Search

Purpose: Mavorixafor is an oral, selective inhibitor of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor that modulates immune cell trafficking. A biomarker-driven phase Ib study (NCT02823405) was conducted in 16 patients with melanoma to investigate the hypothesis that mavorixafor favorably modulates immune cell profiles in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and to evaluate the safety of mavorixafor alone and in combination with pembrolizumab. Experimental Design: Serial biopsies of melanoma lesions were assessed after 3 weeks of mavorixafor monotherapy and after 6 weeks of combination treatment for immune cell markers by NanoString analysis for gene expression and by multiplexed immunofluorescent staining for in situ protein expression. Serum samples taken at biopsy timepoints were evaluated for key chemokine and cytokine alterations using the Myriad Rules Based Medicine multiplex immunoassays. Results: Within the TME, mavorixafor alone increased CD8+ T-cell infiltration, granzyme B signal, antigen presentation machinery, and both tumor inflammatory signature (TIS) and IFNγ gene expression signature scores. Increases in the key serum cytokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 were further enhanced when mavorixafor was combined with pembrolizumab. Adverse events (AE), as assessed by the investigator according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v4.03), related to either mavorixafor or pembrolizumab (≥15%) were diarrhea, fatigue, maculopapular rash, and dry eye. Reported AEs were all ≤ grade 3. Conclusion/Discussion: Treatment with single-agent mavorixafor resulted in enhanced immune cell infiltration and activation in the TME, leading to increases in TIS and IFNγ gene signatures. Mavorixafor as a single agent, and in combination with pembrolizumab, has an acceptable safety profile. These data support further investigation of the use of mavorixafor for patients unresponsive to checkpoint inhibitors. Significance: Despite survival improvements in patients with melanoma treated with checkpoint inhibitor therapy, a significant unmet medical need exists for therapies that enhance effectiveness. We propose that mavorixafor sensitizes the melanoma tumor microenvironment and enhances the activity of checkpoint inhibitors, and thereby may translate to a promising treatment for broader patient populations.

Antibody panels used for mIF analyses.

Serum cytokine and chemokine changes at the end of the 3-week monotherapy period compared to baseline.

Purpose:Mavorixafor is an oral, selective inhibitor of the CXCR4 chemokine receptor that modulates immune cell trafficking. A biomarker-driven phase Ib study (NCT02823405) was conducted in 16 patients with melanoma to investigate the hypothesis that mavorixafor favorably modulates immune cell profiles in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and to evaluate the safety of mavorixafor alone and in combination with pembrolizumab.Experimental Design:Serial biopsies of melanoma lesions were assessed after 3 weeks of mavorixafor monotherapy and after 6 weeks of combination treatment for immune cell markers by NanoString analysis for gene expression and by multiplexed immunofluorescent staining for in situ protein expression. Serum samples taken at biopsy timepoints were evaluated for key chemokine and cytokine alterations using the Myriad Rules Based Medicine multiplex immunoassays.Results:Within the TME, mavorixafor alone increased CD8+ T-cell infiltration, granzyme B signal, antigen presentation machinery, and both tumor inflammatory signature (TIS) and IFNγ gene expression signature scores. Increases in the key serum cytokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 were further enhanced when mavorixafor was combined with pembrolizumab. Adverse events (AE), as assessed by the investigator according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v4.03), related to either mavorixafor or pembrolizumab (≥15%) were diarrhea, fatigue, maculopapular rash, and dry eye. Reported AEs were all ≤ grade 3.Conclusion/Discussion:Treatment with single-agent mavorixafor resulted in enhanced immune cell infiltration and activation in the TME, leading to increases in TIS and IFNγ gene signatures. Mavorixafor as a single agent, and in combination with pembrolizumab, has an acceptable safety profile. These data support further investigation of the use of mavorixafor for patients unresponsive to checkpoint inhibitors.Significance:Despite survival improvements in patients with melanoma treated with checkpoint inhibitor therapy, a significant unmet medical need exists for therapies that enhance effectiveness. We propose that mavorixafor sensitizes the melanoma tumor microenvironment and enhances the activity of checkpoint inhibitors, and thereby may translate to a promising treatment for broader patient populations.

Shared TCR TIL sequences taken from tumor biopsy of patient #5 at various timepoints.

Depiction of T cell clone mobilization from peripheral blood to melanoma site on day 1 and at EOT.

Supplementary Figure 2 - PDF file 55K, Neuroblastoma tissue microarray. A tissue microarray demonstrates expression of RB in neuroblastoma that is higher in high-risk and MYCN amplified samples compared to low-risk or non-amplified samples (p = 0.03)

Pub fees email yes

Supplementary Figure 5 - PDF file 138K, CDK4/6 inhibition does not induce cytotoxicity in neuroblastoma. (A) Caspase 3/7 activation and (B) PARP cleavage were not observed in cell lines with demonstrated sensitivity to LEE011. SN38, a known cytotoxic agent, was used as a positive control

Supplementary Table 1 - PDF file 78K, Genomic aberrations in the Cyclin D/CDK4/CDK6/RB pathway occur frequently in neuroblastoma cell lines

Supplementary Figure 4 - PDF file 88K, Protein level expression of FOXM1 in neuroblastoma

Purpose: The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib (LEE011), displayed preclinical activity in neuroblastoma and malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT) models. In this phase I study, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary activity of single-agent ribociclib were investigated in pediatric patients with neuroblastoma, MRT, or other cyclin D–CDK4/6–INK4–retinoblastoma pathway-altered tumors.Experimental Design: Patients (aged 1–21 years) received escalating once-daily oral doses of ribociclib (3-weeks-on/1-week-off). Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control and real-time PK.Results: Thirty-two patients (median age, 5.5 years) received ribociclib 280, 350, or 470 mg/m2. Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 fatigue (280 mg/m2; n = 1) or grade 4 thrombocytopenia (470 mg/m2; n = 2). Most common treatment-related adverse events (AE) were hematologic: neutropenia (72% all-grade/63% grade 3/4), leukopenia (63%/38%), anemia (44%/3%), thrombocytopenia (44%/28%), and lymphopenia (38%/19%), followed by vomiting (38%/0%), fatigue (25%/3%), nausea (25%/0%), and QTc prolongation (22%/0%). Ribociclib exposure was dose-dependent at 350 and 470 mg/m2 [equivalent to 600 (RP2D)–900 mg in adults], with high interpatient variability. Best overall response was stable disease (SD) in nine patients (seven with neuroblastoma, two with primary CNS MRT); five patients achieved SD for more than 6, 6, 8, 12, and 13 cycles, respectively.Conclusions: Ribociclib demonstrated acceptable safety and PK in pediatric patients. MTD (470 mg/m2) and RP2D (350 mg/m2) were equivalent to those in adults. Observations of prolonged SD support further investigation of ribociclib combined with other agents in neuroblastoma and MRT. Clin Cancer Res; 23(10); 2433–41. ©2017 AACR.

Supplementary Figure 1 - PDF file 56K, Expression of CDK4, CDK6, CCND1, and RB1 in neuroblastoma patients. Expression analysis of neuroblastoma primary tumors demonstrates that CDK4 expression, and to a lesser extent RB1 expression, is higher in high-risk neuroblastoma patients than in low risk patients

Supplementary Figure S1. Neuroblastoma cell lines are sensitive to binimetinib. Supplementary Figure S2. Gene expression profiling of human neuroblastoma cell lines with regards to relative sensitivity to MEK1/2 and CDK4/6 inhibition Supplementary Figure S3. Combined MEK and CDK4/6 inhibition does not induce significant levels of apoptosis or senescence. Supplementary Figure S4. G1 arrest induced by MEK1/2 and CDK4/6 inhibition is reversible. Supplementary Figure S5. Gene expression profiling of human neuroblastoma cell lines with regards to the synergy observed from combined binimetinib-ribociclib treatment. Figure S6. Neuroblastoma xenografts are sensitive to combined binimetinib-ribociclib treatment.

Purpose: Neuroblastoma is a pediatric cancer that continues to exact significant morbidity and mortality. Recently, a number of cell-cycle proteins, particularly those within the Cyclin D/CDK4/CDK6/RB network, have been shown to exert oncogenic roles in neuroblastoma, suggesting that their therapeutic exploitation might improve patient outcomes.Experimental Procedures: We evaluated the effect of dual CDK4/CDK6 inhibition on neuroblastoma viability using LEE011 (Novartis Oncology), a highly specific CDK4/6 inhibitor.Results: Treatment with LEE011 significantly reduced proliferation in 12 of 17 human neuroblastoma-derived cell lines by inducing cytostasis at nanomolar concentrations (mean IC50 = 307 ± 68 nmol/L in sensitive lines). LEE011 caused cell-cycle arrest and cellular senescence that was attributed to dose-dependent decreases in phosphorylated RB and FOXM1, respectively. In addition, responsiveness of neuroblastoma xenografts to LEE011 translated to the in vivo setting in that there was a direct correlation of in vitro IC50 values with degree of subcutaneous xenograft growth delay. Although our data indicate that neuroblastomas sensitive to LEE011 were more likely to contain genomic amplification of MYCN (P = 0.01), the identification of additional clinically accessible biomarkers is of high importance.Conclusions: Taken together, our data show that LEE011 is active in a large subset of neuroblastoma cell line and xenograft models, and supports the clinical development of this CDK4/6 inhibitor as a therapy for patients with this disease. Clin Cancer Res; 19(22); 6173–82. ©2013 AACR.

Supplementary Figure 6 - PDF file 75K, Statistical analysis of in vivo growth suppression. (A) Growth rates of BE2C, 1643, and EBC1 xenografts treated with 200 mg/kg LEE011 or vehicle, as determined by linear mixed effects analysis. (B) Summary table of statistics

Table S1. Specific mutations of genes listed in Table 1. Table S2. Foundation Medicine sequencing calls of cancer-specific gene panel. Table S3. Gene lists corresponding to microarray analysis described in Figures 1A and 1B: (A) binimetinib and (B) ribociclib. Significant genes (in bold type) are defined as having an adjusted p-value of 0.25 or less.

This document contains Supplementary information, including materials and methods as well as Figure Legends for the Supplementary Figures.

Supplementary Table 2 - PDF file 48KB, Copy number variations within the Cyclin D/CDK4/CDK6/RB pathway occur in high-risk neuroblastoma patients

Purpose: Ribociclib (an oral, highly specific cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor) inhibits tumor growth in preclinical models with intact retinoblastoma protein (Rb+). This first-in-human study investigated the MTD, recommended dose for expansion (RDE), safety, preliminary activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ribociclib in patients with Rb+ advanced solid tumors or lymphomas.Experimental Design: Patients received escalating doses of ribociclib (3-weeks-on/1-week-off or continuous). Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian Logistic Regression Model with overdose control principle.Results: Among 132 patients, 125 received ribociclib 3-weeks-on/1-week-off and 7 were dosed continuously. Nine dose-limiting toxicities were observed among 70 MTD/RDE evaluable patients during cycle 1, most commonly neutropenia (n = 3) and thrombocytopenia (n = 2). The MTD and RDE were established as 900 and 600 mg/day 3-weeks-on/1-week-off, respectively. Common treatment-related adverse events were (all-grade; grade 3/4) neutropenia (46%; 27%), leukopenia (43%; 17%), fatigue (45%; 2%), and nausea (42%; 2%). Asymptomatic Fridericia's corrected QT prolongation was specific to doses ≥600 mg/day (9% of patients at 600 mg/day; 33% at doses >600 mg/day). Plasma exposure increases were slightly higher than dose proportional; mean half-life at the RDE was 32.6 hours. Reduced Ki67 was observed in paired skin and tumor biopsies, consistent with ribociclib-mediated antiproliferative activity. There were 3 partial responses and 43 patients achieved a best response of stable disease; 8 patients were progression-free for >6 months.Conclusions: Ribociclib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, dose-dependent plasma exposure, and preliminary signs of clinical activity. Phase I–III studies of ribociclib are under way in various indications. Clin Cancer Res; 22(23); 5696–705. ©2016 AACR.

Fig. S1. Waterfall plot of duration of exposure vs. best percentage change from baseline; Figure S2. Duration of exposure in patients with stable disease treated for at least four cycles; Figure S3. Duration of exposure, best percentage change in target lesion, and genetic profile for the 53 patients with available genetic data.

Purpose: Neuroblastoma is treated with aggressive multimodal therapy, yet more than 50% of patients experience relapse. We recently showed that relapsed neuroblastomas frequently harbor mutations leading to hyperactivated ERK signaling and sensitivity to MEK inhibition therapy. Here we sought to define a synergistic therapeutic partner to potentiate MEK inhibition.Experimental Design: We first surveyed 22 genetically annotated human neuroblastoma-derived cell lines (from 20 unique patients) for sensitivity to the MEK inhibitor binimetinib. After noting an inverse correlation with sensitivity to ribociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor), we studied the combinatorial effect of these two agents using proliferation assays, cell-cycle analysis, Ki67 immunostaining, time-lapse microscopy, and xenograft studies.Results: Sensitivity to binimetinib and ribociclib was inversely related (r = −0.58, P = 0.009). MYCN amplification status and expression were associated with ribociclib sensitivity and binimetinib resistance, whereas increased MAPK signaling was the main determinant of binimetinib sensitivity and ribociclib resistance. Treatment with both compounds resulted in synergistic or additive cellular growth inhibition in all lines tested and significant inhibition of tumor growth in three of four xenograft models of neuroblastoma. The augmented growth inhibition was attributed to diminished cell-cycle progression that was reversible upon removal of drugs.Conclusions: Here we demonstrate that combined binimetinib and ribociclib treatment shows therapeutic synergy across a broad panel of high-risk neuroblastoma preclinical models. These data support testing this combination therapy in relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma patients, with focus on cases with hyperactivated RAS–MAPK signaling. Clin Cancer Res; 23(7); 1785–96. ©2016 AACR.

Supplementary Figure 3 - PDF file 127K, MYCN expression is inversely correlated with LEE011 sensitivity. (A) High mRNA expression of MYCN correlates with low LEE011 IC50s (r = -0.55, p = 0.02). This correlation is further strengthened (r = -0.7, p = 0.003) by the removal of two outliers, SKNSH (IC50 = 148 nM) and its subclone, SY5Y (IC50 = 154 nM). (B) Sensitive cell lines also tend to express higher levels of MYCN protein than resistant cell lines

Background: PARP7 is a stress-induced monoART that suppresses the cellular type I interferon (IFN) response following cytosolic nucleic acid sensing. RBN-2397 is a first-in-class PARP7 inhibitor that induces IFN and an adaptive immune response. The tumor-intrinsic immunomodulatory mechanism of RBN-2397 and preliminary antitumor activity in patients (pts) was demonstrated during dose escalation (Falchook, ASCO 2021; Kuplast-Barr, AACR 2022). Methods: Pts with solid tumors were treated with RBN-2397 at the RP2D of 200 mg BID in 3 expansion cohorts: squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR+ BC). Objectives of the expansion phase included safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity. Results: As of 2 July 2022, 31 pts have been treated: SCCL (n=13), HNSCC (n=10), and HR+ BC (n=8). RBN-2397-related AEs (all grades >10%) included dysgeusia (42%, n=13), nausea (26%, n=8), fatigue (23%, n=7), with Grade 3 events of nausea and pleural infection (each n=1) and ALT/AST increase (n=2), and no Grade 4 events. No significant chronic toxicities were observed. The disease control rate in response-evaluable pts was 44% in SCCL (stable disease [SD] in 4/9 pts), 71% in HNSCC (RECIST partial response [PR] for 12+ months in 1/7; SD in 4/7), and 29% in HR+ BC (SD in 2/7). Biomarker analyses confirmed PARP7 mRNA expression in all baseline biopsies, with H-scores higher in tumor cells than in stromal cells (n=26, H-score range 66-256, P Conclusions: RBN-2397 was well tolerated at biologically active drug exposures, with preliminary antitumor activity observed. Paired tumor biopsy translational studies demonstrated the immunomodulatory mechanism of RBN-2397 and support the ongoing trial of RBN-2397 in combination with pembrolizumab (NCT05127590). Citation Format: Timothy A. Yap, Andres Cervantes, Gerald S. Falchook, Manish R. Patel, Dejan Juric, Saiama N. Waqar, Erin L. Schenk, Geoffrey Shapiro, Valentina Boni, Cesar A. Perez, Barbara Burtness, Yana G. Najjar, Fabricio Racca, Katerin Rojas, Kristy Kuplast-Barr, Kristen McEachern, Manoj Samant, Viviana Bozón, Sudha Parasuraman, Melissa Johnson. First-in-class first-in-human phase 1 trial and translational study of the mono(ADP-ribose) polymerase-7 (PARP7) inhibitor RBN-2397 in patients with selected advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT109.

BackgroundPARP7 is a mono-ART that is upregulated in response to cellular stress (e.g., viral infection, cigarette smoke), and suppresses the Type I interferon (IFN) response following cytosolic nucleic acid sensing. RBN-2397 is a first-in-class PARP7 inhibitor, inducing cancer cell autonomous and immune stimulatory effects in preclinical models through enhanced Type I IFN signaling in cancer cells. Moreover, RBN-2397 induces CD8 T cell-dependent tumor-specific immune memory in an immunocompetent mouse cancer model.1 RBN-2397 is currently being tested in an ongoing Phase I clinical study (NCT04053673).2 Here we aimed to compare biomarker results from preclinical models and patient samples.MethodsIn preclinical models, interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression was assessed by qPCR, NanoString, or ELISA. Plasma CXCL10 from patients was measured by MSD while ISG expression in PBMCs was measured by NanoString. Baseline and on-treatment patient tumor biopsies were analyzed by NanoString, CD8/GZMB IHC, and MIBI-TOF to characterize immune changes in the tumor microenvironment.ResultsRBN-2397 potently restored tumoral Type I IFN signaling in preclinical models as demonstrated by increases in ISGs, namely CXCL10, which were not observed in non-tumor tissue (e.g. spleen, PBMCs). In peripheral blood from patients treated with RBN-2397, neither plasma nor PBMC CXCL10 increased more than 2-fold over baseline. Expression of 42 ISGs was not consistently induced in a dose-dependent manner in PBMCs. However, in tumor types of interest (e.g. cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract), CXCL10 expression increased 1.5 to 8-fold, with similar effects observed for a subset of ISGs in 5 evaluable paired biopsy samples.Confirming preclinical studies [1], up to 8-fold increases in CD8 T cell infiltration along with induction of granzyme B expression were observed in 4 of 5 paired patient tumor biopsies by immunohistochemistry. Using the MIBI-TOF technology, we observed up to 50-fold increases in intratumoral activated T cells as well as monocytes and M1 macrophages, most strikingly in two NSCLC patients.ConclusionsInhibition of PARP7 with RBN-2397 restores tumor-intrinsic Type I IFN signaling in preclinical models leading to enhanced adaptive immunity, resulting in CD8 T cell-dependent durable tumor regressions. These observations are mirrored in samples from patients treated with RBN-2397 in that pharmacodynamic effects of RBN-2397 were preferentially observed in tumor tissue relative to the periphery, including an increase in immune infiltration into the tumor microenvironment. These data provide evidence for induction of an adaptive immune response and confirm the tumor-intrinsic, immunomodulatory mechanism of action of RBN-2397 in patients.ReferencesGozgit, et al. PARP7 negatively regulates the type I interferon response in cancer cells and its inhibition triggers antitumor immunity. Cancer Cell 2021; In press.Falchook, et al. A first-in-human phase 1 study of a novel PARP7 inhibitor RBN-2397 in patients with advanced solid tumors. ASCO 2021; oral presentation.

Background: PARP7 is a mono-ART that is upregulated in response to cellular stress (e.g., viral infection, cigarette smoke), and suppresses the Type I interferon (IFN) response following cytosolic nucleic acid sensing. RBN-2397 is a first-in-class PARP7 inhibitor, inducing cancer cell autonomous and immune stimulatory effects in preclinical models through enhanced Type I IFN signaling in cancer cells. Moreover, RBN-2397 induces CD8 T cell-dependent tumor-specific immune memory in an immunocompetent mouse cancer model [1]. RBN-2397 is currently being tested in an ongoing Phase I clinical study (NCT04053673) [2]. Here we present evidence of proof of mechanism in the paired biopsies of tumors from Phase 1 patients. Methods: Plasma CXCL10 from patients was measured by MSD while ISG expression in PBMCs was measured by NanoString. Baseline and on-treatment patient tumor biopsies were analyzed by NanoString, CD8/GZMB IHC, and MIBI-TOF to characterize immune changes in the tumor microenvironment. Results: In peripheral blood from patients treated with RBN-2397, neither plasma nor PBMC CXCL10 increased more than 2-fold over baseline. Expression of 42 ISGs was not consistently induced in a dose-dependent manner in PBMCs. However, in tumor types of interest (e.g., cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract), CXCL10 expression increased, with similar effects observed for a subset of ISGs in multiple evaluable paired biopsy samples. Confirming preclinical studies [1], increases in CD8 T cell infiltration along with induction of granzyme B expression were observed in several evaluable paired patient tumor biopsies by immunohistochemistry. Using the MIBI-TOF technology, we observed up to 50-fold increases in intratumoral activated T cells as well as monocytes and M1 macrophages, most strikingly in two NSCLC patients. Conclusions: In patients treated with RBN-2397 pharmacodynamic effects were preferentially observed in tumor tissue relative to the periphery, including an increase in immune infiltration into the tumor microenvironment. These data provide evidence for induction of an adaptive immune response and confirm the tumor-intrinsic, immunomodulatory mechanism of action of RBN-2397 in patients. References: 1. Gozgit et al. PARP7 negatively regulates the Type I interferon response in cancer cells and its inhibition triggers antitumor immunity. Cancer Cell. 2021 2. Falchook et al. A First-In-Human Phase 1 Study of a Novel PARP7 Inhibitor RBN-2397 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. ASCO 2021 oral presentation Citation Format: Kristy Kuplast-Barr, Melissa L. Johnson, Manish R. Patel, Timothy A. Yap, Gerald S. Falchook, Patricia LoRusso, Ryan Abo, Chang Liu, Erika L. Manyak, Lisa Cleary, Viviana Bozon, Sudha Parasuraman, Heike Keilhack, Kristen McEachern. RBN-2397, a novel, potent, and selective PARP7 inhibitor, induces tumor-intrinsic type I interferon responses and adaptive immunity in patient tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1836.