Search

Introduction: Compared to abdominoperineal resection (APR), sphincter preservation using low anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer (RC) implies the risk of impaired functional outcome and postoperative complications associated with a persistent or additionally required ostomy. The aim of our study was to compare quality of life (QoL) after AR and APR with a special separate analysis of AR patients with a stoma. Methods: QoL of 84 APR, 356 AR, and 29 AR patients with complications and an additional stoma, termed converted therapy (COT) patients, was compared with regard to groups and effect of radiotherapy (RT). All patients received rectal resection between 1998 and 2013, and 47% of the patients had RT. QoL was assessed using extended EORTC QLQ-C30 and -CR38 questionnaires. Results: Questionnaires from 57 APR, 165 AR, and 25 COT patients alive were evaluated after a median time of 4 years after surgery. Global health status was equally high in AR and APR patients (score: 67), whereas COT patients turned out with a significantly lower score of 50 (p = 0.007). Compared to APR and COT, AR patients revealed less symptoms and higher functionality, especially for physical, role, and social functioning (p < 0.001). The reduction of QoL instances was significant in the COT group and in all patients treated by RT. Conclusion: QoL after RC resection may be further improved by avoiding additionally required ostomy after AR but also RT by a better individual selection of qualified patients. Qualification parameters urgently need to be defined by prospective studies.

Rarely, scientific developments centered around the patient as a whole are published. Our multidisciplinary group, headed by gastrointestinal surgeons, applied this research philosophy considering the most important aspects of the diseases “colon- and rectal cancer” in the long-term developments. Good expert cooperation/knowledge at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm (CCCU) were applied in several phase III trials for multimodal treatments of primary tumors (MMT) and metastatic diseases (involving nearly 2000 patients and 64 centers), for treatment individualization of MMT and of metastatic disease, for psycho-oncology/quality of life involving the patients’ wishes, and for disease prevention. Most of the targets initially were heavily rejected/discussed in the scientific communities, but now have become standards in treatments and national guidelines or are topics in modern translational research protocols involving molecular biology for e.g., “patient centered individualized treatment”. In this context we also describe the paths we had to tread in order to realize our new goals, which at the end were highly beneficial for the patients from many points of view. This description is also important for students and young researchers who, with an actual view on our recent developments, might want to know how medical progress was achieved.

BACKGROUND To cope with the COVID-19 outbreak in Germany, the government imposed a lockdown, which led to restrictions and lifestyle changes for the population. PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the lockdown on activities causing trauma and the consultation in emergency rooms. MATERIAL AND METHODS All consecutive trauma patients consulting the Emergency Department of the Marienhospital Stuttgart (MHS), Germany, during the 6 weeks preceding the lockdown, during and after the lockdown were included. The time and type of consultation, treatment received, Manchester triage score, type of trauma, the anatomical region of the injury as well as demographic data were reported and compared. RESULTS The study included 551 cases during lockdown, 943 cases before and 783 cases after the lockdown. We observed a reduced caseload during the lockdown of 41.6% compared to before and of 29.7% compared to after (p

To cope with the COVID-19 outbreak in Germany, the government imposed a lockdown, which led to restrictions and lifestyle changes for the population.This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the lockdown on activities causing trauma and the consultation in emergency rooms.All consecutive trauma patients consulting the Emergency Department of the Marienhospital Stuttgart (MHS), Germany, during the 6 weeks preceding the lockdown, during and after the lockdown were included. The time and type of consultation, treatment received, Manchester triage score, type of trauma, the anatomical region of the injury as well as demographic data were reported and compared.The study included 551 cases during lockdown, 943 cases before and 783 cases after the lockdown. We observed a reduced caseload during the lockdown of 41.6% compared to before and of 29.7% compared to after (p 0.001). Patients were on average older in the observation group than in both control groups (before : 51.5 years, lockdown: 56.1 years, after: 51.6 years) (p 0.001). Injuries to the head and neck were constant (25.0%, 25.4%, 25.5%). We noticed lower limb injuries decreasing (26.1%, 22.3%, 22.7%) and upper limb injuries increasing (25.5%, 31.8%, 30.1%). A decrease in sports injuries (11.1%, 5.1%, 9.1%) and work accidents (16.1%, 10.7%, 12.8%) resulted in more domestic accidents (30.4%, 52.5%, 31.8%). Self-referral decreased (67.7%, 53.2%, 60.3%) while referral via paramedics increased (28.3%, 38.7%, 35.6). Blunt trauma was the most common cause of injury (55.6%, 61.0%, 55.3%). Indications for surgery were higher (16.8%, 21.6%, 14.0%).The lockdown and restrictions in personal life and daily routine had an impact on the frequency, etiology and management of trauma patients in Stuttgart.HINTERGRUND: Zur Eindämmung des COVID-19-Ausbruchs erließ die Bundesregierung einige Regeln und Einschränkungen für die Bürger. ZIEL: Diese Studie widmet sich dem Einfluss der Maßnahmen auf traumatologische Vorstellungen in der Notaufnahme.Alle konsekutiven traumatologischen Patienten der Notaufnahme des Marienhospitals Stuttgart (MHS), die sich in den 6 Wochen jeweils vor und nach dem Lockdown sowie währenddessen vorstellten, wurden einbezogen. Die Zeit und Art der Vorstellung, die Behandlungsart, der Manchester Triage Score, die Region und Art der Verletzung sowie demografische Daten wurden ermittelt und verglichen.Es wurden 551 Fälle während des Lockdowns, 943 Fälle davor und 783 Fälle danach eingeschlossen. Es konnte eine Fallzahlreduktion um 41,6 % im Vergleich zu davor und um 29,7 % verglichen mit danach (p 0,001) beobachtet werden. Während des Lockdowns waren die Patienten im Mittel älter (vorher: 51,5 Jahre, Lockdown: 56,1 Jahre, danach: 51,6 Jahre) (p 0,001). Kopf-Hals-Verletzungen waren konstant (25,0 %, 25,4 %, 25,5 %). Verletzungen der unteren Extremität waren seltener (26,1 %, 22,3 %, 22,7 %), der oberen Extremität häufiger (25,5 %, 31,8 %, 30,1 %). Besonders Sportverletzungen (11,1 %, 5,1 %, 9,1 %) und Arbeitsunfälle (16,1 %, 10,7 %, 12,8 %) reduzierten sich, dafür stiegen häusliche Unfälle (30,4 %, 52,5 %, 31,8 %). Selbsteinweisungen gingen zurück (67,7 %, 53,2 %, 60,3 %), Vorstellungen mittels Rettungsdienst stiegen (28,3 %, 38,7 %, 35,6 %). Stumpfes Trauma war der häufigste Grund einer Vorstellung (55,6 %, 61,0 %, 55,3 %). Es musste öfter operiert werden (16,8 %, 21,6 %, 14,0 %).Der Lockdown und die Einschränkungen hatten einen Einfluss auf Zahl sowie Art und Behandlung von Traumapatienten in Stuttgart.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Zur Qualitätssicherung der Versorgung Früh- und Reifgeborener wurden vom Gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss umfangreiche Struktur- und Personalvorgaben formuliert. Die Ergebnisqualität für das neonatale Outcome wird bereits seit langer Zeit erhoben. Obwohl Deutschland einer der höchsten Frühgeburtenraten in Europa aufweist, existieren bislang keine zentrumsspezifischen Daten zur Frühgeburtenrate. Methoden An 6 Perinatalzentren Level 1 in Baden-Württemberg wurden über 2 Jahre alle Schwangeren erfasst, die mit einem Schwangerschaftsalter zwischen 22+0 und 31+6 Wochen in der Frauenklinik aufgenommen wurden (n=2972). Sofern sie innerhalb von 24 h nach Aufnahme mindestens eines der folgenden sekundären Einschlusskriterien 1. Gesicherte Amnionruptur, 2. Zervixlänge3 Wehen von je mind. 30 sec. Dauer in 30 min erfüllten, wurde die Frühgeburtenrate vor 32+0 Schwangerschaftswochen bestimmt. Für 70,6% der Frühgeborenen konnte das neonatale Outcome erhoben werden. Ergebnis Bei 21,1% (n=279) der Schwangeren, die mindestens ein sekundäres Einschlusskriterium erfüllten (n=1325), kam es vor 32+0 SSW zur Geburt von 344 Frühgeborenen. Die Frühgeburtenrate lag zwischen 16,8 und 27,9% (Differenz 11,1%). Eine niedrigere Frühgeburtenrate war nicht mit einem schlechteren neonatalen Outcome vergesellschaftet. Schlussfolgerung Um die Ergebnisqualität eines Perinatalzentrums beurteilen zu können, sollte die Frühgeburtenrate als Qualitätsindikator Einzug finden. Eine Reduktion der Frühgeburtenrate um 5% könnte die Zahl der Frühgeborenen

Background: There is still the need to optimize adjuvant treatment of colon cancer (CC). Standard adjuvant chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil (FU) and folinic acid (FA) was compared with a combination including irinotecan (Folfiri). The aim of the present report was to analyze overall survival (OS) after long-term follow-up, to summarize final recurrence rates and toxicity data, and to identify possible clinical and pathological factors associated with prognosis. Methods: Patients (CC stage IIb and III) were randomized to a 6-month treatment with FUFA or Folfiri. The trial was closed after 275 of 588 planned patients, 269 of which were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Results: 133 and 136 patients received FUFA and Folfiri, respectively. Adjuvant therapy was not completed for 16 FUFA (12.0%) and 44 Folfiri (32.4%) patients. Toxicities grade III and IV were observed in 17 (12.8%) patients treated with FUFA and in 50 (36.8%) patients treated with Folfiri. Recurrences occurred in 46 of 133 (34.6%) and in 47 of 136 (34.6%) patients who received FUFA and Folfiri, respectively. 5-year OS rates were 69.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 61.2-77.1) for FUFA and 72.7% (95% CI: 63.9-79.8) for Folfiri. OS was associated with tumor grading (1 & 2 vs. 3), tumor sub-stage (II vs. IIIa vs. IIIb vs. IIIc), and tumor location (left vs. right colon). Conclusion: Folfiri cannot be generally recommended for adjuvant chemotherapy of CC. Besides tumor grading and sub-staging, prognosis of CC may depend on tumor location. Left-sided tumors had a significantly better prognosis irrespective of treatment.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. A diagnosis at early stages with enhanced screening methods is vital as metastases and recurrences increase mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the tumor markers CEA and CA19-9 combined in correlation with diagnostics and prognosis. Therefore, 1487 patients with CRC who were diagnosed and treated between 2000 and 2015 at the University Hospital Ulm, Germany, were retrospectively evaluated. Overall and recurrence-free survival was analyzed in association with preoperative CEA and CA19-9 separately and combined and a multivariate analysis was performed. The 5-year overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with a CEA or CA19-9 level ≥200 compared to patients with an increased, but &lt, 200, or normal level (CEA: 69%/44%/7%, CA19-9: 66%/38%/8%). Patients with both tumor markers increased also showed a remarkably shorter 5-year survival rate (CEA+/CA19-9+: 23%). The multivariate analysis emphasizes these results (p-value &lt, 0.0001). Patients with both tumor markers elevated had the shortest 5-year recurrence-free survival rate, followed by patients with either CEA or CA19-9 elevated (CEA-/CA19-9-: 79%, CEA+/CA19-9, CEA-/CA19-9+: 65%, CEA+/CA19-9+: 44%). In conclusion, measuring CEA and CA19-9 preoperatively in CRC patients is reasonable and could be useful as a prognostic factor.

The Federal Joint Committee of Germany defined structural and staff requirements for the care of preterm and term infants as a proxy measure for quality. Neonatal outcome has been evaluated as a quality marker for a long time. While Germany has one of the highest preterm birth rates in Europe, no data exist on centre-specific preterm birth rates.Over 2 years, all pregnant women admitted to six centres for perinatal medicine in Baden-Württemberg at a gestational age between 22+0 and 31+6 weeks were eligible (n=2972). The preterm birth rate before 32 wks of gestation was evaluated if at least one of the following secondary inclusion criteria was present within 24 h after admission: 1) premature rupture of membranes, 2) cervical length less than 25 mm, or 3) more than 3 contractions of at least 30-s duration within a 30-min period. Neonatal outcome could be documented for 70.6% of infants.Of the women who met at least one secondary inclusion criterion (n=1325), 21.1% (n=279) delivered 344 preterm infants before 32 weeks. The preterm birth rate was between 16.8 and 27.9% (11.1% difference). A lower preterm birth rate was not associated with a worse neonatal outcome.Preterm birth rate should become a quality indicator for perinatal care. A reduction of the preterm birth rate of 5% could help to reduce the number of preterm infants by up to 2,400 per year in Germany (about 25%).Zur Qualitätssicherung der Versorgung Früh- und Reifgeborener wurden vom Gemeinsamen Bundesausschuss umfangreiche Struktur- und Personalvorgaben formuliert. Die Ergebnisqualität für das neonatale Outcome wird bereits seit langer Zeit erhoben. Obwohl Deutschland einer der höchsten Frühgeburtenraten in Europa aufweist, existieren bislang keine zentrumsspezifischen Daten zur Frühgeburtenrate.An 6 Perinatalzentren Level 1 in Baden-Württemberg wurden über 2 Jahre alle Schwangeren erfasst, die mit einem Schwangerschaftsalter zwischen 22+0 und 31+6 Wochen in der Frauenklinik aufgenommen wurden (n=2972). Sofern sie innerhalb von 24 h nach Aufnahme mindestens eines der folgenden sekundären Einschlusskriterien 1. Gesicherte Amnionruptur, 2. Zervixlänge25 mm oder 3. Tokogramm mit3 Wehen von je mind. 30 sec. Dauer in 30 min erfüllten, wurde die Frühgeburtenrate vor 32+0 Schwangerschaftswochen bestimmt. Für 70,6% der Frühgeborenen konnte das neonatale Outcome erhoben werden.Bei 21,1% (n=279) der Schwangeren, die mindestens ein sekundäres Einschlusskriterium erfüllten (n=1325), kam es vor 32+0 SSW zur Geburt von 344 Frühgeborenen. Die Frühgeburtenrate lag zwischen 16,8 und 27,9% (Differenz 11,1%). Eine niedrigere Frühgeburtenrate war nicht mit einem schlechteren neonatalen Outcome vergesellschaftet.Um die Ergebnisqualität eines Perinatalzentrums beurteilen zu können, sollte die Frühgeburtenrate als Qualitätsindikator Einzug finden. Eine Reduktion der Frühgeburtenrate um 5% könnte die Zahl der Frühgeborenen1500 g Geburtsgewicht in Deutschland um 2400/Jahr (ca. 25%) reduzieren.

Frühgeburtenrate in 6 Perinatalzentren in Baden-Württemberg – Potential zur Reduktion der Frühgeborenenzahl Sehr geehrte Herren Rossi, Heller und Maier,vielen Dank für Ihren Leserbrief bezüglich unserer Arbeit Trotter et al. 1, gerne gehen wir auf die einzelnen Punkte ein.

With an increasing number of cancer survivors quality of life (QoL) becomes more and more important in the treatment of rectal cancer (RC). QoL after sphincter-preserving anterior resection (AR), however, was found nonsuperior to abdominoperineal resection. The aim of our study was to evaluate QoL after AR compared with colon cancer patients after right hemicolectomy (CC) and healthy lay persons without history of cancer (HL) in long-term follow-up.Consecutive alive RC patients (n = 293) who received an AR between 1998 and 2008 were included. CC patients (n = 201) and HL of the same age were used as a surgical and a nonsurgical control group, respectively. QoL was assessed using European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires QLQ-C 30 and -CR 38.Questionnaires from 116 RC patients, 105 CC patients, and 103 HL were evaluable with a median time after surgery of 5 years. The global health status did not differ. Social functioning, future perspectives, and financial difficulties tended to poorer scores in the cancer groups. Physical functioning was better in RC and CC patients compared with HL. Defecation problems and diarrhea were more frequent in RC patients (P.05). An additional open question revealed a median stool frequency of 3, 2, and 1 per day for RC, CC, and HL, respectively. Defecation problems were more frequent in RC patients who received radiation therapy (P.05).Diarrhea and defecation problems impaired QoL after AR for RC, which was worsened after radiation therapy. To improve QoL of RC patients in the future, physicians have to focus on minimization of gastrointestinal side effects while optimizing surgical reconstruction.

Colorectal cancer is one leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and distant metastases determine an unfavorable prognosis. Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) improves survival and provides the chance for cure. The aim of this study was to prospectively analyze the outcome of patients with CRLM in a population-based manner, and thereby, to compare the prognosis of patients undergoing resection with those receiving nonsurgical treatment. Moreover, we set out to identify and confirm important prognostic factors after resection of CRLM.We analyzed the outcome of 506 patients diagnosed with CRLM in our institution from 1996 to 2011. Survival and the impact of clinical and pathologic factors were analyzed by univariate analysis. Important independent prognostic factors were analyzed by multivariate analysis.The 5-year overall survival rate (5y-OSR) for patients receiving resection of CRLM (n = 152) was 46% (95% confidence interval (CI), 37%-54%) compared with a 5y-OSR of 6% (95% CI, 4%-9%) for patients treated nonsurgically (n = 354). There was no perioperative mortality. Multivariate analysis revealed, among other factors, good performance status of the patient (low American Society of Anesthesiologists score), the absence of extrahepatic metastases, 5 metastatic lesions, and a tumor-free resection margin (R0) as important, independent prognostic factors. Importantly, repeated hepatic resections of CRLM performed in 13 patients were associated with an excellent outcome (5y-OSR, 47%; 95% CI, 17%-72%).Surgical resection, which can be performed with tolerable site-effects, is the first choice for patients diagnosed with metachronous and synchronous CRLM. Of note, repeated resections should be advised in recurrent intrahepatic colorectal cancer whenever possible.

Adjuvant treatment is still controversially discussed for elderly colon cancer (CC) patients. Our aim was to investigate the benefit of adjuvant treatment for younger (70 years) and elderly (≥70 years) patients.The long-term outcome of patients (n=855) enrolled in a randomized controlled trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU alone, 5-FU plus folinic acid (FA), and 5-FU plus interferon-alpha (IFNa) was compared in younger (70 years) and elderly (≥70 years) patients using a quotient of each patient's survival time and his expected residual life expectancy (QSL) and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.Eight-year overall survival (OS) rates were 58.3% and 57.4% for younger (n=653) and elderly (n=202) patients, respectively. In elderly patients, 8-year OS rates were 51.4%, 61.8%, and 56.3, and median QSL scores were 0.338, 0.371, and 0.343 for 5-FU (n=59), 5-FU plus FA (n=76), and 5-FU plus IFNa (n=67), respectively. In elderly patients treatment with 5-FU plus FA decreased the risk for an event by 1.5-fold compared to 5-FU (HR=0.657, 95%CI=0.495-0.870, p=0.004) and 5-FU plus INFa (HR=0.685, 95%CI=0.515-0.912, p=0.009).Our analysis clearly demonstrates for the first time an additional benefit of FA for adjuvant treatment of elderly CC patients. We conclude that this regimen is very safe and effective for adjuvant treatment of elderly patients.