1. Combining Precursor and Fragment Information for Improved Detection of Differential Abundance in Data Independent Acquisition
- Author
-
Yue Xuan, Jan Muntel, Ting Huang, Lukas Reiter, Olga Vitek, and Roland Bruderer
- Subjects
Proteomics ,Lung Neoplasms ,Computer science ,viruses ,Combined use ,Saccharomyces cerevisiae ,Computational biology ,Orbitrap ,Biochemistry ,Mass Spectrometry ,Analytical Chemistry ,law.invention ,Mice ,03 medical and health sciences ,Cancer Biomarker(s) ,Fragment (logic) ,law ,Quantification ,Cerebellum ,Animals ,Humans ,Label-Free Quantification ,Statistical analysis ,Data-independent acquisition ,Caenorhabditis elegans ,Lung ,Molecular Biology ,030304 developmental biology ,0303 health sciences ,Lung Cancer ,030302 biochemistry & molecular biology ,Technological Innovation and Resources ,equipment and supplies ,Label-free quantification ,Data Interpretation, Statistical ,SWATH-MS ,Protein abundance ,HeLa Cells - Abstract
DIA profiles of complex biological matrices such as tissues can contain quantitative interferences, and the interferences at the MS1 and the MS2 signals are often independent. We developed a statistical procedure incorporating both MS1 and MS2 quantitative information of DIA. We benchmarked the performance of the MS1-MS2-combined method to the individual use of MS1 or MS2 in DIA. In the majority of the comparisons, the combined method outperformed the individual use of MS1 or MS2., Graphical Abstract Highlights Modern DIA methods contain high quality MS1 and MS2. We developed a statistical procedure incorporating MS1 and MS2. Benchmarking, the combined method outperformed the individual use of MS1 or MS2., In bottom-up, label-free discovery proteomics, biological samples are acquired in a data-dependent (DDA) or data-independent (DIA) manner, with peptide signals recorded in an intact (MS1) and fragmented (MS2) form. While DDA has only the MS1 space for quantification, DIA contains both MS1 and MS2 at high quantitative quality. DIA profiles of complex biological matrices such as tissues or cells can contain quantitative interferences, and the interferences at the MS1 and the MS2 signals are often independent. When comparing biological conditions, the interferences can compromise the detection of differential peptide or protein abundance and lead to false positive or false negative conclusions. We hypothesized that the combined use of MS1 and MS2 quantitative signals could improve our ability to detect differentially abundant proteins. Therefore, we developed a statistical procedure incorporating both MS1 and MS2 quantitative information of DIA. We benchmarked the performance of the MS1-MS2-combined method to the individual use of MS1 or MS2 in DIA using four previously published controlled mixtures, as well as in two previously unpublished controlled mixtures. In the majority of the comparisons, the combined method outperformed the individual use of MS1 or MS2. This was particularly true for comparisons with low fold changes, few replicates, and situations where MS1 and MS2 were of similar quality. When applied to a previously unpublished investigation of lung cancer, the MS1-MS2-combined method increased the coverage of known activated pathways. Since recent technological developments continue to increase the quality of MS1 signals (e.g. using the BoxCar scan mode for Orbitrap instruments), the combination of the MS1 and MS2 information has a high potential for future statistical analysis of DIA data.
- Published
- 2020