Search

Background and Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effect of stenting‐related factors, including endoscopists' expertise, on clinical outcomes after bridge‐to‐surgery (BTS) stenting for obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: We analyzed BTS stenting‐related factors, including stenting expertise and the interval between stenting and surgery, in 233 patients (63 [13] years, 137 male) who underwent BTS stenting for obstructive CRC. We evaluated the influence of these factors on post‐BTS stenting clinical outcomes such as stent‐related complications and cancer recurrence. Results: The interval between stenting and surgery was ≤ 7 days in 79 patients (33.9%) and > 7 days in 154 patients (66.1%). BTS stenting was performed by endoscopists with ≤ 50, 51–100, and > 100 prior stenting experiences in 94, 43, and, 96 patients, respectively. The clinical success rate of BTS stenting was 93.1%. Stent‐related and postoperative complications developed in 19 (8.2%) and 20 (8.6%) patients, respectively. Cancer recurrence occurred in 76 patients (32.6%). Short BTS interval of ≤ 7 days increased the risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR], 2.61 [1.03–6.75]; P = 0.043). Endoscopists' stenting experience > 100 showed greater clinical success of stenting (OR, 5.50 [1.45–28.39]; P = 0.021) and fewer stent‐related complications (OR, 0.26 [0.07–0.80]; P = 0.028) compared with stenting experience ≤ 50. BTS stenting‐related factors did not affect long‐term oncological outcomes. Conclusion: Greater expertise of endoscopists was associated with better short‐term outcomes, including high stenting success rate and low rate of stent‐related complications after BTS stenting for obstructive CRC. An interval of > 7 days between BTS stenting and surgery was required to decrease postoperative complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: The clinical impact of perianal Crohn's disease (CD) (pCD), a well‐known poor prognostic factor of CD, has not been fully evaluated in Asian patients. We investigated the outcomes of CD in Korean patients according to the presence of pCD at CD diagnosis. Methods: Using 2010–2014 data from the national health insurance claims database, we evaluated the disease course of CD according to the presence of pCD at CD diagnosis. The results were verified in a hospital‐based cohort of 2923 patients. Results: The cumulative risk of intestinal resection was lower in patients with pCD at diagnosis than in those without, in the population‐based cohort (9.1% vs 14.7% at 5 years after diagnosis, P < 0.001), but it was similar between the two groups in the hospital‐based cohort (36.8% vs 36.8% at 10 years after diagnosis, P = 0.950). Moreover, the cumulative risk of behavioral progression was not significantly different between the two groups in the hospital‐based cohort (43.4% vs 41.6% at 10 years after diagnosis, P = 0.366). On multivariable analysis, pCD at CD diagnosis was not a predictor of intestinal resection, behavioral progression, CD‐related hospital admission, or diverting surgery; however, it was an independent predictor of proctectomy (hazard ratio [HR] 3.210, P < 0.001) and anorectal cancer (HR 3.104, P = 0.047). Conclusions: Although the presence of pCD increased the risk of proctectomy and anorectal cancer in Asian patients, the clinical impact of pCD on the overall outcomes of patients with CD may be less significant in Asian patients compared with Western patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]