1. Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer Treated With Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab or Treatment of Physician’s Choice
- Author
-
Domenica Lorusso, Nicoletta Colombo, Antonio Casado Herraez, Alessandro D. Santin, Emeline Colomba, David Scott Miller, Keiichi Fujiwara, Sandro Pignata, Sally E. Baron-Hay, Isabelle Laure Ray-Coquard, Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, Yong Man Kim, Mary McCormack, Rachid Massaad, Allison Martin Nguyen, Qi Zhao, Jodi McKenzie, Vimalanand S. Prabhu, Vicky Makker, Lorusso, D, Colombo, N, Herraez, A, Santin, A, Colomba, E, Miller, D, Fujiwara, K, Pignata, S, Baron-Hay, S, Ray-Coquard, I, Shapira-Frommer, R, Kim, Y, Mccormack, M, Massaad, R, Nguyen, A, Zhao, Q, Mckenzie, J, Prabhu, V, and Makker, V
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,Endometrial cancer ,Oncology ,Health-related quality of life ,Lenvatinib ,Pembrolizumab ,Patient-reported outcome - Abstract
Purpose: Lenvatinib and pembrolizumab (LEN+PEMBRO) demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in efficacy versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with advanced endometrial cancer (aEC) in the phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775. Health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) is reported. Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive LEN+PEMBRO (n = 411; LEN 20 mg/day; PEMBRO 200 mg Q3W) or TPC (n = 416; doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 Q3W or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 [weekly, 3 weeks on/1 week off]). Impact of treatment on HRQoL assessed by the global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) score of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was a secondary objective; other scales of the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), EORTC QLQ-Endometrial, 24 questions (EORTC QLQ-EN24), and EuroQoL 5 dimensions, 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L) were exploratory objectives. HRQoL was assessed on day 1 of each cycle. Completion/compliance, change from baseline, time to first and definitive deterioration were assessed. No multiplicity adjustments were applied for HRQoL endpoints. Results: The latest timepoint at which the predefined rates of completion (≥60%) and compliance (≥80%) were met was week 12. HRQoL at week 12 between treatment groups was generally similar. Time to first deterioration symptom scales favoured LEN+PEMBRO for QLQ-C30 dyspnoea, and QLQ-EN24 for poor body image, tingling/numbness, and hair loss; and TPC was favoured for QLQ-C30 pain, appetite loss, and diarrhoea, and QLQ-EN24 muscular pain. While the QLQ-C30 physical functional scale favoured TPC, other functional scales were generally similar between arms. Time to definitive deterioration favoured LEN+PEMBRO on most scales. Conclusion: HRQoL data from Study 309/KEYNOTE-775, with previously published efficacy and safety results, indicate that LEN+PEMBRO has an overall favourable benefit/risk profile versus TPC for the treatment of patients with aEC.
- Published
- 2023