1. Discussion of An Empirical Evaluation of Possible Explanations for the Differing Treatment of Apparently Similar Unusual Events.
- Author
-
DREBIN, ALLAN R.
- Subjects
ACCOUNTING standards ,FINANCIAL statements ,INTERNATIONAL accounting standards ,EMPIRICAL research ,CORPORATION reports - Abstract
In this article the author comments on a research paper by John Cumming related to the accounting standard of the Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 9 which requires the inclusion and separate identification of extraordinary items in the income statement. Cumming's research attempts to explain apparent vagaries of accounting practice with respect to extraordinary items. The author raises the question of whether the data necessary for explaining differences in accounting method are actually available. Companies listing an event as extraordinary have already disclosed this fact. On the other hand, a company which elected to treat a similar event as ordinary probably did not disclose this. The author comments that Cumming took shortcuts in conducting his research which may cast doubt on his conclusions such as when he prepared a list of categories of extraordinary items that might be segregated.
- Published
- 1973
- Full Text
- View/download PDF