8 results on '"Luscombe NM"'
Search Results
2. DNA-binding specificities of human transcription factors
- Author
-
Jolma A, Yan J, Whitington T, Toivonen J, Nitta KR, Rastas P, Morgunova E, Enge M, Taipale M, Wei G, Palin K, Vaquerizas JM, Vincentelli R, Luscombe NM, Hughes TR, Lemaire P, Ukkonen E, Kivioja T, and Taipale J.
- Published
- 2013
3. TDP-43 condensation properties specify its RNA-binding and regulatory repertoire.
- Author
-
Hallegger M, Chakrabarti AM, Lee FCY, Lee BL, Amalietti AG, Odeh HM, Copley KE, Rubien JD, Portz B, Kuret K, Huppertz I, Rau F, Patani R, Fawzi NL, Shorter J, Luscombe NM, and Ule J
- Subjects
- 3' Untranslated Regions genetics, Base Sequence, Cell Nucleus metabolism, HEK293 Cells, HeLa Cells, Homeostasis, Humans, Mutation genetics, Nucleotide Motifs genetics, Phase Transition, Point Mutation genetics, Poly A metabolism, Protein Binding, Protein Multimerization, RNA, Messenger genetics, RNA, Messenger metabolism, Sequence Deletion, DNA-Binding Proteins metabolism, RNA metabolism, RNA-Binding Proteins metabolism
- Abstract
Mutations causing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) often affect the condensation properties of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). However, the role of RBP condensation in the specificity and function of protein-RNA complexes remains unclear. We created a series of TDP-43 C-terminal domain (CTD) variants that exhibited a gradient of low to high condensation propensity, as observed in vitro and by nuclear mobility and foci formation. Notably, a capacity for condensation was required for efficient TDP-43 assembly on subsets of RNA-binding regions, which contain unusually long clusters of motifs of characteristic types and density. These "binding-region condensates" are promoted by homomeric CTD-driven interactions and required for efficient regulation of a subset of bound transcripts, including autoregulation of TDP-43 mRNA. We establish that RBP condensation can occur in a binding-region-specific manner to selectively modulate transcriptome-wide RNA regulation, which has implications for remodeling RNA networks in the context of signaling, disease, and evolution., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests J.S. is a consultant for Dewpoint Therapeutics, Maze Therapeutics, and Vivid Sciences. B.P. is an employee of Dewpoint Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Nervous System Regionalization Entails Axial Allocation before Neural Differentiation.
- Author
-
Metzis V, Steinhauser S, Pakanavicius E, Gouti M, Stamataki D, Ivanovitch K, Watson T, Rayon T, Mousavy Gharavy SN, Lovell-Badge R, Luscombe NM, and Briscoe J
- Subjects
- Animals, Cell Line, Cells, Cultured, Chick Embryo, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Male, Mice, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neural Stem Cells cytology, Neural Stem Cells metabolism, Spinal Cord cytology, Spinal Cord growth & development, Spinal Cord metabolism, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Embryonic Induction, Neurogenesis
- Abstract
Neural induction in vertebrates generates a CNS that extends the rostral-caudal length of the body. The prevailing view is that neural cells are initially induced with anterior (forebrain) identity; caudalizing signals then convert a proportion to posterior fates (spinal cord). To test this model, we used chromatin accessibility to define how cells adopt region-specific neural fates. Together with genetic and biochemical perturbations, this identified a developmental time window in which genome-wide chromatin-remodeling events preconfigure epiblast cells for neural induction. Contrary to the established model, this revealed that cells commit to a regional identity before acquiring neural identity. This "primary regionalization" allocates cells to anterior or posterior regions of the nervous system, explaining how cranial and spinal neurons are generated at appropriate axial positions. These findings prompt a revision to models of neural induction and support the proposed dual evolutionary origin of the vertebrate CNS., (Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Heteromeric RNP Assembly at LINEs Controls Lineage-Specific RNA Processing.
- Author
-
Attig J, Agostini F, Gooding C, Chakrabarti AM, Singh A, Haberman N, Zagalak JA, Emmett W, Smith CWJ, Luscombe NM, and Ule J
- Subjects
- Alternative Splicing, Animals, Binding Sites, Exons, HeLa Cells, Humans, Introns, Mice, Mutation, Nucleotide Motifs, Phylogeny, Protein Binding, Protein Interaction Mapping, RNA Splicing, Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoproteins chemistry, Long Interspersed Nucleotide Elements, Nuclear Matrix-Associated Proteins chemistry, Polyadenylation, Polypyrimidine Tract-Binding Protein chemistry, RNA chemistry, RNA-Binding Proteins chemistry
- Abstract
Long mammalian introns make it challenging for the RNA processing machinery to identify exons accurately. We find that LINE-derived sequences (LINEs) contribute to this selection by recruiting dozens of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) to introns. This includes MATR3, which promotes binding of PTBP1 to multivalent binding sites within LINEs. Both RBPs repress splicing and 3' end processing within and around LINEs. Notably, repressive RBPs preferentially bind to evolutionarily young LINEs, which are located far from exons. These RBPs insulate the LINEs and the surrounding intronic regions from RNA processing. Upon evolutionary divergence, changes in RNA motifs within LINEs lead to gradual loss of their insulation. Hence, older LINEs are located closer to exons, are a common source of tissue-specific exons, and increasingly bind to RBPs that enhance RNA processing. Thus, LINEs are hubs for the assembly of repressive RBPs and also contribute to the evolution of new, lineage-specific transcripts in mammals. VIDEO ABSTRACT., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Deterministic Evolutionary Trajectories Influence Primary Tumor Growth: TRACERx Renal.
- Author
-
Turajlic S, Xu H, Litchfield K, Rowan A, Horswell S, Chambers T, O'Brien T, Lopez JI, Watkins TBK, Nicol D, Stares M, Challacombe B, Hazell S, Chandra A, Mitchell TJ, Au L, Eichler-Jonsson C, Jabbar F, Soultati A, Chowdhury S, Rudman S, Lynch J, Fernando A, Stamp G, Nye E, Stewart A, Xing W, Smith JC, Escudero M, Huffman A, Matthews N, Elgar G, Phillimore B, Costa M, Begum S, Ward S, Salm M, Boeing S, Fisher R, Spain L, Navas C, Grönroos E, Hobor S, Sharma S, Aurangzeb I, Lall S, Polson A, Varia M, Horsfield C, Fotiadis N, Pickering L, Schwarz RF, Silva B, Herrero J, Luscombe NM, Jamal-Hanjani M, Rosenthal R, Birkbak NJ, Wilson GA, Pipek O, Ribli D, Krzystanek M, Csabai I, Szallasi Z, Gore M, McGranahan N, Van Loo P, Campbell P, Larkin J, and Swanton C
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Biomarkers, Tumor, Chromosomes, Clonal Evolution, Disease Progression, Evolution, Molecular, Female, Genetic Heterogeneity, Genetic Variation, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Statistical, Mutation, Neoplasm Metastasis, Phenotype, Phylogeny, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Carcinoma, Renal Cell genetics, Carcinoma, Renal Cell pathology, Kidney Neoplasms genetics, Kidney Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
The evolutionary features of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) have not been systematically studied to date. We analyzed 1,206 primary tumor regions from 101 patients recruited into the multi-center prospective study, TRACERx Renal. We observe up to 30 driver events per tumor and show that subclonal diversification is associated with known prognostic parameters. By resolving the patterns of driver event ordering, co-occurrence, and mutual exclusivity at clone level, we show the deterministic nature of clonal evolution. ccRCC can be grouped into seven evolutionary subtypes, ranging from tumors characterized by early fixation of multiple mutational and copy number drivers and rapid metastases to highly branched tumors with >10 subclonal drivers and extensive parallel evolution associated with attenuated progression. We identify genetic diversity and chromosomal complexity as determinants of patient outcome. Our insights reconcile the variable clinical behavior of ccRCC and suggest evolutionary potential as a biomarker for both intervention and surveillance., (Copyright © 2018 Francis Crick Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Direct competition between hnRNP C and U2AF65 protects the transcriptome from the exonization of Alu elements.
- Author
-
Zarnack K, König J, Tajnik M, Martincorena I, Eustermann S, Stévant I, Reyes A, Anders S, Luscombe NM, and Ule J
- Subjects
- Evolution, Molecular, Exons, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Knockdown Techniques, HeLa Cells, Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Group C genetics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Immunoprecipitation, RNA Splice Sites, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Splicing Factor U2AF, Alu Elements, Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Group C metabolism, Nuclear Proteins metabolism, Ribonucleoproteins metabolism, Transcriptome
- Abstract
There are ~650,000 Alu elements in transcribed regions of the human genome. These elements contain cryptic splice sites, so they are in constant danger of aberrant incorporation into mature transcripts. Despite posing a major threat to transcriptome integrity, little is known about the molecular mechanisms preventing their inclusion. Here, we present a mechanism for protecting the human transcriptome from the aberrant exonization of transposable elements. Quantitative iCLIP data show that the RNA-binding protein hnRNP C competes with the splicing factor U2AF65 at many genuine and cryptic splice sites. Loss of hnRNP C leads to formation of previously suppressed Alu exons, which severely disrupt transcript function. Minigene experiments explain disease-associated mutations in Alu elements that hamper hnRNP C binding. Thus, by preventing U2AF65 binding to Alu elements, hnRNP C plays a critical role as a genome-wide sentinel protecting the transcriptome. The findings have important implications for human evolution and disease., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Genome-wide analysis reveals MOF as a key regulator of dosage compensation and gene expression in Drosophila.
- Author
-
Kind J, Vaquerizas JM, Gebhardt P, Gentzel M, Luscombe NM, Bertone P, and Akhtar A
- Subjects
- 3' Flanking Region, Acetylation, Animals, Cell Line, Female, Genome, Insect, Histones genetics, Histones metabolism, Male, Promoter Regions, Genetic, X Chromosome, Dosage Compensation, Genetic, Drosophila Proteins metabolism, Gene Expression Regulation, Histone Acetyltransferases metabolism, Nuclear Proteins metabolism
- Abstract
Dosage compensation, mediated by the MSL complex, regulates X-chromosomal gene expression in Drosophila. Here we report that the histone H4 lysine 16 (H4K16) specific histone acetyltransferase MOF displays differential binding behavior depending on whether the target gene is located on the X chromosome versus the autosomes. More specifically, on the male X chromosome, where MSL1 and MSL3 are preferentially associated with the 3' end of dosage compensated genes, MOF displays a bimodal distribution binding to promoters and the 3' ends of genes. In contrast, on MSL1/MSL3 independent X-linked genes and autosomal genes in males and females, MOF binds primarily to promoters. Binding of MOF to autosomes is functional, as H4K16 acetylation and the transcription levels of a number of genes are affected upon MOF depletion. Therefore, MOF is not only involved in the onset of dosage compensation, but also acts as a regulator of gene expression in the Drosophila genome.
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.