1. International standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine in Europe
- Author
-
Bullock, A, Wilde, J D, Bion, J F, Clutton-Brock, T, Flaatten, H, Mathy, B, van Mook, W, Schuwirth, L, Marsh, B, Phelan, D, Shippey, B, Nimmo, G, Castel, S, Hillion, Y, Bonnet, J, Chaumont, D, Rothen, H U, Reay, H, Krenn, C, Germann, P, Ferdinande, P, de Backer, D, Smilov, I, Keremidchieva, N, Gasparoviae, V, Radonic, R, Kyprianou, T, Kakas, M, Sramek, V, Rubertsson, Sten, m.fl., (et al), Bullock, A, Wilde, J D, Bion, J F, Clutton-Brock, T, Flaatten, H, Mathy, B, van Mook, W, Schuwirth, L, Marsh, B, Phelan, D, Shippey, B, Nimmo, G, Castel, S, Hillion, Y, Bonnet, J, Chaumont, D, Rothen, H U, Reay, H, Krenn, C, Germann, P, Ferdinande, P, de Backer, D, Smilov, I, Keremidchieva, N, Gasparoviae, V, Radonic, R, Kyprianou, T, Kakas, M, Sramek, V, Rubertsson, Sten, and m.fl., (et al)
- Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop internationally harmonised standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine (ICM). METHODS: Standards were developed by using consensus techniques. A nine-member nominal group of European intensive care experts developed a preliminary set of standards. These were revised and refined through a modified Delphi process involving 28 European national coordinators representing national training organisations using a combination of moderated discussion meetings, email, and a Web-based tool for determining the level of agreement with each proposed standard, and whether the standard could be achieved in the respondent's country. RESULTS: The nominal group developed an initial set of 52 possible standards which underwent four iterations to achieve maximal consensus. All national coordinators approved a final set of 29 standards in four domains: training centres, training programmes, selection of trainees, and trainers' profiles. Only three standards were considered immediately achievable by all countries, demonstrating a willingness to aspire to quality rather than merely setting a minimum level. Nine proposed standards which did not achieve full consensus were identified as potential candidates for future review. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary set of clearly defined and agreed standards provides a transparent framework for assuring the quality of training programmes, and a foundation for international harmonisation and quality improvement of training in ICM.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF