1. Class 1C antiarrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease
- Author
-
Michael L. Bernard, Robert M. Bober, Glenn M. Polin, Sammy Khatib, Paul A. Rogers, Daniel P. Morin, and Peter G. Pantlin
- Subjects
Male ,Infarction ,Pilot Projects ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Ventricular Function, Left ,Coronary artery disease ,0302 clinical medicine ,Heart Rate ,Risk Factors ,atrial fibrillation ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Myocardial infarction ,education.field_of_study ,Ejection fraction ,adverse drug effect ,Atrial fibrillation ,Middle Aged ,drug therapy ,Treatment Outcome ,Cardiology ,Female ,Original Article ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Anti-Arrhythmia Agents ,coronary artery disease ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Perfusion Imaging ,Population ,Context (language use) ,Risk Assessment ,Clinical ,03 medical and health sciences ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Coronary Circulation ,Physiology (medical) ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,cardiovascular diseases ,education ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Original Articles ,1C antiarrhythmic drugs ,medicine.disease ,ischemic heart disease ,Positron-Emission Tomography ,Conventional PCI ,business - Abstract
Background Class 1C antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are effective first‐line agents for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. However, these agents commonly are avoided in patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD), due to known increased risk in the postmyocardial infarction population. Whether 1C AADs are safe in patients with CAD but without clinical ischemia or infarct is unknown. Reduced coronary flow capacity (CFC) on positron emission tomography (PET) reliably identifies myocardial regions supplied by vessels with CAD causing flow limitation. Objective To assess whether treatment with 1C AADs increases mortality in patients without known CAD but with CFC indicating significantly reduced coronary blood flow. Methods In this pilot study, we compared patients with AF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% who were treated with 1C AADs to age‐matched AF patients without 1C AAD treatment. No patient had clinically evident CAD (ie, reversible perfusion defect, known ≥70% epicardial lesion, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or myocardial infarction). All patients had PET‐based quantification of stress myocardial blood flow and CFC. Death was assessed by clinical follow‐up and social security death index search. Results A total of 78 patients with 1C AAD exposure were matched to 78 controls. Over a mean follow‐up of 2.0 years, the groups had similar survival (P = .54). Among patients with CFC indicating the presence of occult CAD (ie, reduced CFC involving ≥50% of myocardium), 1C‐treated patients had survival similar to (P = .44) those not treated with 1C agents. Conclusions In a limited population of AF patients with preserved left ventricle function and PET‐CFC indicating occult CAD, treatment with 1C AADs appears not to increase mortality. A larger study would be required to confidently assess the safety of these drugs in this context.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF