Search

Coordinating humanitarian supply chains can be challenging in terms of getting timely aid to those who need it. While operations in commercial supply chains have been well studied, research studies that address coordination in humanitarian supply chains are still lacking. Unlike commercial supply chains, humanitarian supply chains focus on delivering what customers "need" rather than "want" within difficult environments rife with uncertainty. This paper introduces the "Humanitarian Aid and Relief Distribution (HARD) Game" as an experiential learning tool that explores the potential for increased operational efficiency while balancing decision tradeoffs impacting humanitarian supply chain performance, including beneficiary demand satisfaction, operational costs, and transportation resources utilization. The HARD game is intended for graduate and undergraduate students in courses dealing with topics on supply chain management. It allows students to analyze aspects that significantly impact humanitarian supply chain operations, such as: supply chain coordination and planning, supply chain risks, demand volatility, and competing objectives. Statistical analysis of students' survey responses provide evidence that the HARD game is an effective pedagogical tool that is engaging for students and complementary to the traditional lecture format in the field of supply chain management education.

The purpose of this paper is to understand perceptions of interior design students after using game-based learning (GBL) as an approach to address workload distribution, lack of clear assessment criteria, and deficiencies of the master-apprentice model during the process of solving several small-scale design problems along the course of a semester. A literature review of the instructional issues in design studios is presented along with an overview of the activity systems theory as an underpinning theoretical perspective. This research paper explains the research design behind the case study methodology used to perform data collection, analysis measures and organize coding schemes. Findings from the study conclude that GBL fits into the iterative and experimental nature of the design process, helps students focus on the design process through trial and error without a significant risk, changes the studio's feedback structure, and allows students to track their progress while having creative freedom. This paper provides empirical evidence supporting the existence of instructional issues in traditional design studios, provides considerations for using GBL to address these issues, and suggests directions for future research studies in fields of instructional technology, design pedagogy and higher education policy.

The use of games and game structures in educational contexts is growing in popularity. An increasing number of technologies have been developed to meet the needs of designing a course as a game. This article discussed the design process in game-based learning and reviewed the research on structuring a course with a focus on feedback, goals, and interaction. In addition, we presented the best practices and technologies to support the integration of badges and leaderboards into game-based learning. With the intentional and systematic design of game-based learning, instructors and designers will increase the impact of game attributes and elements on student achievement and motivation. Further investigation of game-based learning attributes and elements is needed to provide detailed knowledge on the compatibility with current technological tools.