Search

Activated protein C resistance (APCR) is a common thrombophilia, caused mainly by a mutation. The impact of APCR on the efficacy of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) are still unclear, and no solid recommendations for its management were published. To investigate the effect of APCR on IVF outcomes and assess the efficacy of our management protocol, we retrospectively scanned the medical records of women who were tested with APCR assay in 2019 at our fertility centre. The 66 women (12%) positive for APCR had lower odds of reaching clinical pregnancies after IVF 0.18 [95% CI: 0.07–0.47] and fewer live births. The administration of low-molecular-weight heparin and aspirin associated with more implantation in treated compared to untreated APCR-positive women with an odds ratio of 43.2 [7.51–248.6]. In conclusion, APCR negatively affects the number of clinical pregnancies after IVF, but anticoagulation therapy can mitigate this effect and significantly increase clinical pregnancies.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? The evidence about the impact of APCR on IVF outcomes is still inconclusive. According to the Canadian guideline, routine screening for thrombophilia in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss is not recommended. No clear recommendations regarding the management of APCR in the planning for IVF are yet available.What do the results of this study add? APCR significantly increases implantation failure among infertile women who conduct IVF. Management of APCR using LMWH and aspirin was effective in mitigating this effect and increasing successful implantation.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our findings can support the recommendation to include APCR assay in the routine tests for infertile women conducting IVF, and suggest the combination between LMWH and aspirin as an effective therapy to increase successful implantation in APCR positive candidates. However, more controlled clinical trials are still needed to confirm our results. What is already known on this subject? The evidence about the impact of APCR on IVF outcomes is still inconclusive. According to the Canadian guideline, routine screening for thrombophilia in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss is not recommended. No clear recommendations regarding the management of APCR in the planning for IVF are yet available. What do the results of this study add? APCR significantly increases implantation failure among infertile women who conduct IVF. Management of APCR using LMWH and aspirin was effective in mitigating this effect and increasing successful implantation. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our findings can support the recommendation to include APCR assay in the routine tests for infertile women conducting IVF, and suggest the combination between LMWH and aspirin as an effective therapy to increase successful implantation in APCR positive candidates. However, more controlled clinical trials are still needed to confirm our results.

Introduction:Syrian medical research synthesis is marginal compared to neighboring countries and faces numerous obstacles that have been intensified by the Syrian armed conflict. Perceived research barriers include the lack of mentorship and academic writing skills. We evaluate the outcomes of a peer-run academic writing and publishing workshop, and contrast training synchronicity and its supplementary peer-reviewed assignments. Methods:This randomized controlled trial studied an online workshop that targeted under- and post-graduate medical and paramedical students at all Syrian universities. Blinded participants were randomized into four arms; Two arms attended the workshop synchronously, and the others asynchronously. One arm in each group undertook peer-reviewed scientific writing exercises (active), while the other two self-reviewed the same exercises (passive). Objective knowledge and subjective confidence in the learnt skills were assessed before the workshop, and one month and one year after it.Results: One-hundred-twenty-one participants completed the workshop, which was effective in improving their knowledge (PPP=0.005) and confidence (P=0.003) only in the active groups. Moreover, participants who joined the peer-review process gained higher knowledge (P