Search

Background: Normal stress-only (SO) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using SPECT reduces imaging time and radiation dose with a good prognosis. However, the long-term prognostic value of combining coronary artery calcium score (CACS) with SO MPI to determine the warranty period remains unknown. Hence, we assessed the incremental prognostic value of CACS and its impact on the warranty period of normal SO MPI using SPECT., Methods: We retrospectively included 1375 symptomatic patients without a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) and a normal SO MPI using adenosine who underwent simultaneous CAC scoring. Annual major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates were calculated for CACS categories: 0, 1-399, 400-999, and ≥1000., Results: The mean age was 60.0 ± 11.8 years (66.9% female) with a median follow-up of 10.3 [IQR 9.6-10.9] years. The warranty period for annual MACE rate for normal SO SPECT extended the total follow-up time in years. MACE rate categorized by CAC categories demonstrated an increase in MACE rates with increasing CACS; CACS 0 and CACS 1-399 were associated with a 10-year warranty period, CACS 400-999 had a warranty period of 4 years and no warranty period could be given for CACS≥1000 (5.9 % at 1 year)., Conclusions: CACS as an adjunct to normal pharmacological SO MPI provides additional prognostic information and aids in determining a warranty period., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.)

Introduction: Our aim was to estimate the probability of obstructive CAD (oCAD) for an individual patient as a function of the myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measured with Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) PET in patients with a visually normal or abnormal scan., Materials and Methods: We included 1519 consecutive patients without a prior history of CAD referred for rest-stress Rb-82 PET/CT. All images were visually assessed by two experts and classified as normal or abnormal. We estimated the probability of oCAD for visually normal scans and scans with small (5%-10%) or larger defects (> 10%) as function of MFR. The primary endpoint was oCAD on invasive coronary angiography, when available., Results: 1259 scans were classified as normal, 136 with a small defect and 136 with a larger defect. For the normal scans, the probability of oCAD increased exponentially from 1% to 10% when segmental MFR decreased from 2.1 to 1.3. For scans with small defects, the probability increased from 13% to 40% and for larger defects from 45% to > 70% when segmental MFR decreased from 2.1 to 0.7., Conclusion: Patients with > 10% risk of oCAD can be distinguished from patients with < 10% risk based on visual PET interpretation only. However, there is a strong dependence of MFR on patient's individual risk of oCAD. Hence, combining both visual interpretation and MFR results in a better individual risk assessment which may impact treatment strategy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: We studied the added value of digital FDG-PET/CT in disease staging and restaging compared to the standard work-up with contrast enhanced CT (ceCT) and CA19-9 in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer who received neo-adjuvant therapy. Primary endpoints were tumor response compared to ceCT and CA19.9 as well as the ability to detect distant metastatic disease., Methods: 35 patients were included in this dual-center prospective study. FDG-PET using digital photon counting technology combined with CT scans were acquired before (T 1 ) and after neo-adjuvant therapy (T 2 ). Patients were staged and restaged based on standard protocol with ceCT and CA 19.9, while all PET/CT scans were stored securely and not included in clinical decision making. After the pancreatic resection, an expert team retrospectively assessed the CT tumor diameter, CA19-9, tumor FDG-uptake, and appearance of metastatic disease of all patients for both time points., Results: CA19-9 levels, CT tumor diameter, and tumor FDG-uptake on PET significantly decreased from T 1 to T 2 (p = 0.017, p = 0.001, and p < 0.0001). The change in FDG-uptake values showed a strong positive correlation with the change in CT tumor diameter and change in CA19-9 (R = 0.75 and R = 0.73, respectively). In addition, small-volume liver lesions were detected on digital PET/CT in 5/35 patients (14%), 4 of which were pathology confirmed at laparotomy. Only one of these five cases was detected on baseline staging ceCT (3%)., Conclusion: We found that adding digital PET/CT strengthens restaging after neo-adjuvant therapy based on the observed strong correlation with ceCT tumor diameter and Ca19.9. Also, digital PET/CT was found to detect occult metastatic disease not visualized on ceCT, that would have resulted in altered disease staging and therapeutic strategy in a substantial proportion of patients., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Semi-quantitative scores can be used as an adjunct to visual assessment in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography ( 82 Rb PET). The semi-quantitative cut-off values used in 82 Rb PET are derived from single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). It is unknown whether these cut-off values can be extrapolated to 82 Rb PET. We compared the semi-quantitative with the visual assessment of ischemia and determined which summed difference score (SDS) score predicts ischemia best., Methods: We included 108 patients who underwent 82 Rb PET imaging and performed visual and semi-quantitative assessment. A scan with a SDS ≥ 2 and a summed stress score (SSS) ≥ 4 was considered to demonstrate ischemia. We compared the semi-quantitative with the visual assessment., Results: 41 (38%) Normal scans, and 67 (62%) scans with ischemia and/or an irreversible defect were included. The semi-quantitative assessment showed ischemia more often than the visual assessment (51% vs 29%, P < .001). Patients with a low or intermediate pre-test probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) and a SDS < 4 did not demonstrate ischemia by visual assessment., Conclusion: Semi-quantitative assessment in 82 Rb PET imaging clearly demonstrates the presence of ischemia. Ischemia is unlikely in patients with low and intermediate pre-test probability of CAD and a SDS < 4., (© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.)

Purpose: Visual assessment of Rubidium (Rb-82) PET myocardial perfusion images is usually combined with global myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measurements. However, small regional blood flow deficits may go unnoticed. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic value of regional with global MFR in the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (oCAD)., Methods: We retrospectively included 1519 patients referred for rest and regadenoson-induced stress Rb-82 PET/CT without prior history of oCAD. MFR was determined globally, per vessel territory and per myocardial segment and compared using receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Vessel MFR was defined as the lowest MFR of the coronary territories and segmental MFR as the lowest MFR of the 17-segments. The primary endpoint was oCAD on invasive coronary angiography., Results: The 148 patients classified as having oCAD had a lower global MFR (median 1.9, interquartile range [1.5-2.4] vs. 2.4 [2.0-2.9]), lower vessel MFR (1.6 [1.2-2.1] vs. 2.2 [1.9-2.6]) and lower segmental MFR (1.3 [ 0.9-1.6] vs. 1.8 [1.5-2.2]) as compared to the non-oCAD patients (p < 0.001). The area under the curve for segmental MFR (0.81) was larger (p ≤ 0.005) than of global MFR (0.74) and vessel MFR (0.78)., Conclusions: The use of regional MFR instead of global MFR is recommended as it improves the diagnostic value of Rb-82 PET in the detection of oCAD., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Knowledge of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) influences the interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with SPECT; however, the impact on PET interpretation remains unclear. We compared the added value of CACS to reporting MPI using SPECT vs PET., Methods: We retrospectively included 412 patients. 206 patients who underwent Rb-82 PET were propensity-based matched to a cohort of 4018 patients who underwent cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT MPI to obtain a comparable group of 206 SPECT patients. Next, we created four image sets: SPECT MPI-only, PET-only, SPECT + CACS, and PET + CACS. Two physicians interpreted the 824 images as normal, equivocal, or abnormal for ischemia or irreversible defects. Additionally, event rates were compared between PET and SPECT groups during 30-month follow-up., Results: PET yielded more scans interpreted as normal than SPECT (88% vs 80%, respectively, P = 0.015). Adding CACS to SPECT increased the percentage of normal scans to 86% (P = 0.014), whereas this effect was absent for PET (90%, P = 0.77). Annualized event rates for images interpreted as normal did not differ and varied between 0.7 and 2.0% (P &gt; 0.084)., Conclusion: Adding CACS correctly increased the percentage of normal scans for SPECT MPI but not for PET, possibly limiting the effect of adding CACS to reporting PET., (© 2021. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.)

Background: A variety of temporal sampling protocols is used worldwide to measure myocardial blood flow (MBF). Both the length and number of time frames in these protocols may alter MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measurements. We aimed to assess the effect of different clinically used temporal sampling protocols on MBF and MFR quantification in Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) PET imaging., Methods: We retrospectively included 20 patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging using Rb-82 PET. A literature search was performed to identify appropriate sampling protocols. PET data were reconstructed using 14 selected temporal sampling protocols with time frames of 5-10 seconds in the first-pass phase and 30-120 seconds in the tissue phase. Rest and stress MBF and MFR were calculated for all protocols and compared to the reference protocol with 26 time frames., Results: MBF measurements differed (P ≤ 0.003) in six (43%) protocols in comparison to the reference protocol, with mean absolute relative differences up to 16% (range 5%-31%). Statistically significant differences were most frequently found for protocols with tissue phase time frames < 90 seconds. MFR did not differ (P ≥ 0.11) for any of the protocols., Conclusions: Various temporal sampling protocols result in different MBF values using Rb-82 PET. MFR measurements were more robust to different temporal sampling protocols., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Digital PET systems (dPET) improve lesion detectability as compared to PET systems with conventional photomultiplier tubes (cPET). We prospectively studied the performance of high-resolution digital PET scans in patients with cancer, as compared with high- and standard-resolution conventional PET scans, taking the acquisition order into account., Methods: We included 212 patients with cancer, who were referred for disease staging or restaging. All patients underwent FDG-PET/CT on a dPET scanner and on a cPET scanner in a randomized order. The scans were acquired immediately after each other. Three image reconstructions were generated: 1) standard-resolution (4 × 4 × 4 mm 3 voxels) cPET, 2) high-resolution (2 × 2 × 2 mm 3 voxels) cPET, and 3) high-resolution dPET. Two experienced PET readers visually assessed the three reconstructions side-by-side and ranked them according to scan preference, in an independent and blinded fashion., Results: On high-resolution dPET, the PET readers detected more lesions or they had a higher diagnostic confidence than on high- and standard-resolution cPET (p < 0.001). High-resolution dPET was preferred in 90% of the cases, as compared to 44% for high-resolution cPET and 1% for standard-resolution cPET (p < 0.001). However, for the subgroup of patients where dPET was made first (n = 103, 61 ± 10 min after FDG administration) and cPET was made second (93 ± 15 min after FDG administration), no significant difference in preference was found between the high-resolution cPET and dPET reconstructions (p = 0.41)., Conclusions: DPET scanners in combination with high-resolution reconstructions clinically outperform cPET scanners with both high- and standard-resolution reconstructions as the PET readers identified more FDG-avid lesions, their diagnostic confidence was increased, and they visually preferred dPET. However, when dPET was made first, high-resolution dPET and high-resolution cPET showed similar performance, indicating the positive effect of a prolonged FDG uptake time. Therefore, high-resolution cPET in combination with a prolonged FDG uptake time can be considered as an alternative., (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine.)

Background: PET scanners using silicon photomultipliers with digital readout (SiPM PET) have an improved temporal and spatial resolution compared to PET scanners using conventional photomultiplier tubes (PMT PET). However, the effect on image quality and visibility of perfusion defects in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is unknown. Our aim was to determine the value of a SiPM PET scanner in MPI., Methods: We prospectively included 30 patients who underwent rest and regadenoson-induced stress Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) MPI on the D690 PMT PET (GE Healthcare) and within three weeks on the Vereos SiPM PET (Philips Healthcare). Two expert readers scored the image quality and assessed the existence of possible defects. In addition, interpreter's confidence, myocardial blood flow (MBF), and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) values were compared., Results: Image quality improved (P = 0.03) using the Vereos as compared to the D690. Image quality of the Vereos and the D690 was graded fair in 20% and 10%, good in 60% and 50%, and excellent in 20% and 40%, respectively. Defect interpretation and interpreter's confidence did not differ between the D690 and the Vereos (P > 0.50). There were no significant differences in rest MBF (P ≥ 0.29), stress MBF (P ≥ 0.11), and MFR (P ≥ 0.51)., Conclusion: SiPM PET provides an improved image quality in comparison with PMT PET. Defect interpretation, interpreter's confidence, and absolute blood flow measurements were comparable between both systems. SiPM PET is therefore a reliable technique for MPI using Rb-82., Trial Registration: ToetsingOnline NL63853.075.17. Registered 13 November, 2017., (© 2020. The Author(s).)