Search

Objective: To evaluate the effect of our uniquely designed beating heart simulator for coronary artery bypass surgery residency training., Methods: The balloon of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was inserted into the left ventricle of an isolated porcine heart to form a beating heart simulator. This model simulated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG), and the nonbeating heart model simulated the on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCABG) for training of surgeons. From 2017 to 2019, 60 trainees were randomly divided into nonbeating and beating heart simulator training groups. The training period was 3 months. The performance of anastomosis was evaluated at the beginning (after 1 month), midpoint (after 2 months), and at the end of the assessment (after 3 months)., Results: Trainees improved their performance of coronary artery anastomosis respectively after 3 months of training, whether they were trained on beating heart simulator or nonbeating heart simulator (P < .05). On both nonbeating and beating heart simulator test, trainees in the beating group performed better than those in the nonbeating group in the use of microsurgical instruments, anastomotic quality, and anastomotic speed after 3 months of training (P < .05)., Conclusions: The effect of our uniquely developed beating heart simulator training was better than those of nonbeating heart simulator for OPCABG and ONCABG training of surgeons during residency., (Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In recent years, concerns have been raised about the learning opportunities available to cardiac surgical trainees. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the impact of trainee operator status on clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery., Methods: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies that reported CABG outcomes according to the training status of the primary operator (consultant vs trainee). Data were independently extracted by 2 investigators; a meta-analysis was conducted according to predefined clinical endpoints., Results: Sixteen observational studies (n = 52,966) met criteria for inclusion, with 8 studies (n = 36,479) reporting propensity-adjusted analyses. Trainee cases were associated with increased aortic crossclamp duration (mean difference: 4.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-8.83) and cardiopulmonary bypass duration (mean difference: 4.24; 95% CI, 0.00-8.47). Perioperative mortality was similar for CABG performed primarily by trainees versus consultants (odds ratio 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.18). No significant difference was found in the incidence of perioperative stroke, myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, reoperation for bleeding, or wound infection. Trainee operator status was not associated with increased midterm mortality (hazard ratio 1.00; 95% CI, 0.90-1.11). In subgroup analysis that included 5 studies and 8025 patients, off-pump CABG trainee cases were not associated with increased perioperative mortality or morbidity., Conclusions: With appropriate supervision, conventional CABG can be performed by trainee surgeons without an adverse impact on perioperative outcomes or midterm survival. Data regarding off-pump CABG are limited, and further research is warranted to ascertain the impact of trainee operator status on long-term outcomes after off-pump CABG., (Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We hypothesized that increased postgraduate surgical experience correlates with improved operative efficiency and long-term survival in standard cardiac surgery procedures., Methods: Utilizing a prospectively collected retrospective database, we identified patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n = 3726), aortic valve replacement (AVR) (n = 1626), mitral valve repair (n = 731), mitral valve replacement (MVR) (n = 324), and MVR + AVR (n = 184) from January 2002 through June 2012. After adjusting for patient risk and surgeon variability, we evaluated the influence of surgeon experience on cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp times, and long-term survival., Results: Mean surgeon experience after fellowship graduation was 16.0 ± 11.7 years (range, 1.0-35.2 years). After adjusting for patient risk and surgeon-level fixed effects, learning curve analyses demonstrated improvements in cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp times with increased surgeon experience. There was marginal improvement in the predictability (R(2) value) of cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp time for CABG with the addition of surgeon experience; however, all other procedures had marked increases in the R(2) following addition of surgeon experience. Cox proportional hazard models revealed that increased surgeon experience was associated with improved long-term survival in AVR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; P < .0001), mitral valve repair (HR, 0.73; P < .0001), and MVR + AVR (HR, 0.95; P = .006) but not in CABG (HR, 0.80; P = .15), and a trend toward significance in MVR (HR, 0.87; P = .09)., Conclusions: In cardiac surgery, not including CABG, surgeon experience is an important determinant of operative efficiency and of long-term survival., (Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Previous work has demonstrated high inter-rater reliability in the objective assessment of simulated anastomoses among experienced educators. We evaluated the inter-rater reliability of less-experienced educators and the impact of focused training with a video-embedded coronary anastomosis assessment tool., Methods: Nine less-experienced cardiothoracic surgery faculty members from different institutions evaluated 2 videos of simulated coronary anastomoses (1 by a medical student and 1 by a resident) at the Thoracic Surgery Directors Association Boot Camp. They then underwent a 30-minute training session using an assessment tool with embedded videos to anchor rating scores for 10 components of coronary artery anastomosis. Afterward, they evaluated 2 videos of a different student and resident performing the task. Components were scored on a 1 to 5 Likert scale, yielding an average composite score. Inter-rater reliabilities of component and composite scores were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and overall pass/fail ratings with kappa., Results: All components of the assessment tool exhibited improvement in reliability, with 4 (bite, needle holder use, needle angles, and hand mechanics) improving the most from poor (ICC range, 0.09-0.48) to strong (ICC range, 0.80-0.90) agreement. After training, inter-rater reliabilities for composite scores improved from moderate (ICC, 0.76) to strong (ICC, 0.90) agreement, and for overall pass/fail ratings, from poor (kappa = 0.20) to moderate (kappa = 0.78) agreement., Conclusions: Focused, video-based anchor training facilitates greater inter-rater reliability in the objective assessment of simulated coronary anastomoses. Among raters with less teaching experience, such training may be needed before objective evaluation of technical skills., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: No previous studies have specifically addressed the effect of training on outcomes after concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting. This study evaluated the early and late outcomes after concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting performed by surgeons in training., Methods: A retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively by the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Database between June 2001 and December 2009 was performed. Concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 2540 patients; of these procedures, 290 (11.4%) were by trainees. Patient demographics, intraoperative characteristics, and early morbidity were compared between trainee and staff cases using chi-square analysis and t tests. Multivariate analyses were used to determine the independent association of training status with 30-day and late mortality., Results: Compared with staff cases, trainee cases were younger (mean age, 73.0 vs 74.2 years; P = .025) and less likely to present with triple vessel disease (27.9% vs 38.3%, P = .001) or previous cardiac surgery (6.3% vs 2.8%, P = .016). Trainee cases had longer mean perfusion (160.4 vs 144.6 minutes, P < .001) and crossclamp (125.2 vs 114.6 minutes, P < .001) times. The incidence of early complications was similar between the 2 groups. On multivariate analysis, trainee status was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality (2.4% vs 4.0%, P = .348). Moreover, there was no significant difference in long-term outcomes, and 5-year survival was comparable in both groups (79.6% vs 77.4%, P = .200)., Conclusions: Concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting can be safely and effectively performed by properly supervised trainees in the contemporary era. It is imperative to offer training opportunities to junior surgeons in this complex procedure to ensure quality patient outcomes in the future., (Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Individual surgeon experience and the cumulative experience of the surgical team have both been implicated as factors that influence surgical efficiency. We sought to quantitatively evaluate the effects of both individual surgeon experience and the cumulative experience of attending surgeon-cardiothoracic fellow collaborations in isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures., Methods: Using a prospectively collected retrospective database, we analyzed all medical records of patients undergoing isolated CABG procedure at our institution. We used multivariate generalized estimating equation regression models to adjust for patient mix and subsequently evaluated the effect of both attending cardiac surgeon experience (since fellowship graduation) and the number of previous collaborations between attending cardiac surgeons and cardiothoracic fellow pairs on cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp times., Results: From 2001 to 2010, 4068 consecutive patients underwent isolated CABG procedure at our institution performed by 11 attending cardiac surgeons and 73 cardiothoracic fellows. Mean attending experience after fellowship graduation was 10.9 ± 8.0 years and mean number of cases between unique pairs of attending cardiac surgeons and cardiothoracic fellows was 10.0 ± 10.0 cases. After patient risk adjustment, both attending surgical experience since fellowship graduation and the number of previous collaborations between attending surgeons and cardiothoracic fellows were significantly associated with a reduction in cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp times (P < .001). The influence of attending-fellow pair experience far exceeded the influence of surgical experience with beta estimates for attending-fellow pair experience nearly three times that of attending surgeon experience., Conclusions: Cumulative experience of attending cardiac surgeons and cardiothoracic fellows has a dramatic effect on both cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp times, whereas attending cardiac surgeon learning curves following fellowship graduation are clinically insignificant. Taken together, these findings suggest that the primary driver of operative efficiency in CABG procedure is the collaborative experience of the attending surgeon-cardiothoracic fellow operative team, rather than the individual experience of the attending surgeon., (Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is an established procedure in many cardiothoracic centers. For it to be widely applicable, however, teaching methods must be developed for surgical trainees. Early clinical outcomes and long-term survival of patients who underwent OPCAB at our institution by trainees supervised and unsupervised were compared with those of patients whose procedures were performed by senior surgeons. To evaluate evolution of training, outcomes were analyzed according to 3 different periods (1996-1999, 2000-2004, 2005-2009) and trainee seniority level., Methods: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of prospectively collected data from 5566 consecutive patients who underwent isolated OPCAB performed by trainees (1589, 28.6%; 1111 supervised, 478 unsupervised) and by senior surgeons (3977, 71.4%)., Results: Patients of senior surgeons were more likely to have left ventricular dysfunction (P = .001), peripheral vascular disease (P = .05), more extensive coronary artery disease (P = .001), and higher EuroSCOREs than patients of trainees. In addition, trainees were less likely to have performed urgent operations (P = .02) or reoperations (P = .03) but more likely to have operated on patients with previous percutaneous coronary intervention (P = .006). Early clinical outcomes and long-term survival were similar between groups and not related to trainee seniority, level of supervision by senior surgeon, or period during which training took place., Conclusions: OPCAB is a safe and reproducible surgical technique that can be taught successfully to cardiothoracic trainees. Clinical outcomes are unrelated to level of supervision or seniority of trainees., (Crown Copyright © 2012. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Hospitals with a high volume and academic status produce better patient outcomes than other hospitals after complex surgical procedures. Risk models show that concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting pose a greater risk than isolated coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic valve replacement. We examined the relationship of hospital teaching status and the presence of a thoracic surgery residency program with aortic valve replacement/coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes., Methods: By using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, we identified patients who underwent concomitant aortic valve replacement/coronary artery bypass grafting from 1998 to 2007 at nonteaching hospitals, teaching hospitals without a thoracic surgery residency program, and teaching hospitals with a thoracic surgery residency program. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify intergroup differences. Risk-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and complication rates., Results: The 3 groups of patients did not differ significantly in their baseline characteristics. Patients who underwent aortic valve replacement/coronary artery bypass grafting had higher overall risk-adjusted complication rates in nonteaching hospitals (odds ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.80; P < .0001) and teaching hospitals without a thoracic surgery residency program (odds ratio 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.60; P < .0001) than in thoracic surgery residency program hospitals. However, no difference was observed in the adjusted mortality rate for nonteaching hospitals (odds ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.04; P = .25) or teaching hospitals without a thoracic surgery residency program (odds ratio 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.08; P = .98) when compared with thoracic surgery residency program hospitals. Robust statistical models were used for analysis, with c-statistics of 0.98 (complications) and 0.82 (mortality)., Conclusion: Patients who require complex cardiac operations may have better outcomes when treated at teaching hospitals with a thoracic surgery residency program., (Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We evaluated focused training in coronary artery anastomosis with a porcine heart model and portable task station., Methods: At "Boot Camp," 33 first-year cardiothoracic surgical residents participated in 4-hour coronary anastomosis sessions (6-7 attending surgeons per group of 8-9 residents). At beginning, midpoint, and session end, anastomosis components were assessed on a 3-point rating scale (1 good, 2 average, 3 below average). Performances were video recorded and reviewed by 3 surgeons in a blinded fashion. Participants completed questionnaires at session end, with follow-up surveys at 6 months., Results: Ten to 18 end-to-side anastomoses with porcine model and task station were performed. Initial assessments ranged from 2.11 +/- 0.58 (forceps use) to 2.44 +/- 0.48 (needle angles). Midpoint scores ranged from 1.76 +/- 0.63 (forceps use) to 1.91 +/- 0.49 (needle angles). Session end scores ranged from 1.29 +/- 0.45 (needle holder use) to 1.58 +/- 0.50 (needle transfer and suture management and tension; P < .001). Video recordings confirmed improved performance (interrater reliability >0.5). All respondents agreed that task station and porcine model were good methods of training. At 6 months, respondents noted that the anastomosis session provided a basis for training; however, only slightly more than half continued to practice outside the operating room., Conclusions: Four-hour focused training with porcine model and task station resulted in improved ability to perform anastomoses. Boot Camp may be useful in preparing residents for coronary anastomosis in the clinical setting, but emphasis on simulation development and deliberate practice is necessary., (Published by Mosby, Inc.)

Objective: Cardiac surgery trainees might benefit from simulation training in coronary anastomosis and more advanced procedures. We evaluated distributed practice using a portable task station and experience on a beating-heart model in training coronary anastomosis., Methods: Eight cardiothoracic surgery residents performed 2 end-to-side anastomoses with the task station, followed by 2 end-to-side anastomoses to the left anterior descending artery by using the beating-heart model at 70 beats/min. Residents took home the task station, recording practice times. At 1 week, residents performed 2 anastomoses on the task station and 2 anastomoses on the beating-heart model. Performances of the anastomosis were timed and reviewed., Results: Times to completion for anastomosis on the task station decreased 20% after 1 week of practice (351 +/- 111 to 281 +/- 53 seconds, P = .07), with 2 residents showing no improvement. Times to completion for beating-heart anastomosis decreased 15% at 1 week (426 +/- 115 to 362 +/- 94 seconds, P = .03), with 2 residents demonstrating no improvement. Home practice time (90-540 minutes) did not correlate with the degree of improvement. Performance rating scores showed an improvement in all components. Eighty-eight percent of residents agreed that the task station is a good method of training, and 100% agreed that the beating-heart model is a good method of training., Conclusions: In general, distributed practice with the task station resulted in improvement in the ability to perform an anastomosis, as assessed by times to completion and performance ratings, not only with the task station but also with the beating-heart model. Not all residents improved, which is consistent with a "ceiling effect" with the simulator and a "plateau effect" with the trainee. Simulation can be useful in preparing residents for coronary anastomosis and can provide an opportunity to identify the need and methods for remediation.

Background: The introduction of new procedures in heart surgery is a critical phase that includes learning curves and the risk of increased mortality or morbidity. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting using robotic techniques represents such an innovative procedure. The aim of this report is to demonstrate the safe introduction of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting using a stepwise and modular approach., Methods: From June 2001 until December 2002, 50 procedures were performed using the da Vinci telemanipulator system. After baseline training the following procedure modules were carried out in a stepwise manner: robotically assisted endoscopic left internal thoracic artery harvesting and completion of the procedure as conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, or off-pump coronary artery bypass (n = 19), robotically assisted suturing of left internal thoracic artery to left anterior descending anastomoses during conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 15), totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the arrested heart using remote access perfusion and aortic endocclusion coronary bypass grafting (n = 15). One patient was excluded intraoperatively from a robotic procedure due to pleural adhesions., Results: A significant learning curve was observed for left internal thoracic artery takedown time, y(min) = 181 - 39 x ln(x) (x = procedure number) (P <.001), and total operative time in totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting, y(min) = 595 - 87 x ln(x) x = (procedure number) (P =.028). The conversion rate in totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting was 2/15. Intensive care unit stay correlated significantly with total operative time (r =.427, P =.002). There was no hospital mortality., Conclusion: Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting can be safely implemented into a heart surgery program. Learning curves are steep for robotic left internal thoracic artery takedown and for performance of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Long operative times translate into prolonged intensive care unit stay in specific cases but not into increased mortality.