTS: In short-term follow-up, patients treated with MNCs demonstrated a significant increase in absolute LVEF of 2.21% (95% CI 1.59 to 2.83; P < 0.001; I(2) = 32%) and 6.01% (95% CI 4.45 to 7.57; P < 0.001; I(2) = 0%) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) studies, respectively. This effect was sustained in long-term follow-up. MNC therapy significantly reduced LVESV; however, infarct size (IS), 6MWT, NYHA class, and MACE rates were comparable. CONCLUSION: MNC therapy may convey a modest but sustained increase in LVEF in ICM patients, supporting further investigation. AMI trials, however, demonstrated minimal improvement in LVEF of unclear clinical significance, suggesting a limited role for MNC therapy in AMI.

Background The use of oral P2Y 12 receptor inhibitors after acute myocardial infarction (MI) can reduce risks of subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, and stroke), yet medication persistence is suboptimal. Although copayment cost has been implicated as a factor influencing medication persistence, it remains unclear whether reducing or eliminating these costs can improve medication persistence and/or downstream clinical outcomes. Design ARTEMIS is a multicenter, cluster-randomized clinical trial designed to examine whether eliminating patient copayment for P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor therapy affects medication persistence and clinical outcomes. We will enroll approximately 11,000 patients hospitalized for acute ST-elevation and non–ST-elevation MI at 300 hospitals. Choice and duration of treatment with a P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor will be determined by the treating physician. Hospitals randomized to the copayment intervention will provide vouchers to cover patients' copayments for their P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor for up to 1 year after discharge. The coprimary end points are 1-year P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor persistence and major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary end points include choice of P2Y 12 receptor inhibitor, patient-reported outcomes, and postdischarge cost of care. Conclusion ARTEMIS will be the largest randomized assessment of a medication copayment reduction intervention on medication persistence, clinical outcomes, treatment selection, and cost of care after acute MI.

Contemporary utilization patterns for targeted temperature management (TTM) among patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have not been well characterized in the United States. In this nationwide evaluation of MI patients with OHCA (01/2015–03/2016; 691 hospitals), 34.1% (1792/5260) of OHCA patients received TTM. Patients who were treated with TTM had higher risk clinical features. A wide inter-hospital variation (ranging from 0% to 82%) in TTM use observed despite few differences in case mix.

Background Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) typically requires a greater number of stents and longer stent length than non-CTO PCI, placing these patients at greater risk for adverse ischemic events. We sought to determine whether the association between high platelet reactivity (HPR) and the risk of ischemic events is stronger after CTO than non-CTO PCI. Methods Patients undergoing successful PCI in the multicenter ADAPT-DES study were stratified according to whether they underwent PCI of a CTO. HPR was defined as VerifyNow platelet reaction units >208. The study primary endpoint was the 2-year risk target vessel failure ([TVF] defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization). Results CTO PCI was performed in 400 of 8448 patients. HPR was present in 34.5% of CTO PCI patients and 43.1% of non-CTO PCI patients (P = .0007). Patients undergoing CTO PCI with versus without HPR had significantly higher 2-year rates of TVF (15.0% versus 8.3%, P = .04) without significant differences in bleeding. HPR was an independent predictor of 2-year TVF (adjusted HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.34, P = .03) whereas CTO PCI was not (adjusted HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.65-1.22, P = .48). There was a significant interaction between CTO versus non-CTO PCI and PRU as a continuous variable for 2-year TVF (Pinteraction = 0.02). Conclusions In ADAPT-DES, HPR was associated with an increased 2-year risk of TVF after PCI, an association that was at least as strong after CTO PCI compared with non-CTO PCI.

Although platelet function and pharmacogenomic testing have been studied in clinical trials, their adoption into contemporary practice is unknown.We studied patterns of platelet function and pharmacogenomic testing among 10,048 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention at 226 US hospitals in the TRANSLATE-ACS observational study between April 2010 and October 2012, excluding those receiving research protocol-mandated testing. Inverse probability-weighted propensity adjustment was used to compare 1-year bleeding and major adverse cardiac event risks between patients with and without testing.Overall, 337 (3.4%) patients underwent predischarge platelet function testing, whereas 85 (0.9%) underwent pharmacogenomic testing; 82% and 93% of hospitals never performed any platelet function or pharmacogenomic testing, respectively. Patients undergoing testing were more likely to be on an adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor preadmission or to have percutaneous coronary intervention of a previously treated lesion. Tested patients were more likely than nontested patients to be switched from clopidogrel to prasugrel/ticagrelor (25.7% vs 9.7%, P.001) and were more likely to be on prasugrel/ticagrelor 6 months postdischarge (33.8% vs 25.1%, P.001). No significant differences in 1-year bleeding and major adverse cardiac event risks were observed between tested and nontested patients (adjusted hazard ratios 1.06 [95% CI 0.68-1.65] and 1.21 [95% CI 0.94-1.54], respectively).Platelet function and pharmacogenomic testing are rarely performed in contemporary myocardial infarction patients in the United States. When tested, patients were more likely to be treated with higher-potency adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors, yet no significant differences in longitudinal outcomes were observed.

Background Persistent use of secondary prevention therapies after acute myocardial infarction (MI) is critical to optimizing long-term outcomes. Methods Medication persistence was assessed among 7,955 MI patients in 216 hospitals participating in the Treatment with Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors: Longitudinal Assessment of Treatment Patterns and Events after Acute Coronary Syndrome study from 2010 to 2012. Persistence was defined as continuation of aspirin, adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and statins from discharge to 6 months post-MI. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with nonpersistence, defined as Results Overall, 31% of MI patients stopped taking a least 1 medication by 6 months. The most common reasons cited for medications discontinuation were side effects and physician instruction (57%), whereas financial concerns were cited in 8% overall. After multivariable modeling, black race (odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.15-1.62), older age (odds ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.12), atrial fibrillation (odds ratio 1.67, 95% CI 1.33-2.09), dialysis (odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.15-2.78), and depression (odds ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.45) were associated with lower likelihood of persistence. Private insurance (odds ratio 0.85, 95% 0.76-0.95), prescription cost assistance (odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.75), and outpatient follow-up arranged before discharge (odds ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-0.99) were associated with higher persistence. Conclusions Nearly one-third of MI patients are no longer persistent with their prescribed medications by 6 months. Patients at high risk for nonpersistence may be identified by clinical and sociodemographic features. These observations underscore key opportunities to optimize longitudinal use of secondary prevention therapies.

In patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS), troponin testing is effective for diagnosis and prognosis. Troponin testing has now expanded to include patients without suspected ACS. This nonselective troponin testing has unknown consequences for resource utilization and outcome. Therefore, we examined selective versus nonselective troponin testing with respect to patient characteristics, resource utilization, and outcome.This retrospective 1-year study included all patients with troponin testing at a U.S. emergency department. Testing was classified as selective (ACS) or nonselective (non-ACS) based on admission ICD-9 codes. Troponin upper reference limit (URL) was ≥99th percentile.Among 47,053 patients, troponin was measured in 9109 (19%) of whom 5764 were hospitalized. Admission diagnosis was non-ACS in 4427 (77%) and ACS in 1337 (23%). Non-ACS patients were older, 71±17 versus 65±16 years, with longer hospital stay, 77 versus 32 h, and greater 1-year mortality 22% versus 6.7%; P.001. In patients with troponin ≥URL, revascularization was performed in 64 (4.7%) of non-ACS versus 213 (48%) of ACS; P.001. In patients with troponinURL, 1-year mortality was 16% in non-ACS versus 3.5% in ACS; P.001. In those with troponin ≥URL, 1-year mortality was 35% in non-ACS versus 13% in ACS; P.001. Death was non-cardiac in80% of the non-ACS population CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary troponin testing is frequently nonselective. The non-ACS and ACS populations differ significantly regarding clinical characteristics, revascularization rates, and outcomes. Troponin elevation is a powerful predictor of 1-year mortality in non-ACS, this association reveals an opportunity for risk stratification and targeted therapy.In patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS), troponin testing is effective for diagnosis and prognosis. However, troponin testing has now expanded to include patients without suspected ACS. This nonselective troponin testing has unknown consequences for hospital resource utilization and patient outcome. Our findings demonstrate contemporary troponin testing is largely nonselective (77% of testing was performed in patients without acute coronary syndrome). In comparison to patients with acute coronary syndrome, those with non-acute coronary syndrome are older, with longer hospital stay, lower revascularization rates, and greater 1-year mortality. Troponin elevation identifies a high-risk population in both acute coronary syndrome and non-acute coronary syndrome populations, yet effective treatment for the latter is lacking.

The prognosis of patients with HFrEF remains poor despite the use of current medical and device therapies. Preclinical studies of HFrEF using IC delivery of RT-100, a replication deficient, E1/E3-deleted human adenovirus 5 encoding human AC6 was associated with favorable effects on LV function and remodeling. A recent multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study demonstrated the safety of IC delivery of RT-100 in HFrEF patients and potential efficacy at the higher doses. This phase 2 dose finding study, which included doses not expected to be effective, identified a potential reduction in congestive heart failure admissions in the AC6-treated group one year after randomization. The FLOURISH study is designed to investigate the prospect of reduction of heart failure hospitalization and other clinical adverse events and improvement in EF. The FLOURISH study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase 3 clinical trial that will randomize 536 patients to a one-time IC administration of RT-100 (1012 vp) or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Subjects will be 18-80 years of age, on optimal standard of care HF therapy with LVEF ≥10% and ≤35% by echocardiogram, and will undergo IC administration of RT-100 vs. placebo on Day 1. Follow-up study visits will be performed at Weeks 1 and 4, and Months 3, 6, and 12. Patients will be followed for an additional 36 months for safety assessments with telephone contact at Months 24, 36, and 48. The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of IC RT-100 vs. placebo in reducing the event rate of all (first and repeat) HF hospitalizations occurring from baseline to 12 months. The secondary objectives are to determine the efficacy of IC RT-100 on CV death, all cause death, and all HF events and in improving NYHA functional classification. Exploratory endpoints will include echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, HF symptoms and physical limitations, 6-minute walking distance, Borg dyspnea score, and NT-proBNP levels. The FLOURISH study, which received fast track designation from the Food and Drug Administration in December 2017, will further investigate the role of a one-time intracoronary injection of RT-100 in reducing HF hospitalizations and will serve as a registration trial (potentially pivotal investigation) for RT-100 as a treatment for HFrEF.

Objectives SENECA ( S t E m cell i N j EC tion in c A ncer survivors) is a phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of delivering allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells (allo-MSCs) transendocardially in subjects with anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC). Background AIC is an incurable and often fatal syndrome, with a prognosis worse than that of ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Recently, cell therapy with MSCs has emerged as a promising new approach to repair damaged myocardium. Methods The study population is 36 cancer survivors with a diagnosis of AIC, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤40%, and symptoms of heart failure (NYHA class II-III) on optimally-tolerated medical therapy. Subjects must be clinically free of cancer for at least two years with a ≤ 30% estimated five-year risk of recurrence. The first six subjects participated in an open-label, lead-in phase and received 100 million allo-MSCs; the remaining 30 will be randomized 1:1 to receive allo-MSCs or vehicle via 20 transendocardial injections. Efficacy measures (obtained at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months) include MRI evaluation of LV function, LV volumes, fibrosis, and scar burden; assessment of exercise tolerance (six-minute walk test) and quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire); clinical outcomes (MACE and cumulative days alive and out of hospital); and biomarkers of heart failure (NT-proBNP). Conclusions This is the first clinical trial using direct cardiac injection of cells for the treatment of AIC. If administration of allo-MSCs is found feasible and safe, SENECA will pave the way for larger phase II/III studies with therapeutic efficacy as the primary outcome.

Recent data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry indicate that women with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) continue to have higher mortality and reported delays in treatment compared with men. We aimed to determine whether the sex difference in mortality exists when treatment disparities are reduced.Using a prospective regional percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-based STEMI system database with a standardized STEMI protocol, we evaluated baseline characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes of STEMI patients stratified by sex.From March 2003 to January 2016, 4,918 consecutive STEMI patients presented to the Minneapolis Heart Institute at Abbott Northwestern Hospital regional STEMI system including 1,416 (28.8%) women. Compared with men, women were older (68.4 vs 60.9 years) with higher rates of hypertension (66.7% vs 55.7%), diabetes (21.7% vs 17.4%), and cardiogenic shock (11.5% vs 8.0%) (all P.001). Pre-revascularization medications and PCI were performed with same frequencies, but women were less likely to receive statin or antiplatelet therapy at discharge. After age adjustment, women had similar in-hospital mortality to men (5.1% vs 4.8%, P = .60) despite slightly longer door-to-balloon time (95 vs 92 minutes, P = .004). Five-year follow-up confirmed absence of a sex disparity in age-adjusted survival post-STEMI.Previously reported treatment disparities between men and women are diminished in a regional PCI-based STEMI system using a standardized STEMI protocol. No sex differences in short-term or long-term age-adjusted mortality are present in this registry despite some treatment disparities. These results suggest that STEMI health care disparities and mortality in women can be improved using STEMI protocols and systems.

The American Heart Association Caruth Initiative (AHACI) is a multiyear project to increase the speed of coronary reperfusion and create an integrated system of care for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Dallas County, TX. The purpose of this study was to determine if the AHACI improved key performance metrics, that is, door-to-balloon (D2B) and symptom-onset-to-balloon times, for nontransfer patients with STEMI.Hospital patient data were obtained through the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Action Registry-Get With The Guidelines, and prehospital data came from emergency medical services (EMS) agencies through their electronic Patient Care Record systems. Initial D2B and symptom-onset-to-balloon times for nontransfer primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) STEMI care were explored using descriptive statistics, generalized linear models, and logistic regression.Data were collected by 15 PCI-capable Dallas hospitals and 24 EMS agencies. In the first 18 months, there were 3,853 cases of myocardial infarction, of which 926 (24%) were nontransfer patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. D2B time decreased significantly (P.001), from a median time of 74 to 64 minutes. Symptom-onset-to-balloon time decreased significantly (P.001), from a median time of 195 to 162 minutes.The AHACI has improved the system of STEMI care for one of the largest counties in the United States, and it demonstrates the benefits of integrating EMS and hospital data, implementing standardized training and protocols, and providing benchmarking data to hospitals and EMS agencies.

Advances in technique and adjunctive medication have improved outcome of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, the timely delivery and administration of reperfusion strategies to all eligible patients remain challenging. Currently, up to one-third of eligible STEMI patients in industrialized countries worldwide receive no specific reperfusion treatment, a problem that is rectified by the development and implementation of STEMI networks, as also recommended by the latest European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Indeed, over the last 5 years, published figures demonstrate that STEMI networks increase the percentage of patients treated by any reperfusion strategy, and the percentage of patients receiving treatment within the recommended time frames has also improved, thereby reducing in-hospital and long-term mortality to very low levels. This manuscript demonstrates how STEMI networks can be adapted to local needs and circumstances against pre-existing barriers and despite the heterogeneity in local situations, patient's characteristics, treatment delays, and distances for transfer. Modern and efficacious networks must be prepared to offer both primary percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolytic therapy, preferably prehospital, as long as primary percutaneous coronary intervention cannot be guaranteed to all individuals within the recommended timeline.

The reasons for postdischarge adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor (ADPri) switching among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) are unclear. We sought to describe the incidence and patterns of postdischarge ADPri switching among patients with acute MI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.We used TRANSLATE-ACS (2010-2012) data to assess postdischarge ADPri switching among 8,672 MI patients discharged after percutaneous coronary intervention who remained on ADPri therapy 1 year post-MI. We examined patient-reported reasons for switching, GUSTO moderate or severe bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and definite stent thrombosis events around the time of the switch.Among patients still on ADPri therapy 1 year post-MI, 663 (7.6%) switched ADPri during that year. Switching occurred at a median of 50 days postdischarge and most frequently in patients discharged on ticagrelor (64/226; 28.3%), followed by prasugrel (383/2,489; 15.4%) and clopidogrel (216/5,957; 3.6%) (P.001). Among patients discharged on prasugrel, 97.3% of switches were to clopidogrel and 87.5% of ticagrelor switches were to clopidogrel; both of these groups most often cited cost as a reason for switching (43.6% and 39.1%, respectively), whereas 60.7% who switched from clopidogrel cited physician decision as a reason. In the 7 days preceding the switch from clopidogrel, 40 (18.5%) had a MACE and 12 (5.6%) had a definite stent thrombosis event, whereas that from prasugrel or ticagrelor, a GUSTO moderate or severe bleeding event occurred in 1 (0.3%) and 0 patients, respectively.Postdischarge ADPri switching occurred infrequently within the first year post-MI and uncommonly was associated with MACEs or bleeding events.

Moderate improvements in cardiac performance have been reported in some clinical settings after delivery of bone marrow mononuclear cells to patients with cardiovascular disease. However, mechanistic insights into how these cells impact outcomes are lacking. To address this, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) established a Biorepository Core for extensive phenotyping and cell function studies and storing bone marrow and peripheral blood for 10 years. Analyzing cell populations and cell function in the context of clinical parameters and clinical outcomes after cell or placebo treatment empower the development of novel diagnostic and prognostics. Developing such biomarkers that define the safety and efficacy of cell therapy is a major Biorepository aim.

Background The measurement of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) is a strong predictor of cardiovascular adverse events and mortality in patients with LV dysfunction and has become the most common primary end point in cardiovascular cell therapy trials after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Multiple small trials have been performed using bone marrow mononuclear stem cells (BMCs) in this setting with several meta-analyses demonstrating that BMC administration results in a small improvement in LVEF and may attenuate adverse LV remodeling. However, individual trial results have not been uniform, and the measurement of LVEF in these trials has relied on a variety of imaging techniques including LV angiograpnhy, single-photon emission computed tomography, echocardiography, or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI). Methods Because cMRI provides the most accurate measurement of LVEF, LV volumes, and infarct size in patients after STEMI, we reviewed all randomized cardiovascular stem cell trials (N = 10) that administered intracoronary BMCs versus placebo/control to 686 patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention treatment of STEMI that used cMRI as their principal imaging measurement of LVEF at baseline and 3 to 6 months later. Results Administration of BMCs was associated with a nonsignificant 0.9% ± 0.8% absolute increase in LVEF compared with placebo or control (95% CI −0.7 to 2.4) with a small but nonsignificant decrease LV end-diastolic and LV end-systolic volumes (LV end-diastolic volume −1.1 ± 1.5 mL/m2, LV end-systolic volume −1.6 ± 1.4 mL/m2). Although infarct size uniformly decreased over time, the reduction was not improved by BMC administration (−0.3 ± 1.7 g). Conclusions The benefit of BMC administration after STEMI on LVEF, LV volumes, and infarct size is small when assessed by cMRI.

Background Initial clinical trials from Europe have demonstrated that the administration of bone marrow–derived mononuclear cells (BMCs) may improve left ventricular (LV) function in patients following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, results from trials performed in the United States have not yet been presented. Methods We developed a phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to investigate the effects of BMC administration in patients following STEMI on recovery of LV function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI). Forty patients with moderate to large anterior STEMIs were randomized to 100 million intracoronary BMCs versus placebo 3 to 10 days following successful primary angioplasty and stenting (percutaneous coronary intervention) of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Results Administration of BMC was safely performed in a high-risk cohort with minimal major adverse clinical event rates, and all patients remain alive to date. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 49.0% ± 9.5% at baseline to 55.2% ± 9.8% at 6 months by cMRI in the BMC group ( P P 2 in the BMC group at 6 months but increased significantly in the placebo group (17 mL/m 2 , P Conclusions This phase 1 study from the United States confirms the ongoing safety profile of BMC administration in patients following STEMI. The improvement in LV ejection fraction at 6 months by cMRI in the cell therapy group was not different than the placebo group. However, BMC administration had a favorable effect on LV remodeling at 6 months.

Pretreatment with clopidogrel reduces ischemic complications before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Limited data exist regarding the effect of pretreatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary PCI.Prospective data were analyzed from a regional STEMI system using rapid transfer for primary PCI in 30 community hospitals. Zone 1 community hospitals are60 miles and Zone 2 hospitals are 60 to 210 miles away from the PCI hospital. Compared with 63 minutes in the PCI hospital, median door-to-balloon times were 94 minutes in Zone 1 and 123 minutes in Zone 2 hospitals. All patients received aspirin, unfractionated heparin, and clopidogrel 600 mg in the emergency department of the presenting hospital within 15 minutes of diagnosis.From April 2003 through December 2008, 2,014 consecutive STEMI patients were pretreated with clopidogrel before PCI, with a median (25th-75th percentile) duration from pretreatment to PCI of 75 (58-93) minutes. Patients with longer pretreatment duration had significantly reduced reinfarction/reischemia at 30 days (Zone 1: 0.85%, Zone 2: 0.9%) compared with nontransferred patients (3.2%, P = .001) as well as reduced stent thrombosis (Zone 1: 0.6%, Zone 2: 0.6% vs Abbott Northwestern: 2.0%; P = .04). Similarly, pretreatment duration of60 minutes before PCI had reduced 30-day reinfarction/reischemia (1.0% vs 2.9%, P = .003). There were no significant differences in mortality or major bleeding.ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary PCI in a regional STEMI network who received earlier pretreatment with a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel had less ischemic complications without increased bleeding or mortality.

The following report is based on a working group meeting about advanced coronary artery disease for patients with refractory ischemia who cannot receive revascularization. The aims were to review currently available treatment strategies, define unmet clinical needs, explore clinical trial design issues, and identify promising novel therapeutic targets and approaches for patients with chronic ischemia. The Working Group brought together medical experts in the management of refractory angina with representatives from regulatory agencies, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and industry. The meeting began with presentations reviewing the limitations of the current medical therapies and revascularization strategies and focused on lessons learned from past therapeutic attempts to optimize outcomes and on what are considered to be the most promising new approaches. Perspectives from clinical experts and from regulatory agencies were juxtaposed against needs and concerns of industry regarding development of new therapeutic strategies. This report presents the considerations and conclusions of the meeting on December 4-5, 2006. This document has been developed as a 2-part article, with contemporary and emerging therapies for advanced coronary artery disease reviewed first. Trial design, end points, and regulatory issues will be discussed in the second part of the article.

Background Hospital mortality is an important quality measure for acute myocardial infarction care. There is a concern that despite risk adjustment, percutaneous coronary intervention hospitals accepting a greater volume of high-risk ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) transfer patients may have their reported mortality rates adversely affected. Methods The STEMI patients in the National Cardiovascular Data RegistryAcute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry—Get With the Guidelines from April 2011 to December 2013 were included. High-risk STEMI was defined as having either cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest on first medical contact. Receiving hospitals were divided into tertiles based on the ratio of high-risk STEMI transfer patients to the total number of STEMI patients treated at each hospital. Using the Action Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry—Get With the Guidelines in-hospital mortality risk model, we calculated the difference in risk-standardized in-hospital mortality before and after excluding high-risk STEMI transfers in each tertile. Results Among 119,680 STEMI patients treated at 539 receiving hospitals, 37,028 (31%) were transfer patients, of whom 4,500 (12%) were highrisk. The proportion of high-risk STEMI transfer patients ranged from 0% to 12% across hospitals. Unadjusted mortality rates in the low-, middle-, and high-tertile hospitals were 6.0%, 6.0%, and 5.9% among all STEMI patients and 6.0%, 5.5%, and 4.6% after excluding high-risk STEMI transfers. However, risk-standardized hospital mortality rates were not significantly changed after excluding high-risk STEMI transfer patients in any of the 3 hospital tertiles (low, −0.04%; middle, −0.05%; and high, 0.03%). Conclusions Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rates were not adversely affected in STEMI-receiving hospitals who accepted more high-risk STEMI transfer patients when a clinical mortality risk model was used for risk adjustment.

Background Although several preclinical studies have shown that bone marrow cell (BMC) transplantation promotes cardiac recovery after myocardial infarction, clinical trials with unfractionated bone marrow have shown variable improvements in cardiac function. Methods To determine whether in a population of post–myocardial infarction patients, functional recovery after BM transplant is associated with specific BMC subpopulation, we examined the association between BMCs with left ventricular (LV) function in the LateTIME-CCTRN trial. Results In this population, we found that older individuals had higher numbers of BM CD133 + and CD3 + cells. Bone marrow from individuals with high body mass index had lower CD45 dim /CD11b dim levels, whereas those with hypertension and higher C-reactive protein levels had higher numbers of CD133 + cells. Smoking was associated with higher levels of CD133 + /CD34 + /VEGFR2 + cells and lower levels of CD3 + cells. Adjusted multivariate analysis indicated that CD11b dim cells were negatively associated with changes in LV ejection fraction and wall motion in both the infarct and border zones. Change in LV ejection fraction was positively associated with CD133 + , CD34 + , and CD45 + /CXCR4 dim cells as well as faster BMC growth rates in endothelial colony forming assays. Conclusions In the LateTIME population, BM composition varied with patient characteristics and treatment. Irrespective of cell therapy, recovery of LV function was greater in patients with greater BM abundance of CD133 + and CD34 + cells and worse in those with higher levels of CD11b dim cells. Bone marrow phenotype might predict clinical response before BMC therapy and administration of selected BM constituents could potentially improve outcomes of other future clinical trials.

Recent developments have provided a unique opportunity for the organization of regional ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) receiving center (SRC) networks. Because cumulative evidence has demonstrated that rapid primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the most effective reperfusion strategy for acute STEMI, the development of integrated SRC networks could extend the benefits of primary PCI to a much larger segment of the US population. Factors that favor the development of regional SRC networks include results from recently published clinical trials, insight into contemporary STEMI treatment patterns from observational registries, experience with the nation's current trauma system, and technological advances. In addition, the 2004 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association STEMI guidelines have specified that optimal "first medical contact-to-balloon" times should be

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a major cause of cardiovascular ischemic events and amputation. Knowledge gaps exist in defining and measuring key factors that predict these events. The objective of this study was to assess whether duration of limb ischemia would serve as a major predictor of limb and patient survival.The FReedom from Ischemic Events: New Dimensions for Survival (FRIENDS) registry enrolled consecutive patients with limb-threatening peripheral artery disease at a single tertiary care hospital. Demographic information, key clinical care time segments, functional status and use of revascularization, and pharmacotherapy data were collected at baseline, and vascular ischemic events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality were recorded at 30 days and 1 year.A total of 200 patients with median (interquartile range) age of 76 years (65-84 years) were enrolled in the registry. Median duration of limb ischemia was 0.75 days for acute limb ischemia (ALI) and 61 days for chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI). Duration of limb ischemia of12, 12 to 24, and24 hours in patients with ALI was associated with much higher rates of first amputation (P = .0002) and worse amputation-free survival (P = .037). No such associations were observed in patients with CLI.For individuals with ischemic symptoms14 days, prolonged limb ischemia is associated with higher 30-day and 1-year amputation, systemic ischemic event rates, and worse amputation-free survival. No such associations are evident for individuals with chronic CLI. These data imply that prompt diagnosis and revascularization might improve outcomes for patients with ALI.

Background RPR 109891 is a modified tetrapeptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor available in intravenous and oral formulations. Two phase II dose-ranging studies were performed to investigate pharmacodynamics and safety in acute coronary syndromes. Methods The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 15A trial was a randomized, open-label, study of RPR 109891 administered intravenously for 24 to 96 hours in 91 patients. TIMI 15B was a randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous RPR 109891 plus 4 weeks of oral RPR 109891 (n = 142) compared with placebo (n = 50). Results Intravenous RPR 109891 exhibited a dose-response inhibition of platelet aggregation; mean inhibition after a bolus ranged from 53% to 92%, and at steady state 49% to 98%. Oral RPR 109891 demonstrated less platelet inhibition (peaks, range 48% to 59%; troughs, range 18% to 39%). Mean glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor occupancy and platelet inhibition were highly correlated ( r = 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.88). There were trends for increased major hemorrhage (10% vs 6%, P =.57), thrombocytopenia 3 (13% vs 4%, P =.11), and profound thrombocytopenia P =.33) with intravenous plus oral RPR 109891 compared with placebo. In 3 of 5 cases of profound thrombocytopenia, RPR 109891 had been interrupted because of bypass surgery, and a precipitous fall in platelet count occurred after the first postoperative oral dose. Conclusions Intravenous RPR 109891 is a potent, predictable, dose-related platelet inhibitor. Oral RPR 109891 (≤600 mg/d) achieves moderate platelet inhibition. Interrupted glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade may be associated with a higher risk of profound thrombocytopenia and deserves closer examination in future studies. (Am Heart J 2000;140:81-93.)

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred method of reperfusion for patients with STelevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) based on evidence for decreased mortality compared with fibrinolytic therapy or with no reperfusion. The results from randomized clinical trials that informed international clinical practice guidelines stimulated a concerted effort to increase timely access to PCI in the United States, and included the development of regional STEMI systems. Despite this solid foundation of evidence, questions have been raised about whether regional STEMI systems actually decrease mortality and about whether the focus on timely access to PCI for STEMI patients is appropriate. In a recent editorial, it was argued that “it is time to reconsider transferring patients with STEMI for primary PCI,” stating that “timely reperfusion by thrombolytics, not late primary PCI via transfer, will save lives.” The argument was based primarily on recent data showing that transfer times have been slow to improve; in particular, the goal “door in-door out time” of 30 minutes has been difficult to achieve. Others have pointed to the Reperfusion of Acute Myocardial Infarction in North Carolina Emergency Departments project, a state-wide system to improve the rate and speed of coronary reperfusion, which demonstrated a significant improvement in treatment times but did not show a difference in clinical outcomes including death, cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock. How strong is the evidence of benefit? Is timely access to primary PCI for every STEMI patient in the United States a worthy goal? A decade ago, a quantitative review of 23 randomized trials published in Lancet demonstrated a significant reduction in death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (8% vs 14%, P b .001) for patients treated with primary PCI

Background Cell therapy is a promising therapeutic for a variety of cardiovascular conditions including refractory angina. Elevation of cardiac biomarkers during cell delivery has been frequently described, but the clinical implications have never been studied. Methods ACT34-CMI was a randomized double-blind study assessing the use of intramyocardial delivery of autologous CD34 + cells for the treatment of refractory angina. Patients (n = 167) underwent G-CSF–mediated (5 μg/[kg day] × 5 days) stem cell mobilization, apheresis, and intramyocardial injection of 1 × 10 5 /kg or 5 × 10 5 /kg CD34 + cells or placebo. Troponin and creatinine kinase MB were assessed at baseline (n = 161), after cell mobilization and apheresis (n = 153 and 143, respectively), and post-intramyocardial injection (n = 155 and 141, respectively). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) included death, myocardial infarction, acute congestive heart failure, urgent revascularization, or sustained ventricular arrhythmia. Results Seven (4.3%) subjects had troponin above the upper limits of normal (ULN) at baseline. Thirty-four (22.2%) and 11 (7.2%) subjects had troponin levels > ULN or >3× ULN after cell mobilization and apheresis, whereas 72 (46.1%) and 39 (25.2%) subjects had troponin elevations > ULN or >3× ULN, respectively, after intramyocardial injections. Age, but no other preprocedural factors, was predictive of troponin elevation. Periprocedural troponin elevation was not associated with an increased risk of MACE during 1 year, especially in cell therapy–treated patients. Conclusions Troponin elevation is common during stem cell harvesting and intramyocardial administration, is usually asymptomatic, and does not appear to be associated with long-term MACE in subjects undergoing stem cell mobilization and intramyocardial injection.

Multiple medications have proven efficacy for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD), but the appropriate patient population remains controversial. Even in the presence of multiple cardiovascular risk factors, many patients are not considered high risk and are not offered preventive medications despite proven efficacy.We analyzed a prospective cohort of 1,710 consecutive ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated in a regional STEMI system from May 2007 to July 2010 and enrolled in a comprehensive database that includes preadmission medications.Of the 1,707 patients analyzed, 1,180 (69.1%) did not have known CHD before their event; and 482 (41.7%) of those patients had premature events (men55 years old, women65 years old). In patients without known CHD, cardiovascular risk factors were abundant (52.1% had hypertension, 43.6% had dyslipidemia, 41.4% had a family history of CHD, 58.5% were current or former smokers, and 14.9% were diabetic). Despite the high prevalence of risk factors, only 24.1% were on aspirin, 16.1% were on a statin, and only 7.8% were taking an aspirin and statin. Use of preventive medications was even less common in patients with premature events, including aspirin (15.2% vs 30.2%, P value.001), statins (11.1% vs 19.5%, P value.001), and the combination (5.6% vs 9.4%, P value.001).Approximately 70% of a contemporary STEMI population did not have known CHD before their event, and40% of those events would be considered premature. Despite the significant burden of cardiovascular risk factors, use of preventive therapy was alarmingly low in patients presenting with STEMI.

We sought to determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of transcatheter intramyocardial administration of myoblasts in patients with heart failure (HF).MARVEL is a randomized placebo-controlled trial of image-guided, catheter-based intramyocardial injection of placebo or myoblasts (400 or 800 million) in patients with class II to IV HF and ejection fraction35%. Primary end points were frequency of serious adverse events (safety) and changes in 6-minute walk test and Minnesota Living With HF score (efficacy). Of 330 patients intended for enrollment, 23 were randomized (MARVEL-1) before stopping the study for financial reasons.At 6 months, similar numbers of events occurred in each group: 8 (placebo), 7 (low dose), and 8 (high dose), without deaths. Ventricular tachycardia responsive to amiodarone was more frequent in myoblast-treated patients: 1 (placebo), 3 (low dose), and 4 (high dose). A trend toward improvement in functional capacity was noted in myoblast-treated groups (Δ6-minute walk test of -3.6 vs +95.6 vs +85.5 m [placebo vs low dose vs high dose; P = .50]) without significant changes in Minnesota Living With HF scores.In HF patients with chronic postinfarction cardiomyopathy, transcatheter administration of myoblasts in doses of 400 to 800 million cells is feasible and may lead to important clinical benefits. Ventricular tachycardia may be provoked by myoblast injection but appears to be a transient and treatable problem. A large-scale outcome trial of myoblast administration in HF patients with postinfarction cardiomyopathy is feasible and warranted.

We hypothesized that older patients in a regional ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) transfer program would attain comparable treatment to younger patients.Older patients have been either excluded or underrepresented in STEMI clinical trials. Observational studies suggest that these patients are less likely to receive adjunctive pharmacologies and reperfusion therapy-thrombolysis or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-and therapy is frequently delayed.We identified a consecutive series of 2,262 STEMI patients (March 2003-December 2008) who either presented or were transferred to Abbott Northwestern Hospital for PCI (65 years [n = 1285], 65-74 years [n = 436], 75-84 years [n = 381], and ≥85 years [n = 160]). Main outcome measures included time-to-reperfusion therapy, adjunctive medications received, and all-cause mortality.Overall time-to-reperfusion therapy was similar across age strata-94 minutes (65 years), 101 minutes (65-74 years), 106 minutes (75-84 years), and 103 minutes (≥85 years). No difference in adjunctive antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications was seen at hospital admission, and only slight differences in standard post-myocardial infarction medication use were seen by age at hospital discharge. Age was an independent predictor of in-hospital and yearly mortality up to 5 years (1-year mortality 3.4% [65 years], 9.2% [65-74 years], 15.2% [75-84 years], and 28.9% [≥85 years]; P.0001).Older patients receive similar care to younger patients when treated in a regional STEMI transfer program. Although all-cause mortality in the elderly is increased, the absolute rates are lower than previously established. Our data suggest primary PCI (including transfer) can be applied to all appropriate STEMI patients, regardless of age.

Background The increasing worldwide prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) continues to challenge the medical community. Management options include medical and revascularization therapy. Despite advances in these methods, CAD is a leading cause of recurrent ischemia and heart failure, posing significant morbidity and mortality risks along with increasing health costs in a large patient population worldwide. Trial Design The Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) was established by the National Institutes of Health to investigate the role of cell therapy in the treatment of chronic cardiovascular disease. FOCUS is a CCTRN-designed randomized, phase II, placebo-controlled clinical trial that will assess the effect of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells delivered transendocardially to patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and symptomatic heart failure or angina. All patients need to have limiting ischemia by reversible ischemia on single-photon emission computed tomography assessment. Results After thoughtful consideration of both statistical and clinical principles, we will recruit 87 patients (58 cell treated and 29 placebo) to receive either bone marrow–derived stem cells or placebo. Myocardial perfusion, LV contractile performance, and maximal oxygen consumption are the primary outcome measures. Conclusions The designed clinical trial will provide a sound assessment of the effect of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells in improving blood flow and contractile function of the heart. The target population is patients with CAD and LV dysfunction with limiting angina or symptomatic heat failure. Patient safety is a central concern of the CCTRN, and patients will be followed for at least 5 years.

Several previous studies have demonstrated that administration of autologous bone marrow–derived mononuclear cells (BMMNCs) improves cardiac function in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, optimum timing of administration has not been investigated in a clinical trial. The Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network was developed and funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to address important questions such as timing of cell delivery and to accelerate research in the use of cell-based therapies. The TIME trial is a randomized, phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. The 5 member clinical sites of the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network will enroll 120 eligible patients with moderate-to-large anterior AMIs who have undergone successful percutaneous coronary intervention of the left anterior descending coronary artery and have a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤45% by echocardiography. Participants will have bone marrow aspirations and intracoronary infusions of 150 × 10 6 BMMNCs or placebo on day 3 or day 7 post-AMI. Objectives of this study are (1) to evaluate effects of BMMNCs on regional and global LV function compared to placebo therapy in patients with acute AMI as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months and (2) to assess whether effects of BMMNC infusion on global and regional LV function and safety are influenced by the time of administration. This study will provide further insight into the clinical feasibility and appropriate timing of autologous BMMNC therapy in high-risk patients after AMI and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a noninvasive treatment of patients with refractory angina. The immediate hemodynamic effects of EECP are similar to intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation, but EECP's effects on standard blood pressure measurements during and after treatment are unknown.We evaluated systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) for 108 consecutive patients undergoing EECP. Baseline SBP, DBP, and heart rate were compared for each patient before and after each EECP session, at the end of the course of EECP, and 6 weeks after the final EECP session.One hundred eight patients (mean age 66.4 +/- 11.2 years, 81% male) completed 36.5 +/- 5.1 EECP sessions per patient. Overall, based on 3,586 individual readings, EECP resulted in a decrease in mean SBP of 1.1 +/- 15.3 mm Hg at the end of each EECP session (P.001), 6.4 +/- 18.2 mm Hg at the end the course of EECP (P.001), and 3.7 +/- 17.8 mm Hg 6 weeks after the final EECP session (P = .07), with no significant change in DBP or heart rate. Stratifying by baseline SBP, a differential response was demonstrated: SBP increased in the 2 lowest strata (100 mm Hg and 101-110 mm Hg) and decreased in the remaining strata (P.001). Stratified differences were sustained after individual EECP sessions, at the end of the course of EECP, and 6 weeks after the final EECP session and were independent of changes in cardiovascular medications.Enhanced external counterpulsation improved SBP in patients with refractory angina. On average, EECP decreased SBP during treatment and follow-up; but for patients with low baseline SBP (110 mm Hg), EECP increased SBP. The improvements in SBP may contribute to the clinical benefit of EECP.

The following report is based on a working group meeting about advanced coronary artery disease for patients with refractory ischemia who cannot receive revascularization. The aims were to review currently available treatment strategies, define unmet clinical needs, explore clinical trial design issues, and identify promising novel therapeutic targets and approaches for patients with chronic ischemia. The Working Group brought together medical experts in the management of refractory angina with representatives from regulatory agencies, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and industry. The meeting began with presentations reviewing the limitations of the current medical therapies and revascularization strategies and focused on lessons learned from past therapeutic attempts to optimize outcomes and on what are considered to be the most promising new approaches. Perspectives from clinical experts and from regulatory agencies were juxtaposed against needs and concerns of industry regarding development of new therapeutic strategies. This report presents the considerations and conclusions of the meeting on December 4-5, 2006. This document has been developed as a 2-part article, with contemporary and emerging therapies for advanced coronary artery disease reviewed first. Trial design, end points, and regulatory issues will be discussed in the second part of the article.

The population of patients with advanced coronary artery disease (CAD) is growing as a result of the aging of the general population, the extensive use of revascularization, and the efficacy of therapies that have prolonged the survival of patients with severe atherosclerosis. Patients with symptomatic CAD survive to a point where little else can be done to relieve their angina. Despite an anticipated growth in the number of patients with this condition within the next few decades, advanced CAD receives relatively little attention by the medical and research communities. As a result, the scope of the disease is not well defined, its coverage in guidelines from professional associations is limited, and few new medical options are available. In response to this, a group of experts from different fields were brought together at a meeting held December 4 to 5, 2006. This document has been developed as a 2-part article. In the first part, the contemporary and emerging therapies for advanced CAD were reviewed. The present part reviews the current status of understanding of advanced CAD, the limits of contemporary therapies, and the difficulties in and barriers to the development of new treatments.

Direct percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred method of reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Transfer from community hospitals to PCI centers increases availability for direct PCI, which improves outcomes compared to fibrinolysis in Europe. It has been difficult to achieve similar door-to-balloon times for transfer patients in the United States.We designed a standardized protocol and integrated system of transfer for patients with STEMI. We report the door-to-balloon times for the pre- and postpilot patients in the index hospital and describe the details of the current Level 1 MI Program.In the 15 months before the pilot project, the door-to-balloon time for patients receiving ad hoc transfer for direct PCI was 192 minutes, similar to the national average. The door-to-balloon time for the patients receiving rescue PCI after failed thrombolysis was 221 minutes. The standardized protocol decreased door-to-balloon time to 98 minutes in the pilot trial (P.01) and has now been applied successfully in 29 community hospitals.Rapid transfer of patients with STEMI is feasible in the United States using a standardized protocol and integrated transfer system. This requires a team approach with cooperation between cardiologists, emergency physicians, nurses, and the emergency medical system as well as various health care organizations.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is recognized as a public health issue because of its prevalence, functional limitations, and increased risk of systemic ischemic events. Current treatments for claudication, the primary symptom in patients with PAD, have limitations. Cells identified using cytosolic enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) may benefit patients with severe PAD but has not been studied in patients with claudication. PACE is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted by the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network to assess the safety and efficacy of autologous bone marrow–derived ALDH br cells delivered by direct intramuscular injections in 80 patients with symptom-limiting intermittent claudication. Eligible patients will have a significant stenosis or occlusion of infrainguinal arteries and a resting ankle-brachial index less than 0.90 and will be randomized 1:1 to cell or placebo treatment with a 1-year follow-up. The primary end points are the change in peak walking time and leg collateral arterial anatomy, calf muscle blood flow, and tissue perfusion as determined by magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months compared with baseline. The latter 3 measurements are new physiologic lower extremity tissue perfusion and PAD imaging–based end points that may help to quantify the biologic and mechanistic effects of cell therapy. This trial will collect important mechanistic and clinical information on the safety and efficacy of ALDH br cells in patients with claudication and provide valuable insight into the utility of advanced magnetic resonance imaging end points.

Background Patients with severe myocardial ischemia who are not candidates for percutaneous or surgical revascularization have few therapeutic options. Therapeutic angiogenesis in animal models with use of recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor (rhVEGF) has resulted in successful revascularization of ischemic myocardium. This was a dose escalation trial designed to determine the safety and tolerability of intracoronary rhVEGF infusions. Methods and Results Patients were eligible if they had stable exertional angina, a significant reversible perfusion defect by stress myocardial perfusion study, and coronary anatomy that was suboptimal for percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting. rhVEGF was administered to a total of 15 patients by 2 sequential (eg, right and left) intracoronary infusions, each for 10 minutes, at rates of 0.005 (n = 4), 0.017 (n = 4), 0.050 (n = 4), and 0.167 mg/kg/min (n = 3). Pharmacokinetic sampling and hemodynamic monitoring were performed for 24 hours. Radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging was performed before treatment and at 30 and 60 days after treatment. Follow-up angiograms were performed on selected patients at 60 days. The maximally tolerated intracardiac dose of rhVEGF was 0.050 mg/kg/min. Minimal hemodynamic changes were seen at 0.0050 mg/kg/min (2% ± 7% [SD] mean decrease in systolic blood pressure from baseline to nadir systolic blood pressure), whereas at 0.167 mg/kg/min there was a 28% ± 7% mean decrease from baseline to nadir (136 to 95 mm Hg systolic). Myocardial perfusion imaging was improved in 7 of 14 patients at 60 days. All 7 patients with follow-up angiograms had improvements in the collateral density score. Conclusion rhVEGF appears well tolerated by coronary infusion at rates up to 0.050 mg/kg/min. This study provides the basis for future clinical trials to assess the clinical benefit of therapeutic angiogenesis with rhVEGF. (Am Heart J 2001; 142:872-80.)

Background Enoxaparin has recently been shown to be superior to unfractionated heparin in patients with unstable angina/non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Theoretical advantages of low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin include a higher ratio of anti-Xa to anti-IIa activity (3:1 for enoxaparin), a more predictable dose response that precludes the need for frequent monitoring, and the convenience of subcutaneous administration. Both activated partial thromboplastin time and activated clotting time (ACT) are used to monitor anticoagulation with heparin, and ACTs are now standard during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with heparin. At doses of up to 90 mg, subcutaneous enoxaparin leads to a modest dose-related increase in activated partial thromboplastin time, but the effect on ACT is unknown. Methods Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11A was a multicenter, dose-ranging trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous enoxaparin in patients with unstable angina/non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We obtained peak (mean 4.3 hours after enoxaparin) and trough (mean 11.5 hours after enoxaparin) anti-Xa levels and ACTs for 26 patients in the TIMI 11A trial. Results Despite doses of enoxaparin in the range of 89 ± 19 mg every 12 hours and significant increases in anti-Xa levels even at trough, there was no change in the ACT measured by HemoTec and only a small increase with Hemachron. The correlation of peak Hemachron ACT with peak anti-Xa levels was poor ( R = 0.5, P =.08). Conclusions In contrast to heparin, ACTs are not useful for assessment of anticoagulation with subcutaneous enoxaparin and should not be relied on in patients receiving enoxaparin who require acute PCI. Studies to determine the optimal dose, safety, and efficacy of enoxaparin in patients undergoing PCI are underway. (Am Heart J 2001;142:590-3.)

Preclinical trials indicate that CD34+ cells represent an effective angiogenic stem cell component. Early-phase clinical trials suggest that intramyocardial administration of autologous CD34+ cells may improve functional capacity and symptoms of angina. RENEW is a pivotal phase 3 trial designed to determine the efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized CD34+ stem cells for the treatment for patients with refractory angina and chronic myocardial ischemia. Patients (n = 444) receiving maximally tolerated antianginal therapies and lacking conventional revascularization options with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III or IV angina and ischemia on stress testing will be randomized 2:1:1 to cell therapy (G-CSF-mediated stem cell mobilization, apheresis, and intramyocardial injection of 1 × 10(5) autologous CD34(+) cells/kg), active control (G-CSF-mediated stem cell mobilization, apheresis, and intramyocardial placebo injection), or open-label standard of care. The primary efficacy end point is change in exercise treadmill time in the treated vs active control patients, with 90% power to detect a 60-second difference in exercise time between cell-treated (n = 200) and active control (n = 100) patients. Key secondary end points include total number of anginal episodes per week and the incidence of independently adjudicated major adverse cardiac events and serious adverse events. RENEW will be the first adequately powered study aimed at definitively determining the efficacy of a cell therapy (intramyocardially delivered autologous CD34+ cells) for improvement of functional capacity in patients with refractory angina.

Background Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell (ABMMNC) therapy has shown promise in patients with heart failure (HF). Cell function analysis may be important in interpreting trial results. Methods In this prospective study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the transendocardial delivery of ABMMNCs in no-option patients with chronic HF. Efficacy was assessed by maximal myocardial oxygen consumption, single photon emission computed tomography, 2-dimensional echocardiography, and quality-of-life assessment (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure and Short Form 36). We also characterized patients' bone marrow cells by flow cytometry, colony-forming unit, and proliferative assays. Results Cell-treated (n = 20) and control patients (n = 10) were similar at baseline. The procedure was safe; adverse events were similar in both groups. Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina score improved significantly ( P = .001) in cell-treated patients, but function was not affected. Quality-of-life scores improved significantly at 6 months ( P = .009 Minnesota Living with Heart Failure and P = .002 physical component of Short Form 36) over baseline in cell-treated but not control patients. Single photon emission computed tomography data suggested a trend toward improved perfusion in cell-treated patients. The proportion of fixed defects significantly increased in control ( P = .02) but not in treated patients ( P = .16). Function of patients' bone marrow mononuclear cells was severely impaired. Stratifying cell results by age showed that younger patients (≤60 years) had significantly more mesenchymal progenitor cells (colony-forming unit fibroblasts) than patients >60 years (20.16 ± 14.6 vs 10.92 ± 7.8, P = .04). Furthermore, cell-treated younger patients had significantly improved maximal myocardial oxygen consumption (15 ± 5.8, 18.6 ± 2.7, and 17 ± 3.7 mL/kg per minute at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively) compared with similarly aged control patients (14.3 ± 2.5, 13.7 ± 3.7, and 14.6 ± 4.7 mL/kg per minute, P = .04). Conclusions ABMMNC therapy is safe and improves symptoms, quality of life, and possibly perfusion in patients with chronic HF.