341 results
Search Results
2. Arthur N. Prior and the Lvov-Warsaw School.
- Author
-
Rybaříková, Zuzana
- Subjects
LVOV-Warsaw school of philosophy ,LOGIC ,ONTOLOGY ,PHILOSOPHY - Abstract
This paper presents the link between Arthur N. Prior and logicians that belonged to the Lvov-Warsaw School. Although certain members of the Lvov-Warsaw School influenced Prior's views, the amount and the form of the impact are still under discussion. Prior also cooperated with some of them in the development of his systems of logic. This paper focuses on four main areas in which Prior admitted adopting ideas from the Lvov-Warsaw School: systems of propositional logic, the history of logic, modal and temporal logic and ontology. Prior's published works as well as his correspondence, which is stored in Prior's Nachlass, are used to describe the influence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Mathematical Incompleteness Results in First-Order Peano Arithmetic: A Revisionist View of the Early History.
- Author
-
Kripke, Saul A.
- Subjects
INCOMPLETENESS theorems ,NOTIONS (Philosophy) ,MATHEMATICIANS ,LOGICIANS - Abstract
In the Handbook of Mathematical Logic, the Paris-Harrington variant of Ramsey's theorem is celebrated as the first result of a long 'search' for a purely mathematical incompleteness result in first-order Peano arithmetic. This paper questions the existence of any such search and the status of the Paris-Harrington result as the first mathematical incompleteness result. In fact, I argue that Gentzen gave the first such result, and that it was restated by Goodstein in a number-theoretic form. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. An Axiomatic System Based on Ladd-Franklin's Antilogism.
- Author
-
Xu, Fangzhou
- Subjects
- *
AXIOMATIC design , *SET theory , *SYLLOGISM , *FORM (Logic) - Abstract
This paper sketches the antilogism of Christine Ladd-Franklin and historical advancement about antilogism, mainly constructs an axiomatic system Atl based on first-order logic with equality and the wholly-exclusion and not-wholly-exclusion relations abstracted from the algebra of Ladd-Franklin, with soundness and completeness of Atl proved, providing a simple and convenient tool on syllogistic reasoning. Atl depicts the empty class and the whole class differently from normal set theories, e.g. ZFC, revealing another perspective on sets and set theories. Two series of Dotterer and the theorem proved by Russinoff are re-characterized in antilogistic formulas corresponding to the square of opposition and twenty-four moods of syllogism. Then the restricted equivalence between two forms of antilogism and minimal inconsistency is built up, implying the internal connection between antilogisms and minimal inconsistency and leaving two related conjectures not proved. Besides, this paper provides a new explanation for the reason why contrariety, subcontrariety, and subalternation and the nine special moods require the non-empty assumption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Burhān al-dīn Nasafī as the Author of Al-Manṭiq al-kabīr (MS Aḥmad iii, no. 3401).
- Author
-
Fallahi, Asadollah
- Subjects
- *
HISTORIANS , *HISTORY associations , *LOGIC , *INTELLECT , *PHILOSOPHY - Abstract
Recently, in 'An inquiry on Fakhr al-Dīn Rāzī's authorship of Al-manṭiq al-kab $ \bar{\iota} $ ι ¯ r (MS Aḥmad iii, no. 3401)', we refuted the quite common view among historians of Arabic logic as to attribute Al-manṭiq al-kab $ \bar{\iota} $ ι ¯ r (Major [book on] logic) to Fakhr al-dīn Rāzī; however, in that paper, we could not identify the real author of the book. In this paper, we try to show that Al-manṭiq al-kab $ \bar{\iota} $ ι ¯ r was written by Burhān al-dīn Nasafī (1203–1288), who authored another book, Sharḥ Asās al-kiyāsa whose logical part is very similar to Al-manṭiq al-kab $ \bar{\iota} $ ι ¯ r in the following significant features: the titles of chapters and sections, the style of writing, some technical as well as some non-technical terms, many sentences word by word. None of these features we find in any other Arabic logical work. So, Al-manṭiq al-kab $ \bar{\iota} $ ι ¯ r and Sharḥ Asās al-kiyāsa are so close to each other that we might most possibly identify the authors of the books as the same scholar, i.e. Burhān al-dīn Nasafī. Fortunately, this has been verified recently by two manuscripts of a medieval Arabic logical book. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Reflections on Orlov.
- Author
-
Priest, Graham
- Subjects
RELEVANCE logic ,ETHICAL intuitionism ,LOGICIANS - Abstract
In 1928 Ivan Orlov published a remarkable paper which contains the first formulation of a relevant logic. The paper remained largely unknown to English-speakers until this discovery of relevant logic was shown by Kosta Do en in 1992. By that time the material on relevant logic was well known; however, there is more of interest in Orlov's paper than this: his remarks on intuitionism, the motivation for his construction, and its wider implications. This paper explains and reflects on these matters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. The Pioneering Proving Methods as Applied in the Warsaw School of Logic – Their Historical and Contemporary Significance.
- Author
-
Wybraniec-Skardowska, Urszula
- Subjects
- *
HUMAN activity recognition , *LVOV-Warsaw school of philosophy , *POLISH philosophy , *LOGIC , *PHILOSOPHY - Abstract
Justification of theorems plays a vital role in any rational human activity. It is indispensable in science. The deductive method of justifying theorems is used in all sciences and it is the only method of justifying theorems in deductive disciplines. It is based on the notion of proof, thus it is a method of proving theorems. In the Warsaw School of Logic (WSL) – the famous branch of the Lvov-Warsaw School (LWS) – two types of the method: axiomatic deduction method and natural deduction method were developed and practiced. In this paper, both of these methods are briefly discussed with an emphasis on their historical, groundbreaking significance for logic. The axiomatic method by means of rejection (proposed by Jan Łukasiewicz – a co-creator of the WSL), which is the method of the so-called rejection proof (rejection/refutation method) in logical systems and the proving method of generalized natural deduction, which is a hybrid deduction–refutation method of proving theorems, are also outlined in the paper. The author discusses their historical significance. This paper also contains a brief mention of the most significant results which the application of the discussed methods introduced into contemporary scientific research, not only logical one. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Mathematical Logic in the History of Logic: Łukasiewicz's Contribution and Its Reception.
- Author
-
Rybaříková, Zuzana
- Subjects
- *
MATHEMATICAL logic , *LOGIC , *HISTORICAL research , *SYLLOGISM - Abstract
Łukasiewicz introduced a new methodological approach to the history of logic. It consists of the use of modern formal logic in the research of the history of logic. Although he was not the first to use formal logic in his historical research, Łukasiewicz was the first who used it consistently and formulated it as a requirement for a historian of logic. The aim of this paper is to present Łukasiewicz's contribution and the history of its formulation. In addition, the paper will present its reception. There are two main themes in Łukasiewicz's work on the history of logic. He discussed Stoic logic and Aristotle's syllogistic. The second part of the paper focuses on current reception of Łukasiewicz's contribution and on the question of whether there is a difference between knowledge about his contribution to Stoic logic and to Aristotle's syllogistic, given that it has been hypothesised that Łukasiewicz's contribution is currently more known among Aristotelian scholars than among those who focus on Stoic logic. Based on the papers that have appeared in the last five years at Web of Science and Scopus this hypothesis has not been confirmed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Logic and Its History in the Lvov-Warsaw School.
- Author
-
Świętorzecka, Kordula and Łyczak, Marcin
- Subjects
- *
LVOV-Warsaw school of philosophy , *LOGIC , *HISTORICAL research , *THEOLOGY , *PROOF theory - Abstract
We take into account two areas of the logical research of the Lvov-Warsaw School. First, we consider a new approach to research in the history of logic introduced and practiced by Łukasiewicz and some of his followers. In this style of doing history of logic, the knowledge of original philosophical and logical texts was combined with competence in modern logic. This method resulted in many important discoveries both in history and in logic and philosophy. At the same time, we pay attention to contemporary historical research devoted to the logic created by the School itself. In this context, we present an overview of the six papers included in the special issue 'Logic and its History in the Lvov-Warsaw School'. These papers were presented at an international symposium, 'History in/of the Lvov-Warsaw School', held in October 2022 in Warsaw, and they cover various aspects of historical-logical and logical achievements of the School. They concern topics from history of ancient logic, history of modern proof theory, and the issues of applying logic to philosophy and theology in the same way as the one implemented at the Lvov-Warsaw School. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Direct Reduction of Syllogisms with Byzantine Diagrams.
- Author
-
Bhattacharjee, Reetu
- Abstract
The paper explores the potential of Byzantine diagrams in syllogistic logic. Byzantine diagrams are originated by Byzantine scholars in the early modern period to use as tools for teaching and studying Aristotelian logic. This paper presents pioneering work on employing Byzantine diagrams for checking syllogistic validity through reduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Introduction to 'Studies in Post-Medieval Logic'.
- Author
-
Geudens, Christophe and Coesemans, Steven
- Subjects
HUMANISM ,SCHOLARLY method ,TRANSLATING & interpreting ,MEDICAL research - Abstract
This special issue contains three papers on evolutions in logic during the so-called 'post-medieval' period (roughly the years 1450–1700). The papers discuss the following topics: (1) traditions of logic in the British Isles during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries; (2) approaches to validity in medieval and post-medieval logic; and (3) scholastic and humanist interpretations of the prologue to Galen's Art of Medicine. All papers provide an original contribution to research on post-medieval logic, which to date is still in the early stages. Together they testify to the great diversity of the discourse on logic during the period under consideration, something that has not been sufficiently appreciated in the scholarship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Connexive Principles After a 'Classical' Turn in Medieval Logic.
- Author
-
Johnston, Spencer C.
- Subjects
SYLLOGISM ,LOGIC ,MEDIEVAL authors - Abstract
The aim of this paper is to look at the arguments advanced by three Parisian arts masters about how to understand Prior Analytics II 4 and the more general discussion that medieval authors situate this in, revolving around the validity of various rules of inference. In particular, this paper argues that all three arts masters read Aristotle's remarks as committing him to a weak form of connexive principles where the antecedent needs to be either true or at least formally possible; this is known in the contemporary literature as a weak connexive thesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Logic and Discrimination.
- Author
-
Ficara, Elena
- Subjects
- *
LOGIC , *DISCRIMINATION (Sociology) , *PSYCHOLOGY , *SOCIAL psychology - Abstract
The paper is about the connection between logic and discrimination, with special focus on Plumwood's ideas in her groundbreaking article 'The Politics of Reason. Towards a Feminist Logic' (1993). Although Plumwood's paper is not focused on the notion of discrimination, what she writes is useful for illuminating some basic mechanisms of thought that are at the basis of discriminatory practices. After an introductory section about the concepts of logic and discrimination and their possible interconnections, I present Plumwood's ideas in 1993 with a special focus on their relevance for understanding the nature of discrimination. More specifically, I use examples of discriminatory practices that make the connection between logical operations and oppression envisaged by Plumwood clear. I focus especially on two questions: Can logic produce discrimination? Can logic contribute to the fight against discrimination? If so, how? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Polish Logicians on Social Functions of Logic.
- Author
-
Woleński, Jan
- Subjects
- *
LOGICIANS , *SEMIOTICS , *METHODOLOGY , *PHILOSOPHY , *POLITICAL participation - Abstract
The paper examines the interplays between logic and politics in the Polish School of Logic starting from 1914. The Polish School of Logic flourished between 1920 and 1939. Philosophically, it was influenced by Kazimierz Twardowski (1866–1938). For Twardowski logic is fundamental for every kind of human activity, professional and private and this means that every argument should be formulated and proceed by correct inferential rules. These rules involve semiotics, formal logic and methodology of science. The paper shows how this position was shared by Twardowski's students, including Jan Łukasiewicz, Stanisław Leśniewski, Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz and Tadeusz Kotrabiński, as well as by the next generation of logicians and philosophers and especially by Alfred Tarski. These authors considered logic, philosophy and science as completely neutral with respect to politics and ideology but they also considered logical skills as indispensable in political activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. The Structure and Extension of (Proto)Type Concepts: Husserl's Correlationist Approach.
- Author
-
Taieb, Hamid
- Subjects
PHILOSOPHY ,PHILOSOPHERS ,LOGICIANS ,ONTOLOGY ,LINGUISTICS - Abstract
This paper aims to reassess a notion in the works of the later Husserl that is both historically important and philosophically insightful, but remains understudied, namely, that of type. In opposition to a standard reading which treats Husserl's type presentations as pre-conceptual habits, this paper argues that these representations are a specific kind of concept. More precisely, it shows that Husserl's account of type presentations is akin to the contemporary prototype theory of concepts. This is historically important, since the predecessor of the prototype theory is usually said to be Wittgenstein. From a philosophical standpoint, the paper shows that Husserl has an innovative account of the connection between type concepts and their extension. Contrary to the standard view of extensions as sets and thus sharp entities, Husserl develops a correlationalist theory of concepts, according to which, for the specific characteristics in the structure of a concept, there are corresponding characteristics in the arrangement of its members, and vice versa. According to this theory, while sharp concepts lead to sharp extensions, vague concepts such as (proto)type concepts lead to vague extensions. The paper presents this understanding of Husserl in detail and explains its philosophical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Wittgenstein and Formal Semantics: A Case Study on the Tractarian Notions of Truth-Conditions and Compositionality.
- Author
-
Bartunek, Nicoletta
- Subjects
SEMANTICS ,INFORMATION theory ,COMPARATIVE linguistics ,COMPOSITIONALITY (Linguistics) ,NATURAL language processing - Abstract
This paper argues that there are three reasons why we should regard Wittgenstein's Tractatus as a forerunner of formal semantics: Wittgenstein is convinced that we can apply formal notions to natural languages, that the meaning of a sentence is to be explained in terms of its truth-conditions and that language is compositional. These claims are also defended against the following three objections. First, the formal semantics defines truth-conditions using the language-metalanguage distinction, while Wittgenstein doesn't. He relies on the picture theory, which is not a formal notion. Secondly, the formal semanticists' 'compositionality principle' presupposes that the truth-conditions of complex sentences should be understood in terms of the truth-conditions of elementary ones, whereas Wittgenstein applies the notion of truth-conditions only to complex sentences. And, finally, that differently from the formal semanticists, Wittgenstein doesn't envisage recursive rules for the combination of the semantic primitives. The claim of this paper is that the first objection can be overcome by relating the picture theory to the pre-Tractarian principle of bipolarity, the second by relying on the famous distinction between what a sentence says and what it shows and the third by acknowledging that Wittgenstein, differently from the formal semanticists, works with propositional logic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. The Venn-MacColl Dispute in Nature.
- Author
-
Verburgt, Lukas M.
- Subjects
LOGICIANS ,PHILOSOPHERS - Abstract
During 1881, the British logicians John Venn and Hugh MacColl engaged in a brief dispute in Nature about 'symbolical logic'. The letters to the editor shed interesting light on the early reception of MacColl's contributions to logic and his position in the logical community of the Victorian era. Drawing on the correspondence between Venn and William Stanley Jevons, this paper analyzes the background and context of these letters, adding to the recent interest in the social dimensions of the development of British algebraic logic in the confusing intermediary period between the 1870s and 1890s. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Connexivity in Aristotle's Logic.
- Author
-
Ruge, Fabian
- Subjects
- *
LOGIC , *SEPARATION (Law) , *SYLLOGISM , *FORM (Logic) - Abstract
At APr 2.4 57a36–13, Aristotle presents a notorious reductio argument in which he derives the claim 'If B is not large, B is large' and calls that result impossible. Aristotle is thus committed to some form of connexivity and this paper argues that his commitment is to a strong form of connexivity which excludes even cases in which 'B is large' is necessary. It is further argued that Aristotle's view of connexivity is best understood as arising from his analysis of affirmation and negation in terms of combination and separation: a proposition that separates two terms cannot entail a proposition that combines the same two terms. In order to motivate this account of connexivity, this paper interprets Aristotle as emphasising the predicative structure, especially the copulae, of the argument's component propositions. The arguments for this are based on a consideration of the larger context of APr 2.2–4. A reconstruction of the argument using propositional variables does not fully capture Aristotle's intentions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Bolzano on Bolzano: A Hitherto Unknown Announcement of Bolzano's Beyträge.
- Author
-
Fuentes Guillén, Elías
- Subjects
- *
PUBLICATIONS , *MANUSCRIPT preparation (Authorship) , *LOGIC , *TRANSLATIONS , *LANGUAGE & languages - Abstract
In 1817, in the preface to his Rein analytischer Beweis, Bernard Bolzano revealed that he had decided to postpone the publication of any subsequent instalment of his Beyträge zu einer begründeteren Darstellung der Mathematik because of the few and 'superficial' reviews of its first instalment, published in 1810. Bolzano's transcriptions of the only two known reviews of this book are conserved at the Literární archiv Památníku národního písemnictví / Muzea literatury, in Prague, together with another manuscript on his Beyträge, the provenance of which was unknown to Bolzano's scholars until recently. In this paper it is shown that this latter manuscript is a draft of an announcement that was published at the time and that was indeed written at least to some extent by Bolzano himself. This hitherto unknown announcement of Bolzano's Beyträge not only solves the mystery surrounding that manuscript, but also helps to date the publication of this book more precisely and provides an unusual insight into what we must take Bolzano himself to have considered most noteworthy about his work, namely his study on logic. The paper includes a transcription of the manuscript and an English translation of the announcement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Judgments vs Propositions in Alexander of Aphrodisias' Conception of Logic.
- Author
-
McConaughey, Zoe
- Subjects
- *
JUDGMENT (Logic) , *LOGIC , *TERMS & phrases , *EPISTEMIC logic - Abstract
This paper stresses the importance of identifying the nature of an author's conception of logic when using terms from modern logic in order to avoid, as far as possible, injecting our own conception of logic in the author's texts. Sundholm (2012. “‘Inference versus consequence” revisited: Inference, conditional, implication’, Synthese, 187, 943–956) points out that
inferences are staged at the epistemic level and are made out of judgments, not propositions. Since it is now standard to read Aristoteliansullogismoi as inferences, I have taken Alexander of Aphrodisias's commentaries to Aristotle's logical treatises as a basis for arguing that the premises and conclusions should be read as judgments rather than as propositions. Under this reading, when Alexander speaks ofprotaseis , we should not read the modern notion of proposition, but rather what we now call judgments. The point is not just a matter of terminology, it is about the conception of logic this terminology conveys. In this regard, insisting on judgments rather than on propositions helps bring to light Alexander's epistemic conception of logic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Arthur N. Prior on the Labours of Ł3 Conjunctions.
- Author
-
Joaquin, Jeremiah Joven and Eldridge-Smith, Peter
- Subjects
- *
PUBLIC radio , *INFERENTIAL statistics , *MATHEMATICAL statistics , *SEMANTICS - Abstract
In 'Many-valued Logics', a lecture broadcast over New Zealand's public radio in 1957, Arthur N. Prior (1914–1969) complained that conjunctions are put 'to something like forced labour' in Łukasiewicz's three-valued semantics, Ł3. In this paper, we discuss what Prior might have meant by this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Dashtakī's Solution to the Liar Paradox: A Synthesis of the Earlier Solutions Proposed by Ṭūsī and Samarqandī.
- Author
-
Zarepour, Mohammad Saleh
- Subjects
- *
PARADOX , *FIGURES of speech , *LOGIC , *PHILOSOPHY , *PHILOSOPHERS - Abstract
Ṣadr al-Dīn al-Dashtakī (d. 1498) has proposed a solution to the liar paradox according to which the liar sentence is a self-referential sentence in which the predicate 'false' is iterated. Discussing the conditions for the truth-aptness of the sentences with nested and iterated instances of the predicates 'true' and/or 'false', Dashtakī argued that the liar sentence is not truth-apt at all. In the tradition of Arabic logic, the central elements of Dashtakī's solution—the self-referentiality of the liar sentence and the implicit iteration of the predicate 'false'—were initially highlighted in two earlier solutions proposed by Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī (d. 1274) and Shams al-Dīn al-Samarqandī (d. 1322), respectively. Here I investigate all three solutions and show that Dashtakī's solution can be taken as a synthesis of the other two. None of these solutions seems to be convincing at the end of the day. Nevertheless, all of them include significant logical and philosophical insights. In particular, although Dashtakī's solution is not itself compelling, it is only a few steps away from a promising solution. The appendix to this paper includes translations of the relevant passages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Brouwer's Intuition of Twoity and Constructions in Separable Mathematics.
- Author
-
Bentzen, Bruno
- Subjects
- *
MATHEMATICS , *ARITHMETIC , *ONTOLOGY , *PHILOSOPHY - Abstract
My first aim in this paper is to use time diagrams in the style of Brentano to analyze constructions in Brouwer's separable mathematics more precisely. I argue that constructions must involve not only pairing and projecting as basic operations guaranteed by the intuition of twoity, as sometimes assumed in the literature, but also a recalling operation. My second aim is to argue that Brouwer's views on the intuition of twoity and arithmetic lead to an ontological explosion. Redeveloping the constructions of natural numbers and systems sketched in an appendix to Brouwer's Cambridge lectures, I observe that the only plausible way he can make some elementary arithmetic in his separable mathematics is by allowing for the same canonical number to be determined by multiple separable entities, resulting in an overabundant mathematical ontology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. John Eliot's Logick Primer: A Bilingual English-Massachusett Logic Textbook.
- Author
-
Uckelman, Sara L.
- Subjects
- *
BILINGUALISM , *VOCABULARY , *SYLLOGISM , *PAMPHLETS - Abstract
In 1672 John Eliot, English Puritan educator and missionary to New England, published The Logick Primer: Some Logical Notions to initiate the INDIANS in the knowledge of the Rule of Reason; and to know how to make use thereof (Eliot 1672) The Logick Primer: Some Logical Notions to Initiate the INDIANS in the Knowledge of the Rule of Reason; and to Know How to Make Use Thereof , Cambridge, MA: Marmaduke Johnson]. This roughly 80 page pamphlet introduces syllogistic vocabulary and reasoning so that syllogisms can be created from Biblical texts. The use of logic for proselytizing purposes is not distinctive: What is distinctive about Eliot's book is that it is bilingual, written in both English and Massachusett (Wôpanâak), an Algonquian language spoken in eastern coastal and southeastern Massachusetts. It is one of the earliest bilingual logic textbooks and it is the first, and perhaps only, textbook in an indigenous American language. In this paper, we (1) introduce John Eliot and the linguistic context he was working in; (2) introduce the contents of the Logick Primer – vocabulary, inference patterns, and applications; (3) discuss notions of 'Puritan' logic that inform this primer; and (4) address the importance of his work in documenting and expanding the Massachusett language and the problems that accompany his colonial approach to this work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Tractatus 6 Reconsidered: An Algorithmic Alternative to Wittgenstein's Trade-Off.
- Author
-
Roman, A. and Gomułka, J.
- Subjects
- *
CONJOINT analysis , *LOGIC , *TRUTH functions (Mathematical logic) - Abstract
Wittgenstein's conception of the general form of a truth function given in thesis 6 can be presented as a sort of a trade-off: the author of the Tractatus is unable to reconcile the simplicity of his original idea of a series of forms with the simplicity of his generalisation of Sheffer's stroke; therefore, he is forced to sacrifice one of them. As we argue in this paper, the choice he makes – to weaken the logical constraints put on the concept of a series of forms, thus effectively metaphorising that concept for the sake of upholding the N-operation's role of generating the series – is unfortunate. An actual expansion of a series of truth functions as defined in 6 would require either making decisions at each step (Anscombe) or outwardly rejecting the concept of a series (Sundholm). However, neither is faithful to Wittgenstein's own fundamental intuitions regarding the nature of logic. For this reason, a different trade-off that prioritises upholding the basic features of a series of forms over the simplicity of the operation that generates that series seems to be much more reasonable. We offer such a trade-off by developing the schema already present in the Tractatus (5.101). The key element of our alternative solution is the construction of an operation that can perform the task of producing all consecutive truth functions of a given collection of atomic propositions as an invariant difference between any base and its successor throughout the series. We define it as a composition of three functions (in an algebraic sense): the first turns a symbol of a given truth function into a binary number, the second increments that number, the third turns the result back into a symbol of another truth function. We also show how the operation can be defined by means of a different notation without invoking binary arithmetic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Prior's big Y and the Idea of Branching Time.
- Author
-
Øhrstrøm, Peter and González, Manuel
- Subjects
- *
BRANCHING processes , *STOCHASTIC processes , *CLADISTIC analysis - Abstract
In his famous letter to A. N. Prior dated 3 September 1958, Saul Kripke suggested the use of branching time in temporal logic. In this paper, however, it is argued that Prior worked with an idea close to the notion of branching time ('the big Y') already the year before he received Kripke's letter. It is likely that Prior's findings based on this early study can explain why Prior so quickly accepted the idea of branching time when he received Kripke's letter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Searching for the General Science of Evidence: Venn on Probability and Induction.
- Author
-
Stergiou, Chrysovalantis, Apostolidis, Alexandros, and Psillos, Stathis
- Subjects
- *
INFERENCE (Logic) , *PROBABILITY theory , *TWENTIETH century - Abstract
In this paper Venn's account of probability inference and induction is examined, tracing their differences as well as how they ‘co-operate’ in inferences from particulars to particulars. We discuss the role of mathematical idealizations in making probability inferences, the celebrated rule of succession and we delve into the nature of the reference class problem arguing that for Venn it is a common problem for both induction and inference in probability. Our approach is both historical and philosophical attempting to sketch Venn's position both in the philosophy of probability and induction of his time and in relation to the twentieth-century frequentism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Sellars, Second-order Quantification, and Ontological Commitment.
- Author
-
Parisi, Andrew
- Subjects
ONTOLOGY ,PHILOSOPHY ,LANGUAGE & languages ,SEMANTICS ,SENTENCES (Grammar) - Abstract
Sellars [1960. 'Grammar and existence: A preface to ontology', Mind, 69 (276), 499-533; 1979. Naturalism and Ontology, Reseda, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company] argues that the truth of a second-order sentence, e.g. , does not incur commitment to there being any sort of abstract entity. This paper begins by exploring the arguments that Sellars offers for the above claim. It then develops those arguments by pointing out places where Sellars has been unclear or ought to have said more. In particular, Sellars's arguments rely on there being a means by which language users could come to understand sentences of a second-order language wherein the truth of sentences of the form do not require there to be abstract entities. In addition to this, as Sellars [1979. Naturalism and Ontology, Reseda, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company] notes, a formal account of quantification is required that does not make use of the apparatus of sequences. Both a translation of and a formal account of quantification are provided by this paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. A Formal Explication of Blanchette's Conception of Fregean Consequence.
- Author
-
Eder, Günther
- Subjects
LOGIC ,PHILOSOPHY ,SEMANTICS - Abstract
Over the past decades, Patricia Blanchette has developed a sophisticated account of Frege's conception of logic and his views on logical consequence. One of the central components of her interpretation is the idea that Frege's conception of logical consequence is 'semantically laden' and not purely formal. The aim of the present paper is to provide precise explications of this as well as related ideas that inform her account, and to discuss their significance for the philosophy of logic in general and Frege's philosophy in particular. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Ramsey's Lost Counterfactual.
- Author
-
Sisti, Caterina
- Subjects
CONDITIONALS (Logic) ,COUNTERFACTUALS (Logic) ,LOGIC ,PHILOSOPHERS - Abstract
In contemporary works on conditionals, the Ramsey test is a procedure for the evaluation of conditional sentences. There are several versions of the test, all inspired by a footnote by the British philosopher and mathematician Frank Ramsey, in his General Propositions and Causality. However, no study on Ramsey's own account of conditionals has been put forth so far. Furthermore, the footnote seems to cover indicative conditionals only, and this has led to the belief that no account of counterfactuals can be found in Ramsey's work. In this paper, I recover Ramsey's account of counterfactuals and show that it is sketched in the footnote too. The result is a well-developed account of counterfactuals that resembles many contemporary ones. But Ramsey uses the same approach also for other types of conditionals, and this casts doubts on the current criteria for the classification of this type of sentences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Hegel's Interpretation of the Liar Paradox.
- Author
-
d'Agostini, Franca and Ficara, Elena
- Subjects
LIAR paradox ,PLAUSIBILITY (Logic) ,HYPOTHESIS ,DIALETHEISM - Abstract
In his Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Hegel develops a subtle analysis of Megarian paradoxes: the Liar, the Veiled Man and the Sorites. In this paper, we focus on Hegel's interpretation of the Liar. We note that in Hegel's treatment there are positive suggestions for a new analysis of the paradox. Faced with the Liar's sentence 'µ' that says '"µ" is false', Hegel's idea is that the conjunction 'µ and not µ' is to be held true, but the two conjuncts 'µ' and 'not µ', separately taken, are untrue. Other parts of Hegel's work confirm the idea that a true contradiction for him is made of two untrue sentences, which is an interesting but unusual account of inconsistency. In this paper, we explore the plausibility of the hypothesis with the lens of the contemporary theories of paradoxes. We compare Hegel's view with standard dialetheism, and we present Hegel's idea of truth which underlies the theory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Proof by Assumption of the Possible in Prior Analytics, 1.15; How Not to Blend Modal Frameworks.
- Author
-
Kapantais, Doukas and Karamanolis, George
- Subjects
MODAL logic ,PHYSICS ,METAPHYSICS - Abstract
The present paper aims to show that the reconstruction of the formal framework of the proofs in Pr. An. 1.15, as proposed by Malink and Rosen 2013 ('Proof by Assumption of the Possible in Prior Analytics 1.15', Mind, 122, 953-85) is due to affront a double impasse. Malink and Rosen argue convincingly that Aristotle operates with two different modal frameworks, one as found in the system of modal logic presented in Prior Analytics 1.3 and 8-22, and one occurring in many of Aristotle's works, such as the Physics, De Caelo and the Metaphysics. However, they misconstrue the latter framework. More precisely, they misconstrue the domain of significance of what they call the 'Principle of Necessitation'. As a consequence, bringing the two frameworks into one results into a contradictory modal logic. On the other hand, if the Principle of Necessitation is rectified, the proofs put forward by Malink and Rosen in the same paper are no longer available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Hobson's Conception of Definable Numbers.
- Author
-
Fan, Zhao
- Subjects
MATHEMATICIANS ,DEFINABILITY theory (Mathematical logic) ,COMPUTABILITY logic ,MODULES (Algebra) - Abstract
In this paper, I explore an intriguing view of definable numbers proposed by a Cambridge mathematician Ernest Hobson, and his solution to the paradoxes of definability. Reflecting on König's paradox and Richard's paradox, Hobson argues that an unacceptable consequence of the paradoxes of definability is that there are numbers that are inherently incapable of finite definition. Contrast to other interpreters, Hobson analyses the problem of the paradoxes of definability lies in a dichotomy between finitely definable numbers and not finitely definable numbers. To bypass this predicament, Hobson proposes a language dependent analysis of definable numbers, where the diagonal argument is employed as a means to generate more and more definable numbers. This paper examines Hobson's work in its historical context, and articulates his argument in detail. It concludes with a remark on Hobson's analysis of definability and Alan Turing's analysis of computability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Aristotle in Prussian Gymnasiums: Why the Texts of the Ancient Philosopher Became Popular for Teaching Logic.
- Author
-
Demin, Maxim
- Subjects
COLLEGE curriculum ,GERMAN philosophy ,PHILOSOPHY of science ,HUMANISM ,PHILOSOPHY - Abstract
During the nineteenth century, German philosophy developed from a type of general knowledge to an academic discipline at the university. Changes across disciplines to the philosophy of science and psychological surveys created new challenges for the place and purpose of philosophy in the educational system. The content of logic courses for secondary schools (Gymnasiums) was centred on the dissociation of nature and the scale of logic.In this paper, I will examine a number of projects for teaching philosophy at the secondary school level from new humanism to reduce philosophical to philological concerns about different projects offered by Niethammer, Hegel and Herbart. Then, I will focus on the most successful – Adolf Trendelenburg's Elements of Aristotle's Logic (1st edition of 1836). This work is a compilation of the logical texts of Aristotle, and for as long as sixty years, it was an official textbook in Prussian secondary schools. The aim of the paper is to show how the rethinking of Aristotle's heritage affected the theoretical and ideological expectations of propaedeutic courses and transformed the image of logic as a philosophical discipline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Kalmár's Argument Against the Plausibility of Church's Thesis.
- Author
-
Szabó, Máté
- Subjects
PHILOSOPHY of mathematics ,NUMBER theory ,PROPOSITION (Logic) ,PREDICATE (Logic) ,UNIVERSALS (Philosophy) - Abstract
In his famous paper,
An Unsolvable Problem of Elementary Number Theory , Alonzo Church (1936 ) identified the intuitive notion ofeffective calculability with the mathematically precise notion ofrecursiveness . This proposal, known as Church's Thesis, has been widely accepted. Only a few papers have been written against it. One of these is László Kalmár'sAn Argument Against the Plausibility of Church's Thesis from 1959. The aim of this paper is to present Kalmár's argument and to fill in missing details based on his general philosophical thoughts on mathematics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Regensburg Colloquy of 1601: Its Disputation Method and the German Second Scholastic Disputation Handbooks.
- Author
-
Kotala, Lukáš
- Subjects
RELIGIOUS disputations ,POLITICAL leadership ,LOGIC ,ART literature ,HANDBOOKS, vade-mecums, etc. - Abstract
The article deals with the Lutheran–Catholic religious colloquy at Regensburg of 1601. It points out that the event was of importance not only for political and religious reasons but also in terms of applied logic. Analysis of samples of the colloquy minutes proves that the overall disputation method in the Acta Colloquii Ratisbonensis consists of the Multi-thread, Asking-answering and the Objection-solving paradigmatic methods and shows in which phases of the colloquy these methods were applied. Further, with quantitative precision, the paper aims to present the colloquy as an explanation of why the phenomenon of treatises on how to dispute emerged in Europe in the first half of the seventeenth century. Within that, quarrels over burden of proof and the dialectical form at Regensburg are also explicated in detail. Finally, it is inquired whether or not there was any other religious colloquy that was more significant for the rise of the handbooks genre than the Regensburg. The paper also provides four detailed tables as a ground for various proofs and for the reader's own study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Czeżowski's Theory of Reasoning and Mediaeval Biblical Exegesis.
- Author
-
Trepczyński, Marcin and Będkowski, Marcin
- Subjects
- *
LVOV-Warsaw school of philosophy , *REASONING , *LOGICIANS - Abstract
We present how the theory of reasoning developed by Tadeusz Czeżowski, a Polish logician and a member of the Lvov-Warsaw School (LWS) can be applied to the mediaeval texts which interpret the Bible, which we collectively call as Biblical exegesis (BE). In the first part of the paper, we characterise Czeżowski's theory of reasoning with some modifications based on remarks of Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz. On these grounds, we discuss the nature of reasoning and its different types, as well as the problem of textual representation of reasoning. In the second part, we describe the analytical nature of some BE at the end of twelfth century and in the thirteenth century by referring to the examples of Stephen Langton, Robert Grosseteste, Bonaventure, Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas. We argue that they represented an analytical approach in BE, characterised by advanced use of logic and specific methods, including reasoning reconstruction and logical analysis. In the third part, we present selected examples to show how Czeżowski's framework helps in identifying various types of reasoning. We indicate some universal problems with the textual representation of reasoning found in the BE of the authors in question. Lastly, we point out how Czeżowski's framework enables the understanding of phenomena such as 'Special Biblical Inference'. Thanks to this experiment, we can see how a framework as advanced as that offered by LWS representatives can be put to the test using mediaeval Biblical commentaries, yielding interesting results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Russell's Theories of Events and Instants from the Perspective of Point-Free Ontologies in the Tradition of the Lvov-Warsaw School.
- Author
-
Pietruszczak, Andrzej
- Subjects
- *
ONTOLOGY , *AXIOMS , *MATHEMATICS , *LVOV-Warsaw school of philosophy - Abstract
We classify two of Bertrand Russell's theories of events within the point-free ontology. The first of such approaches was presented informally by Russell in 'The World of Physics and the World of Sense' (Lecture IV in Our Knowledge of the External World of 1914). Based on this theory, Russell sketched ways to construct instants as collections of events. This paper formalizes Russell's approach from 1914. We will also show that in such a reconstructed theory, we obtain all axioms of Russell's second theory from 1936 and all axioms of Thomason's theory of events from 1989. Russell's work certainly influenced the works of Stanisław Leśniewski, his student Alfred Tarski, and Czesław Lejewski – prominent members of the Lvov-Warsaw School (LWS). We see our work in the tradition of the research of Leśniewski and Tarski. Building on the technical tools developed in this environment and in the spirit of the traditional research of the LWS, we engage here, in particular, with two classic works by Russell on fundamental ontology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. The Problem of Natural Representation of Reasoning in the Lvov-Warsaw School.
- Author
-
Indrzejczak, Andrzej
- Subjects
- *
REASONING , *THOUGHT & thinking , *REASON , *MATHEMATICS , *NATURAL deduction (Logic) , *PROOF theory - Abstract
The problem of precise characterisation of traditional forms of reasoning applied in mathematics was independently investigated and successfully resolved by Jaśkowski and Gentzen in 1934. However, there are traces of earlier interests in this field exhibited by the members of the Lvov-Warsaw School. We focus on the results obtained by Jaśkowski and Leśniewski. Jaśkowski provided the first formal system of natural deduction in 1926. Leśniewski also demonstrated in some of his papers how to construct proofs in accordance with intuitively correct principles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. The Theory of Nigrahasthāna in <italic>Vādanyāya</italic> of Dharmakīrti.
- Author
-
Wei, Gan and Zhixi, Chen
- Abstract
Vādanyāya is one of the representative works of Dharmakīrti. It is concerned with debate logic and deals with win-or-lose reasoning rules in the broad sense of logic. In this paper, we will concentrate our discussion on Dharmakīrti’s theory of nigrahasthāna (fault) in his debate logic, a key issue inVādanyāya . First, we point out that the justification of three logical reasons as proof conditions of debate constitutes the rational point of departure for Dharmakīrti’s debate logic. Second, we analyze the differences between Dharmakīrti’s and the Naiyāyika’s notion of debate and point out that Dharmakīrti’s ‘debate’ involves two parties (the disputant and the opponent) attempting to rationally refute the other’s opinion to persuade the other to change their wrong ideas. Last, based on the discussion of Dharmakīrti’s concept of debate logic, we identify seven types of nigrahasthāna inVādanyāya with regard to the two parties of a debate (the disputant and the opponent). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Ruth Barcan Marcus on the Deduction Theorem in Modal Logic.
- Author
-
Ballarin, Roberta
- Abstract
In this paper, I examine Ruth Barcan Marcus's early formal work on modal systems and the deduction theorem, both for the material and the strict conditional. Marcus proved that the deduction theorem for the material conditional does not hold for system S2 but holds for S4. This last result is at odds with the recent claim that without proper restrictions the deduction theorem fails also for S4. I explain where the contrast stems from. For the strict conditional, Marcus proved the deduction theorem for S4 though restricted to arguments with necessary premises. I discuss Marcus's result and analyze her philosophical position on the significance of the deduction theorem for modal systems designed to express the notion of deducibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Entailment and Truthmaking: The <italic>Consequentia Rerum</italic> from Boethius to the <italic>Ars Meliduna</italic>.
- Author
-
Donato, Enrico
- Abstract
In
Categories 12 (14b11–22), Aristotle famously claims that [1] true sentences and reality stand in a mutually implicative relationship, and that [2] reality causes the truth of sentences but notvice versa . In this paper, I first argue that Boethius’ reading of the above passage led medieval logicians to assess [1] and [2] within the framework of a theory of consequence. Then, I consider two important questions raised by Boethius and later logicians in relation to [1] and [2], and, namely, whether the implication described in [1] really satisfies the requirement for consequence, and whether the truthmaking relation posited in [2] can be boiled down to the relation of consequence. Boethius himself, I argue, answered affirmatively to both questions and thus (much like some contemporary truthmaker theorists) committed himself to an account of truthmaking as entailment. I then consider criticisms to Boethius’ account found in the writings of William of Champeaux, two anonymous authors connected to the school of Jocelyn of Soissons, Peter Abelard, and the author of theArs Meliduna . Here, I argue that the emergence of a concern for relevance drives the need for abandoning Boethius’ account as well as his conception of truthmaking as entailment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Hegel's Interpretation of the Sorites.
- Author
-
d'Agostini, Franca
- Subjects
SORITES paradox ,LOGIC ,PARADOX ,DIALETHEISM - Abstract
Hegel's approach to soritical arguments (as well as to paradoxes in general) can be read as a kind of conjunctive paraconsistency: the 'explosive' effect of contradictions is avoided by assuming 'the unity of the opposites', so that contradictory conjunctions are not simplifiable. The paper reconsiders what Hegel says about the Sorites and justifies the conjunctive interpretation. The first section introduces the analysis, presenting the role of the Einheit Entgegengesetzter for contemporary theories of paradoxes. In the second section, the focus is on Hegel's interpretation of the Sorites. The third section briefly considers some contemporary accounts of vagueness in the light of Hegel's view so reconstructed. The last section summarizes the main results and explores some ideas about how to formalize a Hegel-inspired conjunctive view. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. A Lack of Form in Hegel's Logic? Hegel and the Trans-classical Logic of Gotthard Günther.
- Author
-
Pluder, Valentin
- Subjects
LOGIC ,DIALECTIC ,MODALITY (Theory of knowledge) - Abstract
Gotthard Günther's early work is inspired by Hegel's logic. Both share the view that the forms of 'classical logic' are insufficient to capture essential aspects of thought. However, while Hegel rules out formalization for his dialectical logic, Günther attributes this to the fact that Hegel's thought itself is still bound to the forms of a classical logic. Günther thus develops a trans-classical logic, with which he believes he can formally capture some of Hegel's insights. The paper presents Günther's critical engagement with Hegel and outlines some basic assumptions arising from his critique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. The Logical Structure of Dialectic.
- Author
-
Priest, Graham
- Subjects
DIALECTIC ,MODALITY (Theory of knowledge) ,DIALETHEISM - Abstract
I give a formal model of dialectical progression, as found in Hegel and Marx. The model is outlined in the first half of the paper, and deploys the tools of a formal paraconsistent logic. In the second half, I discuss a number of examples of dialectical progressions to be found in Hegel and Marx, showing how they fit the model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. L.E.J. Brouwer's ‘Unreliability of the Logical Principles’: A New Translation, with an Introduction.
- Author
-
Van Atten, Mark and Sundholm, Göran
- Subjects
LOGIC -- History ,PROPOSITION (Logic) ,STATISTICAL reliability ,TRUTH ,MEANING (Philosophy) ,TWENTIETH century - Abstract
We present a new English translation of L.E.J. Brouwer's paper ‘De onbetrouwbaarheid der logische principes’ (The unreliability of the logical principles) of 1908, together with a philosophical and historical introduction. In this paper Brouwer for the first time objected to the idea that the Principle of the Excluded Middle is valid. We discuss the circumstances under which the manuscript was submitted and accepted, Brouwer's ideas on the principle of the excluded middle, its consistency and partial validity, and his argument against the possibility of absolutely undecidable propositions. We note that principled objections to the general excluded middle similar to Brouwer's had been advanced in print by Jules Molk two years before. Finally, we discuss the influence on George Griss' negationless mathematics. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. The Birth of Dialetheism.
- Author
-
Ficara, Elena
- Subjects
DIALETHEISM ,PHILOSOPHY ,DIALECTICAL materialism - Abstract
The aim of this paper is to lay bare the roots of dialetheism in discussions about dialectics and dialectical logic at the time of the first development of paraconsistent logics. In other words, this essay is the attempt to write the first step of a history of dialetheism. I consider, first, the logico-philosophical terrain in which dialetheism was born: the discussions on what was called at that time 'dialectical logic' and its relation to paraconsistent logic. Second, I highlight what I define a dialectical turn in Richard Routley's thought. Third, I consider Graham Priest's arrival to Australia, which goes hand in hand with the beginning of a longstanding collaboration and friendship with Routley, and provides the conditions for the introduction of the new word at the beginning of the 1980s. I conclude with some reflections about what happens when a new word enters the philosophical world: what is made possible by the new presence? But also: what can get lost, and how can what was lost be recuperated? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. An Inquiry on Fakhr al-Dīn Rāzī's Authorship of Al-Manṭiq al-kabīr (MS Aḥmad iii, no. 3401).
- Author
-
Fallahi, Asadollah
- Subjects
HISTORIANS ,AUTHORSHIP ,LOGICIANS ,LOGIC ,PHILOSOPHY - Abstract
It is quite common among historians of Arabic logic to attribute MS Aḥmad iii, no. 3401, entitled Al-manṭiq al-kabīr (Major [book on] logic), to Fakhr al-Dīn Rāzī. This view is expressed explicitly and forcefully by Franziska Knobel (2015) and Turgut Akyüz and Elmin Aliyev (2020). In this paper, we try to refute this attribution through textual analysis, thereby exposing new evidence to the contrary. We show that the text has several references to Fakhr al-Dīn Rāzī himself as well as to some later logicians such as Rāzī's pupil Zayn al-Dīn Kashshī and the latter's successor Afḍal al-Dīn Khūnajī. We also show that contrary to some contemporary historians, all references to 'kitābunā al-kabīr' ('our major book') in Rāzī's Sharḥ Al-ishārāt do not refer to Al-manṭiq al-kabīr, but to Al-mabāhith al-mashriqiyya. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Carnapian Lessons for Anti-Exceptionalism about Logic.
- Author
-
Becker Arenhart, Jonas Rafael and Ferreira da Cunha, Ivan
- Subjects
EXCEPTIONALISM (Political science) ,LOGIC ,PRAGMATICS ,GENERAL semantics ,PHILOSOPHY of language - Abstract
This paper aims at disentangling two distinct problems in present philosophy of logic: the a priori/a posteriori divide and the theory choice problem. A confusion of these problems is present in the heart of current anti-exceptionalism about logic, as the use of a posteriori methods is identified with theory choice. We illustrate how the division may be preserved in a version of anti-exceptionalism by discussing Carnap's approach, which had both an a priori epistemology and a pragmatic account of logical theory choice. This contributes to illuminate the claim that the current understanding is mistaken in considering Carnap as an exceptionalist, and it also helps us to address one of the difficulties of current anti-exceptionalism, to know, that, by equating a posteriori with theory choice, it requires appeal to framework-independent facts. We suggest that the pragmatic account of both Quine and Carnap to theory choice was advanced precisely to avoid that kind of difficulty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Psychology and Time in Boole's Logic.
- Author
-
Stone, Andrew
- Subjects
LAWS of thought ,PSYCHOLOGISM ,PHENOMENOLOGICAL psychology - Abstract
In the Laws of Thought, Boole establishes a theory of secondary propositions based upon the notion of time. This temporal interpretation of secondary propositions has historically been met with wide disapproval and is usually dismissed in the modern literature as a philosophical non-starter. What was Boole thinking? This paper attempts to give an answer to this question. Specifically, it provides an account according to which Boole's temporal interpretation follows from his psychologistic conception of logic, in addition to certain background assumptions regarding the psychological necessity of the concept of time. Once Boole's psychological premises are laid bare, it becomes clearer how he might have viewed the temporal interpretation to be an essential feature of his theory of secondary propositions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.