Search

Angiogenesis is crucial in tissue repair and prevents scar tissue formation following an ischemic event such as myocardial infarction. The ischemia induces formation of new capillaries, which have high expression of integrin αvβ3. [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-E[(cRGDyK)]2 ([68Ga]Ga-RGD) is a promising PET-radiotracer reflecting angiogenesis by binding to integrin αvβ3. A Göttingen mini-pig underwent transient catheter-induced left anterior descending artery (LAD) occlusion for 120 min, and after 8 weeks was imaged on a Siemens mMR 3T PET/MR system. A large antero-septal infarction was evident by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on the short axis and 2–4 chamber views. The infarcted area corresponded to the area with high [68Ga]Ga-RGD uptake on the fused PET/MR images, with no uptake in the healthy myocardium. To support the hypothesis that [68Ga]Ga-RGD uptake reflects angiogenesis, biopsies were sampled from the infarct border and healthy myocardium. Expression of αvβ3 was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. The staining showed higher αvβ3 expression in the capillaries of the infarct border compared to those in the healthy myocardium. These initial data confirm in vivo detection of angiogenesis using [68Ga]Ga-RGD PET in a translational model, which overall support the method applicability when evaluating novel cardio-protective therapies.

Eosinophilic cystitis (EC) is a relatively rare, but benign inflammatory bladder disease compared to that of the malignant pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), in which it can be mimicking on initial suspicion. The origin, symptoms and findings of both EC and RMS are still discussed and hence, lead to the challenge in distinguishing them by cystoscopy and several image modalities. We present a case in which cross-sectional imaging modalities including fluorine-18-fluro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) / computed tomography (CT) / magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (18F-FDG-PET/CT/MRI (The imaging modality 18F-FDG-PET/CT/MRI referring to two continuous scans scanned on the same 18F-FDG-tracer dose for both the whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT and the regional 18F-FDG-PET/MRI of the pelvis.)) raised suspicion of RMS. Hence, the final diagnosis of EC was established by repeated histopathology. It is important to have EC in mind when seeking differential diagnosis of malignant diseases like RMS in order to provide the correct treatment for the patient and highly homogenously increased 18F-FDG-uptake should raise the suspicion of EC as a differential diagnosis. Furthermore, 18F-FDG-uptake rate is suggested as a future potential biomarker for monitoring of therapeutic response in eosinophilic inflammatory diseases, thus more research on this topic is needed.

Purpose: With the increasing number of therapy options available for patients with lung cancer, early response evaluation is needed. We performed this pilot study to assess the feasibility of early, repeated Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance (PET/MR), the impact of timing and the capability for response prediction in lung tumors during chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer referred for chemotherapy were prospectively recruited. Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose(18F-FDG)-PET/MR scans were performed prior to, during and after the first or second cycle of chemotherapy. Primary tumors were defined on all scans and size, FDG-uptake and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured. Early response was described over time and a Standard Linear Mixed Model was applied to analyze changes over time. Results: 45 FDG-PET/MR scans were performed in 11 patients. Whereas the overall changes measured by ADC did not change significantly, there was an overall significant decrease in FDG-uptake from pre to post treatment scans. There was no difference in the FDG-uptake measured 1 or 3 weeks after therapy, but uptake measured 2 weeks after therapy differed from measurements at week 3. Changes measured in patients scanned during the first treatment cycle appeared more pronounced than during the second cycle. Conclusions: This pilot study indicates that response evaluation shortly after initiation of chemotherapy appears concordant with later evaluation and probably more reliable than evaluation midway between cycles. Responses during or after the first cycle of chemotherapy rather than during subsequent cycles are likely to be more readily measured.