1. Visualisation of the tricuspid valve using a new 3D echocardiographic scoring system
- Author
-
Tanja, Kücken, Sarah, Tamm, Anja, Haase-Fielitz, Christoph Roland, Edlinger, Michael, Neuss, Marwin, Bannehr, and Christian, Butter
- Subjects
Aged, 80 and over ,Male ,transoesophageal ,Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional ,Reproducibility of Results ,transthoracic ,Middle Aged ,Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency ,body regions ,tricuspid valve disease ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Valvular Heart Disease ,Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ,Humans ,echocardiography ,Female ,Tricuspid Valve ,three dimensional ,Echocardiography, Transesophageal ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
With rising focus on interventional treatment of the tricuspid valve (TV), the need for good echocardiographic imaging increases. Aim of this study was to develop a scoring system describing how accurate three dimensional (3D) echocardiographic imaging of TV and its anatomical structures is. Methods and results In this retrospective exploratory cohort study, we analysed data from consecutive patients undergoing transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). 3D sequences were stored using eight different views. In each view, scoring focused on visualisation of five (in TOE 6) anatomical structures with a maximum of three points per structure for excellent imaging quality. We compared the scores of patients with and without relevant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (cut-off effective regurgitant orifice 0.4 cm² measured in two-dimensional (2D) TTE using velocity time integral and proximal isovolumetric velocity area). 108 consecutive patients were examined, 40.7% presented with relevant TR. With the exception of coaptation, a higher score was achieved for all structures in TOE than in TTE. TV ring (TVR) was easiest to visualise with TOE in four-chamber view (4 CV) (2.42±0.67 points) presenting the highest score independent of anatomical structure and view. Posterior leaflet had best imaging scores in TOE in 4 CV (2.0±0.86) compared with TTE in 4 CV (1.64±0.80), p=0.001. Patients with relevant TR had significantly better 3D imaging scores in 4 CV compared with patients without relevant TR (TTE p
- Published
- 2020