Search

Autism spectrum disorders and developmental coordination disorders are both associated with sensorimotor impairments, yet their nature and specificity remain unknown. In order to clearly distinguish the specificity between the two disorders, children with autism spectrum disorder or developmental coordination disorder presenting the same degree of motor impairment, thus homogeneous profiles, were examined in a reach-to-displace paradigm, which allows the integrity of two main aspects of motor control (anticipation/feedforward control and movement correction/feedback control) to be separately interrogated. We manipulated children's previous knowledge of the weight of the object they were to displace: when known, participants could anticipate the consequences of the weight when reaching for the object, prior to contact with it, thus allowing for feedforward control. Conversely, when unknown prior to contact, participants had to cope with the object weight in the displacing phase of the movement, and use feedback control. Results revealed a preserved feedforward control, but an impaired movement execution (atypical slowness) in children with developmental coordination disorder, while children with autism spectrum disorder displayed the opposite pattern with an impaired feedforward control, but a preserved feedback one. These findings shed light on how specific motor impairments might differently characterize developmental disorders and call for motor rehabilitation programmes adapted to each population.

Introduction In France, over recent years, the prescription rate of antipsychotic (AP) remained stable in children and adolescents. Prescription of second-generation antipsychotics increased, whereas prescription of first-generation antipsychotics decreased. Off-label prescriptions are very frequent in this population. Adverse events (AEs) in youth treated with AP are common and may be severe. AEs have hitherto been poorly monitored in naturalistic studies independent from industry.Method and analysis We describe a French prospective multicentre study in an AP-naïve paediatric population named Etude de la Tolérance des AntiPsychotique chez l'Enfant (ETAPE). The study started in April 2013. So far, 200 patients have been included. The inclusion criteria are: male or female inpatients aged from 6 to 18 years, treated with an AP drug for less than 28 days, never been treated or having received AP for less than 3 months, discontinued at least 6 months prior to inclusion. These assessments of AE are performed at inclusion, as well as at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the introduction of the AP. The monitoring period will end in May 2016.Ethics and dissemination The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee ‘Sud Méditerrané V’ (number 12.082) and by the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (number 2012-004546-15). All patients and their parents signed informed consent on enrolment in the study. We will submit the results of the study to relevant journals and offer national and international presentations. This study will enable better characterisation of the prescription of AP drugs. The results will further help to develop quality standards and recommendations for monitoring AE during the prescription of AP.Trial registration number NCT02007928.

Abstract Background Perinatal mental health disorders (PMHD) remain often undetected, undiagnosed, and untreated with variable access to perinatal mental health care (PMHC). To guide the design of optimal PMHC (i.e., coproduced with persons with lived experience [PLEs]), this qualitative participatory study explored the experiences, views, and expectations of PLEs, obstetric providers (OP), childcare health providers (CHPs), and mental health providers (MHPs) on PMHC and the care of perinatal depression. Methods We conducted nine focus groups and 24 individual interviews between December 2020 and May 2022 for a total number of 84 participants (24 PLEs; 30 OPs; 11 CHPs; and 19 MHPs). The PLEs group included women with serious mental illness (SMI) or autistic women who had contact with perinatal health services. We recruited PLEs through social media and a center for psychiatric rehabilitation, and health providers (HPs) through perinatal health networks. We used the inductive six-step process by Braun and Clarke for the thematic analysis. Results We found some degree of difference in the identified priorities between PLEs (e.g., personal recovery, person-centered care) and HPs (e.g., common culture, communication between providers, and risk management). Personal recovery in PMHD corresponded to the CHIME framework, that is, connectedness, hope, identity, meaning, and empowerment. Recovery-supporting relations and peer support contributed to personal recovery. Other factors included changes in the socio-cultural conception of the peripartum, challenging stigma (e.g., integrating PMH into standard perinatal healthcare), and service integration. Discussion This analysis generated novel insights into how to improve PMHC for all users including those with SMI or autism.

Dissociative Identity Disorders (DIDs) are controversial psychiatric conditions encountered in clinical practice and nosology. DID as described in the international classifications has little similarity with the clinical picture of “DID” met in current youth psychiatry. From this Perspective, we hypothesize that this current clinical presentation does not satisfy the categorical criteria of the international classifications. Based on the two terminological challenges related to the definition of DID (i.e., the notion of dissociative disorders and the different meanings of the term identity), we propose to differentiate two distinct entities from each other. The first is medical and listed in diagnostic criteria of international classifications; the second comes from popular culture and refers to the vast majority of clinical presentations received in daily clinical practice—presented under the term Dissociative Identity Conditions (DIC). Since the status of DIC is a hot topic in current clinical psychiatry, we aim to identify eight possible explanations that can be provided to support its occurrence: (1) impact of iatrogenicity; (2) factors of suggestibility and desire for social acceptability; (3) psychoanalytic explanations; (4) neuropsychological explanations; (5) socio-cognitive explanations; (6) emotional labeling; (7) narrative explanations; (8) and transient illnesses explanations. In conclusion, we sustain that DIC results from a narrative interpretation of medical discourse by popular culture, developing in patients presenting undeniable distress. Such a transient disease fits in an ecological niche, which echoes the values of society, persisting under the action of a need for narrative continuity of the self.

In order to create a dynamic for the psychiatry of the future, bringing together digital technology and clinical practice, we propose in this paper a cross-teaching translational roadmap comparing clinical reasoning with computational reasoning. Based on the relevant literature on clinical ways of thinking, we differentiate the process of clinical judgment into four main stages: collection of variables, theoretical background, construction of the model, and use of the model. We detail, for each step, parallels between: i) clinical reasoning; ii) the ML engineer methodology to build a ML model; iii) and the ML model itself. Such analysis supports the understanding of the empirical practice of each of the disciplines (psychiatry and ML engineering). Thus, ML does not only bring methods to the clinician, but also supports educational issues for clinical practice. Psychiatry can rely on developments in ML reasoning to shed light on its own practice in a clever way. In return, this analysis highlights the importance of subjectivity of the ML engineers and their methodologies.

Abstract Background The role of deleterious copy number variations in schizophrenia is well established while data regarding pathogenic variations remain scarce. We report for the first time a case of schizophrenia in a child with a pathogenic mutation of the chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 2 (CHD2) gene. Case presentation The proband was the second child of unrelated parents. Anxiety and sleep disorders appeared at the age of 10 months. He presented febrile seizures and, at the age of 8, two generalized tonic-clonic seizures. At the age of 10, emotional withdrawal emerged, along with a flat affect, disorganization and paranoid ideation, without seizures. He began to talk and giggle with self. Eventually, the patient presented daily auditory and visual hallucinations. The diagnosis of childhood onset schizophrenia (DSM V) was then evoked. Brain imaging was unremarkable. Wakefulness electroencephalography showed a normal background and some bilateral spike-wave discharges that did not explain the psychosis features. A comparative genomic hybridization array (180 K, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) revealed an 867-kb 16p13.3 duplication, interpreted as a variant of unknown significance confirmed by a quantitative PCR that also showed its maternal inheritance. Risperidone (1,5 mg per day), led to clinical improvement. At the age of 11, an explosive relapse of epilepsy occurred with daily seizures of various types. The sequencing of a panel for monogenic epileptic disorders and Sanger sequencing revealed a de novo pathogenic heterozygous transition in CHD2 (NM_001271.3: c.4003G > T). Conclusions This case underlines that schizophrenia may be, sometimes, underpinned by a Mendelian disease. It addresses the question of systematic genetic investigations in the presence of warning signs such as a childhood onset of the schizophrenia or a resistant epilepsy. It points that, in the absence of pathogenic copy number variation, the investigations should also include a search for pathogenic variations, which means that some of the patients with schizophrenia should benefit from Next Generation Sequencing tools. Last but not least, CHD2 encodes a member of the chromodomain helicase DNA-binding (CHD) family involved in chromatin remodeling. This observation adds schizophrenia to the phenotypic spectrum of chromodomain remodeling disorders, which may lead to innovative therapeutic approaches.

The idea that intelligence is embedded not only in a single brain network, but instead in a complex, well-optimized system of complementary networks, has led to the development of whole brain network analysis. Using graph theory to analyze resting-state functional MRI data, we investigated the brain graph networks (or brain networks) of high intelligence quotient (HIQ) children. To this end, we computed the “hub disruption index κ,” an index sensitive to graph network modifications. We found significant topological differences in the integration and segregation properties of brain networks in HIQ compared to standard IQ children, not only for the whole brain graph, but also for each hemispheric graph, and for the homotopic connectivity. Moreover, two profiles of HIQ children, homogenous and heterogeneous, based on the differences between the two main IQ subscales [verbal comprehension index (VCI) and perceptual reasoning index (PRI)], were compared. Brain network changes were more pronounced in the heterogeneous than in the homogeneous HIQ subgroups. Finally, we found significant correlations between the graph networks’ changes and the full-scale IQ (FSIQ), as well as the subscales VCI and PRI. Specifically, the higher the FSIQ the greater was the brain organization modification in the whole brain, the left hemisphere, and the homotopic connectivity. These results shed new light on the relation between functional connectivity topology and high intelligence, as well as on different intelligence profiles.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) affects today 0.6 to 0.7% of the world’s population, which makes it one of the most frequent neurodevelopmental disorders in daily practice. Long presented in a pejorative or even deficient mode, the social representation of ASD has evolved considerably over the past 20 years, in particular to the benefit of the concept of neurodiversity and the work of associations supporting these people. In this movement, adults with ASD increasingly allow themselves to choose to become parents (or not) and therefore to engage (or not) in a maternity project. We present here the particularities of the parental experience of women and couples affected by ASD in order to enlighten the care teams and enable them to guide these couples, as well as possible, in their first interactions with their baby. We also aim to avoid any risk of stigmatization or misinterpretation of the quality of mother-baby exchanges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Périnatalité is the property of John Libbey Eurotext Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Périnatalité is the property of John Libbey Eurotext Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Importance: Growing evidence supports an association between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in childhood and subsequent psychotic disorders. Both disorders share physiopathological features such as attention deficits, dopaminergic imbalance, and genetic susceptibility. However, the results of epidemiologic studies have been conflicting.Objective: To provide a quantitative synthesis of studies exploring the association between ADHD and the risk of subsequent psychotic disorder.Data Sources: A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycInfo, and Web of Science databases was performed from inception until the final analysis on July 7, 2020. No restriction of language was applied.Study Selection: Cohort and case-control studies examining the relative risk of developing a psychotic disorder in people diagnosed with ADHD at younger than 18 years compared with control individuals without ADHD.Data Extraction and Synthesis: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were followed in reporting results. Two independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of individual studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Preferably adjusted odds ratios (aORs) or hazard ratios from the identified studies were extracted, and ORs were computed when they were not adjusted. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled relative effect using the meta package in R.Main Outcomes and Measures: An association between ADHD (exposure) and psychotic disorder (outcomes); both diagnoses were based on international classification.Results: A total of 15 studies were included in the review. Twelve studies were pooled in the meta-analysis, representing 1.85 million participants. A diagnosis of ADHD in childhood was associated with a significant increase in the risk of subsequent psychotic disorder, with a pooled relative effect of 4.74 (95% CI, 4.11-5.46; I2 = 43% [95% CI, 0%-70%]). No significant between-group differences were found for subgroup analyses according to psychotic disorder (odds ratio [OR], 5.04; 95% CI, 4.36-5.83) or schizophrenia (OR, 4.59; 95% CI, 3.83-5.50) outcomes, cohort (OR, 4.64; 95% CI, 4.04-5.34) or case-control (OR, 6.81; 95% CI, 4.21-11.03) study design, and adjusted (OR, 4.72; 95% CI, 4.11-5.46) or unadjusted (OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.39-10.49) estimates. Meta-regressions were not significant when sex and bias score were used as covariates. No evidence of publication bias was found.Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that childhood ADHD is associated with an increased risk of a subsequent psychotic disorder. Further studies are required to determine the mechanisms linking these common conditions and whether early intervention for ADHD might reduce the risk of subsequent psychotic disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Le recours à une Unité de Concertation Éthique en Néphrologie depuis plus de 10 ans semble utile au néphrologue pour l'aider à décider de maintenir ou d'arrêter la dialyse chez des patients en fin de vie. Son apport majeur serait de structurer un débat pluridisciplinaire entre professionnels de santé de toutes catégories et personnes qualifiées extérieures. Un protocole de recherche qualitatif en 3 parties (médicale, juridique et philosophique) a cherché à vérifier cette hypothèse. Le travail visait à étudier l'incidence des délibérations en Unité de Concertation Éthique en Néphrologie sur la perception, la connaissance, la prise en compte de considérations juridiques et éthiques ainsi que leurs répercussions concrètes sur la logique de décision et les pratiques médicales, sur la relation avec le malade ou sa famille comme avec les autres interlocuteurs intervenant dans sa prise en charge. Deux questionnaires et un entretien semi-directif menés respectivement par 3 éléments moteurs de l'Unité de Concertation Éthique en Néphrologie ont été réalisés auprès des 22 membres permanents de l'Unité de Concertation Éthique en Néphrologie ayant assisté aux 10 sessions de l'année universitaire 2015–2016 pour discuter 21 saisines. Treize participants (4 médecins, 6 infirmiers diplômés d'État, 3 non-soignants) ont répondu aux questionnaires et 6 médecins aux entretiens. Les résultats montrent que le patient vu dans sa globalité, placé au centre d'une discussion libre et multidisciplinaire cadrée par des rappels juridiques et éthiques, constitue un processus de prise de décision rassurant. Communiquer sur son existence, anticiper davantage les situations, assouplir son organisation, rendre plus lisibles ses comptes rendus, reprendre a posteriori des observations et élargir le champ des compétences présentes amélioreraient le fonctionnement de l'Unité de Concertation Éthique en Néphrologie. For more than 10 years, nephrologists in the Grenoble-region have sought advice from the Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology with regards to whether to stop or continue dialysis for patients under palliative care. This process deserves a multidisciplinary debate between health professionals and qualified non-health professionals. Thus, we organized a qualitative research protocol in three parts (medical, philosophical, judicial) to explore this issue. Our study aimed to assess the impact of Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology's discussions regarding perception, knowledge, and judicial and ethical considerations. The practical repercussions of decision-making within medical practice, its impacts on the patient and his/her family, as well as associated-health professionals, was assessed. To achieve this, two questionnaires and an interview were organized by three Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology-leaders to review the viewpoints of the 22 permanent Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology members that had participated in 10 Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology sessions between 2015 and 2016 to discuss 21 case-reports. Only 13 persons (4 physicians, 6 nurses, 3 non-health professionals) agreed to respond to the questionnaires, and six physicians agreed to participate in an interview. Overall, it was found that most affected patients' physicians agreed with the multidisciplinary discussion, which included judicial and ethical perspectives, and felt reassured with regards to Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology's final decision. However, our study showed that Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology's functioning could be improved by promoting its existence more widely, by making these decisions earlier within clinical situations, to make Ethical Concertation Unit in Nephrology more accessible to health workers, to make reports easier to understand, to re-examine a posteriori some clinical situations, and to broaden the scope of multidisciplinary skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]