1. Global difficulty modulates the prioritization strategy in multitasking situations
- Author
-
Sébastien Scannella, Frédéric Dehais, Benoît Valéry, Nadine Matton, Institut Supérieur de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace (ISAE-SUPAERO), Sciences de la Cognition, Technologie, Ergonomie (SCoTE), Institut national universitaire Champollion [Albi] (INUC), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, ENAC - Programme transverse IHM Aéronautique (IHM Aero), Ecole Nationale de l'Aviation Civile (ENAC), Département Conception et conduite des véhicules Aéronautiques et Spatiaux (DCAS), Département de Mathématiques, Informatique, Automatique (DMIA), This research was supported by a DGA-MRIS (French Defense Procurement Agency) scholarship., Ecole Nationale de l'Aviation Civile - ENAC (FRANCE), Institut Supérieur de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace - ISAE-SUPAERO (FRANCE), and Institut National Universitaire Champollion - INU (FRANCE)
- Subjects
Male ,Prioritization ,Computer science ,Decision Making ,Metacognition ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Human Factors and Ergonomics ,Task (project management) ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,Cognition ,0302 clinical medicine ,Task Performance and Analysis ,Humans ,Human multitasking ,Attention ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality ,Engineering (miscellaneous) ,050107 human factors ,Working memory ,Attentional processes ,05 social sciences ,Neurosciences ,Multitasking Behavior ,Dual task ,030210 environmental & occupational health ,Psychologie ,[SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/Psychology ,Female ,Heuristics ,Decision-making ,Cognitive psychology - Abstract
International audience; There has been a considerable amount of research to conceptualize how cognition handle multitasking situations. Despite these efforts, it is still not clear how task parameters shape attentionnal resources allocation. For instance, many research have suggested that difficulty levels could explain these conflicting observations and very few have considered other factors such as task importance. In the present study, twenty participants had to carry out two N-Back tasks simultaneously, each subtask having distinct difficulty (0,1 or 2-Back) and importance (1 or 3 points) levels. Participants's cumulative dwell time were collected to assess their attentional strategies. Results showed that depending on the global level of difficulty (combination of the two levels of difficulty), attentional resources of people were driven either by the subtask difficulty (under low-global-difficulty) or the subtask importance (under high-global-difficulty), in a non-compensatory way. We discussed these results in terms of decision-making heuristics and metacognition.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF