Internal disturbance and civil war that have started in 2011 in Syria caused the people to suffer important problems. One of these problems is the destruction or threatening of the relatives and the environment in which they live. Therefore, most of the people had to take refuge in neighbor countries to overcome these problems. However, this asylum brings many difficulties. The problems experienced by asylum-seekers can be categorized under three headings as the ones that caused compulsory immigration, the problems encountered during the asylum process, and the problems experienced in the settled areas. Psychological dramatic events such as physical injury, witnessing the death or injury of relatives, rape, torture, arrest, genocide (Nicholl & Thompson, 2004, p. 353) during internal disturbance are often the causes of forced migration; disruptions of geographical and cultural ties with the society, uncertainty at the end of migration, unemployment and employment difficulties, concerns about reunion with the remaining family members, language barriers, difficulties in cultural adaptation (Kirmayer et al„ 2011, p. 961) are among the problems encountered. All these problems become sources of stress on asylum-seekers and require them to resort to various coping methods continually. Otherwise, they may experience important mental disorders such as suffocation, depression, psychosomatic symptoms, sleep disorder, attention deficit, suicide, and post-traumatic stress disorder.Some coping models have been developed based on the findings obtained from studies conducted to determine which methods people use to deal with their problems. The most widely accepted models are those that deal with coping under two headings: problem-oriented and emotion-oriented coping methods. The problem-oriented coping method focuses more on stress-causing resources and their elimination or mitigation, with strategies such as self-control, taking responsibility, establishing plans to solve the problem, and thinking aboutthe positive sides of the problem. In the emotion-oriented coping method, the effect of the stress source is tried to be reduced by focusing on stress-containing emotions instead of direct stress sources (Carver et al., 1989, p. 267). Denial of distress, trying to stay away from it chatting with other people, seeking support are accepted as emotion-oriented coping strategies, and thus, it is aimed to manage the distress emotionally. One or more coping methods may be used against one or more difficulties. It is seen that in situations where stress solutions exist or are known, problem-oriented coping methods, in situations where it is not possible to control or prevent it mostly emotion-oriented methods are used (Carver etal., 1989, p. 268). In this study, the effect of asylum seekers' religiosity on coping methods was investigated. A more scientific study of the relationship between religiosity and psychology and its publication in the most important journals in the fields of medicine and psychology took place only in the last quarter-century. Recently, studies in this area have increased significantly. The majority of researchers argue that religiosity has a positive effect on mental health and the treatment of illnesses, while only a few have a negative effect (Roger & Hatala, 2018, s. 34). Although some studies are defending the negative effects of religiosity on patients, this trend is weakening day by day. When the last 15 years are taken into consideration, studies that defend the negative effects of religiosity have decreased considerably. On the other hand, it is understood from the researches examining the relationship between happiness and religiosity that happiness has an increasing positive relationship with religiosity and that religiosity positively affects happiness. Islam provides important guidance for asylum-seekers to cope with the problems they face. The relations between asylum-seekers and local people have been given great importance since the early years of Islam. Because the Prophet Mohammad himself had to emigrate, he left Mecca where he was born and raised and took refuge in Medina with his friends. Therefore, many verses and hadiths regulate the relations between native people (Ansar) and immigrants (Muhajir) after this forced migration, which is called Hijra, encouraging the appropriate behaviors, prohibiting negative behaviors and praising the good relations of both sides. Through these verses and hadiths, the integration between asylum-seekers and native people was encouraged and they were ensured to obey each other's law. Therefore, although not under the same conditions, relations that could serve as an example for coping with the problems that will emigrate and host Muslim communities in later periods have been put forward. Considering the guidance provided by Islam, it is assumed that there is a significant relationship between religiosity and functional coping methods, and with the increase in religiosity, that Syrian asylum-seekers will use more effective coping methods. It is predicted that coping methods will differ significantly with religiosity levels, and those with high religiosity will use functional coping methods and those with low religiosity levels will use nonfunctional coping methods. The questionnaire technique, w*hich is one of the quantitative research methods, was used in the study, and the questionnaire containing personal information, religiosity and coping scales were prepared by the purpose of the research. Since the study will be applied to Syrian asylum-seekers, it ensures that the language of the questionnaire is Arabic completely. All information, which may vary by country, such as educational status in the personal information section, is regulated by Syrian researchers. The form of the religiosity scale used in the study, which was developed by the authors and which was in Arabic, was used. The version of the coping scale used was used after the control of some Syrian researchers. The data obtained from 269 of the Syrian refugees who participated in the study were evaluated. It was understood that the asylum-seekers who were asked to participate in the research were concerned about the use of the information they would provide for political or intelligence purposes. However, they were told that they could leave questions that they did not want to answer. Syrian asylum-seekers, who are fluent in Turkish, w*ho had been assisted in the field study, had important contributions to this uneasiness. Thus, the data were reliably collected only from willing participants. As a result of the increase in worship, it was seen that asylum-seekers used problem and emotion-oriented coping methods such as effective coping, positive reinterpretation, acceptance, using emotional, social support, and instrumental social support and mentally disabling attention. Increased beliefs, on the other hand, have reduced the use of substance and denial, which are dysfunctional coping methods. Therefore, there is a significant relationship between religiosity and functional coping methods. With the increasing religiosity, the hypothesis confirms that Syrian asylum-seekers use more effective coping methods. Those with high religiosity use functional coping methods, and those with low religiosity use non-functional coping methods. The coping methods using by asylum-seekers intensely are effective coping and planning with approaching to religion indicates that asylum seekers are not only praying more at the moment of distress but are actually struggling to eliminate the distress, that they do not give up the struggle by looking at the positive sides of die problems with the thought that there is wisdom in everything that comes to the fore, that therefore they have rarely used an avoidant coping method, such as substance use. It is also important to note that turning to religion as a method of coping does not adequately explain the worship dimension of religiosity. In other words, when religiosity increases, the problem and emotion-oriented coping methods are used by asylum-seekers to cope with the problems, not only to religion and to pray more. That is, the fact that asylum-seekers or people, in general, are members of a religion does not mean that they use only religious coping methods. Therefore, it is considered that it is more appropriate to use general coping dimensions instead of religious coping scales to measure the coping methods of Muslim asylum-seekers. On the other hand, it was seen that increasing belief also increased the use of denial coping methods. In other words, asylum-seekers think that the world is a place of examinations, that the problems are not real that life is temporary and the problems will not always continue. Under normal circumstances, denial of distress is a non-functional coping method, whereas denial is a functional coping method since it is used by asylum-seekers with functional coping methods and can provide patience and patience to asylum-seekers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]