Search

Background Nephrostomy tubes are commonly placed for urinary obstruction, urinary diversion, or future endourologic procedures. While the technical success of nephrostomy tube placement is high, nephrostomy tube complications may occur. Objective of review Limited literature exists regarding the complication of nephrostomy tubes and their approach in the emergency department. This review summarizes the existing literature and provides a framework for emergency providers regarding the evaluation and management of nephrostomy tube complications. Discussion Nephrostomy tube failure, caused by kinking, dislodgment, or migration can manifest with obstructive signs and symptoms. In well appearing patients, asymptomatic bacteriuria is common and should not be treated. However, in the presence of infectious symptoms, patients should be treated similarly to complicated cystitis or pyelonephritis. While gross hematuria is common following catheter placement, prolonged hematuria, or the return of hematuria after previous resolution should trigger investigation for hematoma formation or a delayed presentation of an intraoperative vascular injury. Finally, clinicians should obtain laboratory testing, advanced imaging, and specialty consultation if serious complications are suspected. Conclusion This narrative review highlights general nephrostomy tube care, minor complications, and troubleshooting in the emergency department. The majority of these minor complications can be managed at the bedside without specialty consultation. However, in patients with more serious complications including dislodgement, obstruction, infection, bleeding, and pleural injury, laboratory assessment and advanced imaging to include ultrasound and computed tomography with specialty consultation are essential in the patient's evaluation and management, particularly in cases of immune compromise and worsening renal function.

Purpose To evaluate national trends in tube-related genitourinary interventions, with specific attention to primary operator specialty. Methods Using a 5% national sample of Medicare claims data from 2005 to 2015, all claims associated with nephrostomy tube, nephro-ureteral tube, and ureteral stent placement and exchange were identified. The annual volume of the nine billable procedures were analyzed to evaluate trends in the number of procedures performed and primary operator specialty over time. The Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to evaluate patient comorbidities and to determine differences in patient populations treated by interventional radiologists and urologists. Results The total volume of tube-related genitourinary interventions has increased over the course of the study period, representing 455.0 services per 100,000 Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries in 2005 to 607.2 services in 2015, an increase of 33.4%. Interventional radiologists performed the majority of all procedures in all procedure types and for each year (>90%) with the exception of nephro-ureteral catheter placement or ureteral stent placement, for which urologists performed the overwhelming majority of procedures each year (>85%). Interventional radiologists performed 63% of their total number of procedures on patients with a CCI = 3 or higher, and urologists performed 42% of their total number of procedures on patients with a CCI = 3 or higher (P Conclusion Tube-related genitourinary interventions have demonstrated persistent growth over the 2005 to 2015 decade. Interventional radiologists are the dominant providers for the majority of these interventions compared with urologists while delivering care to a patient population with a higher number of comorbidities.

Background: Double j (jj) routinely inserted cystoscopically in retrograde manner in managing various causes of ureteric obstruction. sometimes we face situations at which the jj failed to be inserted in such conventional route or carrying high degree of difficulty. antegrade jj can be successful alternative modality in managing such failures/ difficulties.Aim of the work: Evaluate the antegrade ureteric stenting as an alternative to the retrograde ureteric stenting in the difficult cases of ureteric obstruction and to evaluate the predictors of success/failure of this procedurePatients & Methods: Prospective non-blinded interventional study that is conducted from the department of urology faculty of medicine Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt, between 2016 till 2020. included 78 patients with different causes of ureteric obstruction in two groups; group(I) included 28 patients with ureteric obstruction who had failed retrograde ureteric stenting; for them antegrade jj stenting were tried & group (II) included 50 cases of ureteric obstruction with high probability of difficulty or failure of retrograde stenting for them retrograde jj stenting tried first in 34 cases & if failed retrograde stenting were tried, while antegrade stenting tried directly in 16 patients due to high patients vulnerability.Results: In patients of group(I) antegrade stenting succeeded in 26 (92.86) patients & failed in 2 (7.14) patients.in group (II) retrograde trial succeeded in (7) cases & antegrade tried in (43) cases (27 cases after retrograde trial failure & 16 cases tried from the start), antegrade stenting succeeded in 39 (90.7%) cases & failed in 4(9.3%) cases. dye study e.g flow of dye to bladder showed statistically significant predictor of success/failure in both groups. most prevalent complications were hematuria in group(I) in (57 %) of the studied cases(hemoglobin drop didn’t exceed 1 gm /dl & hematuria subsided with genera measures) while in group (II) no complications occurred in (44%) of cases. nephrostomy tube needed in(21%) of cases in group (I) & needed in (38%) of cases in group(II)Conclusion: Antegrade ureteric stenting is successful alternative in cases of failure of conventional retrograde stenting & show high success rate in cases of high probability of difficulties.

Hydroureteronephrosis (HUN) of the renal transplant (RT) can be obstructive or non-obstructive, refluxing or non-refluxing, and can cause allograft dysfunction. HUN of the RT as a manifestation of rejection is uncommon and has not been described in children. We describe two pediatric RT recipients who presented with late-onset HUN, 5 and 10 years after transplantation. Both had new-onset HUN which occurred at the time of rejection; HUN resolved in both patients after treatment of rejection. Renal function stabilized in both patients without the need for stent or nephrostomy tube placement. There was no obstruction or vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Edema of the uroepithelial cells leading to transient obstruction causing HUN is a most likely explanation. We conclude that treatment of rejection in patients without obstruction or VUR may lead to resolution of HUN without the need for urological interventions.

Urothelial carcinoma and nephrolithiasis are a common cause of obstructive uropathy which can be relieved by percutaneous nephrostomy catheter placement. A rare, but known complication of this procedure is iatrogenic seeding of tumor cells along the nephrostomy tract. We describe a case of 68-year-old-female with cutaneous metastasis of high-grade urothelial carcinoma with seeding of tumor cells along the percutaneous nephrostomy catheter tract 8 months after the removal of the catheter. Given its severity, interventional radiologists should be mindful of the number of percutaneous access attempts, exchanges, and catheter manipulations in patients with urothelial carcinoma due to the risk of metastatic seeding along the percutaneous tract or to nearby tissues.

Background To retrospectively assess the experience of day-surgery semi tubeless ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP) for the treatment of kidney stones by experienced surgeons. Methods Clinical data of 358 patients with kidney stones (254 males and 104 females; mean age: 59.60±11.70) who were performed UMP surgery in Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine affiliated Renji Hospital from June 2015 to December 2018. Patient demographics, operative data, complications, and readmission rates were recorded. Day-surgery UMP was defined as discharge of patients either the same day or within 24 h after surgery. Semi tubeless UMP was defined as no placement of DJ and nephrostomy tube after surgery. Results The average size of stones was 14.56±6.24 mm (range, 4-30 mm). There are solitary stones in 192 cases, multiple stones in 142 cases and 29 cases with Staghorn stones. F13 outer sheath was used for all operations; 358 patients completed UMP on the day of admission; 326 (91.06%) patients achieved same-day discharge or received overnight observation prior to discharge, and 32 patients (8.94%) required full admission (longer than 24 h). The readmission rate was 0.56% (2 patients). The postoperative complications within 1 week occurred in 36 (10.06%) patients, including 23, 10, 3 of grades I, II, IIIa complications (Clavien-System). The average operation time was 29.64 min and the hemoglobin drop were 13.42±9.55 g/L. The stone clearance rate was 91.62% (328/358). The semi tubeless rate war 95.25% (341/358). Conclusions For day-surgery semi tubeless UMP, experienced surgeons gain excellent patient outcomes in appropriately selected patients. Day-surgery semi tubeless UMP is worth promoting.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of infectious complications after routine office nephrostomy tube replacement (NTR) in patients that did not receive antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP).METHODS: We prospectively enrolled all patients undergoing routine office NTR between July 2018 and September 2019. Each procedure was considered an independent event. Clinical, microbiological, demographic data were collected. AMP was exclusion criterion. All patients received a questionnaire via phone call within 3 weeks after NTR investigating fever, antibiotics use, hospital admissions. Infectious complications risk was assessed with univariate and multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis.RESULTS: One hundred forty-five routine NTRs were performed. Nineteen patients receiving AMP were excluded. Median age was 78 years (interquartile range 71-81). Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was ≥5 in 53.2% of patients, 34 had positive urine culture, none received AMP. Seventeen (13.49%) patients reported fever after procedure, 9 received antibiotic therapy while fever resolved spontaneously in 8. Three patients needed hospitalization, 2 for nephrostomy malfunction, 1 for infectious complications. At multivariate analysis only CCI score ≥3 was associated (P < .001) with increased infectious complications risk.CONCLUSION: In this study fever occurs after the 13.5% of the routine NTRs, in almost half cases resolves spontaneously rather than with oral antimicrobial therapy. Avoiding AMP before routine NTR does not expose patients to life-threatening infections.

Introduction: Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) is one of the most accepted surgical modality for removal of renal stone. Placement of a nephrostomy tube at the end of PCNL is a standard procedure for PCNL, however many reports have showed the safety and efficacy of tubeless PCNL for the removal of renal stone. Aims: The present study aimed to report the outcomes of PCNL with or without nephrostomy tube. Methods: It is Prospective Hospital Study conducted from June 2017 to April 2020 in the Department of Urology Nepalgunj Medical College. Total 153 patients under inclusion criteria were divided into two groups. Group 1 (75 patients) was allocated to patients who were being treated under standard PCNL procedure while Group 2 (78 patients) was allocated for patients who were being treated under Tubeless PCNL procedure. The two groups were compared for operation time (minutes), hospital stay (days), post operative dose of analgesic (mg), post operative complications such as, leakage (%), bleeding (%) and infection (%). Data were analyzed from SPSS and p-value less than 0.5 was considered as significant. Results: In Group II the mean hospital stay, analgesic dose and rate of leakage was significantly lesser than Group I (p0.05). Conclusion: Tubeless PCNL procedure causes more rapid recovery and earlier discharge from the hospital, reduction in postoperative pain and no leakage when compared to standard tubless PCNL.

Background: Ureteral stricture disease is a troubling urologic issue that can be managed with surgical reconstruction or, more conservatively, with chronic nephrostomy tubes or ureteral stents. These indwelling tubes require exchanges and are prone to complications such as encrustation or stent failure. Metallic ureteral stents are designed to be more resistant to extrinsic compression and allow for exchanges at longer intervals. However, encrustation or tissue ingrowth can occur with these stents as well. The removal of encrusted or embedded metallic ureteral stents poses a difficult clinical scenario. We present a case of an encrusted metallic stent embedded in a proximal ureteral stricture requiring percutaneous endoscopic removal with a novel looped-wire technique. Case Presentation: A 50-year-old Caucasian man with bilateral ureteral stricture disease, managed with chronic indwelling metallic stents, failed retrograde removal on the right during routine exchange. Staged procedures with percutaneous nephrostomy, followed by combined percutaneous antegrade and retrograde endoscopy were required to observe and access the embedded stent. The exposed metallic surface was unable to be grasped by available instruments through flexible endoscopy. Under endoscopic control with fluoroscopic guidance, a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-coated guidewire was looped around the metallic stent. With gentle traction on the wire loop, the embedded stent curl was delivered out of the stricture and into the renal pelvis from where it was extracted carefully with graspers inserted through a rigid nephroscope. Follow-up antegrade fluoroscopic studies with contrast showed no extravasation. Conclusion: Percutaneous removal of metallic stents retained within the ureter has unique challenges. We present a novel method of extraction of a retained metallic stent with a looped PTFE-coated guidewire, which may safely and effectively be used in complex situations.

Background In literature, the reports of outcomes after percutaneous nephrolithotomies are rather heterogeneous. This may influence studies comparison, it may also render difficult to evaluate surgical adequacy, peri-operative morbidity and patient's quality of life between studies. For this reason, we propose to introduce PNL-Trifecta as composite measure to standardize data reporting outcomes after percutaneous nephrolithotomies. Methods We performed a prospective multicentric study on consecutive patients undergone PNL to treat renal stones between 2018 and 2020. Successful PNL-trifecta was considered achieved when procedures obtained the three following results: no residual fragments > 2mm at unenhanced CT scan at 3 months post-op, no complications (defined as Clavien-Dindo Score 0) and operation carried out without placing a nephrostomy tube (tubeless or totally tubeless). We compared results of standard versus mini-PNL and between stones of different complexity (evaluated with Guy's Stone Score and S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry Score). Univariate analysis was utilized to identify other factors influencing achievement of PNL-Trifecta. Results 245 patients fulfilled inclusion/exclusion criteria and have been enrolled in the study (median age: 56, IQR 48-57). The overall PNL-Trifecta achievement rate was 22.85% (28.66% in the mini-PNL group and 13.68% in the standard-PNL group, p=0.010). The stone free rate, CD 0 rate and tubeless/totally tubeless rate in the mini-PNL group were 60.66%, 89.33% and 51.33% respectively. In the standard-PNL group they were 44.21%, 40.00% and 15.78% respectively. At the univariate analysis, differences between Guy's Stone Score groups in achieving PNL-Trifecta were significant (p=0.001). Also, the level of upper puncture (p=0.010) and utilization of device with active suction (p=0.002) showed statistically significant differences. Furthermore, the length of stay in the patient's group achieving Trifecta was 2.28 versus a mean length of stay of 4.64 days in the group of patients not achieving Trifecta (p=0.046). Conclusions We present Trifecta for PNLs as a potential tool to evaluate quality of percutaneous nephrolithotomies and to provide an instrument for an adequate standard data reporting. It can represent a valid way to assess and monitor surgeon's learning curves. It will require further external validation and studies to evaluate its correlation with mid- and long-term results and patient's health related quality of life outcomes.

This study evaluated outcomes for percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement in pregnant patients, including potential complications that required early, unplanned tube exchange. A retrospective review was conducted for 51 pregnant patients and a nonpregnant cohort matched 1:1 who received percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement between 2012 and 2020. Factors potentially contributing to unplanned tube exchanges were analyzed, including gestational age, prevalence and severity of hydronephrosis, presence of renal calculi, and serum calcium level. The mean tube exchange interval was significantly shorter in the pregnant group (3.4 weeks ± 1.8 [standard deviation] vs 5.7 weeks ± 0.7, P < .0001), and pregnant subjects were significantly more likely to require reintervention before the 6-week scheduled exchange (80.4% vs 21.6%, P < .0001). The serum calcium level was lower in pregnant subjects (8.4 mg/dL ± 0.4 vs 8.9 mg/dL ± 0.7, P = .002). A shorter interval schedule (every 3 weeks) of routine percutaneous nephrostomy tube exchange in pregnant patients may be necessary to avoid complications.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard treatment of large and staghorn kidney stones. Despite technological progress and improvement of PCNL technique, this procedure is associated with complications and in some cases remain a challenge for endourologists. According to the time, complications can be divided into intra- and postoperative. Intraoperative complications include bleeding, injury of the renal collecting system, visceral organs, pulmonary complications, thromboembolic disorders, extrarenal migration of the stone fragments and incorrect nephrostomy tube placement. Postoperative complications include infection and sepsis, bleeding, persistent urinary fistula, infundibular stenosis and death of the patient. The different recommendations that might be useful for the timely diagnosis of various complications in patients undergoing PCNL are provided in the review. Additionally, information on treatment algorithms is included.

Ways to increase the effectiveness of nephrostomy tube sanitation for preventing undesirable effects of external drainage (in particular, encrustation) were studied. A method for invasive ultrasound treatment was proposed. A technique for sanitation of ureteral stents was also developed. Ultrasound treatment of an ureteral stent was shown to be an effective and safe way of reducing salt obstruction. It can be recommended for use as a part of treatment aimed at preventing obstructive pyelonephritis.

Objective To ascertain the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithomy in patients with previous open renal surgery. Study design Descriptive study. Place and duration of study The Kidney Centre Postgraduate Training Institute, Karachi from January to December 2018. Methodology Patients with previous open renal surgery underwent percutaneous nephrolithomy during study period (Group A). Equal number of percutaneous nephrolithomy patients without previous open surgery taken as controls (Group B). Safety was defined in terms of 'blood loss' as change in hemoglobin (HB) level and 'blood transfusion,' while efficacy was defined in terms of 'stone clearance' and were compared between both the groups. Results There were a total of 87 patients. Both groups had comparative gender ratio [p = 0.858]. Mean age [p = 0.132] and BMI [p = 0.879] of patients in both groups was not significantly different from each other. Both groups showed no statistically significant difference in terms of values of stone size [p = 0.186], stone laterality [p = 0.437] stone location [p = 0.949], preoperative Hb [p = 0.095], postoperative Hb [p = 0.423] and change in Hb (indicating blood loss, p = 0.398). Puncture levels were significantly different among both groups (supracostal puncture in 18 and 36 patients; infracostal puncture in 63 and 51 patients in groups A and B, respectively, p = 0.006), while operative time [p = 0.787], calyx punctured [p = 0.051], double puncture [p = 0.787], nephrostomy tube [p = 0.288] were statistically not different among groups. Similar number of patients demonstrated residual stones [p = 0.773], along with residual stone sizes [Group A (0.5; 0.5) and Group B (0.65; 0.38)] [p = 0.445]. Intra- and postoperative complications like blood transfusion [p = 0.700] and fever [p = 1.000] along with hospital stay [p = 0.614] were comparable among groups. Conclusion Percutaneous nephrolithomy is safe and effective in previously operated kidneys despite the possibility of calyceal anatomy distortion and scarring. Key Words: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Open surgery, Kidney calculi.

Objective To demonstrate the feasibility and success of a robotic approach to reconstruction of ureterovesical anastomotic strictures in kidney transplants. Materials and Methods Between November 2017 and December 2019, a total of 5 patients with transplant ureteral stricture were identified and treated with robot assisted laparoscopic repair. All patients were confirmed to have ureteral stricture with a preoperative antegrade nephrostogram through their nephrostomy tube and cystogram. The patients demographics, ureteral characteristics, type of procedure, and outcomes are reported. Results All patients were diagnosed after evaluation for renal deterioration. The average age of the patients was 49 years old. The average stricture length was 2.5 cm, and the location was variable, though more commonly in the distal ureter. Three patients required a pyelo-vesicostomy, while 2 required a ureteroneocystostomy. The mean length of stay was 2.2 days. Average follow-up was 97 days, with all 5 patients having successful outcomes, no strictures or delayed leaks were identified. There were no wound infections or readmissions within 30 days. Conclusion Though a complex repair, the robot-assisted approach to transplant ureter reconstruction using either an end to side neoureterocystotomy or direct pyelo-vesicotomy is technically feasible and successful. Given the many advantages inherent in comparison to an open approach, the robotic repair offers significant advantages to both the patient and the surgeon who is experienced with robotic surgery and reconstructive principles.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of multiple-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) as a day surgery for the treatment of complex renal stones. A mature protocol for day surgery was implemented. Forty-six patients who underwent planned day-surgery PCNL via multiple tracts for the treatment of complex renal stones were retrospectively reviewed. All procedures were performed by an experienced surgeon. The outcomes were recorded. The mean stone size and burden were 4.8 cm and 990.2 mm2, respectively. There were 26 (56.5%) and 20 (43.5%) patients with staghorn stones and multiple stones, respectively. Totals of two, three, and more than three tracts (with up to 7 tracts) were established in 22, 11, and 13 patients, respectively. The tract sizes ranged from 14 to 24 Fr. One to four nephrostomy tubes were placed in most patients, and a tubeless process was accomplished in only 3 (6.5%) patients. The mean surgery time was 116 min with a hemoglobin drop of 22.1 ± 16.8 g/L. Eight (17.4%) patients developed postoperative complications, with severe complications (Clavien grades III–IV) in two cases (4.4%). 39 (84.8%) patients were discharged within 24 h after surgery, and 7 (15.2%) patients were fully admitted. Only 1 (2.2%) patient required readmission. The stone clearance rate was 84.8%. Day-surgery PCNL can be safely performed via multiple percutaneous tracts by experienced surgeons and is an efficient strategy for the treatment of complex renal stones.

Aim to compare the results of treatment of patients with acute obstructive calculous pyelonephritis, who underwent to retroperitoneoscopic procedure, with patients, who underwent to drainage of the collecting system by means of ureteral stent or nephrostomy tube as the first stage. Materials and methods A total of 121 patients were treated from 2011 to 2019. Of these, 78 patients were included in the main group. The stones were located in the ureteropelvic junction (n = 20) and the upper and middle ureter (n = 58). The average size of the stone was 12.9 +/- 4.8 mm. Preliminary upper urinary tract drainage was not carried out and the stone was removed completely. The group 2 consisted of 26 people. The stones were located in the upper (n = 18) and the middle ureter (n = 8); the average size was 9 +/- 2.8 mm. Renal drainage was done using ureteral stent and when pyelonephritis resolved, ureterolithotripsy was performed. The group 3 was represented by 17 patients. All stones were located in the ureteropelvic junction. The average size was 20.3 +/- 10.7 mm. Renal drainage was done using percutaneous nephrostomy; when there were no inflammatory changes, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy was performed. Results In the main group, normalization of body temperature and resolution of inflammatory changes in the blood and urine occurred earlier. The stone was removed completely and there were no residual fragments. Period of rehabilitation was are also significantly shorter than in groups 2 and 3. The retroperitoneoscopic method was more effective and safer for the treatment of patients with acute obstructive pyelonephritis caused by large stones located in the upper or middle ureter and ureteropelvic junction.

Background and ObjectiveTo investigate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of performing mini PCN (MIP-M Karl Storz) as a day case procedure. We report our experience and outcomes from our case series which to our knowledge is the first reported in the UK. Material and MethodsTen patients appropriate for mini PCN and day-case surgery were selected prospectively. All 10 patients underwent a mini PCN procedure in a prone position. Access was achieved by the operating surgeon under fluoroscopic guidance in 9 cases and by a consultant uroradiologist under ultrasound guidance in 1 patient with a ureterosigmoidostomy using a Kellet needle and the MIP-M system (Karl Storz, Germany). Stones were fragmented with a 550um laser fibre and retrieved by both the Vortex effect and a grasper. Drainage was achieved with a 6 Fr antegrade stent in 9 cases and a 10 Fr nephrostomy tube in one patient. Stone related outcomes, duration of surgery, length of stay and complications were recorded. ResultsAll cases were completed as planned. The mean operating time was 93 minutes. A day case rate of 80% was achieved. Two patients were admitted overnight for social reasons; one lived on a nearby island and was not ready for discharge in time to catch the last ferry and another no longer had a responsible adult at home to monitor him overnight. All patients were deemed radiologically stone free. No readmissions, transfusion, infections or other complications were recorded at 90 days postoperatively. ConclusionWe have shown that day-case mini PCN is a feasible and safe procedure in selected patients. A larger number of cases are needed to establish our patient selection criteria and corroborate our early outcomes.

Objective: To determine possible risk factors for accidental nephrostomy tube dislodgement and compare two different tube types in this context in patients with chronic catheters. Materials and Met...

BACKGROUND Calyceal diverticula outpouchings that occur rarely in the upper collecting system of the kidney and is often difficult to detect. In this study, we present two cases of calyceal diverticula and discuss their clinical characteristics and radiologic features. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the presented two cases, we applied several imaging examinations, including delayed intravenous pyelography, retrograde pyelography and axial computerized tomographic (CT) scanning of the kidneys with and without contrast. Serum creatinine levels in fluid withdrawn from the diverticula were found to be significantly higher than the simultaneous serum creatinine levels. Intravenous injection of methylene blue through a ureteral catheter was also aided in the diagnosis. Calyceal diverticulum neck dilatation was performed through a percutaneous nephroscope.ResultsThe two cases were diagnosed preoperatively and the operation was successful performed. The nephrostomy tube was removed seven days after surgery without complications. CT scans of the kidney after six months showed that the size of the calyceal diverticulum of two patients were considerably smaller than pre-surgery. There were no reports of pain in the lumbar region or other discomfort. COMMENTS Diagnosis of calyceal diverticulum mainly depend on a variety of imaging examinations, including the delayed intravenous pyelography, retrograde pyelography, and kidney CT plain scan plus enhanced scan. If the patient cannot be diagnosed by above methods, cyst fluid can be aspirated percutaneously to measure the preoperative creatinine level. If it is significantly higher than the serum creatinine level, the cyst fluid is considered urine, which can assist in the diagnosis of calyceal diverticulum. A ureteral catheter should also be inserted before operation namely, intravenous injection of methylene blue through a ureteral catheter is helpful for diagnosis. The choice of surgical treatment is based on the size and location of calyceal diverticulum and clinical manifestations.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold standard treatment for large renal and ureteric stones. A nephrostomy tube is often inserted post-operatively to reduce complications such as tract haemorrhage and infection. However, nephrostomy tubes cause significant discomfort, increasing both analgesic requirements and length of inpatient stay. Whilst tubeless PCNL has been shown to be safe in low-risk patients, the risk of above complications remains. To address these concerns, clinicians have trialled applying haemostatic agents (HA) to the tract, with varied results. We aim to determine if HA are safe and clinically beneficial in PCNL. Systematic review of literature yielded 97 original research articles. Seventeen papers were deemed suitable after abstract screening and eligibility criteria application. These 17 research studies compared either tubeless PCNL vs PCNL with HA or PCNL with nephrostomy tube vs PCNL with HA. Within these studies a wide range of HA with differing mechanisms were used. Outcomes compared, where available, included bleeding (as determined by Hb drop or transfusion rates), pain scores, analgesic requirements, length of hospital stay and complication rates. We conclude that low-risk patients undergoing tubeless PCNL are unlikely to benefit from HA. However, potential remains in using HA to complement or replace nephrostomy tube in patients with significant intraoperative bleeding. Further studies are required to determine the optimal patient demographic who may benefit from HA, with a focus on cost-benefit analysis. Whilst HA were found to be safe, concerns remain regarding inadvertent collecting system injection and long-term effects, as well as increased cost.

Introduction: Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been limited to highly selected patients. The objective of our study was to compare complication and stone-free rates after ambulatory PCNL in standard selection criteria vs. extended criteria patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of prospective data on all patients who underwent ambulatory PCNL at one academic center from 2007–2018. Extended criteria patients were defined as one or more of: age >75 years, body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) >2, bilateral stones, solitary kidney, transplant kidney, complete staghorn calculi, stone burden >40 mm, multiple tracts, or prior nephrostomy tubes/stents. Primary outcomes were complication rates (Clavien-Dindo classification) and stone-free rates. Results: We identified 118 patients, of which 92 (78%) met extended criteria. Mean BMI was 31 kg/m2 and 45% were ASA 3 or higher. Mean sum maximum stone diameter was 24 mm. Multiple stones were present in 25%, bilateral stones in 7%, and complete staghorn stones in 4% of patients. There was no difference in complication (12% vs. 18%, p=0.56), emergency department visit (12% vs. 18%, p=0.56), or re-admission (4% vs. 5%, p=1) rates between standard and extended criteria patients respectively. Of the complications, 85% were Clavien-Dindo grade 1. Stone-free rates were not different between standard (84%) and extended (83%) criteria patients (p=1). No extended criteria variables were associated with complications in multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Complication and stone-free rates were not different between standard and extended selection criteria patients undergoing ambulatory PCNL. This data indicates that many of the preoperative patient and stone factors that have previously been used as exclusion criteria for ambulatory PCNL are not strictly necessary.

Background Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the preferred technique for treating large renal stones (over 2cm in diameter). It involves keyhole surgery performed through a small skin incision overlying the kidney. Objectives Our study aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of local hemostatic sealant (surgiflo®) use in tubeless PCNL to enhance postoperative outcomes of PCNL. Patients and Methods We randomized our patients into two groups, Group A nephrostomy tube was used as standard PCNL, and at group B tubeless PCNL was done followed by injection of the local hemostatic flowable gelatin matrix (surgiflo®) under fluoroscopic guidance in the prone position Results There was no statistically significant difference between two groups regarding demographic data age, sex and BMI (P- value 0.280, 0.736 and 0.440 respectively), stone site and size (P- value 0.525 and 0.533 respectively), operative time (P- value 0.855), intraoperative complications as blood loss and pelvicalyceal perforation, (P- value 0.92 and P- value 0.83 respectively), postoperative complication as fever, haematuria and UTI (P- value 1.000, 0,113 and 1.000 respectivly), and Hb drop (P- value 0.735). Conclusion Tubeless PCNL with hemostatic sealant use is associated with less pain, no leakage from nephrostomy tract, less narcotic agent use, and a shorter hospital stay.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Sepsis secondary to obstructive uropathy is a Urological emergency associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Urgent decompression using retrograde placement of...

BACKGROUND: The tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was proposed to eliminate the side effects of the nephrostomy tube in recent years, such as pain, channel infection, postoperative bleeding, and longer hospital stay. But there is neither clinical guidelines nor consensus about tubeless PCNL in clinical practice. The study is aimed to how to implement the tubeless PCNL step by step, including case selection preoperatively, improving the technique of the surgeon, making the correct decisions at the end of the procedure, which had not been previously examined. METHODS: From January 2017 to March 2018, 364 consecutive patients requiring PCNL were comprehensively analyzed preoperatively and patients were selected for scheduled tubeless PCNL based on four aspects. The selected patients were divided into two groups according to whether the nephrostomy tube was finally placed. The mean operative time, intraoperative blood loss, stone clearance rate, visual pain score, postoperative hospitalization days and perioperative complications were all evaluated. RESULTS: Based on the preoperative evaluation, 42 patients were selected for tubeless PCNL, among which there were finally 37 cases of completed tubeless PCNL. Compared with patients undergoing conventional PCNL, there were not statistical differences in the mean operative time (P=0.207) or intraoperative blood loss (P=0.450) in the tubeless group. Stone clearance rate was 100% in both groups. The visual pain scores in the tubeless PCNL group were lower on operation day (P=0.029), first postoperative day (P

Backgrounds/aims Operation room (OR) time is of great value affecting surgical outcome, complications and the daily surgical program with financial implications. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 570 consecutive patients submitted to ureteroscopy or ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of ureteral or renal stones. Demographic parameters, patient's stones characteristics, type of ureteroscope, surgeon experience and surgical theater characteristics were analyzed. OR time was calculated from the initiation of anesthesia to patient extubation. Multivariate analysis was conducted using a linear regression test with multiple parameters to identify predictors of OR time. Results Eight factors were identified as significant. These include total stones volume, ureteroscope used, stone number, nurses experience, radio-opacity of the stone on kidney-ureter-bladder X-ray, main surgeon experience, operating room type, and having a nephrostomy tube prior to surgery. Conclusions The surgical team experience and familiarity with endourological procedure, and the surgical room characteristics has a crucial impact on OR time and effectiveness.

We report two cases of complicated Urinary Tract Infection, one with nephrostomy tube left in-situ and other with bladder outlet obstruction, caused by Trichosporon loubieri. Both patients responded well to antifungal treatment along with change/removal of catheters. In both the cases, correct identification of T. loubieri was done by IGS1 sequencing. Prompt identification and timely management headed to good clinical outcome. Hence, clinicians should be aware of T. loubieri as an emerging fungi causing human infections. Keywords: Trichosporon loubieri, Urinary tract infection, Nephrostomy tube, Bladder outlet obstruction, IGS1 sequencing

The aim of this study is to evaluate overnight ureteral catheterization vs nephrostomy tube for urinary diversion in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) under spinal anesthesia.Patients were enrolled using block randomization between February 2016 and July 2016. Patients with renal stones2 cm confirmed via noncontrast-enhanced CT were included. All patients underwent PNL under spinal anesthesia. Group 1 refers to patients who had a nephrostomy tube following PNL, whereas group 2 refers to overnight ureteral catheterization. Those who refuse spinal anesthesia,18 years of age,70 years of age, and anomalous kidneys (ectopic pelvic kidney, horseshoe kidney, etc.) were excluded. In group 1, nephrostomy tube (14F) was removed 48 hours after surgery, whereas the ureteral catheter (6F) was removed at postoperative 12th hour in group 2. Visual analogue scores (VASs) at 24th hour and mean narcotic analgesic (tramadol) amounts were compared.There were 30 patients in both groups. Mean age, mean body mass index, and stone area were not significant between groups (p 0.05, for all). With regard to operative measures, mean duration of surgery, mean number of accesses, and mean drop in Hb levels were comparable. Besides, mean hospitalization period in group 1 was 68.8 ± 12 hours, whereas it was 54.5 ± 10 hours in group 2 (p 0.001). No patients in either group needed transfusion. Stone-free rates were similar in both groups (83% vs 90%, p = 0.391). Mean 24th hour VAS was 6.17 ± 1.4 in group 1 and 3.37 ± 1.4 in group 2 (p 0.001). Also, there was a statistically significant difference in mean tramadol requirements between groups (181.67 ± 56.45 vs 86.67 ± 57.13, groups 1 and 2, respectively).In patients undergoing PNL under spinal anesthesia, using an open-ended ureteral catheter to be removed at early postoperative period reduces analgesic requirement and duration of hospital stay without compromising surgical outcomes and complication rates.

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with or without nephrostomy tube. Materials & Methods: This prospective comparative study intended to compare the outcomes between PCNL without nephrostomy tube and PCNL with nephrostomy tube. A total of 50 cases of renal stone disease planned for PCNL in Dhaka Medical College Hospital from July 2015 to June 2017, were included in this study according to the statistical calculation. Cases were randomly allocated to group A (PCNL without nephrostomy tube) and group B (PCNL with nephrostomy tube). Each group consisted of 25 patients. The outcome variables were post operative pain, requirement of analgesic, leakage of urine and post operative hospital stay. Data were analyzed and compared by statistical tests. Results: No significant differences were found regarding age (p = 0.95), sex (p = 0.55) and operation time (p = 0.36) between two groups. Post operative pain (p < 0.0007) and analgesic requirement (p < 0.0001) were less in group A than group B cases. Leakage of urine is higher in group B in comparison to group A (p < 0.0001). Post operative hospital stay is shorter in group A than group B cases which is statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy without nephrostomy tube is better than percutaneous nephrolithotomy with nephrostomy tube in selective cases. It significantly reduces post operativepain, analgesic requirement and postoperative hospital stay. So percutaneous nephrolithotomy without nephrostomy tube is safe and effective.

Introduction: Placement of a nephrostomy tube at the conclusion of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been traditionally considered a standard practice. However, in the past decade, t...

Innovations in lasers and surgical technology have led to a renewed interest in the miniaturization of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We review the different approaches and evidence on the efficacy of mini-PCNL. Mini-PCNL encompasses a range of techniques using tract sizes from 4.8 to 22 F to treat renal stones. The most common device uses irrigation to passively extract stones out of the sheath. Super-mini-PCNL incorporates active suction. Ultra- and micro-techniques reduce the tract to smaller diameters. Laser fragmentation is the main lithotripsy modality. Studies demonstrate an association with reduced complications, hospital stay, and increased tubeless rate. Drawbacks include longer operative times while stone-free rates for larger stones may be sub-optimal. Mini-PCNL has advantages of less trauma and the avoidance of nephrostomy tubes. Ambulatory surgery is feasible in select patients. Advances in laser lithotripsy and active suction have the potential to improve stone clearance and treat larger stones.

Patient’s preparation is the important step of PCNL procedure. Hemostasis and urine bacteriologic and radiologic assessment are the key procedure of patient’s preparation. Patient’s selection, experience of the surgeon, and surgical steps including anesthesia, positioning, renal access, tract dilatation, stone disintegration, and nephrostomy tube placement are the important factors of the surgical outcome.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the primary method for the treatment of renal calculi. The preservation of the nephrostomy tube after operation brings severe pain to the patients. We use a 1,470 nm semiconductor laser to stop bleeding after the operation, which cannot reserve the nephrostomy tube, fully reflect its safety and effectiveness, and provide a new method for clinical practice. METHODS: Forty-two patients with renal stones who came to our hospital from March 2016 to September 2019 were randomly divided into two groups: laser operation group (20 patients) and traditional operation group (22 patients). The stone removal rate, surgical effect, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the stone clearance rate between the two groups at the 4th week after operation (P>0.05). However, the incidence of postoperative infection, incision pain, and massive bleeding in the laser surgery group were lower than those in the traditional surgery group (P0.05). The average postoperative hospital stay in the laser surgery group was shorter than that in the traditional surgery group, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 1,470 nm laser is safe, effective, and feasible in PCNL operation, especially in hemostasis of the renal puncture channel, and it is worth popularizing.

Objective To report urologic outcomes from a series of IUIs, sustained during nonurologic procedures, with regards to timing of diagnosis and management of the injury. Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) is the most common mechanism of ureteral trauma. Injuries can be intraoperatively diagnosed (IOD) or postoperatively diagnosed (POD). Methods This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients at a single institution who sustained an IUI from a non-urologic procedure between 2008 and 2019. Primary outcome was tube-dependence (ureter stent or nephrostomy tube) and nephrectomy rates at last follow-up. Secondary outcome was the number of additional urologic procedures required to manage subsequent complications of IUI. Results There were 30 patients with IOD and 57 patients with POD. In the IOD group, at mean follow up of 6.3 months, 4 patients (14.3%) were tube dependent. In the POD group, at mean follow up of 13.1 months, 5 patients (10%) were tube dependent (P = .570). Rate of nephrectomy was higher in POD group compared to IOD, but the difference was not statistically significant (12.3% vs 6% respectively, P = .414). Additionally, in the POD group, 56% and 19.3% required a secondary and tertiary procedure to manage IUI complications, respectively. These rates were 16.7% (P Conclusion Delayed diagnosis of IUI was significantly associated with increased number of procedures needed to manage the injury. The rate of nephrectomy and tube dependence in this group was higher but not statistically significant. Delayed diagnosis of IUI is associated with higher treatment burden.

Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy is generally safe, it has various complications. We present an extremely rare case in which the nephrostomy tube pierced renal parenchyma, proceeded through the right renal vein and inferior vena cava, finally reaching the right atrium. Such a tube misplaced to atrium level was firstly reported, which was safely withdrawn using a 2-step process under fluoroscopic monitoring. We also recommend the tube be marked with different color lines to maintain awareness of the tube length that has passed the peel-away sheath. Such information might help to avoid such complication.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:There is an obvious distinction between countries regarding nephrostomy tube (NT) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Large-bore NT PNL (LB-PNL) seems to provide he...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Hydronephrosis prior to radical cystectomy (RC) for urothelial carcinoma is variably treated with observation, ureteral stent, or percutaneous nephrostomy tube (PNT). A s...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Renal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy may be obtained via a pre-existing nephrostomy tube (NT) tract; however, emergently placed NTs are not always ideal for subse...

BackgroundGiant hydronephrosis is rare with a controversy about the complete loss of renal functions. Our objective is to present our center’s experience with the management of cases of clinically visible giant hydronephrosis considering the potential residual functions. Our study is a retrospective case series of clinically visible giant hydronephrosis which was managed during the period July 2001–June 2016. Demographic and clinical variables were studied with specific considerations to the potential residual functions.ResultsOf more than 82,000 urological interventions, only 47 cases (0.057%) were operated upon for clinically visible giant hydronephrosis. Group 1 included 21 patients (mean age = 50.43 ± 13.71 years) who were treated initially by nephrostomy tube, and group 2 included 26 patients (mean age = 42.96 ± 15.16 years) who were treated primarily by nephrectomy. The main clinical presentation was abdominal distention (61.7%), while 13 patients (27.7%) were unaware of the swellings. The commonest underlying causes of hydronephrosis were urolithiasis (68.1%) and bilharzial ureteral strictures (23.4%). The contralateral kidney was diseased in 22 cases (46.8%) including the bilateral clinically visible hydronephrosis in 7 cases (15%). Indications of placement of a nephrostomy tube included uremia, infections, and evaluation of renal functions, where 5 cases of group 1 regained significant split function ranged 14–33%.ConclusionsClinically visible giant hydronephrosis is an extreme form of renal dilatation with different etiologies such as urolithiasis and bilharziasis. Initial placement of a nephrostomy tube may save significant residual functions in these kidneys.

Introduction: The removal of an encrusted nephrostomy tube can be a challenging maneuver. Urological literature is very bare in detailing techniques for removal of entrapped percutaneous catheters. We present a simple, safe and non-invasive technique of nephrostomy removal using a vascular introducer sheath, useful to manage complicated situations such as nephrostomies blocked for severe encrustations or disabled in their self-locking system. Surgical technique: The nephrostomy tube is cut and the stump is passed with a suture needle. The suture is passed through the inner vascular introducer sheath tip, and the introducer is then removed. The introducer sheath is advanced over the nephrostomy until joining the pigtail segment, under fluoroscopy guidance. Thus the suture is pulled out with strenght to contrast the opposite stiffness of the encrusted coil, until the nephrostomy has safely come out. Comment: The sheath exchange technique is quick, involves less manipulation through the perirenal fascia and kidney, and is suitable for different conditions of entrapped nephrostomies.

BACKGROUND Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the gold-standard for treatment of renal stones larger than 20 mm. Traditionally, a nephrostomy tube (NT) is placed, causing discomfort and prolonged hospitalization but some surgeons prefer the tubeless technique (TL). Simultaneously, the effectiveness of ureteral stents after PNCL is doubtful. We investigated the safety of the TL technique as well as that of the single loop (SL) over double loop (DL) stents. METHODS Three hundred and twenty-one individuals submitted to PCNL in a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed to compare procedures regarding safety and effectiveness (stone size, residual stones, operative time, peri- and post-operative complications, need for blood transfusion and length of hospital stay) between two groups regarding presence or absence of NT placement (NT [N.=198] vs. TL [N.=123]); and according to the type of stent used (SL [N.=74] vs. DL [N.=247]). RESULTS NT was associated with a higher complications rate compared to the TL (30.3% and 13%, respectively; P=0.001) and longer hospitalization (4 vs. 2 days; P=0.001). Regarding ureteral stents, they cause similar morbidities (20.7% and 24.4%; P=0.881), and median length of stay (3 days; P=0.947). NT and DL were more frequent in patients with higher stone burden. CONCLUSIONS Tubeless PCNL encompasses lower morbidity and should be considered as an option for select patients, particularly with less stone burden and uncomplicated procedures. Regarding ureteral stents, SL is a safe option and does not require further procedures for removal.

Objective: To determine possible risk factors for accidental nephrostomy tube dislodgement and compare two different tube types in this context in patients with chronic catheters. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of long-term patients with nephrostomy tube. We performed a comparative analysis, studying the possible variables that were related to catheter dislodgement. In addition, a subanalysis was also carried out comparing different catheter designs (Pigtail and Foley) in case this could be related to the dislodgement. Results: Two hundred five cases were collected. A total of 51.2% of cases had a pigtail nephrostomy and 48.8% Foley type, and accidental dislodgement occurred in 26.3% of cases. In multivariate analysis, we observed that first time nephrostomy tube placement entailed higher risk of accidental dislodgement than successive placements (odds ratio [OR] 1.95, confidence interval [CI] 1.01-3.74, p = 0.04). In the pigtail-type catheter patient subgroup, tubes placed by a resident were more prone to accidental dislodgement than those placed by an attending physician (OR 3.39, CI 1.29-8.91, p = 0.01), while first episode cases were more likely to have become dislodged than in a subsequent event (OR 3.17, CI 1.17-8.57, p = 0.02). In addition, the mean (in days) until nephrostomy tube dislodgement in cases where this occurred was 20.32 +/- 3.52 for pigtail and 60.92 +/- 5.15 for Foley (p < 0.01 in Kaplan-Meier's test). Conclusion: Nephrostomy tube displacement in long-term patients is a common problem. Some factors associated with the catheter could increase the risk of involuntary displacement, such as being a first event or being inserted by less experienced resident doctors. In addition, pigtail type nephrostomies tend toward accidental dislodgement earlier than Foley ones.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to review the incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) and pyelonephritis after placement of percutaneous nephrostomy tube (NT) in our patients.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent NT placement from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2015, at N

The article presents the experience of successful surgical treatment of a patient with complete ureteral obliteration after transurethral endoscopic pyelolithotripsy in the left renal pelvis with lithoextraction and stenting. Two months later the patient developed stent obstruction and underwent repeat stenting and insertion of a left nephrostomy tube. After another 1.5 months, he was found to have complete obliteration of the left ureter. Ileal substitution of the left ureter was performed with the formation of a pyelo-ileal anastomosis and antireflux ileo-cysto-anastomosis. Contrast-enhanced MRI-urography performed on the 21st day ascertained the complete patency of the anastomosis. The patient was discharged in a satisfactory condition. At a follow-up examination five months after hospital discharge, the patient was in satisfactory condition with no complaints. Renal ultrasound and MRI showed no signs of obstruction of the ileal autograft.

Introduction Percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure is generally used to treat stones resistant to other treatment modalities. Colonic perforation even though rare, is a serious complication that increases patient's morbidity. This case report describes the case of a patient with retrorenal colon who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of pelvis/lower calyceal staghorn stone. Case presentation A 63-year-old female patient presented for the management of a staghorn pelvis-lower calyceal stone. The patient had a preoperative computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis that showed an incidental finding of left retrorenal colon. Under computed tomography scan guidance, a nephrostomy tube was successfully placed by an interventional radiologist, and then she underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Conclusion This case report aims to stress on the importance of doing a computed tomography scan whenever a prior abdominal surgery is performed. We strongly believe that gastrointestinal injuries could be avoided by using computed tomography guided access in high risk patients.

Inguinoscrotal herniation of the bladder is a rare presentation of inguinal hernia that can result in significant complications if untreated. We describe a case of an elderly male with a delayed presentation of bladder herniation resulting in severe acute kidney injury requiring urgent placement of nephrostomy tubes. Ultimately surgery is required for definitive management.

To manage bilateral complete distal ureteral transections (CDUT) via stent placement achieved through a combination of antegrade and retrograde approaches. An antegrade wire was advanced through the nephrostomy tube. Flexible ureteroscopy was utilized via retrograde approach to identify the guidewire in the pelvis. The guidewire was grasped and withdrawn out the urethra, and bilateral stents were placed over guidewire. Patient continues to remain asymptomatic one year later, with symmetrical renal function and no evidence of obstruction. We demonstrate that a CDUT can be successfully realigned with a combined endourological approach, thereby avoiding open/laparoscopic ureteral repair.

SummaryPercutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using a nephrostomy tube as a drainage has been considered the standard procedure. However, recently many literatures have reported the use of tubeless and totally tubeless drainage following PCNL with excellent results. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE databases to review each drainage technique following PCNL (tubeless, totally tubeless, or nephrostomy tube) and also to assess the most recent evidence that compare the safety of these drainage procedures with a clear-cut clinical parameter imposed. Tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL is significantly superior to standard PCNL in terms of length of hospital stay, postoperative pain (visual analog scale) score, demands or dosage of analgesics required, as well as faster return to activity for the patients. However, despite the many advantages of tubeless or totally tubeless PCNL over standard PCNL, there are a number of situations requiring the consideration of nephrostomy tube placement. Nonetheless, decision to use or not to use nephrostomy tube after PCNL depends on the surgeon’s experience and clinical judgment.

A 16-year-old female with a complex medical history, including myelomeningocele and nephrolithiasis, presented with severe chest pain and dyspnea following nephrolithotomy and nephrostomy tube inse...