Search

Background: Due to the heterogeneity of anatomic anomalies in Ebstein's anomaly (EA), particularly in the subset of patients with atrial septal defect (ASD), hemodynamic changes, which ultimately cause left ventricular (LV) deterioration remain unclear. The current study aimed to investigate the effect of concomitant ASD on LV function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with EA. Methods: This study included 31 EA patients with ASD, 76 EA patients without ASD, 35 patients with simple ASD and 40 healthy controls. Left/right ventricular (RV, the RV was defined as a summation of the functional RV and atrialized RV in EA patients) volumes and functional parameters, LV strain parameters, and echocardiogram indices were compared among the four groups. Associations between variables were evaluated via Spearman or Pearson correlation analyses. The association between risk factors and LV ejection fraction (EF) was determined via multivariate linear regression analysis. Results: Both EA patients and ASD patients had a higher RV/LV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV/LVEDV) as well as lower LV and RV ejection fractions (LVEF/RVEF) compared to healthy controls (all p < 0.05). Moreover, the EA patients with ASD had a significantly higher RVEDV/LVEDV and a lower LVEF and RVEF than those without ASD (all p < 0.05). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that the presence of ASD was independently associated with LVEF (β = − 0.337, p < 0.001). The RVEDV/LVEDV index was associated with LVEF (r = − 0.361, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the LV longitudinal peak diastolic strain rate (PDSR) was lower in EA patients with ASD than those without ASD, patients with simple ASD, and healthy controls (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Concomitant ASD is an important risk factor of LV dysfunction in patients with EA, and diastolic dysfunction is likely the predominate mechanism related to LV dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Progressive cardiomyopathy accounts for almost all mortality among Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients.‍ Thus, our aim was to comprehensively characterize myocardial involvement by investigating the heterogeneity of native T1 mapping in DMD patients using global and regional (including segmental and layer-specific) analysis across a large cohort. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 99 DMD patients (8.8 ± 2.5 years) and 25 matched male healthy controls (9.5 ± 2.5 years). All subjects underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with cine, T1 mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. Native T1 values based on the global and regional myocardium were measured, and LGE was defined. Results: LGE was present in 49 (49%) DMD patients. Global native T1 values were significantly longer in LGE-positive (LGE +) patients than in healthy controls, both in basal slices (1304 ± 55 vs. 1246 ± 27 ms, p < 0.001) and in mid-level slices (1305 ± 57 vs. 1245 ± 37 ms, p < 0.001). No significant difference in global native T1 was found between healthy controls and LGE-negative (LGE−) patients. In segmental analysis, LGE + patients had significantly increased native T1 in all analyzed segments compared to the healthy control group. Meanwhile, the comparison between LGE− patients and healthy controls showed significantly elevated values only in the basal anterolateral segment (1273 ± 62 vs. 1234 ± 40 ms, p = 0.034). Interestingly, the epicardial layer had a significantly higher native T1 in LGE− patients than in healthy controls (p < 0.05), whereas no such pattern was noticed in the global myocardium. Epicardial layer native T1 resulted in the highest diagnostic performance for distinguishing between healthy controls and DMD patients in receiver operating curve analyses (area under the curve [AUC] 0.84 for basal level and 0.85 for middle level) when compared to global native T1 and endocardial layer native T1. Conclusions: Myocardial regional native T1, particularly epicardial native T1, seems to have potential as a novel robust marker of very early cardiac involvement in DMD patients. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx) ChiCTR1800018340, 09/12/2018, Retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]