Search

Leaders in academic medicine have observed that ‘the goal of faculty development is to provide faculty members with the skills relevant to their institutional setting and faculty position, and to s...

Background: Literature describing the effectiveness of teaching strategies in the clinical setting is limited. This realist synthesis review focuses on understanding the effectiveness of teaching strategies used in the clinical setting. Methods: We searched ten databases for English language publications between 1 January 1970 and 31 May 2017 reporting effective teaching strategies, used in a clinical setting, of non-procedural skills. After screening, we used consensus to determine inclusion and employed a standardised instrument to capture study populations, methodology, and outcomes. We summarised what strategies worked, for whom, and in what settings. Results: The initial search netted 53,642 references after de-duplication; 2037 were retained after title and abstract review. Full text review was done on 82 references, with ultimate inclusion of 25 publications. Three specific teaching strategies demonstrated impact on educational outcomes: the One Minute Preceptor (OMP), SNAPPS, and concept mapping. Most of the literature involves physician trainees in an ambulatory environment. All three have been shown to improve skills in the domains of medical knowledge and clinical reasoning. Discussion/conclusions: Apart from the OMP, SNAPPS, and concept mapping, which target the formation of clinical knowledge and reasoning skills, the literature establishing effective teaching strategies in the clinical setting is sparse.

Although faculty members may relate strongly to their clinical and/or research identities, they frequently struggle to develop and maintain an educator identity, which may be underdeveloped or in t...

Previous studies on the identity development and motivation of faculty developers have occurred with seasoned developers in a research-rich environment. We sought to determine if the findings of those studies could be replicated with novice faculty developers in a resource-constrained environment.We interviewed 15 novice faculty developers from Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) who, at the time, had led faculty development activities for no more than two years. We conducted a qualitative analysis sensitized by the previous findings.Results were very similar to the previous work. The developers described compartmentalized, hierarchical, and merged identities. The impact was on their teaching as well as on others at MUHAS and on the institution itself. The motivations related to mastery, purpose, duty, satisfaction, and relatedness.This replication led us to conclude that identity development as a faculty developer occurs even in novice developers who do faculty development as only part of their work and despite constrained resources and a different culture. These developers find the work richly rewarding and their motivations benefit the institution. This body of research highlights how faculty development provides benefits to the institution as well as engaging career opportunities.

As we mark the 100th anniversary of the Flexner report which revolutionized the process of medical education, there is again concern that we face a critical need for change in the process of medical education in order to meet the needs of learners, teachers, and patients. In this symposium, panelists shared perspectives on medical education reform from throughout the world, including The Future of Medical Education in Canada, the role of regulators in contributing to reform, the evolution of accreditation standards, the current state of medical education in Southeast Asia, and the perspectives of a medical student on medical education reform. In the "Audience discussion" section, themes emerged surrounding medical education as a social good, the need for governmental support of medical education, the cost of medical education and the rise of for-profit medical schools, and embracing a broader view of health professional education. There remain remarkable parallels in calls for reform in medical education at the turn of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries but education which is patient-centered and actively involves the voices of our patients and our students is likely to be a hallmark.

In both 1910 and 2010, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching used existing educational innovations and learning theory to point the way to the future of medical education. Flexner's transformative report of 1910 was strongly influenced by the innovative curriculum at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and by educational principles of the Progressive Era. In 1912, Flexner wrote a similar critique of medical education in Europe. These two reports have powerfully shaped medical education for the past century. Yet much has changed since then, which prompted The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching to commission another report that was published in 2010. Drawing on contemporary educational innovations and research from the learning sciences, the authors make four recommendations for reform: (1) standardize on learning outcomes while individualizing the learning process, (2) integrate formal knowledge with clinical experience, (3) imbue habits of inquiry and improvement to achieve lifelong learning and excellence, and (4) explicitly cultivate the formation of professional identity. In this article, the author describes educational innovations and educational principles relevant to each of these four recommendations.

The one-minute preceptor (OMP) model was developed to effectively and efficiently teach learners while simultaneously addressing patient needs. This study was conducted to determine if third- and fourth-year medical students prefer the OMP model over the traditional precepting model and what teaching points they needed from the clinical encounters.Third- and fourth-year students (N = 164) at two medical schools completed a questionnaire and prompts on teaching points in response to viewing two videotaped precepting encounters. Differences between OMP and traditional precepting scores were computed using a factorial repeated measures analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA). Teaching points were coded and counted.Students preferred the OMP precepting model to the traditional teaching model (p = 0.001). While the desired teaching points changed as the case presentation/discussion progressed, students were most interested in learning about the clinical presentation or natural progression of the disease regardless of teaching model used.Students rate the OMP as a more effective model of teaching than the traditional model. The teaching points desired by students change as the case presentation/discussion unfolds. Work carried out at: University of California, San Francisco, Office of Medical Education and University of California, Irvine, Department of Family Medicine.