This paper proposes a multi-criteria model to solve the planning problem of a renewable energy portfolio in which economic, social, and environmental sustainability objectives are considered. In the first stage, a parametric set of Fuzzy Hierarchy Goal Programming models is built to find a collection of energy mixes that satisfy soft priorities according to the corresponding economic, social, or environmental profile. In the second stage, we determine the weights of the goals based on stakeholder preferences using the Extended Best-Worst method. We then calculate the utility of each renewable energy portfolio detected in the first stage by applying a value function associated with the importance of the objectives. Finally, the best energy mix for each profile is found by applying a behavioral TOPSIS method. The proposal is applied to Spain. This method allows us to find renewable energy systems that guarantee good economic performance and environmental and social benefits. Purpose: A model that is able to flexibly take into account the preferences of different stakeholders when designing a portfolio of alternative renewable technologies. A hybrid methodology Goal Programming with a Fuzzy Hierarchy (GPFH) model combining with a Behaviour TOPSIS is proposed to achieve this purpose. The methodology is applied in Spain for 2025 and 2030 according to the provisions granted for the Reference Scenario 2020 model (Commission et al., 2021). Methodology: The pioneering model of goal programming (GP) was proposed by Charnes and Cooper (1955) and further developed by several authors, including Lee (1972), Ignizio (1985), and Romero (2014). GP has become one of the most popular techniques within the field of multiple criteria decision-making (Jones & Tamiz, 2010) and is one of the most widely used methods due to its applicability to real problems (see, e.g., Bilbao-Terol et al., 2012; Chang, 2015; Hocine, 2020). The methodology unfolds in two stages. In Stage 1, a Goal Programming Model with a Fuzzy Hierarchy is applied. Assume that a stakeholder with a specific profile wants to propose a Renewable Energy (RE) portfolio that addresses the conflicting impacts of the different technologies according to her preferential structure. To incorporate the priority structure of the impacts for the stakeholders, we develop a decision goal programming model in which the particular preferred solutions of the stakeholders and their imprecise hierarchy structure are taken into account. Stage 1 gives a finite set of portfolios in which the corresponding stakeholder should choose her preferred solution according to the importance awarded to the impacts of each alternative. In Stage 2, we select the best portfolio by applying Behavioural TOPSIS with Best-Worst weights. We address a weighting process to determine the relative importance of the impacts according to the profile of the corresponding stakeholder. We use the Extended Best-Worst method (Bilbao-Terol et al., 2022), which determines the priority weights from interval pairwise comparison judgments and is based on the Best-Worst (BW) method (Rezaei, 2015) for constructing the incomplete interval comparison matrix. We solve an Extended Best-Worst (EBW) method considering the most important criterion (best) and the least important criterion (worst) for the decision maker. The results of EBW are applied to a value function to assess the alternative RE portfolios. Lastly, a Behavioural TOPSIS is used to find the best RE portfolio. Results: The proposed MCDM methodology allows us to use six impacts, specifically Total Employment (APPA, 2022), Energy return on investment (Mekonnen et al., 2015), Land-use footprint (King et al., 2023), Levelised Cost Electricity (IRENA, 2023), Lifecycle assessments of GHG emission values (IRENA, 2022), Water footprint (Mekonnen et al., 2015) to assess six renewable technologies: Bioenergy, Concentrated Solar Power, Hydropower, Offshore and Onshore Wind, and Solar Photovoltaic Power. We present three profiles: economic, ecological, and social. Each profile is determined by fuzzy relations modelled according to the proposed methodology, and a set of weights is obtained by applying the EBW method. The results show that the largest share corresponds to onshore wind in the economic and environmental profiles. For the economic profile, the largest share corresponds to onshore wind, the technology with the lowest LCOE. Also, Bioenergy and Offshore wind increase their use concerning generation in 2023. For the environmental profile, the largest share corresponds to onshore wind, the technology with the lowest LU. Bioenergy decreases its share compared to generation in 2023 due to its highest LU and high WF. Also, the SPV decreased its share with respect to generation in 2023 due to its highest LCA, and the CSP and Hydropower decreased their share with respect to generation in 2023. Finally, the social profile's largest share corresponds to solar power and wind. Bioenergy's share with respect to generation will decrease in 2023 due to its highest LU and high WF. Research limitations: In future research we want to address the treatment of imprecision and ambiguity in the coefficients that determine the performance of each technology in each of the criteria considered. Our idea is to extend the work of Inuiguchi (1991), Arenas et al. (1999) by proposing an interval goal programming. Originality: A new methodology that, in two stages, achieves an RE portfolio according to the soft priorities of DMs. Fuzzy relationships allow us to overcome the drawbacks of the lexicographic order. The different energy profiles have different priorities for the considered impacts, but they cannot forget the impacts situated in inferior positions. Therefore, fuzzy relations are suitable in energy planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]