Search

La oncología de precisión, definida como la perfilación molecular de los tumores para identificar alteraciones modulables, se ha desarrollado rápidamente para integrarse en la práctica clínica. Las pruebas genómicas involucran diversas partes interesadas que trabajan coordinada y articuladamente para controlar la logística de las muestras de tejido tumoral y desarrollar las pruebas en laboratorios con altos parámetros de calidad, donde el análisis apropiado conduce a resultados reproducibles. Los médicos deben estar familiarizados con las variantes genómicas informadas y con la tecnología utilizada para determinarlas, incluidas las limitaciones de los informes y las metodologías actuales. La interpretación de los hallazgos genómicos se realiza de manera óptima gracias al aporte multidisciplinario, necesario para reducir la incertidumbre de las recomendaciones relacionadas con las variantes documentadas. Los genes 1/2/3 del receptor neurotrópico de la quinasa para la tropomiosina (NTRK) codifican las quinasas del receptor de tropomiosina (TRK) A/B/C, respectivamente. Los reordenamientos cromosómicos que causan fusiones del gen NTRK pueden dar como resultado la activación constitutiva de las proteínas TRK, que actúan como impulsores oncogénicos a través de la activación de diversas vías de crecimiento celular. Las fusiones del gen NTRK ocurren en ~0,3 % de los tumores sólidos, aunque su incidencia varía según el tipo de cáncer. Su prevalencia es >90 % en algunas neoplasias raras como el carcinoma secretor de mama y el carcinoma secretor análogo de la glándula salivar (MASC). Los inhibidores de TRK (larotrectinib, entrectinib y repotrectinib) son activos en los tumores positivos para la fusión de NTRK, y han permitido cambiar el curso natural de múltiples enfermedades. El artítuculo desarrolla una revisión integral sobre la perspectiva de la medicina de precisión y su implementación en pacientes pediátricos y adultos con genes de fusión NTRK en Colombia.

Osimertinib is a third generation EGFR-TKI inhibitor approved in the first-line setting for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Additionally, it represents the treatment of choice in patients who present with T790M mutations and evidence of relapse of the disease. Effectiveness and safety of this drug have been studied in multiple clinical trials and observational studies, however, information regarding outcomes among Hispanic patients treated with Osimertinib is scarce. The objective of this study was to examine real-world effectiveness and safety of first-line Osimertinib in a cohort of Hispanic patients with NSCLC, emphasizing post-progression outcomes.This is a multicenter, multinational, retrospective cohort study of Hispanic patients treated with Osimertinib as first-line for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received Osimertinib (80mg/day until evidence of disease progression or presence of intolerable adverse effects) were identified and included. NGS was performed in tumor samples or liquid biopsies among patients who had disease progression. The primary outcome was progression-free survival, and the secondary outcome was post-progression survival.A total of 94 patients from Mexico, Argentina, Costa Rica, Colombia, Panama, Chile and the USA were included, with a median age of 59 years. Identified mutations included EGFR Exon 19 deletions and EGFR pL858R point mutations. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.4 months (95%CI 12.4-18.2 months). Lung/pleura and lymph nodes were the most common sites of progression. Median post-progression survival was 7.73 months (95%CI 4.07 months-Not reached). Factors which negatively affected PFS included presence of liver metastases at diagnosis and a tumor mutational burden5 mut/Mb.Treatment with first line osimertinib represents an effective and safe option for Hispanic patients with metastatic NSCLC. Liver metastases and a higher tumor mutation burden were associated with a lower PFS. Despite effectiveness, different mechanisms of resistance were identified among the patients in this cohort, including mutations which can be targeted by other therapeutic options.

Highlights • The identification of the KRAS G12C mutation in non-small cell lung cancer is relevant with new molecules being introduced for treatment. • The variation of mutation prevalence among different regions indicate that certain populations are more prone to develop KRAS G12C mutations among lung cancer than others. • Using genomic markers traditionally employed for the identification of individuals we managed to construct a model that was predictive for KRAS G12C mutational incidence, further indicating that appearance of KRAS G12C follows population substructures., Background The KRAS exon 2 p. G12C mutation in patients with lung adenocarcinoma has been increasing in relevance due to the development and effectiveness of new treatment medications. Studies around different populations indicate that regional variability between ethnic groups and ancestries could play an essential role in developing this molecular alteration within lung cancer. Methods In a prospective and retrospective cohort study on samples from lung adenocarcinoma from 1000 patients from different administrative regions in Colombia were tested for the KRAS p.G12C mutation. An analysis of STR populations markers was conducted to identify substructure contributions to mutation prevalence. Results Included were 979 patients with a national mean frequency for the KRAS exon 2 p.G12C mutation of 7.97% (95%CI 6.27–9.66%). Variation between regions was also identified with Antioquia reaching a positivity value of 12.7% (95%CI 9.1–16.3%) in contrast to other regions such as Bogota DC (Capital region) with 5.4% (2.7–8.2%) and Bolivar with 2.4% (95%CI 0–7.2%) (p-value = 0.00262). Furthermore, Short tandem repeat population substructures were found for eight markers that strongly yielded association with KRAS exon 2 p.G12C frequency reaching an adjusted R2 of 0.945 and a p-value of < 0.0001. Conclusions Widespread identification of KRAS exon 2 p.G12C mutations, especially in cases where NGS is not easily achieved is feasible at a population based level that can characterize regional and national patterns of mutation status. Furthermore, this type of mutation prevalence follows a population substructure pattern that can be easily determined by population and ancestral markers such as STR.

Background: Mutations in STK11 (STK11(Mut)) and, frequently co-occurring, KEAP1 mutations (KEAP1(Mut)) are associated with poor survival in metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (mNSCLC) patients treated with immunotherapy. However, there are limited data regarding the prognostic or predictive significance of these genomic alterations among Hispanics. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed a cohort of Hispanic patients (N = 103) diagnosed with mNSCLC from the US and seven Latin American countries (LATAM) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) alone or in combination as first-line (Cohort A). All cases were treated in routine care between January 2016 and December 2021. The main objectives were to determine the association of mutations in STK11 or KEAP1 in these patients' tumors with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), presence of KRAS mutations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and other relevant clinical variables. To compare outcomes with a STK11(Wt)/KEAP1(Wt) population, historical data from a cohort of Hispanic patients (N = 101) treated with first-line ICI was used, matching both groups by country of origin, gender, and Programed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level (Cohort B). Results: Most tumors had mutations only in STK11 or KEAP1 (45.6%) without KRAS co-mutation or any other genomic alteration. Besides, 35%, 8.7%, 6.8%, and 3.9% were KRAS(Mut) + STK11(Mut), KRAS(Mut) + STK11(Mut) + KEAP1(Mut), STK11(Mut) + KEAP1(Mut), and KRAS(Mut) + KEAP1(Mut), respectively. Based on KRAS status, STK11 alterations were associated with significantly lower PD-L1 expression among those with KRAS(Wt) (p = 0.023), whereas KEAP1 mutations were predominantly associated with lower PD-L1 expression among KRAS(Mut) cases (p = 0.047). Tumors with KRAS(Mut) + KEAP1(Mut) had significantly higher median TMB when compared to other tumors (p = 0.040). For Cohort A, median PFS was 4.9 months (95%CI 4.3-5.4), slightly longer in those with KEAP1(mut) 6.1 months versus STK11(Mut) 4.7 months (p = 0.38). In the same cohort, PD-L1 expression and TMB did not influence PFS. OS was significantly longer among patients with tumors with PD-L1 >= 50% (30.9 months), and different from those with PD-L1 1-49% (22.0 months), and PD-L1 < 1% (12.0 months) (p = 0.0001). When we compared the cohorts A and B, OS was significantly shorter for patients carrying STK1 [STK11(Mut) 14.2 months versus STK11(Wt) 27.0 months (p = 0.0001)] or KEAP1 [KEAP1(Mut) 12.0 months versus KEAP1(Wt) 24.4 months (p = 0.005)] mutations. PD-L1 expression significantly affected OS independently of the presence of mutations in STK11, KEAP1, or KRAS. TMB-H favored better OS. Conclusions: This is the first large Hispanic cohort to study the impact of STK11 and KEAP1 mutations in NSCLC patient treated with ICI. Our data suggest that mutations in the above-mentioned genes are associated with PD-L1 expression levels and poor OS.

To describe the clinical, endoscopic, and histopathology features of esophageal graft-vs-host disease (GVHD).Patients with biopsy-proven esophageal GVHD diagnosed at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2021 were included.In 43 esophageal patients, other organ GVHD was present in 58% before and 86% at esophageal GVHD diagnosis. Esophageal specific symptoms were uncommon (dysphagia 26% and odynophagia/heartburn 5%). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was abnormal in 72% patients demonstrating erosive esophagitis, ulceration, desquamation, or rings/furrows in a diffuse or focal pattern.There should be a low threshold for esophageal biopsies for GVHD because esophageal symptoms and endoscopic findings may be nonspecific or absent.