Search

Study Design: A retrospective state database analysis.Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology and complications of as well as indications for primary isolated atlantoaxial fusion.Summary Of Background Data: Atlantoaxial fusion involves unique indications, techniques, and complications. There is limited epidemiologic literature focused specifically on this procedure.Methods: New York's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database, an all-payer hospitalization reporting system, was queried to identify all patients undergoing primary isolated atlantoaxial fusion in the state from 1997 to 2012. Demographic and clinical data were extracted and analyzed. United States Census Bureau figures were used to calculate population-adjusted surgical rates.Results: One thousand five hundred fifty-nine patients underwent isolated primary atlantoaxial fusion during the study period. The overall population-adjusted annual surgical rate did not change significantly over time. By 2012, individuals aged ≥70 years had the highest incidence of surgery [2.37 per 100,000 population; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.68-3.07]. Medicare was the most common payer (44.0% of claims). Approximately 85% of patients had a Charlson/Deyo Comorbidity Index of zero or one. Over time, a significantly lower proportion of atlantoaxial fusions were attributable to rheumatic disease, and a significantly higher proportion were due to fracture. By 2012, management of fractures was the most common indication for C1-C2 fusion (44.1% of cases). Dysphagia or dysphonia occurred after 0.8% of cases, dural tear after 0.3%, infection after 0.5%, and seroma, hematoma, or hemorrhage after 0.5%. In-hospital mortality was 2.7%, of which 76% had fracture as the surgical indication.Conclusion: Isolated atlantoaxial fusions have been performed at a stable, low level over the past 16 years in New York. Although most of these patients are relatively healthy pre-operatively, approximately one in 10 experience an in-hospital complication and nearly 3% die in-hospital. Knowledge of these risks will hopefully spur further efforts to minimize them and allow for more accurate counseling of patients and their families.Level Of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Limited data exist on long-term revision rates following cervical spine arthrodeses. The purposes of this study were to define reoperation rates after primary cervical arthrodeses and to identify risk factors for revisions.Methods: New York State's all-payer health-care database was queried to identify all primary subaxial cervical arthrodeses occurring in the 16 years from 1997 through 2012. A total of 87,042 patients were included in the study cohort. Demographic information was extracted. Patients' preoperative medical comorbidities, surgical indications, and operative approaches were assembled using codes from the ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification). The cohort was followed to revision surgical procedures, death, or the end of the study period. All subsequent contiguous spinal arthrodeses, including in the subaxial cervical spine, were considered revisions. The overall revision risk and the risk associated with various preoperative characteristics, surgical indications, and operative approaches were assessed using a Cox proportional hazard model.Results: During the study period, 6,721 patients (7.7%) underwent revision. The median time to revision was 24.5 months. The probability of undergoing at least one revision by 192 months was 12.6%. Arthrodeses performed via anterior-only approaches had a significantly higher probability of revision (p < 0.001) at 13.4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 12.9% to 13.9%) than those performed via posterior approaches at 7.4% (95% CI, 6.6% to 8.4%) or circumferential (anterior and posterior) approaches at 5.2% (95% CI, 4.0% to 6.8%). This relationship persisted in multivariate analysis; compared with anterior surgical procedures, there was a significantly lower risk of revision (p < 0.001) for posterior surgical approaches at a hazard ratio of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.84) and circumferential approaches at a hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.66). Patient age of 18 to 34 years, white race, insurance status of Workers' Compensation or Medicare, and surgical procedures for spinal stenosis, spondylosis, deformity, and neoplasm were associated with elevated revision risk. Arthrodeses spanning few levels and those performed for fractures had a lower revision risk.Conclusions: Primary subaxial cervical spine arthrodeses had a probability of revision approaching 13% over a 16-year period, with elevated reoperation rates in patients undergoing anterior-only surgical procedures. Age, race, insurance status, surgical indication, and number of spinal levels included in the arthrodesis were also associated with reoperation risk.Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite declines in both the incidence of and mortality following hip fracture, there are racial and socioeconomic disparities in treatment access and outcomes. We evaluated the presence and implications of disparities in delivery of care, hypothesizing that race and community socioeconomic characteristics would influence quality of care for patients with a hip fracture.Methods: We collected data from the New York State Department of Health Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS), which prospectively captures information on all discharges from nonfederal acute-care hospitals in New York State. Records for 197,290 New York State residents who underwent surgery for a hip fracture between 1998 and 2010 in New York State were identified from SPARCS using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate the association of patient characteristics, social deprivation, and hospital/surgeon volume with time from admission to surgery, in-hospital complications, readmission, and 1-year mortality.Results: After adjusting for patient and surgery characteristics, hospital/surgeon volume, social deprivation, and other variables, black patients were at greater risk for delayed surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.42, 1.57), a reoperation (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.21; CI = 1.11, 1.32), readmission (OR = 1.17; CI = 1.11, 1.22), and 1-year mortality (HR = 1.13; CI = 1.07, 1.21) than white patients. Subgroup analyses showed a greater risk for delayed surgery for black and Asian patients compared with white patients, regardless of social deprivation. Additionally, there was a greater risk for readmission for black patients compared with white patients, regardless of social deprivation. Compared with Medicare patients, Medicaid patients were at increased risk for delayed surgery (OR = 1.17; CI = 1.10, 1.24) whereas privately insured patients were at decreased risk for delayed surgery (OR = 0.77; CI = 0.74, 0.81), readmission (OR = 0.77; CI = 0.74, 0.81), complications (OR = 0.80; CI = 0.77, 0.84), and 1-year mortality (HR = 0.80; CI = 0.75, 0.85).Conclusions: There are race and insurance-based disparities in delivery of care for patients with hip fracture, some of which persist after adjusting for social deprivation. In addition to investigation into reasons contributing to disparities, targeted interventions should be developed to mitigate effects of disparities on patients at greatest risk.Level Of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study which determined the yearly rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in New York in the past 20 years as of March 2014. It also examines the age distribution for ACL reconstruction, as well as the effects of patient demographic and socioeconomic factors in ACL reconstruction. In the study, data from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database were used.

The article presents a study that measures the frequency of meniscal repairs, discover the failure rate for a meniscal repair as reflected by subsequent meniscectomies. The study determines the risk factors for a subsequent meniscectomy after repair in a large population-based cohort. It supports the notion that repairing a meniscus is a safe and effective procedure in the long term.