Search

Background Immune allosensitization can be triggered by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF LVAD). However, the effect of this type of allosensitization on post-transplant outcomes remains controversial. This study examined the post-transplant course in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing transplantation with and without LVAD bridging. Methods We included consecutive patients who were considered for cardiac transplant from 2006 to 2015. Serum alloantibodies were detected with single-antigen beads on the Luminex platform (One Lambda Inc., Canoga Park, CA). Allosensitization was defined as calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) > 10%. cPRA was determined at multiple times. LVAD-associated allosensitization was defined as development of cPRA > 10% in patients with cPRA ≤ 10% before LVAD implantation. Post-transplant outcomes of interest were acute cellular rejection (ACR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and survival. Results Allosensitization status was evaluated in 268 patients (20% female). Mean age was 52 ± 12 years, and 132 (49.3%) received CF LVADs. After LVAD implant, 30 patients (23%) became newly sensitized, and the level of sensitization appeared to diminish in many of these patients while awaiting transplant. During the study period, 225 of 268 patients underwent transplant, and 43 did not. A CF LVAD was used to bridge 50% of the transplant recipients. Compared with patients without new sensitization or those already sensitized at baseline, the patients with LVAD-associated sensitization had a higher risk of ACR ( p = 0.049) and higher risk of AMR ( p = 0.018) but a similar intermediate-term post-transplant survival. The patients who did not receive a transplant had higher level of allosensitization, with a baseline cPRA of 20% vs 6% in those who received an allograft and a high risk (40%) of death during follow-up. Conclusions New allosensitization takes place in > 20% of patents supported with CF LVADs. Among patients who undergo transplant, this results in a higher risk of ACR and AMR, but survival remains favorable, likely due to the efficacy of current management after transplant. However, mortality in sensitized patients who do not reach transplant remains high, and new approaches are necessary to meet the needs of this group of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Organ transplant candidates with serum antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) face longer waiting times and higher mortality while awaiting transplantation. This study examined the accuracy of virtual crossmatch, in which recipient HLA-specific antibodies, identified by solid-phase assays, are compared to the prospective donor HLA-type in heart transplantation. Methods: We examined the accuracy of virtual crossmatch in predicting immune compatibility of donors and recipients in heart transplantation and clinical outcomes in immunologically sensitized heart transplant recipients in whom virtual crossmatch was used in allograft allocation. Results: Based on analysis of 257 T-cell antihuman immunoglobulin complement-dependent cytotoxic (AHG-CDC) crossmatch tests, the positive predictive value of virtual crossmatch (the likelihood of an incompatible virtual crossmatch resulting in an incompatible T-cell CDC-AHG crossmatch) was 79%, and the negative predictive value of virtual crossmatch (the likelihood of a compatible virtual crossmatch resulting in a compatible T-cell CDC-AHG crossmatch) was 92%. When used in a cohort of 28 sensitized patients awaiting heart transplantation, 14 received allografts based on a compatible virtual crossmatch alone from donors in geographically distant locations. Compared with the other 14 sensitized patients who underwent transplant after a compatible prospective serologic crossmatch, the rejection rates and survival were similar. Conclusion: Our findings are evidence of the accuracy of virtual crossmatch and its utility in augmenting the opportunities for transplantation of sensitized patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation before heart transplantation has been associated with formation of antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigens (HLA), often referred to as sensitization. This study investigated whether prior sensitization or LVAD type affected the degree of post-implantation sensitization. The records of consecutive HeartMate (HM) I and HM II LVAD patients were reviewed. Panel reactive antibody (PRA) was assessed before LVAD implantation and biweekly thereafter. Sensitization was defined as PRA > 10%, and high-degree sensitization was defined as PRA > 90%. An HM LVAD was implanted in 64 patients, and 11 received a HM II LVAD as a bridge to transplant. Ten HM I patients (16%) were sensitized before LVAD implantation (HM I-S), and 54 (84%) were not (HM I-Non-S). Nine HM I-S patients (90%) became highly sensitized (PRA > 90%) compared with 9 HM I-Non-S patients (16.7%; p < 0.001). The PRA remained elevated (> 90%) in 8 of the 9 (88.9%) highly sensitized HM I-S patients vs 5 of the 9 (55.6%) HM I-Non-S highly sensitized patients. The PRA levels in the rest of the HM I-S highly sensitized patients declined from 93% ± 4% to 55% ± 15% (p = 0.01). Among the 11 HM II patients, 1 (9%) was sensitized before LVAD implantation (PRA, 40%) and the PRA moderately increased to 80%. No other HM II patient became sensitized after implantation. Thus, 1 of 11 (9%) HM II patients became sensitized compared with 29 of 64 (45%) HM I patients (p = 0.04). Pre-sensitized patients are at higher risk for becoming and remaining highly HLA-allosensitized after LVAD implantation. The HeartMate II LVAD appears to cause less sensitization than HeartMate I. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]