1. Suture versus stapler in distal pancreatectomy and its impact on postoperative pancreatic fistula
- Author
-
Amanda de Oliveira Silva Nascimento, Otávio Decanini Cantarella Silva, Bruno Noronha Duarte, Isadora de Carvalho Baptista Barbosa, Carolina Midori Oda Bajou, João Victor Taba, Leonardo Zumerkorn Pipek, Leandro Ryuchi Iuamoto, Wu Tu Hsing, Luiz Augusto Carneiro-D’Albuquerque, Wellington Andraus, and Alberto Meyer
- Subjects
Pancreatectomy ,Surgical suture ,Surgical staplers ,Fistula ,Medicine ,Science - Abstract
Abstract Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a critical complication after distal pancreatectomy. The aim of this systematic review is to assess new reports on the main pancreatic stump closure techniques (stapler and hand-sewn suture) in distal pancreatectomy, to define their influence on postoperative pancreatic fistula rates. A literature review was performed following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42023408181). The survey was conducted in Medline (via PubMed) and EMBASE. Clinical trials and cohorts were included if they assessed pancreatic fistula rates after distal pancreatectomy, and excluded if they used a fistula rating system other than the ISGPF one. The risk of bias was assessed using the Study Quality Assessment Tools | NHLBI, NIH. A meta-analysis was presented as forest-plots. Eleven articles were included, representing 1498 patients. No significant difference was found between Suture and Bare stapler (95% CI 0.91–1.68) or Bare stapler and Reinforced stapler for A-graded fistula rates (95% CI 0.78–1.28) and B-graded fistula rates (I-squared = 0.0%, p = 0.784). Most articles showed unclear risk of detection bias. This meta-analysis found no difference in fistula rates between stump closure techniques. This choice should be made by surgeons' and hospital administration's preferences.
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF