Search

Aims: To determine the phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (PC-CMR) slice-position above aortic leaflet-attachment-plane (LAP) that provides flow-velocity, -volume and aortic valve area (AVA) measurements with best agreement to invasive and echocardiographic measurements in aortic stenosis (AS)., Methods and Results: Fifty-five patients with moderate/severe AS underwent cardiac catheterization, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and CMR. Overall, 171 image-planes parallel to LAP were measured via PC-CMR between 22 mm below and 24 mm above LAP. AVA via PC-CMR was calculated as flow-volume divided by peak-velocity during systole. Stroke volume (SV) and AVA were compared to volumetric SV and invasive AVA via the Gorlin-formula, respectively. Above LAP, SV by PC-CMR showed no significant dependence on image-plane-position and correlated strongly with volumetry (rho: 0.633, p < 0.001, marginal-mean-difference (MMD): 1 ml, 95 % confidence-interval (CI): -4 to 6). AVA assessed in image-planes 0-10 mm above LAP differed significantly from invasive measurement (MMD: -0.14 cm 2 , 95 %CI: 0.08-0.21). In contrast, AVA-values by PC-CMR measured 10-20 mm above LAP showed good agreement with invasive determination without significant MMD (0.003 cm 2 , 95 %CI: -0.09 to 0.09). Within these measurements, a plane 15 mm above LAP resulted in the lowest bias (MMD: 0.02 cm 2 , 95 %CI:-0.29 to 0.33). SV and AVA via TTE correlated moderately with volumetry (rho: 0.461, p < 0.001; bias: 15 ml, p < 0.001) and cardiac catheterization (rho: 0.486, p < 0.001, bias: -0.13 cm 2 , p < 0.001), respectively., Conclusion: PC-CMR measurements at 0-10 mm above LAP should be avoided due to significant AVA-overestimation compared to invasive determination. AVA-assessment by PC-CMR between 10 and 20 mm above LAP did not differ from invasive measurements, with the lowest intermethodical bias measured 15 mm above LAP., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives: To prospectively compare image-quality, reliability and graft sizing of a prototype self-navigated and a navigator-gated non-contrast three dimensional (3D) whole-heart magnetic-resonance-angiography (MRA) sequence with computed-tomography-angiography (CTA) for planning transcatheter-aortic-valve-implantation (TAVI)., Methods: Self- and navigator-gated 1.5 T MRA were performed in 27 patients (aged 83 ± 5 years, 41 % male) for aortic root sizing and coronary ostia height measurements; 15 (56 %) patients underwent additional CTA. Subjective-image quality was graded on a 4-point Likert scale, objective MRA image-quality was assessed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Continuous MRA and CTA measurements were analyzed with regression and Bland-Altman analysis, valve sizing by kappa statistics., Results: Median image-quality as rated by two observers was 1.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 1-3] for self-navigated MRA and 1 [IQR 1-2] for navigator-gated MRA (p = 0.059). SNR and CNR were comparable between MRA sequences (p = 0.471 and 0.445, respectively). Acquisition time was shorter for self-navigated MRA compared to navigator-gated MRA (5.5 ± 1 min vs, 6.5 ± 2 min, p = 0.029). Inter-observer correlation of aortic root measurements was high to very high for both self- and navigator-gated MRA (r = 0.75 to 0.94 and r = 0.85 to 0.96, respectively, all p < 0.0001). Theoretical prosthetic valve sizing of self-navigated MRA and CTA was equivalent (κ = 1). However, in four patients (15 %) one coronary ostium each (right coronary artery 3, left main artery 1) was not clearly definable on self-navigated MRA., Conclusion: Self-navigated MRA enables aortic annulus TAVI measurements without significant difference to navigator-gated MRA at shortened acquisition time. Prosthesis sizing by self-navigated MRA measurements is equivalent to navigator-gated MRA and CTA-based choice., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)