In India, some politicians are using that country's Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) to lock up their political opponents as terrorists. A landmine attack on October 1st, 2003, on the convoy of Chandrababu Naidu, chief minister of the state of Andhra Pradesh, was a reminder of the variety of terrorist threats facing India. Mr. Naidu was lucky to survive the assassination attempt, presumed to be by the People's War Group, a Maoist faction that has issued his "death warrant." Such groups, combined with long-running insurgencies in Kashmir and the north-east and newer extremist Islamist outfits, are used to justify the draconian provisions of India's POTA, passed into law in 2002. Jayaram Jayalalitha has demanded the sacking of M. Kannappan, India's minister for non-conventional energy sources. She has threatened to use POTA to arrest Mr. Kannappan, who is a member of a party in opposition in Tamil Nadu, but part of the ruling national coalition. Some lawyers claim POTA is unconstitutional because it infringes the rights of free speech and association and permits arbitrary detention. In Uttar Pradesh, India's most populous state, the former government led by Miss Mayawati used it to detain a number of its opponents, including Raja Bhaiya, a well-known local warlord. Miss Mayawati's government fell in August. Its successor quickly ordered his release. Civil-rights lawyers recall the abuses of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, which lapsed in 1995 after nearly 80,000 people had been detained nationwide, but only 1% of them convicted. POTA expires next October, but is likely to be extended.