Search

This article deals with the children's story Tom, ojos azules by José Jiménez Lozano, through the study of the event, a central category in the contemporary short story as defended by the scholar Guadalupe Arbona Abascal. The analysis allows us to delve into the mystery of the story, discovering the richness of literary materials and the ambiguity of its reading as key aspects that explain the vivid and gratifying experience of the text for the child or adult reader. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Throughout time, the study of typographical errors has been approached from a variety of fields, such as bibliography, textual criticism, publishing, metalexicography, psycholinguistics and natural language processing (NLP). However, typographical errors are inherent in written texts, and there is no multidisciplinary and allencompassing method for their treatment. For that reason, we present a theoretical review of typographical errors and their categorisation, especially from the perspective of psycholinguistics and NLP. On the one hand, some of the most thorough studies from the XX century onwards have been conducted in those two fields. On the other hand, there are remarkable similarities, regarding both the conclusions reached (e.g. the low frequency of errors in the first letter of words) and the limitations encountered (e.g. ambiguity in error categorisation). Thus, our starting point will be the theoretical distinction between motoric or execution errors (mistypings) and orthographic or cognitive errors (misspellings). Moreover, we will analyse the commonalities between the abovementioned disciplines when it comes to identifying the wrong operations (omission, insertion, substitution, and transposition) behind those phenomena. Finally, we will confirm that sometimes execution errors and competence errors cannot be distinguished in the practice of writing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Forewarning of a persuasive attempt has been found to reduce persuasion because people tend to resist being manipulated. Likewise, messages that are high in ambiguity tend to be less persuasive than messages that are clear, among other reasons, because people prefer information that is easy to be processed. The present research postulates that these two variables (persuasive attempt forewarning and message ambiguity) can result paradoxically persuasive when combined together. Participants of the present experiment received a message composed by images that were presented in a logic (low ambiguity) or in a random order (high ambiguity). Furthermore, the message was said to be a commercial advertisement (with persuasive attempt) or a neutral narrative (without persuasive attempt). As predicted, it was found that the highly ambiguous message was more persuasive when it was presented as an advertisement (with persuasive attempt) rather than as a narrative context (without persuasive attempt). Knowing that the message constitutes a persuasive attempt (ad) could bias the generation of thoughts to interpret that informatio n in a positive manner (consonant with the direction of the arguments supposedly contained in the ad), leading to more attitude change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]