Search

Runting stunting syndrome (RSS) is a disease condition that affects broilers and causes impaired growth and poor feed conversion because of enteritis characterized by pale and distended small intestines with watery contents. The etiology of the disease is multifactorial, and a large variety of viral agents have been implicated. Here we describe the detection and isolation of an infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) -like coronavirus from the intestines of a flock of 60,000 14-day-old brown/red broiler chicks. The birds showed typical clinical signs of RSS including stunting and uneven growth. At necropsy, the small intestines were pale and distended with watery contents. Histopathology of the intestines revealed increased cellularity of the lamina propria, blunting of villi, and cystic changes in the crypts. Negative stain electron microscopy of the intestinal contents revealed coronavirus particles. Transmission electron microscopy of the intestine confirmed coronavirus in the cytoplasm of enterocytes. Using immunohistochemistry (IHC), IBV antigen was detected in the intestinal epithelial cells as well as in the proventriculus and pancreas. There were no lesions in the respiratory system, and no IBV antigen was detected in trachea, lung, air sac, conjunctiva, and cecal tonsils. A coronavirus was isolated from the intestine of chicken embryos but not from the allantoic sac inoculated with the intestinal contents of the broiler chicks. Sequencing of the S1 gene showed nucleic acid sequence identities of 93.8% to the corresponding region of IBV California 99 and of 85.7% to IBV Arkansas. Nucleic acid sequence identities to other IBV genotypes were lower. The histopathologic lesions in the intestines were reproduced after experimental infection of specific-pathogen-free chickens inoculated in the conjunctiva and nares. Five days after infection, six of nine investigated birds showed enteritis associated with IBV antigen as detected by IHC. In contrast to the field infection, birds in the experimental group showed clear respiratory signs and lesions in the upper respiratory tract. The results suggest a broader tissue tropism of this isolate, which might be related to the mutations in the S1 gene.

On the basis of the data from the California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory System, 1444 infectious bronchitis (IB) cases were diagnosed between 1997 and 2012. Epidemiologic analyses demonstrated two major IB virus (IBV) outbreak peaks, affecting mainly 35-to-49-day-old broiler chickens. California variant 1737 (CA1737) and California variant 1999 (Cal 99) IBV types were the most prevalent genotypes during the analyzed period. To further understand the increased prevalence of these genotypes, we assessed and compared the variability of the S1 gene hypervariable region of CA1737 and Cal 99 with the variability of IBV strains belonging to the Massachusetts 41 (M41) and Arkansas (Ark) types during serial passages in embryonated chicken eggs. On the basis of the S1 nonsynonymous changes, seven different subpopulations were detected in M41. However, the predominant population of the field strain M41 before passages continued to be predominant throughout the experiment. In contrast, Ark passaging resulted in the detection of 13 different subpopulations, and the field sequence became extinct after the first passage. In IBV Cal 99, eight different subpopulations were detected; one of these became predominant after the second passage. In CA1737, 10 different subpopulations were detected. The field strain major sequence was not detected after the first passage but reappeared after the second passage and remained at low levels throughout the experiment. Compared with M41 and Ark, Cal 99 and CA1737 showed intermediate variability.

The relationship between passive immunity and the development of false layer syndrome (FLS) and its associated lesions was investigated in this study by comparing the long-term reproductive effects of an infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) DMV/1639 wild-type strain and the GA08 vaccine in birds with and without maternal antibodies. There was a clear protective effect provided by maternal antibodies against both the early vaccination and challenge. It was also observed that vaccination at an early age, in the absence of maternal antibodies, can induce reproductive issues, such as reduced egg production and FLS-associated lesions (e.g., cystic oviduct and egg yolk coelomitis). This might indicate that maternal antibodies and the timing of IBV infection are more important in the generation of FLS than the IBV strain type. Mitigación del síndrome de la falsa ponedora mediante anticuerpos maternos contra el virus de la bronquitis infecciosa. En este estudio se investigó la relación entre la inmunidad pasiva y el desarrollo del síndrome de la falsa ponedora (FLS) y sus lesiones asociadas comparando los efectos reproductivos a largo plazo de una cepa de tipo silvestre DMV/1639 del virus de la bronquitis infecciosa (IBV) y la cepa vacunal GA08, en aves con y sin anticuerpos maternos. Hubo un claro efecto protector proporcionado por los anticuerpos maternos tanto contra la vacunación temprana como contra el desafío. También se observó que la vacunación a una edad temprana, en ausencia de anticuerpos maternos, puede inducir problemas reproductivos, como una reducción de la producción de huevo y lesiones asociadas al síndrome de la falsa ponedora (p. ej., oviducto quístico y celomitis de yema de huevo). Esto podría indicar que los anticuerpos maternos y el momento de la infección por el virus de la bronquitis infecciosa son más importantes en la generación del síndrome de la falsa ponedora que el tipo de cepa del virus de la bronquitis infecciosa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

False layer syndrome is a condition in which the reproductive tract of chicks is infected with infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) strains that cause permanent damage to the oviduct. These chickens subsequently develop cystic oviducts and do not lay eggs, and affected flocks fail to reach expected egg production peaks. The California Animal Health and Food Safety laboratory, Turlock Branch, received four separate case submissions from a 25-to-28-wk-old commercial ISA Brown layer flock. Birds were submitted for diagnostic evaluation due to suboptimal egg production and vent pecking. Submissions totaled 31 birds and consisted of live layers, recent mortality, and a flat of eggs. No clinical signs were observed in the submitted live birds. The most common gross findings included cystic left oviducts, signs of vent pecking, ovarian regression, and yolk coelomitis. The eggs were abnormally shaped with irregular, white, gritty deposits on the surface of the shell. Microscopically, there was atrophy of the oviducts, glandular hypoplasia, and lymphocytic salpingitis. In addition, lymphoplasmacytic tracheitis was observed, and renal tubules were dilated with multifocal areas of mineralization. IBV was identified by reverse transcription quantitative PCR from cecal tonsil tissue pools and tracheal swab pools. Sequencing of the S1 hypervariable region of IBV and whole-genome IBV sequencing were 97% homologous to the California variant CA1737/04. Definitive proof of the CA1737 strain's causing reproductive abnormalities will require challenge studies with fulfillment of Koch's postulates and evaluation of confounding and risk factors. Reporte de caso- Virus de la bronquitis infecciosa Variante de California CA1737 aislada de una parvada comercial de ponedoras con oviductos quísticos y mala calidad externa del huevo. El síndrome de la falsa capa es una condición en la cual el tracto reproductivo de las gallinas está infectado con cepas del virus de la bronquitis infecciosa (IBV) que causan daño permanente al oviducto. Posteriormente, estas gallinas desarrollan oviductos quísticos y bajas en la postura de huevo, las parvadas afectadas no alcanzan los picos de producción de huevos esperados. El laboratorio de Salud Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria de California, con sede en Turlock, recibió cuatro casos separados de una parvada comercial de ponedoras ISA Brown de 25 a 28 semanas de edad. Las aves se enviaron para evaluación diagnóstica debido a una producción de huevos subóptima y por presencia de picoteo en las cloacas. Se recibieron un total de 31 aves y consistieron en aves de postura vivas, mortalidad reciente y además una charola de huevos. No se observaron signos clínicos en las aves vivas enviadas. Los hallazgos macroscópicos más comunes incluyeron oviductos izquierdos quísticos, signos de picoteo en las cloacas, regresión ovárica y celomitis de la yema. Los huevos tenían una forma anormal con depósitos irregulares, blancos y arenosos en la superficie de la cáscara. Microscópicamente, había atrofia de los oviductos, hipoplasia glandular y salpingitis linfocítica. Además, se observó traqueítis linfoplasmocítica y túbulos renales dilatados con áreas multifocales de mineralización. El virus de la bronquitis infecciosa se identificó mediante PCR cuantitativa de transcripción inversa a partir de grupos de tejidos de tonsilas cecales y muestras agrupadas de hisopos traqueales. La secuenciación de la región hipervariable S1 de IBV y la secuenciación de IBV del genoma completo fueron homólogas en un 97 % a la variante de California CA1737/04. La prueba definitiva de las anomalías reproductivas causantes de la cepa CA1737 requerirá estudios de desafío con el cumplimiento de los postulados de Koch y la evaluación de los factores de riesgo y de confusión. Key words: infectious bronchitis virus, cystic oviducts, California, CA1737 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Avian reovirus variants (ARVs) are important pathogens currently causing losses in poultry production. These variants escape protection elicited by conventional vaccines, i.e., S1133, 2408, and 1733 in chickens. Historically, ARVs have been classified according to their antigenic type and relative pathogenicity. Due to the virus variability, antigenic testing is difficult and laboratory specific, while pathotyping is costly and complex. Current molecular classification methods focus only on one gene, and genomic changes within this gene are not predictive of changes in antigenicity and pathogenicity. This review focuses on existing literature on reovirus antigenicity, pathogenicity, and molecular assessments as an aid to provide insights on how to predict antigenic and pathogenic phenotypes based on genomic information and future focus on development of new and comprehensive classification systems. Estudio recapitulativo- Caracterización molecular de reovirus aviares variantes y su relación con antigenicidad y patogenicidad. Las variantes del reovirus aviar (ARV) son patógenos importantes que actualmente causan pérdidas en la producción avícola. Estas variantes escapan a la protección provocada por las vacunas convencionales, que incluyen a las cepas S1133, 2408 y 1733 en pollos. Históricamente, los reovirus aviares se han clasificado según su tipo antigénico y patogenicidad relativa. Debido a la variabilidad del virus, las pruebas antigénicas son difíciles y específicas de laboratorio, mientras que la patotipificación es costosa y compleja. Los métodos de clasificación molecular actuales se enfocan solo en un gene, y los cambios genómicos dentro de este gene no predicen cambios en la antigenicidad y patogenicidad. Esta revisión se centra en la literatura existente sobre la antigenicidad, la patogenicidad y las evaluaciones moleculares de los reovirus como una ayuda para proporcionar información sobre cómo predecir los fenotipos antigénicos y patógenos en función de la información genómica y el enfoque futuro en el desarrollo de sistemas de clasificación nuevos y completos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Avian Diseases is the property of American Association of Avian Pathologists, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article discusses the effects of very virulent infectious bursal disease virus (vvIBDV) reassortants challenge on commercial chicken. Topics include immunosuppression in broilers and layers, evaluation of cytokine gene expression, detection of lymphoid depletion and evidence suggesting the ineffectiveness of IBDV vaccination of breeders.

The article reports on research which was conducted to investigate whether infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) Ark serotype vaccines induce suboptimal mucosal responses and contribute to the prevalence of the Ark serotype in poultry and contribute to a high prevalence of the serotype seen in poultry in the Southeastern U.S. despite extensive vaccination. Researchers vaccinated several chickens. They found that lower mucosal Immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody levels are observed upon secondary exposure to IBV, which may contribute to vulnerability of host epithelial cells to infection by IBV and persistence of the Ark serotype

The article reports on research which investigated the protective properties of three distinct infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) Ark Delmarva (AD) poultry industry (ArkDPI) S1 proteins encoded from replication-defective recombinant adenovirus vectors. Researchers found that the first portion of S1 displays relevant immunoprotective epitopes and that use of an optimal dose of AdIBVS1.C2 effectively protected chickens from clinical signs and significantly reduced viral load after an IBV Ark virulent challenge.

The article presents a study on the host intraspatial selection of infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) populations. For the study, researchers proceeded in inoculating 15-day-old chickens with embryo infective doses of an Arkansas-type IBV commercial vaccine through the ocular and nasal paths. They also determined the sequences of the S1 gene of IBV. They found signficant differences in the occurrence of some distinct IBV predomimant populations in tissues and fluids. They concluded that IBV undergoes intraspatial variation while conducting host invasion.