1. Linked Color Imaging with Light-Emitting Diode Light Enhances the Visibility of Gastric Neoplasm: A Prospective, Multicenter, Comparative Trial.
- Author
-
Iwai N, Dohi O, Kotachi T, Tsuda M, Yagi N, Ono S, Seya M, Teshima H, Kubo K, Nakahata Y, Obora A, Oka S, Tanaka S, Itoh Y, and Kato M
- Abstract
Background: Early detection of gastric cancer can play a key role in improving prognosis. Recently, light-emitting diodes (LED) have been developed as novel endoscopic systems. However, the differences in the visibility of gastric neoplastic lesions between LED and laser endoscopy remains unclear. We conducted a prospective multicenter trial to evaluate the non-inferiority of LED endoscopy in the visibility of gastric neoplastic lesions undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in comparison to laser endoscopy., Methods: A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in patients undergoing ESD for gastric neoplastic lesions at five hospitals throughout Japan. Seventy patients with 74 lesions were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the non-inferiority of the difference in the individual scores of linked color imaging (LCI) and white-light imaging (WLI) for LED and laser endoscopy for gastric neoplastic lesions., Results: The mean individual score was 2.66 ± 1.02, 3.17 ± 0.83, 2.75 ± 1.05, and 3.21 ± 0.84 in LED-WLI, LED-LCI, laser-WLI, and laser-LCI, respectively. The difference in individual scores of LCI and WLI was 0.51 ± 0.77 and 0.46 ± 0.80 in LED and laser endoscopy, respectively. The mean difference between LED and laser endoscopy was 0.04 (95% confidence interval [CI]: - 0.05 to 0.13, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: This study revealed the non-inferiority of the differences in individual scores between LCI and WLI in the comparison of LED and laser endoscopy for gastric neoplastic lesions., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: Osamu Dohi received research funding from Fujifilm Co. Ltd. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Fujifilm Co. had no role in the design, conduct, data collection, data interpretation, or reporting of this study. Ethical approval: The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine and other hospitals., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF