1. [Correct use of Kreatech DNA probes to detect MYC gene amplification in medulloblastomas by fluorescence in situ hybridization].
- Author
-
Ryzhova MV, Snigireva GP, Golanov AV, Zheludkova OG, Trunin YY, and Antipina NA
- Subjects
- Humans, Cerebellar Neoplasms diagnosis, Cerebellar Neoplasms genetics, Gene Amplification, Genes, myc, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Medulloblastoma diagnosis, Medulloblastoma genetics
- Abstract
In most cases, oncogene amplification are prognostic and predictive markers for various tumors, therefore DNA probes are unable to reveal changes in the copy numbers should not be used to diagnose malignant tumors., Objective: To comparatively analyze DNA probes from different manufacturers to detect MYC gene amplification in routine practice., Material and Methods: The study material was formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded medulloblastoma fragments from 4 patients, with discrepancies in the results in the detection of MYC gene amplification., Results: MYC gene amplification was determined using DNA probes: Kreatech MYC (8q24)/SE 8, Vysis LSI MYC SO, Vysis CEP 8 (D8Z2) SG, and Zytolight SPEC MYC/CEN 8 Dual Color Probe. The use of the probes Kreatech TERC (3q26)/MYC (8q24)/SE7 Triple-Color probe failed to detect MYC gene amplification; this probe showed a balanced profile of chromosome 8., Conclusion: In routine practice, fluorescence in situ hybridization with the DNA probes Kreatech MYC (8q24)/SE 8, Vysis LSI MYC SO, Vysis CEP 8 (D8Z2) SG and Zytolight SPEC MYC/CEN 8 Dual Color Probe can be the method of choice for studying the copy number of the MYC gene. However, the authors strongly recommend that the Kreatech TERC (3q26)/MYC (8q24)/SE7 Triple-Color should not be used for this purpose. In addition, probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization must be necessarily tested in large reference laboratories dealing with one or another area of oncopathology.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF