Search

Background The optimal reperfusion technique in patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery (PCA) occlusion is uncertain. We compared clinical and technical outcomes with first‐line stent retriever (SR), contact aspiration (CA), or combined techniques in patients with isolated PCA occlusion. Methods This international case–control study was conducted at 30 sites in Europe and North America and included consecutive patients with isolated PCA occlusion presenting within 24 hours of time last seen well from January 2015 to August 2022. The primary outcome was the first‐pass effect (FPE), defined as expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2c/3 on the first pass. Patients treated with SR, CA, or combined technique were compared with multivariable logistic regression. Results There were 326 patients who met inclusion criteria, 56.1% male, median age 75 (interquartile range 65–82) years, and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 8 (5–12). Occlusion segments were PCA‐P1 (53.1%), P2 (40.5%), and other (6.4%). Intravenous thrombolysis was administered in 39.6%. First‐line technique was SR, CA, and combined technique in 43 (13.2%), 106 (32.5%), and 177 (54.3%) patients, respectively; FPE was achieved in 62.8%, 42.5%, and 39.6%, respectively. FPE was lower in patients treated with first‐line CA or combined technique compared with SR (CA versus SR: adjusted odds ratio 0.45 [0.19–1.06]; P=0.07; combined versus SR: adjusted odds ratio 0.35 [0.016–0.80]; P=0.01). There were lower odds of functional independence (modified Rankin scale score 0–2) in the first‐line CA versus SR alone group (adjusted odds ratio 0.52 [0.28–0.95]; P=0.04). FPE was associated with higher rates of favorable outcomes (modified Rankin scale score 0–2: 58% versus 43.4%; P=0.01; modified Rankin scale score 0–1: 36.6% versus 25.8%; P=0.05). Overall, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was present in 5.6% (18/326) and mortality in 10.9% (35/326) without difference between first‐line technique. Conclusion In patients with isolated PCA occlusion, SR was associated with a higher rate of FPE compared with CA or combined techniques with no difference in final successful reperfusion. Functional independence at 90 days was more likely with first‐line SR compared with CA. FPE was associated with better 90‐day clinical outcomes.

Introduction The optimal reperfusion technique in patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery (PCA) occlusion is uncertain. Previous studies in LVO and MeVO have demonstrated a correlation between good clinical outcomes and the first pass effect (FPE, eTICI 2c/3 on the first pass) but no differences in FPE rates or clinical outcomes between first‐line endovascular therapy techniques.1‐6 We compared clinical and technical outcomes with first‐line stent‐retriever (SR), contact aspiration (CA), or combined techniques in patients with isolated PCA occlusion. Methods This international cohort study was conducted at 30 sites in Europe and North America and included consecutive patients with isolated PCA occlusion and pre‐stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0‐3, presenting within 24 hours of time last seen well from January 2015 to August 2022.7 The primary outcome was the first‐pass effect (FPE), defined as eTICI 2c/3 on the first pass. Secondary outcomes included final successful reperfusion (eTICI 2b‐3), 90‐day excellent outcome (mRS 0 to 1), 90‐day functional independence (mRS 0 to 2), sICH, and 90‐day mortality. Patients treated with SR, CA, or combined technique were compared with multivariable logistic regression. This study was registered under NCT05291637. Results There were 326 patients who met inclusion criteria, consisting of 56.1% male, median age 75 (IQR 65‐82) years and median NIHSS 8 (5‐12). Occlusion segments were PCA P1 (53.1%), P2 (40.5%), and other (6.4%). Intravenous thrombolysis was administered in 39.6%. First‐line technique was SR, CA, and combined technique in 43 (13.2%), 106 (32.5%), and 177 (54.3%) patients, respectively; FPE was achieved in 62.8%, 42.5%, and 39.6%, respectively. Compared to SR, FPE was lower in patients treated with first‐line combined technique and similar in patients treated with first‐line CA (combined vs. SR: aOR 0.35 [0.016‐0.80], p=0.01; CA vs. SR: aOR 0.45 [0.19‐1.06], p=0.07). Final successful reperfusion (eTICI 2b‐3) was present in 81% of cases with no differences between treatment groups. Excellent outcome (mRS 0‐1) occurred in 30.7% of patients and functional independence (mRS 0‐2) occurred in 50.0% of patients. There were lower odds of functional independence in the first‐line CA versus SR alone group (aOR 0.52 [0.28‐0.95], p=0.04). FPE was associated with higher rates of favorable outcomes (mRS 0‐2: 58% vs. 43.4%, p=0.01; mRS 0‐1: 36.6% vs. 25.8%, p=0.05). sICH was observed in 5.6% (18/326) and mortality in 10.9% (35/326) with no differences between first‐line technique. Conclusion In patients with isolated PCA occlusion undergoing EVT, first line SR was associated with a higher rate of FPE compared to CA or combined techniques with no difference in final successful reperfusion. Functional independence at 90‐days was more likely with first‐line SR compared to CA in adjusted analyses. FPE was associated with higher rates of 90‐day excellent outcomes and functional independence. No difference in sICH or mortality was noted across the three techniques. As the endovascular field evolves to treat patients with distal vessel occlusion and milder severity of stroke, optimizing the efficacy and safety of the procedure is essential.8

Background For acute proximal intracranial artery occlusions, contact aspiration may be more effective than stent‐retriever for first‐line reperfusion therapy. Due to the lack of data regarding medium vessel occlusion thrombectomy, we evaluated outcomes according to first‐line technique in a large, multicenter registry. Methods Imaging, procedural, and clinical outcomes of patients with acute proximal medium vessel occlusions (M2, A1, or P1) or distal medium vessel occlusions (M3, A2, P2, or further) treated at 37 sites in 10 countries were analyzed according to first‐line endovascular technique (stent‐retriever versus aspiration). Multivariable logistic regression and propensity‐score matching were used to estimate the odds of the primary outcome, expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b–3 (“successful recanalization”), as well as secondary outcomes (first‐pass effect, expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2c‐3, intracerebral hemorrhage, and 90‐day modified Rankin scale, 90‐day mortality) between treatment groups. Results Of the 440 included patients (44.5% stent‐retriever versus 55.5% aspiration), those treated with stent‐retriever had lower baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Scale scores (median 8 versus 9; P

Introduction Two recent trials demonstrated a benefit for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the treatment of basilar artery occlusion (BAO). Considering the expected increase in the utilization of EVT for BAO, we sought to understand the technique preferences of neurointerventionalists currently performing EVT for BAO. Methods We conducted an international online survey of physician opinions on the use of EVT in BAO between January to March 2022. The survey was distributed through stroke and neurointerventional organizations. Survey questions examined selection of patients for the procedure and the techniques currently used for EVT in BAO. Results More than 3,000 participants were invited yielding 1,245 respondents, of which 543 were classified as neurointerventionalists across 52 countries and included in this analysis. Most neurointerventionalists would proceed to EVT for occlusions of the V4 segment, the basilar artery, or the PCA, without regard for prior IVT. For BAO of embolic etiology, aspiration only thrombectomy was the preferred method with 50.3% of neurointerventionalists. For BAO of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) etiology, combined stent retriever and aspiration thrombectomy was the preferred method with 40.5% of neurointerventionalists (Figure 1). The majority of neurointerventionalists (88.0%) would proceed to stenting after three or fewer failed passes for patients with BAO of ICAD etiology. In patients undergoing stenting, aspirin and clopidogrel was the most common antiplatelet regime (52.4%). Conclusions Amongst the surveyed neurointerventionalists, the most common techniques for EVT of patients with BAO were contact aspiration or combined stent retriever with aspiration thrombectomy. For patients with BAO due to ICAD, the majority of neurointerventionalists were willing to stent and do so most often after three or fewer failed passes and with the use of dual antiplatelet medications. Further study is needed to determine the optimal technique for EVT of BAO with or without ICAD.

Background Two recent trials demonstrated a benefit for endovascular therapy (EVT) in the treatment of basilar artery occlusion (BAO). In light of the expected increase in the use of EVT for BAO, we sought to understand the technique preferences of neurointerventionalists performing EVT for BAO. Methods We conducted an international online survey of physician opinions on the use of EVT in BAO between January and March 2022. The survey was distributed through stroke and neurointerventional organizations. Survey questions examined selection of patients for the procedure and the techniques currently used for EVT in BAO. Responses from neurointerventionalists were analyzed. Results More than 3000 participants were invited yielding 1245 respondents, of whom 543 were classified as neurointerventionalists across 52 countries and included in this analysis. Most neurointerventionalists would proceed to EVT for occlusions of the V4 segment, the basilar artery, or the posterior cerebral artery, without regard for prior intravenous thrombolysis. For BAO of embolic etiology, aspiration only thrombectomy was the preferred method of 50.3% of neurointerventionalists. For BAO of intracranial atherosclerotic disease etiology, combined stent retriever and aspiration thrombectomy was the preferred method of 40.5% of neurointerventionalists. The majority of neurointerventionalists (88.0%) would proceed to stenting after 3 or fewer failed passes for patients with BAO of intracranial atherosclerotic disease etiology. In patients undergoing stenting, aspirin and clopidogrel was the most common antiplatelet regime (52.4%). Conclusions Among the surveyed neurointerventionalists, the most common techniques for EVT of patients with BAO were contact aspiration or combined stent retriever with aspiration thrombectomy. For patients with BAO due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease, the majority of neurointerventionalists were willing to stent and do so most often after 3 or fewer failed passes and with the use of dual antiplatelet medications. Further study is needed to determine the optimal technique for EVT of BAO with or without intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Key Words