Search

Although the study on the regulatory mechanism of endothelial differentiation from the perspective of development provides references for endothelial cell (EC) derivation from pluripotent stem cells, incomplete reprogramming and donor-specific epigenetic memory are still thought to be the obstacles of iPSCs for clinical application. Thus, it is necessary to establish a stable iPSC-EC induction system and investigate the regulatory mechanism of endothelial differentiation. Based on a single-layer culture system, we successfully obtained ECs from porcine iPSCs (piPSCs). In vitro, the derived piPSC-ECs formed microvessel-like structures along 3D gelatin scaffolds. Under pathological conditions, the piPSC-ECs functioned on hindlimb ischemia repair by promoting blood vessel formation. To elucidate the molecular events essential for endothelial differentiation in our model, genome-wide transcriptional profile analysis was conducted, and we found that during piPSC-EC derivation, the synthesis and secretion level of TGF-β as well as the phosphorylation level of Smad2/3 changed dynamically. TGF-β-Smad2/3 signaling activation promoted mesoderm formation and prevented endothelial differentiation. Understanding the regulatory mechanism of iPSC-EC derivation not only paves the way for further optimization, but also provides reference for establishing a cardiovascular drug screening platform and revealing the molecular mechanism of endothelial dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Proton therapy enables the delivery of a high radiation dose to tumors while sparing surrounding normal tissues. Inaccurate patient positioning may lead to underdosing of the targeted tumor and overdosing of nearby healthy tissues. Before a course of proton therapy, a CT scan is acquired for treatment planning with the patient in the treatment position, and this image dataset is used as a reference for patient localization at each treatment fraction. Radiation therapists perform daily cone-beam CT (CBCT) image guidance to align the patient to closely match the planning CT and minimize inaccuracies in radiation delivery. In this study, CBCT scans were systematically collected with clinical and treatment information to investigate questions related to image guidance, setup uncertainty, and patient motion during the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. Knowledge gained from this study provides a basis for designing safe and optimal proton treatments. This study quantifies setup uncertainty in brain tumor patients who received image-guided proton therapy. Patients analyzed include 165 children, adolescents, and young adults (median age at radiotherapy: 9 years (range: 10 months to 24 years); 80 anesthetized and 85 awake) enrolled in a single-institution prospective study from 2020 to 2023. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed daily to calculate and correct manual setup errors, once per course after setup correction to measure residual errors, and weekly after treatments to assess intrafractional motion. Orthogonal radiographs were acquired consecutively with CBCT for paired comparisons of 40 patients. Translational and rotational errors were converted from 6 degrees of freedom to a scalar by a statistical approach that considers the distance from the target to the isocenter. The 95th percentile of setup uncertainty was reduced by daily CBCT from 10 mm (manual positioning) to 1–1.5 mm (after correction) and increased to 2 mm by the end of fractional treatment. A larger variation existed between the roll corrections reported by radiographs vs. CBCT than for pitch and yaw, while there was no statistically significant difference in translational variation. A quantile mixed regression model showed that the 95th percentile of intrafractional motion was 0.40 mm lower for anesthetized patients ( p = 0.0016 ). Considering additional uncertainty in radiation-imaging isocentricity, the commonly used total plan robustness of 3 mm against positional uncertainty would be appropriate for our study cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Limited effective therapies exist for the treatment of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated plexiform neurofibroma (PN). The aim of our prospective clinical trial was to evaluate the activity and safety of vinblastine and methotrexate (conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies) given on a metronomic schedule in children and young adults with NF1 and PN. Of the 23 participants evaluable for treatment outcomes and toxicities, 14 completed all protocol therapy. There were no participants that discontinued therapy due to dose-limiting toxicities. In addition, there were no participants that demonstrated a partial response. VBL/MTX was well-tolerated but did not result in objective volumetric responses. Limited therapies exist for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-associated plexiform neurofibroma (PN). For this reason, the activity of vinblastine (VBL) and methotrexate (MTX) was evaluated in children and young adults with NF1 and PN. Patients ≤ 25 years of age with progressive and/or inoperable NF1-PN received VBL 6 mg/m2 and MTX 30 mg/m2 weekly for 26 weeks, followed by every 2 weeks for 26 weeks. Objective response rate was the primary endpoint. Of 25 participants enrolled, 23 were evaluable. The median age of participants was 6.6 years (range 0.3–20.7). The most frequent toxicities were neutropenia and elevation of transaminases. On two-dimensional (2D) imaging, 20 participants (87%) had stable tumor, with a median time to progression of 41.5 months (95% confidence interval 16.9, 64.9). Two of eight participants (25%) with airway involvement demonstrated functional improvements including decreased positive pressure requirements and apnea-hypopnea index. A post hoc three-dimensional (3D) analysis of PN volumes was completed on 15 participants with amenable imaging; 7 participants (46%) had progressive disease on or by the end of therapy. VBL/MTX was well-tolerated but did not result in objective volumetric response. Furthermore, 3D volumetric analysis highlighted the lack of sensitivity of 2D imaging for PN response evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]