Search

The article provides an overview on the contents of the book "Prohibition at Its Worst," by Irving Fisher, professor of Economics at Yale University. Fisher declares in his book that the city, known as the wettest city in the U.S., shows a steady decrease of single-time offenders for drunkeness. The author concluded that the present situation of imperfect enforcement is intolerable.

Focuses on the tabular standard in Massachusetts history. Adjustment of depreciated bills of credit; Relationship of pay to computer rise of prices.

This articles suggests that the accepted analysis of price formation in black markets is defective and the conclusions based on it incorrect. The accepted treatment of price formation in black markets is based substantially on the standard analysis of price formation under discriminating monopoly. For instance, Professor Bronfenbrenner in a well-known article suggests that a monopolist would produce the output at which marginal cost equals the controlled or official price (which equals the marginal revenue on official sales), that he would make sales in the black market up to the amount at which marginal revenue in that market equals the official price, and that he would sell the rest at the official price. This analysis assumes that the black market price is a function of the quantity supplied in that market and is independent of the quantity supplied in the official market. This assumption is inappropriate. With a given total output, any change in black market sales necessarily involves a diversion of supply to or from the official market, and a corresponding diversion of demand. In other words, black market demand is directly related to a change in black market supply. It is, therefore, inappropriate to represent the black market demand as a fixed curve determining a different black market price for each quantity supplied in that market. In a situation with a given total output, the black market price changes only if the slope of the black market demand curve changes with different allocations of the total quantity between the official market and the black market. The marginal revenue in the black market is also constant, and the "discriminating" monopolist has no scope to vary his black market sales out of his total output--uniquely determined by marginal conditions in the official market according to the accepted analysis--so as to equate marginal revenue in the two markets.