1. A Serology Strategy for Epidemiological Studies Based on the Comparison of the Performance of Seven Different Test Systems - The Representative COVID-19 Cohort Munich
- Author
-
Ernst-Markus Quenzel, Ronan Le Gleut, Jessica Michelle Guggenbuehl Noller, Jan Hasenauer, Silke Martin, Andreas Wieser, Noemi Castelletti, Abhishek Bakuli, Peter Puetz, Yannik Schaelte, Michael Pritsch, Laura Olbrich, Philipp Girl, Isabel Brand, Alisa Markgraf, Friedrich Riess, Franz Weinauer, Marc Becker, Max Diefenbach, Tabea M. Eser, Christiane Fuchs, Leonard Gilberg, Flora Deak, Philine Falk, Mercè Garí, Volker Fingerle, Katharina Mueller, Elmar Saathoff, Roman Woelfel, Michael Hoelscher, Juergen Durner, Katja Radon, and Inge Kroidl
- Subjects
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak ,medicine.medical_specialty ,education.field_of_study ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,business.industry ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,Population ,Serology ,Test (assessment) ,Internal medicine ,Cohort ,Epidemiology ,Medicine ,business ,education - Abstract
BackgroundSerosurveys are essential to understand SARS-CoV-2 exposure and enable population-level surveillance, but currently available tests need further in-depth evaluation. We aimed to identify testing-strategies by comparing seven seroassays in a population-based cohort.MethodsWe analysed 6,658 samples consisting of true-positives (n=193), true-negatives (n=1,091), and specimens of unknown status (n=5,374). For primary testing, we used Euroimmun-Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA-IgA/IgG and Roche-Elecsys-Anti-SARS-CoV-2; and virus-neutralisation, GeneScript®cPass™, VIRAMED-SARS-CoV-2-ViraChip®, and Mikrogen-recomLine-SARS-CoV-2-IgG, including common-cold CoVs, for confirmatory testing. Statistical modelling generated optimised assay cut-off-thresholds.FindingsSensitivity of Euroimmun-anti-S1-IgA was 64.8%, specificity 93.3%; for Euroimmun-anti-S1-IgG, sensitivity was 77.2/79.8% (manufacturer’s/optimised cut-offs), specificity 98.0/97.8%; Roche-anti-N sensitivity was 85.5/88.6%, specificity 99.8/99.7%. In true-positives, mean and median titres remained stable for at least 90-120 days after RT-PCR-positivity. Of true-positives with positive RT-PCR (recomLine-RBD) were >94.9% sensitive, >98.1% specific. Seasonality had limited effects; cross-reactivity with common-cold CoVs 229E and NL63 in SARS-CoV-2 true-positives was significant.ConclusionOptimised cut-offs improved test performances of several tests. Non-reactive serology in true-positives was uncommon. For epidemiological purposes, confirmatory testing with virus-neutralisation may be replaced with GeneScript®cPass™ or recomLine-RBD. Head-to-head comparisons given here aim to contribute to the refinement of testing-strategies for individual and public health use.
- Published
- 2021