Search

Purpose Endoxifen is a tamoxifen metabolite with potent antiestrogenic activity. Patients and Methods We performed a phase I study of oral Z-endoxifen to determine its toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity. Eligibility included endocrine-refractory, estrogen receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer. An accelerated titration schedule was applied until moderate or dose-limiting toxicity occurred, followed by a 3+3 design and expansion at 40, 80, and 100 mg per day. Tumor DNA from serum (circulating cell free [cf); all patients] and biopsies [160 mg/day and expansion]) was sequenced. Results Of 41 enrolled patients, 38 were evaluable for MTD determination. Prior endocrine regimens during which progression occurred included aromatase inhibitor (n = 36), fulvestrant (n = 21), and tamoxifen (n = 15). Patients received endoxifen once daily at seven dose levels (20 to 160 mg). Dose escalation ceased at 160 mg per day given lack of MTD and endoxifen concentrations > 1,900 ng/mL. Endoxifen clearance was unaffected by CYP2D6 genotype. One patient (60 mg) had cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (pulmonary embolus). Overall clinical benefit rate (stable > 6 months [n = 7] or partial response by RECIST criteria [n = 3]) was 26.3% (95% CI, 13.4% to 43.1%) including prior tamoxifen progression (n = 3). cfDNA mutations were observed in 13 patients ( PIK3CA [n = 8], ESR1 [n = 5], TP53 [n = 4], and AKT [n = 1]) with shorter progression-free survival ( v those without cfDNA mutations; median, 61 v 132 days; log-rank P = .046). Clinical benefit was observed in those with ESR1 amplification (tumor; 80 mg/day) and ESR1 mutation (cfDNA; 160 mg/day). Comparing tumor biopsies and cfDNA, some mutations ( PIK3CA, TP53, and AKT) were undetected by cfDNA, whereas cfDNA mutations ( ESR1, TP53, and AKT) were undetected by biopsy. Conclusion In endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer, Z-endoxifen provides substantial drug exposure unaffected by CYP2D6 metabolism, acceptable toxicity, and promising antitumor activity.

TPS12136 Background: Patients w advanced cancer participating in Phase I trials carry a high symptom burden from cancer and prior therapies. Our prior work shows patients on phase I trials w multiple active symptoms impacting their immediate quality of life with implications on toxicities and clinical outcomes on subsequent therapy. To identify an effective scalable approach to comprehensive symptom management for patients w adv cancer on phase I trials, we leveraged the increased technology use to design a technology-enhanced symptom management and palliative care intervention (TEC). Methods: Patients w adv cancer seen in the phase I clinic will be given the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) tool of common cancer symptoms to identify those with a high symptom burden defined as ≥4 out of 10 on >1 ESAS symptom and a Global Distress Score (GDS) of ≥20. The GDS, a validated score of overall symptom intensity derived from the ESAS, is comprised of 6 physical (pain, fatigue, nausea, drowsiness, appetite, shortness of breath) & 2 psychosocial symptoms (depression, anxiety), and overall wellbeing. TEC is an innovative patient-centered care program of strategic vigorous symptom management where standard-of-care clinic visits are complemented by proactive symptom monitoring between clinic visits remotely and through provider-initiated calls. In this pilot randomized study, we will determine the effect sizes of High-Intensity TEC (HI-TEC; q3day remote PRO assessments w preset provider-initiated call bw visits), Low-Intensity TEC (LO-TEC; q5day remote PRO assessments w preset provider-initiated call bw visits), and Standard Palliative Care (no preset provider contact bw visits). Our guiding hypothesis is that a comprehensive, proactive, technology-enhanced symptom management program led by a Palliative Care team can mitigate the high symptom burden of patients with advanced cancers enrolling in phase I trials. The primary objective assesses the effect size of each TEC intervention on the GDS measure of symptom burden prior to C1D1 on phase I trial. Our working hypothesis is that HI-TEC and LO-TEC will be associated with a lower overall symptom burden signifying symptom optimization prior to starting on a phase I trial. Secondary objectives aim to estimate the effect size of TEC on the following: Symptom burden over 12 weeks on a phase I trial using ESAS, quality of life using FACIT-Sp, PRO-CTCAE and patient satisfaction using FAMCARE-P13. clinical outcomes at 6 months including OS, treatment outcomes (interruptions, dose reductions, discontinuation, time on trial) and quality metrics for end-of-life (EOL) (chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life, ICU admit in last 30 days of life, death without hospice or < 3d of hospice). Qualitatively assessment of patients’ + caregivers’ perceptions of receiving TEC-based cancer care. Clinical trial information: NCI-2020-07465.

580 Background: Patients (pts) in Cohort A of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 (Alliance) trial of NET for cStage II-III breast cancer were randomized to anastrozole [ANA], letrozole [LET] or exemestane [EXE] for 16-18 weeks (wks). In Cohort B, pts chose between ANA and LET and switched to chemotherapy or surgery if a tumor biopsy after 2-4 wks of NET had Ki67 >10%. Treatments after surgery were not defined by the trial protocol. SET2,3 measures nonproliferation gene expression related to estrogen and progesterone receptors adjusting for a baseline prognostic index that combines clinical tumor and nodal stage and a 4-gene molecular subtype (RNA4) defined by ESR1, PGR, ERBB2 and AURKA. High SET2,3 in a pre-treatment biopsy using cStage information is defined as SET2,3 >1.77. Methods: 379 pts had gene expression data from a research tumor biopsy prior to NET (Agilent 44K microarrays). A bioinformatician blinded to pt treatment and clinical outcomes determined SET2,3. The trial statistician then examined the association between SET2,3 and pharmacodynamic response at 2-4 wks (N=141, Cohort B): Ki67 ≤10% and complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA Ki67 ≤2.7%); pathologic outcomes in pts who completed NET: ypStage 0/1 (N=329, Cohorts A&B), PEPI-0 rate (N=155, Cohort B); and event-free survival (EFS) post-registration (N=244, Cohorts A&B). We used Fisher’s exact tests to assess whether responses, and Cox modeling to evaluate whether EFS, differed with respect to SET2,3 status. Results: High SET2,3 in 48% of pts (183/379) was associated with older age (median: 66 vs 63 years; p=0.012); cStage II (95% vs 75%; p

592 Background: Immune responses in the tumor microenvironment have prognostic and predictive value in BC. However, the potential of immune responses observed in peripheral blood as biomarkers in BC remains unclear. We have shown that a higher frequency of circulating monocytes and a lower frequency of antigen-experienced memory CD8+ T cells are associated with response to NAC in triple negative BC (Leon-Ferre et al SABCS 2019). Here, we used cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF) to evaluate associations between circulating immune cells, clinical features and response to T-based NAC in HER2+ BC. Methods: PBMC suspensions from 36 pts with stage I-III HER2+ BC were prospectively collected prior to initiation of T-based NAC, stained with 29 metal-tagged antibodies optimized to identify major human immune cell subsets, and acquired in the Helios CyTOF instrument. Differential abundance analysis of immune cells by clinical characteristics and by NAC response was evaluated using Wilcoxon rank sum test. % of immune cell subsets is presented as % of all PBMCs. Results: Most pts presented with ER- tumors (56%), measuring > 5cm (64%) and with nodal metastases (78%). After NAC, 16 pts (44%) achieved pathologic complete response (pCR). Analysis of preNAC PBMCs demonstrated a significantly higher number of B cells (8% vs 5%, p = 0.05) and effector memory CD8+ T cells (CD45RA-/CCR7-, 3 vs 1%, p = 0.02) in pts with pCR compared to those with residual disease. Of the B cell subsets, naïve B cells (CD24-/CD27-) were higher in pts who achieved pCR vs not (7% vs 4%, 0 = 0.04). Regarding clinical characteristics, cN+ pts at presentation exhibited a lower number of peripheral blood T cells compared to cN- pts (47% vs 63%, p = 0.03). Of the T cell subsets, overall CD4+ and naïve CD4+ T cells (CD45RA+/CCR7+) were lower in cN+ vs cN- pts (31% vs 45%, p = 0.05; and 11% vs 24%, p = 0.04). We also observed differences in CD56+/CD16- NK cells by ER status (ER- 1% vs ER+ 3%, p = 0.01), and a moderate negative correlation between age and % circulating CD8+ T cells (rho -0.4669, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Distinct peripheral blood immune cell profiles are observed in HER2+ BC at diagnosis, and are associated with response to T-based NAC and initial clinical characteristics. Notably, pts who later achieved pCR had a relative abundance of B cells and effector memory CD8+ T cells at diagnosis. These data suggest that immune cell phenotyping in peripheral blood may have potential as a biomarker to predict response to NAC in BC.

504 Background: For PM patients (pts) with locally advanced ER+ HER2- BC, NET improves breast conservation surgery (BCS) rates, and modified preoperative endocrine prognostic index (mPEPI) 0, defined as pT1-2 pN0 Ki67< 2.7%, or pathologic complete response (pCR: no invasive disease in breast or lymph node) is associated with low risk of recurrence without adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). The ALTERNATE trial was initiated to assess if the endocrine-sensitive disease rate (ESDR: number of mPEPI 0 pts/number of eligible pts initiating NET) with fulvestrant (F) or F+anastrozole (A) is improved relative to A alone (reported here) and if the 5-year (yr) recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate for pts with mPEPI 0 on A alone without CT is ≥ 95% (awaits further follow-up). Methods: PM pts with clinical stage II/III ER+ HER2- BC were randomized 1:1:1 to 1 mg A po daily, 500 mg F IM every 4 week (wk)s after loading dose, or A+F for 6 months. Ki67 was tested centrally on biopsies acquired prior to NET, wk 4, wk 12 and at surgery. Pts with Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12 were recommended to go off protocol-directed ET and switch to CT. Pts with mPEPI 0 at surgery were recommended to continue assigned ET for 1.5 yrs followed by A for a total of 5 yrs ET (and not to receive CT). The primary endpoint of the neoadjuvant phase was ESDR. ESDR of each F arm was compared to that of the A alone arm. With 425 pts per arm, a one-tailed alpha = 0.025 chi-square test of two independent proportions has 84% power to detect an increase of ≥10% in ESDR for F or F+A compared to the A arm, assuming ESDR ≤30% in A. Results: 1362 pts (A 452; F 454; A+F 456) were enrolled Feb 2014 to Nov 2018. 63 pts were excluded (did not start NET). Of the remaining 1299 pts (A 434; F 431, A+F 434), 42% were cN1-3 and 73% were considered candidates for BCS. ESDR was 18.6% (95%CI: 15.1-22.7%) with A, 22.7% (95%CI: 18.9-27.0%) with F, and 20.5% (95%CI: 16.8-24.6%) with A+F. No significant difference in ESDR was found between A and F (p=0.15) or A and A+F (p=0.55). Among the 825 pts with wk 4 Ki67 < 10% who completed NET and surgery, ESDR and the BCS rate were 27.7% and 70.3% with A; 29.6% and 68.1% with F, and 26.8% and 69.9% with A+F, respectively. Conclusion: Neither F nor F+A significantly improved ESDR compared to A alone in PM pts with locally advanced ER+ HER2- BC. RFS data are awaited. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ; NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. Clinical trial information: NCT01953588 .

e18097 Background: AB160 is a 160 nm nano-immunoconjugate consisting of nab-paclitaxel (NP) nanoparticles non-covalently coated with bevacizumab (BEV) for targeted delivery into tissues expressing high levels of vascular-endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Both taxanes (GOG-0129C, GOG-0126R, GOG-0127V) and BEV (GOG-0229E, AURELIA, GOG-0227C) have demonstrated clinical activity in previously treated metastatic endometrial cancer (EC), ovarian cancer (OC), and cervical cancer (CC), respectively. Methods: A 3+3 phase I trial was conducted in patients with EC, platinum-resistant OC and CC who had prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease to determine the maximum tolerated dose of AB160 administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The starting dose level (DL1) was NP at 125 mg/m2 with BEV at 50 mg/m2. There were 2 higher dose levels: DL2 (NP at 150 mg/m2 with BEV at 60 mg/m2) and DL3 (NP at 175 mg/m2 with BEV at 70 mg/m2). Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) included grade (G) 4 neutropenia or anemia, PLT < 25,000, serum creatinine ≥2 times baseline, G2-4 neurologic toxicity or G3-4 non-hematologic toxicities. Disease evaluations were conducted after every 2 treatment cycles using RECIST criteria. Patients were treated until disease progression or intolerability. Samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. Results: Nine women 41 – 74 years of age (median 57) have enrolled (5 with EC and 4 with OC); data are available for the first 8. No DLTs have been observed among the 3 women enrolled on DL1, 3 women on DL2, and 2 women on DL3. All 3 patients on DL3 continue on treatment. The other 6 patients have discontinued due to adverse reactions (3), progression (2), and patient choice (1). The median number of cycles administered is 6 (4-14). The most common severe (G3/4) toxicities include neutropenia (37.5%) and leukopenia (25%). There have been 5 partial responses (62.5%): 1 on DL1 and 2 each on DL2 and DL3. PK evaluation is pending. Conclusions: AB160 therapy is safe and demonstrates promising clinical activity in patients with previously treated metastatic gynecologic malignancies. Further clinical testing is being pursued in this patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT02020707.

Purpose Less than 20% of patients with melanoma who undergo sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy based on American Society of Clinical Oncology/Society of Surgical Oncology recommendations are SLN positive. We present a multi-institutional study to discover new molecular risk factors associated with SLN positivity in thin and intermediate-thickness melanoma. Patients and Methods Gene clusters with functional roles in melanoma metastasis were discovered by next-generation sequencing and validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction using a discovery set of 73 benign nevi, 76 primary cutaneous melanoma, and 11 in-transit melanoma metastases. We then used polymerase chain reaction to quantify gene expression in a model development cohort of 360 consecutive thin and intermediate-thickness melanomas and a validation cohort of 146 melanomas. Outcome of interest was SLN biopsy metastasis within 90 days of melanoma diagnosis. Logic and logistic regression analyses were used to develop a model for the likelihood of SLN metastasis from molecular, clinical, and histologic variables. Results ITGB3, LAMB1, PLAT, and TP53 expression were associated with SLN metastasis. The predictive ability of a model that included these molecular variables in combination with clinicopathologic variables (patient age, Breslow depth, and tumor ulceration) was significantly greater than a model that only considered clinicopathologic variables and also performed well in the validation cohort (area under the curve, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.97; false-positive and false-negative rates of 22% and 0%, respectively, using a 10% cutoff for predicted SLN metastasis risk). Conclusion The addition of cell adhesion–linked gene expression variables to clinicopathologic variables improves the identification of patients with SLN metastases within 90 days of melanoma diagnosis.

Purpose Positive interim analysis findings from four large adjuvant trials evaluating trastuzumab in patients with early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive breast cancer were first reported in 2005. One of these reports, the joint analysis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group NCCTG N9831 (Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With HER2-Overexpressing Breast Cancer) and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project NSABP B-31 (Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Plus Paclitaxel With or Without Trastuzumab in Treating Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer That Overexpresses HER2), was updated in 2011. We now report the planned definitive overall survival (OS) results from this joint analysis along with updates on the disease-free survival (DFS) end point. Methods In all, 4,046 patients with HER2-positive operable breast cancer were enrolled to receive doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab in both trials. The required number of events for the definitive statistical analysis for OS (710 events) was reached in September 2012. Updated analyses of overall DFS and related subgroups were also performed. Results Median time on study was 8.4 years. Adding trastuzumab to chemotherapy led to a 37% relative improvement in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.73; P < .001) and an increase in 10-year OS rate from 75.2% to 84%. These results were accompanied by an improvement in DFS of 40% (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.68; P < .001) and increase in 10-year DFS rate from 62.2% to 73.7%. All patient subgroups benefited from addition of this targeted anti-HER2 agent. Conclusion The addition of trastuzumab to paclitaxel after doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer results in a substantial and durable improvement in survival as a result of a sustained marked reduction in cancer recurrence.

86 Background: Optimal benefits from palliative cancer care (PC) are achieved when first consults (PC1) occur early, ideally in the outpatient setting. Late PC1, such as those occurring in the intensive care unit (ICU), limit the benefits of PC and are a poor indicator of the integration of PC and oncology. Our aim was to determine the proportion of PC1 over time in three clinical settings: outpatient clinic (OPC), ICU, and inpatient non-ICU (IP). We also examined patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics and the timing of PC access (from PC1 to death or last contact) by the setting of PC1. Methods: We evaluated consecutive administrative/billing records to ascertain the annual number of PC1 and its distribution across settings from 2011 to 2017. ICU PC1 (n = 309) and a random sample of an equal number of OPC and IP PC1 were reviewed to retrieve patients’ demographics, clinical characteristics, and date of death/last contact. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to determine trend differences in the proportion of PC1 among settings. Results: The total annual number of PC1 increased by 58% from 2011 (n = 2286) to 2017 (n = 3615). We found a significant decreasing trend in the proportion of PC1 at the ICU (from 2.3% in 2011 to 1% in 2017, p < 0.001). There were no significant changes over time in the proportion of PC1 at OPC versus inpatient settings (p = 0.2). Hematologic cancer patients were more likely to have a PC1 at the ICU (p < .001). PC1 at ICU accessed PC much later, median survival (95% CI) after PC1 in months: OPC= 7.7 (6.3 - 9.7); IP= 3.4, (2.4 - 4.5), ICU= 0.1 (0.1, 0.1), p < .01). Conclusions: Over time, the total annual number of PC1 has increased and the proportion of PC1 at ICU, a very late clinical setting, is decreasing. Further efforts are needed to promote early PC referrals for patients with hematologic malignancies.

Purpose Trastuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The clinical benefits of adjuvant trastuzumab have been demonstrated in interim analyses of four large trials. Initial data of the combined analysis of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831 Intergroup trial and National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-31 trial were reported in 2005. Long-term follow-up results on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) have been awaited. Patients and Methods Patients with HER2-positive operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab in the NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31 trials. The similar design of both trials allowed data from the control and trastuzumab-containing arms to be combined in a joint analysis. Results At 3.9 years of median follow-up, there continues to be a highly statistically significant reduction in DFS event rate in favor of the trastuzumab-containing arm (P < .001). Similarly, there continues to be a statistically significant 39% reduction in death rate in favor of the trastuzumab-containing arm (P < .001). Conclusion These data demonstrate consistent DFS and OS advantages of adjuvant trastuzumab over time, with the longest follow-up reported to date. The clinical benefits continue to outweigh the risks of adverse effects.

Purpose Objective tumor response rates observed in phase II trials for metastatic melanoma have historically not provided a reliable indicator of meaningful survival benefits. To facilitate using overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) as an endpoint for future phase II trials, we evaluated historical data from cooperative group phase II trials to attempt to develop benchmarks for OS and PFS as reference points for future phase II trials. Patients and Methods Individual-level and trial-level data were obtained for patients enrolled onto 42 phase II trials (70 trial arms) that completed accrual in the years 1975 through 2005 and conducted by Southwest Oncology Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, North Central Cancer Treatment Group, and the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic variables, and between-trial(-arm) variability in 1-year OS rates and 6-month PFS rates were examined. Results Statistically significant individual-level and trial-level prognostic factors found in a multivariate survival analysis for OS were performance status, presence of visceral disease, sex, and whether the trial excluded patients with brain metastases. Performance status, sex, and age were statistically significant prognostic factors for PFS. Controlling for these prognostic variables essentially eliminated between-trial variability in 1-year OS rates but not in 6-month PFS rates. Conclusion Benchmarks are provided for 1-year OS or OS curves that make use of the distribution of prognostic factors of the patients in the phase II trial. A similar benchmark for 6-month PFS is provided, but its use is more problematic because of residual between-trial variation in this endpoint.

PurposeFulvestrant is an antiestrogen that leads to estrogen receptor degradation and has demonstrated efficacy in breast cancer patients who have had disease recurrence or progression after tamoxifen. This study was designed to examine the efficacy and toxicity of fulvestrant in patients with disease progression on a third-generation aromatase inhibitor (AI).Patients and MethodsA one-stage phase II trial was conducted in postmenopausal women with measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria who experienced disease progression after treatment with a third-generation AI and, at most, one additional hormonal agent. Tumors must have been estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor positive. The primary end point was objective response rate, and secondary end points were time to disease progression, survival, duration of response, and toxicity.ResultsEighty patients were enrolled, and three were ineligible. Characteristics of the 77 eligible patients included median age of 68 years, performance score of 0 or 1 in 91% of patients, visceral dominant disease in 88% of patients, two prior hormonal treatments in 73% of patients, and prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease in 32% of patients. Eleven patients (14.3%) achieved a partial response, and 16 patients (20.8%) had stable disease for at least 6 months, for a clinical benefit rate of 35%. Antitumor activity seemed to be higher in women with prior treatment with AI alone compared with women whose prior treatment also included tamoxifen. Median time to progression was 3 months, and median survival time was 20.2 months. Fulvestrant was well tolerated.ConclusionFulvestrant is a well-tolerated treatment and has efficacy against breast cancers that have progressed after therapy with a third-generation AI.

Purpose To evaluate changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after four cycles of adjuvant doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (node-positive or node-negative) breast cancer enrolled onto the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 Intergroup Adjuvant Trial. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive standard doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by (1) weekly paclitaxel for 12 weeks; (2) weekly paclitaxel for 12 weeks, then weekly trastuzumab for 52 weeks; or (3) weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab for 12 weeks, then weekly trastuzumab for 40 weeks. LVEF was monitored before and after AC. Results Of the 1,576 eligible patients who completed AC, 1,458 had pre- and post-AC LVEF measurements taken using the same methodology (multiple-gated acquisition in 1,153 patients and echocardiogram in 305 patients). Among these 1,458 patients, 745 (51.1%) had ≤ 15% decrease in LVEF and LVEF that remained at or above the radiologic lower limit of normal (LLN); 42 patients (2.9%) had ≤ 15% decrease in LVEF and LVEF that decreased to or below the LLN; and 37 patients (2.5%) had an LVEF decrease of more than 15%. There was grade 2 LVEF toxicity in 96 (6.6%) of the 1,458 patients. Conclusion Standard AC chemotherapy is associated with frequent decreases in LVEF, which are noted when measured 3 weeks after completion of the fourth cycle. Patients are being observed to determine the long-term significance of this and the potential impact on subsequent treatment options.

10121 Background: Palliative Care referral is often thought to be delayed as judged by health professionals and caregivers. However, no studies have ever examined patients’ perception of timeliness of referral. The primary objective of this study was to determine patients’ perception of the timeliness of their own referral to an outpatient palliative care clinic. We also examined the association between perceived timeliness and actual timing of referral. Methods: In this prospective survey, patients with advanced cancer were asked to rate their perceived timeliness of referral using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from much too early to much too late within 7-35 days after their first consultation visit at Supportive Care Center. They were also asked when they felt referral to Supportive Care should occur along 4 points in their disease trajectory. Actual timing of referral was assessed based on survival from the timing of completion of the survey. Results: 200 advanced cancer patients were surveyed. Median age was 64, 111 (55%) were female, and 35 (18%), 32 (16%) and 26 (13%) had gastrointestinal, lung and breast cancer, respectively. The median overall survival was 8.5 months. 144 (72%) patients perceived their referral was “just in time,” 42 (21%) felt it was “late/much too late,” and 14 (7%) felt it was much “too early/early.” 76/193 (39%) felt the referral should occur at the time of diagnosis of cancer, 32 (17%) when they start first-line chemotherapy, 46 (24%) at diagnosis of recurrent disease, 14 (7%) when there are no further treatment options, and 4 (2%) reported never. We found no significant difference in survival among patients who reported their referral was early, just in time, and late (median 9.8 vs. 8.3 vs. 9.0 months, P=0.43). Conclusions: Patients with advanced cancer were referred to our outpatient Supportive Care clinic a median of 8.5 months before death. A vast majority of patients perceived the timing of referral was appropriate, and many agreed that referral should occur early in the disease trajectory. The lack of association between perceived timeliness of referral and survival may be related to the ceiling effect and the small number of patients who felt their referral was late.

3034 Background: Unique to modern immune therapy for cancer is that early in the course of treatment, patients frequently exhibit transient tumor enlargement (pseudo-progression, pPROG) due to tumor infiltration by lymphocytes (TIL). Currently, pPROG cannot be reliably distinguished from true tumor progression (PROG). There is a need for biomarker techniques to discriminate pPROG (effect of therapy) and PROG (therapy failure). Nuclear medicine offers radiopharmaceuticals capable of imaging immune cells; images can be fused to evaluate functional and anatomic characteristics of tumors, and potentially discriminate pPROG from PROG. Methods: In our study of metastatic melanoma patients, SPECT/CT imaging with 99mTc-interleukin-2 (99mTc-IL2) was performed to visualize TIL. Images were collected before/after 12 weeks of ipilimumab (IPI) or pembrolizomab (PEMBRO) therapy. The 99mTc-IL2 tracer was synthesized by conjugating succinimidyl-6-hydrazinopyridine-3-carboxylate (HYNIC-NHS) with commercial interleukin-2 (Aldesleukin). HYNIC-IL2 was incubated with tricine, 99mTcO4- (370-740 MBq) and SnCl2. After labelling 99mTc-IL2 was purified by reverse-phase chromatography and diluted in 5% glucose with 0.1% human albumin before injection. Five patients were enrolled in this study. Two patients failed to complete the 12 week 99mTc-IL2 scan due to discontinuation of IPI after: 1) grade 3 colitis and 2) patient refusal for adverse events attributed to IPI. No adverse events attributable to the tracer infusion were reported. Results: Metastatic lesions could be visualized by the tracer. Some lesions decreased in size, while others increased. A positive correlation was found between size and 99mTc-IL2 uptake, before and after therapy, suggesting the potential discrimination of tumor PROG (no 99mTc-IL2 uptake) from pPROG (high 99mTc-IL2 uptake). Immunohistochemical staining for TIL of 99mTc-IL2 positive and negative lesions are illustrated. Conclusions: The results demonstrate feasibility of 99mTc-IL2 imaging as a clinically useful tool capable of discriminating tumor PROG from pPROG. A clinical validation study is in progress. Clinical trial information: NCT01789827.

1043 Background: In estrogen receptor (ER) positive MBC, mutations (e.g. ESR1), identified from tumor biopsies or cfDNA, confer resistance. The concordance between mutations observed in tumor and cfDNA and the implications for response to Z-endoxifen, a potent anti-estrogen, are unknown. Methods: We previously conducted a phase I trial of Z-endoxifen in endocrine refractory, ER positive MBC. Seven dose levels were considered ranging from 20 to 160 mg/day followed by expansion cohorts (EC) of 40, 80, and 100 mg/day. Pretreatment blood samples (all pts) and fresh tumor biopsies (EC) were collected prospectively. Tumor and cfDNA were evaluated by targeted NGS. Results: 41 pts (38 evaluable) were enrolled. Prior endocrine therapy included aromatase inhibitors (37/38, 97%), fulvestrant (22/38, 58%) and tamoxifen (26/38, 68%). Substantial endoxifen exposure without DLTs at doses above 80 mg/day led to a halt in dose escalation and opening of the EC. Overall clinical benefit (stable > 6 months [7 pts.] or partial response by RECIST criteria [3 pts.]) rate was 26.3% (95%CI: 13.4-43.1%). cfDNA was obtained from 36 pts and mutations were identified in 13 (36%) including ESR1 [ Y537N or D538G] (5), PIK3CA [ H1047R or E542K] (8), TP53 [ K132R, R248Q, R267Q, or H179Y] (4), AKT ( Q79K) (1), and KRAS ( G12D) (1). In 5 pts with cf ESR1 mutations, 4 had additional cfDNA mutations including PIK3CA (3), and TP53 (1). PFS was shorter in pts with cfDNA mutations relative to those without (median: 61 vs.132 days; log-rank p = 0.021). Discordance was observed between tumor and cfDNA mutations where 3/7 PIK3CA tumor mutations were detected by cfDNA, 1/2 TP53 tumor mutations were detected by cfDNA, and 0/1 AKT tumor mutations were detected by cfDNA. Conversely, 2 pts had cfDNA mutations (either ESR1, TP53 or AKT) undetected in tumor. Conclusions: The absence of cfDNA mutations in patients with endocrine resistant, MBC treated with Z-Endoxifen was associated with significantly longer PFS. Given the discordance between tumor and cfDNA sequence data, future studies must determine which approach maximizes prognosis and prediction of benefit for estrogen-targeted therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01327781.

e13596 Background: Pazopanib is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor approved for use in renal cell carcinoma and soft tissue sarcoma and has also shown benefit in other cancers. Macrocytosis has been...

e14028 Background: Folate receptor alpha (FRα) is overexpressed by multiple cancers, including breast and ovarian cancers. Endogenous T-cell immunity to each of five degenerate peptides from FRα (F...

6026 Background: Pazopanib is a small molecule inhibitor of kinases principally including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR)-1,-2, and -3, platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFR)-α and –β; and c-Kit. We previously reported a tumor response rate of 49% in patients with advanced differentiated thyroid cancer and 0% in patients with advanced anaplastic thyroid cancer. The present report details results of pazopanib therapy in advanced medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Methods: Having noted preclinical activity of pazopanib in MTC, patients with advanced MTC who had disease progression within the preceding 6 months were accrued to this multi-institutional international Phase II clinical trial to assess tumor response rate (by RECIST criteria) and safety of pazopanib given orally once daily at 800 mg until disease progression or intolerability. Results: From September 22, 2008 to December 11, 2011, 35 individuals (80% males, median age 60 years) were enrolled. All patients have been fo...

e17042 Background: Historical outcomes in ATC have been highly discouraging. However, in response to aggressive first-line therapy combining intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and multiag...

11130 Background: Use of next generation sequencing (NGS) in the neoadjuvant setting results in identification of drug targets/pathways associated with chemotherapy resistance. PDX may be superior ...

We thank Magne et al for their thoughtful comments. The issue of cardiac toxicity from trastuzumab used in combination with radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer remains an important one as women continue to be treated with both of these modalities. We emphasized in our work the need for longer follow-up in these patients treated with both trastuzumab and RT to determine whether our findings of lack of increased cardiac toxicity remain true over a greater length of time. Often cardiac manifestations of RT may not manifest until a decade or more after therapy. We performed two analyses to date evaluating cardiac toxicity acutely up to 14 months after commencement of RT, including the current analysis with a median follow-up of 3.7 years. Future analysis of is planned in the future given the known possibility of late occurrences of cardiac toxicity from RT in breast cancer treatment. Long-term monitoring of ejection fraction and of clinical events for at least 10 additional years from study entry is planned. We agree that great attention must be given to RT planning parameters relative to all critical normal structures that pose a risk for adverse events. In our trial, RT treatment planning details were not collected. Therefore, we are unable to comment on the cardiac volume irradiated in these patients. When our study was developed more than a decade ago, some RT techniques for internal mammary irradiation were known to be associated with greater coincident irradiation of the heart and with cardiac mortality. We were in uncharted territory at that time, so our approach was to prohibit irradiation of the internal mammary nodes in order to minimize the volume of heart irradiated as a safety precaution. More recently, some studies do suggest that patients treated in the older RT era experienced excess cardiac morbidity compared with those treated with more modern techniques where the irradiated cardiac volume is reduced. The use of more modern radiation treatment planning techniques, including three-dimensional computed tomography– based tools, has aided in cardiac sparing in breast cancer therapy. However, additional assessment of these more modern RT techniques, including those used in combination with newer systemic chemotherapeutic agents, is needed to assess the incidence of long-term development of cardiac issues. Despite the lack of longer-term information, we maintain that our recent study provides some assurance that the concurrent administration of RT and trastuzumab is associated with a safety profile that supports its use in contemporary practice. It is imperative that long-term analysis is conducted, and we, indeed, value the need for additional follow-up.