Search

Purpose: Doublet chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine (FP) and oxaliplatin (OX) plus bevacizumab (BEV) is a standard regimen for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). However, the efficacy of adding OX to FP plus BEV (FP + BEV) remains unclear for older patients, a population for whom FP + BEV is standard. We aimed to confirm the superiority of adding OX to FP + BEV for this population., Methods: This open-label, randomized, phase III trial was conducted at 42 institutions in Japan. Patients with unresectable MCRC age 70-74 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 2 and those 75 years and older with ECOG-PS 0-2 were randomly assigned (1:1) to an FP + BEV arm or an OX addition (FP + BEV + OX) arm. Fluorouracil plus levofolinate calcium or capecitabine was declared before enrollment. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (identifier: jRCTs031180145)., Results: Between September 2012 and March 2019, 251 patients were randomly assigned to the FP + BEV arm (n = 125) and the FP + BEV + OX arm (n = 126). The median age was 80 and 79 years in the respective arm. The median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 8.3 to 10.3) in the FP + BEV arm and 10.0 months (9.0 to 11.2) in the FP + BEV + OX arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84 [90.5% CI, 0.67 to 1.04]; one-sided P = .086). The median overall survival was 21.3 months (18.7 to 24.3) in the FP + BEV arm and 19.7 months (15.5 to 25.5) in the FP + BEV + OX arm (HR, 1.05 [0.81 to 1.37]). The proportion of any grade ≥3 adverse events was higher in the FP + BEV + OX arm (52% v 69%). There was one treatment-related death in the FP + BEV arm and three in the FP + BEV + OX arm., Conclusion: No benefit of adding OX to FP + BEV as first-line treatment was demonstrated in older patients with MCRC. FP + BEV is recommended for this population.

Objective: To investigate the specificity of Target of Myb1-Like1 (Tom1L1) expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma tissues and analyze the predictive value of Tom1L1 in the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma., Methods: The cancerous tissues and paracancerous normal tissues of 102 patients diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma without treatment were selected; quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), Western blot and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were adopted to validate the expression level of Tom1L1 in the two groups. Furthermore, 34 patients with locally progressive mid-low rectal adenocarcinoma, who were treated with neoadjuvant Xelox chemotherapy prior to the operation, IHC was adopted to detect the expression of Tom1L1 protein in patients before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to analyze the relationship between the expression level of Tom1L1 and the sensitivity of neoadjuvant therapy., Results: The results of qPCR, Western blot and IHC showed that the expression of Tom1L1 in colorectal adenocarcinoma tissues was significantly higher than that in paracancerous normal tissues, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01); Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly more effective in patients with low expression of Tom1L1 protein than in those with high expression of Tom1L1 protein, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Tom1L1 is highly expressed in colorectal adenocarcinoma tissues; neoadjuvant Xelox chemotherapy can have an impact on Tom1L1 expression in progressive rectal cancer; patients with locally progressive mid-low rectal adenocarcinoma who have low Tom1L1 expression are more sensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Informed consent and approval were obtained from all the patients and the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University (K2022058). The research was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Ethics Committee listed in the Ethics Statement. Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and images. Consent for publication Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parent for publication of this case report and the accompanying images. A copy of the written consent obtained from the parent of the patient in this case report is available for review by the editorial office of this journal. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Previous studies elucidated that capecitabine (CAP) works as an anti-tumor agent with putative immunosuppressive effects. However, the intricate mechanisms underpinning these effects remain to be elucidated. In this study, we aimed to unravel the molecular pathways by which CAP exerts its immunosuppressive effects to reduce allograft rejection., Methods: Hearts were transplanted from male BALB/c donors to male C57BL/6 recipients and treated with CAP for seven days. The rejection of these heart transplants was assessed using a range of techniques, including H&E staining, immunohistochemistry, RNA sequencing, LS-MS/MS, and flow cytometry. In vitro, naïve CD4 + T cells were isolated and cultured under Th1 condition medium with varying treatments, flow cytometry, LS-MS/MS were employed to delineate the role of thymidine synthase (TYMS) during Th1 differentiation., Results: CAP treatment significantly mitigated acute allograft rejection and enhanced graft survival by reducing graft damage, T cell infiltration, and levels of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, it curtailed CD4 + T cell proliferation and the presence of Th1 cells in the spleen. RNA-seq showed that TYMS, the target of CAP, was robustly increased post-transplantation in splenocytes. In vitro, TYMS and its metabolic product dTMP were differentially expressed in Th0 and Th1, and were required after activation of CD4 + T cell and Th1 differentiation. TYMS-specific inhibitor, raltitrexed, and the metabolite of capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, could inhibit the proliferation and differentiation of Th1. Finally, the combined use of CAP and the commonly used immunosuppressant rapamycin can induce long-term survival of allograft., Conclusion: CAP undergoes metabolism conversion to interfere pyrimidine metabolism, which targets TYMS-mediated differentiation of Th1, thereby playing a significant role in mitigating acute cardiac allograft rejection in murine models., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ki67 index changes during the treatment of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) treatment. The study aimed to detect alterations of grade based on Ki67 index and immune microenvironment in PanNET responding to capecitabine/temozolomide (CapTem)., Method: Retrospective data of patients with PanNET were collected. In control group, 35 patients underwent surgery immediately after biopsy. In CapTem group, 38 patients received CapTem after biopsy and responded well to treatment (defined as either stable disease or partial response), and subsequently underwent surgery. All patients have pathological Ki67 index at biopsy and after surgery. CD163 + CD68 + CD206 + M2 macrophages, CD68 + CD86 + CD80 + M1 macrophages, CD11b + CD33 + myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and CD4 + CD25 + regulatory T cells were stained using multiplex immunofluorescence., Results: In control group, the paired grade based on Ki67 index directly after surgery showed no upgrade or downgrade compared to biopsy. In patients who responded well to CapTem, the grade based on Ki67 index before and after CapTem was altered. Thirteen patients had upgraded Ki67 index and 11 patients had downgraded. The proportion of stable disease was higher in the upgraded group compared to downgraded group (p = 0.0155). And upgraded group had a significantly shorter mPFS than patients in the downgrade group (8.5 months vs. 20 months, HR 4.834, 95% CI 1.414 to 16.53, p = 0.012). M1 macrophages was significantly lower in the downgraded group than in the Ki67 upgraded group (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Grade based on Ki67 index and immune environment change in PanNET patients responding well to CapTem. Patients with downgraded had longer mPFS compared to those with upgraded. It is necessary to reassess the Ki67 index after CapTem treatment, even in patients responding well to CapTem., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a highly malignant tumor, with limited therapy regimens and short response duration. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of camrelizumab, apatinib, and capecitabine as the first- or second-line treatment in patients with advanced BTC., Methods: In this phase 2, nonrandomized, prospective study, eligible patients received camrelizumab (200 mg, d1, Q3W), apatinib (250 mg, qd, d1-d21, Q3W), and capecitabine (1000 mg/m², bid, d1-d14, Q3W) until trial discontinued. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety., Results: From July 2019 to April 2023, we enrolled a total of 28 patients, of whom 14 patients were in the first-line treatment setting and 14 patients were in the second-line setting. At the data cutoff (April 30, 2023), the median follow-up duration was 18.03 months. Eight of 28 patients reached objective response (ORR: 28.57%), with an ORR of 50% and 7.1% for first-line and second-line treatment patients (P = .033). The median PFS was 6.30 months and the median OS was 12.80 months. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 9 (32.14%) patients, including elevated transaminase, thrombocytopenia, etc. No serious treatment-related AEs or treatment-related deaths occurred., Conclusions: In this trial, the combination of camrelizumab, apatinib, and capecitabine showed promising antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced BTC, especially in the first-line setting., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04720131., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Adjuvant oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) therapy is recommended for patients with curatively resected colon cancer. However, prospective data on its practical application in Japanese patients are limited. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a long-term clinical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of adjuvant XELOX in patients with curatively resected stage III colon cancer (MCSCO-1024). This prospective, multi-center, open-label, single-arm, phase II study enrolled patients with curatively resected stage III colon cancer. The treatment protocol consisted of a 120-minute intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m 2 ) on day 1 and two divided doses oral capecitabine (2000 mg/m 2 /day) for 14 days in a 3-week cycle, totaling eight cycles (24 weeks). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoints were 5-year overall survival and long-term prognosis of peripheral sensory neuropathy. A total of 196 patients were enrolled between November 2011 and August 2014 (34 months). The 3-year DFS rate was 73%, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 87%. The overall incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy was 17%, with a 1% rate of grade 3 neuropathy after 5 years. Adjuvant XELOX demonstrated utility and safety in the clinical management of Japanese patients with stage III colon cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To evaluate the initial results of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy (total neoadjuvant therapy - TNT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and its side effects., Material and Method: A prospective study in 75 patients with stage II and III rectal cancer at 108 Military Central Hospital and Nghe An Oncology Hospital from April 2022 to January 2024 who received total neoadjuvant therapy (preoperative chemoradiation of 50.4 Gy concurrent with Capecitabine 825 mg/m², twice a day for 5 days per week, then added neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the mFOLFOX6 or CAPEOX regimen) and subsequently underwent surgery., Results: The median age was 60.07. Males accounted for 58.7%. Most patients in the study group exhibited tumor stage T3, accounting for 88.0% of the total. The percentages for lymph node stages N0, N1, and N2 were 14.7%, 40.0%, and 45.3%, respectively. 20.09% of patients exhibited a positive result for CRM on magnetic resonance imaging. CEA levels measured before and after using TNT were stati-stically significantly lower than before TNT. After treatment, 25 out of 75 patients (33.3%) had a pathological complete response (pCR). Side effects were mainly grade 1 or 2. Leukopenia was the most common side effect in both neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy. The patients underwent TME (60%), Miles (26.7%), LAR-RAR (12%), and ISR (1.3%). 10.6% of the patients experienced postoperative complications., Conclusion: Total neoadjuvant therapy is an effective and safe treatment and results in acceptable rates of pathological complete response.

Aim: To determine the mortality rate and the predictive value of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) for all-cause mortality during the 24 months in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer treated with capecitabine., Methods: We conducted a study on 87 stage IV colorectal cancer patients treated with capecitabine. Before the day of treatment, all patients were measured CEA and CRP-hs levels and calculated neutrophil/lympho ratio (NLR) and PNI. Patients were monitored and collected drug side effects and mortality for 24 months., Results: The mortality rate of study subjects was 60.9%. CRP-hs, NLR, and PNI were independent factors associated with 24-month mortality in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (p < 0.05 to p < 0.01). At a cut-off value of 38.51, PNI was a predictor for mortality, with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 and p < 0.001., Conclusions: PNI was a good predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer treated with capecitabine for 24 months., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (IMA) is a rare histological subtype of lung invasive adenocarcinoma with unique clinical, radiological, histopathological, and genomic characteristics. There have been limited studies on the effectiveness of systemic therapy for lung IMA, with conflicting results reported., Methods: We retrospectively investigated the medical records of patients diagnosed with lung IMA. Patients who were ≥ 18 years of age and received at least 1 course of treatment for metastatic or locally advanced inoperable disease were included in the study. Archive records of 113 patients diagnosed with IMA were screened for the study., Results: A total of 41 patients with lung IMA were included. The targetable mutation rate was 20.6% (in 6 of 29 patients). Most patients (83.1%) had received platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. The objective response rate (ORR) was 25.7%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.1 months (95% CI, 5.02-11.2) and 17.5 months (95% CI, 11.7-23.3 months), respectively, in the patients who received chemotherapy. The median PFS and ORR were 20.6 (95% CI, 18.9-66.5) and 66.6%, respectively, in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive patients (n = 3) with relevant targeted therapy. Only 1 patient used oxaliplatin and capecitabine combination (XELOX) as chemotherapy in the second-line treatment and achieved a partial response (PR) at 7.2 months., Conclusion: Platinum-based chemotherapies moderately enhance IMA patients' survival rates. Anti-EGFR-targeted drugs are seen as potentially effective in patients with EGFR driver mutation positive. Large, prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings., Competing Interests: Disclosure Young Kwang Chae COI Research Grant: Abbvie, BMS, Biodesix, Freenome, Predicine Honoraria/Advisory Boards: Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Foundation Medicine, Neogenomics, Guardant Health, Boehringher Ingelheim, Biodesix, Immuneoncia, Lilly Oncology, Merck, Takeda, Lunit, Jazz Pharmaceutical, Tempus, BMS, Regeneron, NeoImmunTech, Esai All other authors do not have competing interests., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of low-dose gemcitabine and metronomic capecitabine in combination with tislelizumab for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) who have previously received other anti-PD-1 therapies., Methods: This retrospective, observational study included patients with RM-NPC who had prior treatment with anti-PD-1 therapy and subsequently received tislelizumab along with low-dose gemcitabine and metronomic capecitabine between March 2019 and August 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Among 25 eligible patients, 8 (20%) achieved a complete response (CR). The objective response rate (ORR) was 68%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 80%. The 1-year PFS rate was 78%. All patients experienced treatment-related adverse events, which were all grade 1 or 2., Conclusion: The combination of tislelizumab with low-dose gemcitabine and metronomic capecitabine demonstrated promising antitumor effectiveness in RM-NPC patients who had failed previous anti-PD-1 therapy, with a manageable safety profile., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: HER2-low populations constitute a heterogeneous group, and the cytotoxic anticancer agent efficacy based on HER2 status remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with advanced breast cancer showing HER2-low expression treated with eribulin or capecitabine, two treatment options after anthracycline and taxane treatment., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who were treated with eribulin or capecitabine between 2011 and 2015. HER2 status was evaluated according to the ASCO/CAP guidelines., Results: No significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS; eribulin: hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI 0.40-1.10; capecitabine: HR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.45-1.30) or progression-free survival (PFS; eribulin: HR, 1.13; 95% CI 0.72-1.78; capecitabine: HR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.56-1.44) between patients receiving eribulin (HER2-null: 35, HER2-low: 44) and those receiving capecitabine (HER2-null: 41, HER2-low: 33). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in OS between the two groups in the hormone-positive and -negative populations for eribulin and capecitabine. HER2-null and HER2-low patients showed objective response rates (ORRs) of 22.5% and 9.1% (p = 0.09) overall, and 32.0% and 10.5% (p = 0.03), respectively, in hormone-positive cases among eribulin-treated patients. No response was observed in hormone-negative patients. Capecitabine treatment in HER2-null and HER2-low patients had overall ORRs of 26.8% and 15.2% (p = 0.23), respectively, with 27.3% and 16.1% (p = 0.28) for hormone-positive cases; and 25.0% and 0% (p = 1.0), respectively, for hormone-negative cases., Conclusions: Eribulin and capecitabine sensitivity may vary based on HER2 expression in patients with HER2-low and HER2-null breast cancer. Prognosis was similar between the HER2-low and the HER2-null groups., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Regulatory guidance suggests capturing patient-reported overall side effect impact in cancer trials. We examined whether the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) GP5 item ("I am bothered by side effects of treatment") post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy differed between oxaliplatin vs. non- oxaliplatin arms in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) R-04 trial of stage II-III rectal cancer patients., Methods: The R-04 neoadjuvant trial compared local-regional tumor control between patients randomized to receive 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine with radiation, with or without oxaliplatin (4 treatment arms). Participants completed surveys at baseline and immediately after chemoradiotherapy. GP5 has a 5-point response scale: "Not at all" (0), "A little bit" (1), "Somewhat" (2), "Quite a bit" (3), and "Very much" (4). Logistic regression compared the odds of reporting moderate-high side effect impact (GP5 2-4) between patients receiving oxaliplatin or not after chemoradiotherapy, controlling for relevant patient characteristics. We examined associations between GP5 and other patient-reported outcomes reflecting side effects., Results: Analyses were performed among 1132 study participants. Participants receiving oxaliplatin were 1.58 times (95% CI: 1.22-2.05) more likely to report moderate-high side effect bother at post-chemotherapy/radiation. In both arms, worse overall side effect impact was associated with patient-reported diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and peripheral sensory neuropathy (p < 0.01 for all)., Conclusion: This secondary analysis of R-04 found that GP5 distinguished between patients receiving oxaliplatin or not as part of their post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, adding patient-centric evidence on the reduced tolerability of oxaliplatin and demonstrating that GP5 is sensitive to known toxicity differences between treatments., Clinicaltrials: GOV: NCT00058474., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Apocrine carcinoma associated with Paget's disease is a rare malignancy that typically manifests in elderly individuals, predominantly affecting the geriatric population. It commonly arises in regions rich in apocrine glands and often exhibits an insidious onset, potentially requiring several years to be diagnosed., Case Presentation: An 80-year-old male was simultaneously diagnosed with scrotal apocrine carcinoma (showing Paget changes) and early-stage gastric cancer. Whole-genome exome sequencing confirmed these as independent malignancies with minimal genetic overlap, indicating that they were two primary tumors. The patient initially underwent successful surgery but experienced recurrence and metastasis. Treatment with capecitabine and paclitaxel showed promising responses, highlighting similarities between breast and apocrine carcinomas. Challenges were noted in the use of genetic testing and drug susceptibility assessments for treatment guidance. Notably, HER-2 expression in metastatic lesions, a trait of apocrine carcinoma, has remained unexplored due to negative HER-2 FISH results and a lack of available targeted therapies in China., Conclusion: Elderly patients often exhibit a lesser degree of aggressiveness toward treatment following a diagnosis of malignant tumors. It is imperative to carefully consider how to strike a balance between effective treatment and maintaining a satisfactory quality of life for these patients. This case underscores the complexity of treating coexisting rare cancers in older adults and emphasizes the need for personalized treatments and continued innovation in cancer therapy. The insights gained offer significant value in understanding and managing such rare cancer cases., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Backgroud: Adjuvant chemotherapy is crucial for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. However, various factors negatively impact chemoadherence, with malnutrition after gastrectomy being a critical determinant. This study aims to analyze the impact of malnutrition, assessed through the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) and other immunonutritional indices, on chemoadherence and its subsequent effect on survival., Methods: This retrospective study included 116 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy and received oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX). Preoperative nutritional status was assessed using the GLIM criteria along with other immunonutritional indices, such as the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS). Chemotherapy adherence was measured using relative dose intensity (RDI). Statistical analyses included least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to identify the key predictors of RDI and Cox proportional hazards models and assess the impact on survival., Results: Overall, 116 patients were included in this analysis. In the multivariate analysis using LASSO regression, higher GLIM severity was independently associated with a lower RDI (coefficient = -0.0216; p < 0.01). Other significant factors influencing RDI included older age ( p < 0.01), female sex ( p = 0.02), higher mGPS ( p = 0.03), higher CONUT score ( p = 0.04), and higher CAR ( p = 0.05), all of which were associated with a lower RDI. The Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that higher RDI was significantly associated with better survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.06; p < 0.005)., Conclusions: This study highlights the critical role of immunonutritional status, particularly as measured using the GLIM criteria, in maintaining adherence to chemotherapy and improving survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. Routine preoperative nutritional assessments using GLIM can help identify high-risk patients, and early nutritional interventions may improve chemotherapy adherence and outcomes. These findings support the integration of nutritional strategies, specifically targeting those identified by the GLIM, into standard care to enhance the efficacy and survival of chemotherapy.

Li et al. present data from a randomized frontline phase II trial in HER2+ gastroesophageal cancers exploring dual targeting of HER2 with HLX22 (a novel HER2-specific antibody) with HLX02 (a trastuzumab biosimilar) and capecitabine/oxaliplatin chemotherapy. While the objective response and progression-free survival are encouraging, the future development of the combination in a crowded HER2 space remains unclear., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests S.J.K. has served a consultant/advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Eisai, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pieris, Natera, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Mersana, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Coherus, Taiho, and I-Mab. S.J.K. reports research funding to their institution from Leap Therapeutics, Arcus, I-Mab, Astellas, The DeGregorio Foundation, Gastric Cancer Foundation, and the National Cancer Institute. S.J.K. reports stock/equity in Turning Point Therapeutics and Nuvalent Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer death worldwide, yet the prognosis of advanced disease remains poor., Methods: This was a randomized, double-blinded, phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04908813). Patients with locally advanced/metastatic HER2-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer and no prior systemic antitumor therapy were randomized 1:1:1 to 25 mg/kg HLX22 (a novel anti-HER2 antibody) + HLX02 (trastuzumab biosimilar) + oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) (group A), 15 mg/kg HLX22 + HLX02 + XELOX (group B), or placebo + HLX02 + XELOX (group C) in 3-week cycles. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent radiological review committee (IRRC)., Findings: Between November 29, 2021, and June 6, 2022, 82 patients were screened; 53 were randomized to group A (n = 18), B (n = 17), and C (n = 18). With 14.3 months of median follow-up, IRRC-assessed median PFS was prolonged with the addition of HLX22 (A vs. C, 15.1 vs. 8.2 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-1.27]; B vs. C, not reached vs. 8.2 months, HR 0.1 [95% CI 0.04-0.52]). Confirmed ORR was comparable among groups (A vs. B vs. C, 77.8% vs. 82.4% vs. 88.9%). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 18 (100%), 16 (94.1%), and 17 (94.4%) patients, respectively. One (5.6%) patient in group C reported a grade 5 TRAE., Conclusions: Adding HLX22 to HLX02 and XELOX prolonged PFS and enhanced antitumor response in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive gastric cancer, with manageable safety., Funding: Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests F.Y., H.Y., Jing Li, Q.W., and J. Zhu are employees of Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) poses unique challenges in treatment, with current neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NA-CRT) showing limitations. The CapeOX regimen emerges as a potential less aggressive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for LARC., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving treatment-naïve patients with LARC from March 2014 to March 2021 who received 2-4 cycles of CapeOX NAC followed by radical surgery. Treatment response was evaluated using tumor regression grade (TRG), MRI-based TRG (MRI-TRG), and Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) score., Results: 94.7% of patients experienced symptom improvement and 96.4% achieved sphincter-preserving surgery. Post-NAC showed significant tumor regression and MRI confirmed a tumor length reduction (P < 0.001). Clinical and pathological staging discrepancies post-NAC suggest broader therapeutic advantages. 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 78.4% and 73.4%. NAR scores provided better prognostic accuracy than MRI-TRG., Conclusion: CapeOX NAC presents notable benefits for LARC patients and its clinical significance may be underestimated. The NAR score demonstrates superior prognostic value over MRI-TRG., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision is a standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Mismatch repair-deficient locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) was highly sensitive to PD-1 blockade. However, most rectal cancers are microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) subtypes for which PD-1 blockade is ineffective. Radiation can trigger the activation of CD8 + T cells, further enhancing the responses of MSS/pMMR rectal cancer to PD-1 blockade. Radioimmunotherapy offers a promising therapeutic modality for rectal cancer. Progenitor T exhausted cells are abundant in tumour-draining lymph nodes and play an important role in immunotherapy. Conventional irradiation fields include the mesorectum and regional lymph nodes, which might cause considerable damage to T lymphocytes and radiation-induced fibrosis, ultimately leading to a poor response to immunotherapy and rectal fibrosis. This study investigated whether node-sparing modified short-course irradiation combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade could be effective in patients with MSS/ pMMR LARC., Methods: This was a open-label, single-arm, multicentre, prospective phase II trial. 32 LARC patients with MSS/pMMR will receive node-sparing modified short-course radiotherapy (the irradiated planned target volume only included the primary tumour bed but not the tumour-draining lymph nodes, 25 Gy/5f, 5 Gy/f) followed by CAPOX and tislelizumab. CAPOX and tislelizumab will be started two days after the completion of radiotherapy: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m 2 intravenous infusion, day 1; capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 oral administration, days 1-14; and tislelizumab 200 mg, intravenous infusion, day 1. There will be four 21-day cycles. TME will be performed at weeks 14-15. We will collect blood, tumour, and lymphoid specimens; perform flow cytometry and in situ multiplexed immunofluorescence detection; and analyse the changes in various lymphocyte subsets. The primary endpoint is the rate of pathological complete response. The organ preservation rate, tumour regression grade, local recurrence rate, disease-free survival, overall survival, adverse effects, and quality of life will also be analysed., Discussion: In our research, node-sparing modified radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy probably increased the responsiveness of immunotherapy for MSS/pMMR rectal cancer patients, reduced the occurrence of postoperative rectal fibrosis, and improved survival and quality of life. This is the first clinical trial to utilize a node-sparing radiation strategy combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 blockade in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer, which may result in a breakthrough in the treatment of MSS/pMMR rectal cancer., Trial Registration: This study was registered at www., Clinicaltrials: gov ., Trial Registration Number: NCT05972655. Date of registration: 31 July 2023., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease. The CBCSG010 trial is a prospective and multicenter phase III clinical trial confirming that adding adjuvant capecitabine significantly improved the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate in patients with TNBC by 5.9%. In this study, we attempted to identify the specific population that benefited from adjuvant therapy., Methods: In this retrospective exploratory analysis, we performed RNA sequencing of tumor tissues from patients with TNBC in the CBCSG010 clinical trial. A single-sample gene set enrichment analysis algorithm and survival analysis were performed to characterize the intrinsic molecular features of the TNBC microenvironment and assess the associations between immune-related gene expression levels or immune cell counts with capecitabine treatment efficacy. Additionally, we performed immunohistochemical staining of 2 markers, PD-L1 and CD8, and hematoxylin-eosin staining of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens to validate findings from bioinformatics analyses., Results: We found that patients with TNBC with high immune-infiltration treated with capecitabine were more likely to have a better prognosis. We used a cutoff of ≥25 combined positive score (CPS) of PD-L1, ≥10% positive sTILs, and ≥10% positive cells of CD8 to define the "immune-hot" patients. Among immune-hot patients, Kaplan-Meier curves showed that 5-year DFS rates were 96.9% and 79.4% in the capecitabine and control groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.52; P=.049 in favor of capecitabine). In the capecitabine group, the 5-year DFS rate was higher for immune-hot patients than for immune-cold patients (96.9% vs 76.4%; hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04-0.29; P=.028)., Conclusions: Our study suggested that immune-hot patients with TNBC are more likely to benefit from adjuvant capecitabine, and that combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy may be expected to be more effective in immune-hot patients.

Background and Aims: The best adjuvant chemotherapy for resected biliary tract cancer (BTC) is under debate, with capecitabine supported by weak evidence. Aim of this network meta-analysis is to estimate the efficacy of different phase II/III regimens, comparing monotherapies (gemcitabine or fluoropyrimidines) head-to-head, against observation and combination regimens., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed and EMBASE for phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) available as of December 2023, reporting hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). A frequentist framework employing a random-effects model was applied; treatment rankings were outlined according to P-score, based on direct and indirect evidence. Exploratory subgroup analyses for OS were also performed (primary site, resected margin status and nodal involvement)., Results: Six RCTs (1979 total patients) were identified. Fluoropyrimidine monotherapy showed significantly better OS (HR .84 [.72-.97]) and EFS (HR .79 [.69-.91]) than observation, as any monotherapy did (HR .84 [.74-.96]; HR .79 [.70-.89]). In the head-to-head comparison for OS, only S1 confirmed to be superior to observation alone (HR .69 [.49-.98]) while fluoropyrimidines achieved the best P score (.81), similarly to any monotherapy (0.92). Combinations failed to prove superior to monotherapies with respect both to OS and EFS. Subgroup analyses were inconclusive due to results' inconsistency and limited sample size., Conclusions: Our work confirmed that adjuvant chemotherapy grants OS and EFS benefit for resected BTC patients. Fluoropyrimidines appeared the most effective option, confirming capecitabine as the preferred choice for the Western population., (© 2024 The Author(s). Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Oral capecitabine improves convenience compared to intravenous therapies but presents monitoring challenges. We conducted a randomized pilot trial to evaluate a mobile health intervention to remotely monitor capecitabine adherence and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among women with breast cancer., Methods: Patients with breast cancer prescribed capecitabine, an oral chemotherapy with a complex, cyclical regimen, were randomly assigned to enhanced usual care (EUC) or PRO arm. Participants were asked to use a smart pill bottle to measure adherence (timing and dose) and complete baseline and 90-day follow-up surveys. PRO participants received text messages for missed or incorrect doses and weekly text-based symptom assessments, and their oncologists received alerts for severe symptoms or missed doses. We compared nonadherence (<80%) and changes from enrollment to follow-up on reported physical and mental health quality-of-life scores and number of severe symptoms by study arm., Results: Overall, 32 women were randomly assigned (17 EUC and 15 PRO): 28 (87.5%) received the intervention and 24 (78.1%) completed the follow-up survey. Among participants who received the intervention, PRO participants responded to 83.3% of symptom questions; 7.7% of PRO participants were nonadherent compared with 40.0% of EUC participants ( P = .049). Among those who completed the follow-up survey, 12.5% of PRO participants had reductions in their mental health composite scores compared with 69.2% of EUC participants ( P = .011); 10% of PRO participants had more severe symptoms at follow-up compared with 57.1% of EUC participants ( P = .019)., Conclusion: A mobile health intervention using text message reminders and symptom assessments improved medication adherence and mental health quality-of-life scores and lowered symptom burden of patients with breast cancer prescribed capecitabine. Future work should evaluate the longer-term impacts of this intervention.

PURPOSETo assess whether the integration of PD-1 inhibitor with total neoadjuvant therapy (iTNT) can lead to an improvement in complete responses (CRs) and favors a watch-and-wait (WW) strategy in patients with proficient mismatch repair or microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).PATIENTS AND METHODSWe conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial using a pick-the-winner design. Eligible patients with clinical T3-4 and/or N+ rectal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to group A for short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by six cycles of consolidation immunochemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin and toripalimab or to group B for two cycles of induction immunochemotherapy followed by SCRT and the rest four doses. Either total mesorectal excision or WW was applied on the basis of tumor response. The primary end point was CR which included pathological CR (pCR) after surgery and clinical CR (cCR) if WW was applicable, with hypothesis of an increased CR of 40% after iTNT compared with historical data of 25% after conventional TNT.RESULTSOf the 130 patients enrolled, 121 pMMR/MSS patients were evaluable (62 in group A and 59 in group B). At a median follow-up of 19 months, CR was achieved at 56.5% in group A and 54.2% in group B. Both groups fulfilled the predefined statistical hypothesis ( P < .001). Both groups reported a pCR rate of 50%. Respectively, 15 patients in each group underwent WW and remained disease free. The most frequent grade 3 to 4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Patients in group A had higher rate of cCR (43.5% v 35.6%) at restaging and lower rate of grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia (24.2% v 33.9%) during neoadjuvant treatment.CONCLUSIONThe iTNT regimens remarkably improved CR rates in pMMR/MSS LARC compared with historical benchmark with acceptable toxicity. Up-front SCRT followed by immunochemotherapy was selected for future definitive study.

We evaluated modulation of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in both local and liver metastatic colorectal cancer (LMCC), focusing on tumor-associated macrophages, which are the predominant immunosuppressive cells in LMCC. We developed an orally administered metronomic chemotherapy regimen, oral CAPOX. This regimen combines capecitabine and a nano-micelle encapsulated, lysine-linked deoxycholate and oxaliplatin complex (OPt/LDC-NM). The treatment effectively modulated immune cells within the tumor microenvironment by activating the cGAS-STING pathway and inducing immunogenic cell death. This therapy modulated immune cells more effectively than did capecitabine monotherapy, the current standard maintenance chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. The macrophage-modifying effect of oral CAPOX was mediated via the cGAS-STING pathway. This is a newly identified mode of immune cell activation induced by metronomic chemotherapy. Moreover, oral CAPOX synergized with anti-PD-1 antibody (αPD-1) to enhance the T-cell-mediated antitumor immune response. In the CT26. CL25 subcutaneous model, combination therapy achieved a 91 % complete response rate with a confirmed memory effect against the tumor. This combination also altered the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in LMCC, which αPD-1 monotherapy could not achieve. Oral CAPOX and αPD-1 combination therapy outperformed the maximum tolerated dose for treating LMCC, suggesting metronomic therapy as a promising strategy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest There are no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have potentially influenced the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has been used for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The optimal sequence of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy (CT) is a matter of debate., Methods: We performed a pooled analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 and OPRA multicenter, randomized phase 2 trials to identify patient subsets that could benefit from one TNT sequence over the other regarding disease-free survival (DFS). Patients with stage II/III rectal cancer were randomized to CRT (50.4-54 Gy) with either induction (INCT-CRT) or consolidation CT (CRT-CNCT) with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (CAO/ARO/AIO-12 and OPRA) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (OPRA) followed by mandatory total mesorectal excision (TME) (CAO/ARO/AIO-12) or selective watch-and-wait surveillance (OPRA). 311 and 324 patients were recruited from June 15, 2015 to January 31, 2018; and from April 12, 2014 to March 30, 2020 in the two trials, respectively. Pretreatment clinical and tumor characteristics included were age, sex, ECOG, cT-category, cN-category, clinical UICC stage, location from anal verge, and tumor grade., Findings: In total, 628 eligible patients were included in the pooled analysis (CAO/ARO/AIO-12, n = 304; OPRA, n = 324). Of those, 313 were randomly assigned to the INCT-CRT group, and 315 to the CRT-CNCT group. Median follow-up was 43 months (IQR, 35-49) months in the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial and 61,2 months (IQR, 42-68,4) in the OPRA trial. Pooled analysis of baseline clinical and tumor characteristics did not identify any subgroups of patients that would benefit by the one TNT sequence over the other with regard to DFS., Interpretation: To our knowledge, this is the first pooled analysis of two randomized trials after direct head-to-head comparison of both TNT sequences. Both trials reported higher rates of complete response with CRT-CNCT, and this should be considered the preferred TNT sequence if organ preservation is a priority., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial was supported by a grant from the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe; funding number 110460). The OPRA trial was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute of the United States R01CA182551, P30CA008748, and T32 CA009501. These were investigator-initiated trials and, hence, the funding organizations had no influence on and did not contribute to either the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data, preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript, and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. EF has received research funding from AstraZeneca and honoraria from Celgene, Merck and Akamis Bio UK. AJW has ownership Interests in Simphotek, had an advisory Role for AstraZeneca, MORE Health and NanoVi, and has received research funding and expenses from CivaTech Oncology. LBS had an advisory role for Genor, and has received research funding from Taiho Pharmaceutical. JJS received travel support for fellow education from Intuitive Surgical. He also served as a clinical advisor for Guardant Health and as a clinical advisor for Foundation Medicine. He served as a consultant and speaker for Johnson and Johnson and serves as a clinical advisor and consultant for GlaxoSmithKline. MW has served as consultant for Precisca, received funding from Clinical Genomics and is UpToDate Section Editor. TF reported receiving grants from German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe) and personal fees from Bayer Consultancies, Janssen Consultancies, Novartis Consultancies, Roche Consultancies, Vifor Consultancies, Fresenius Kabi Consultancies, CSL Behring Consultancies, and Minoryx Consultancies outside the submitted work. JGA owns stock in Intuitive Surgical and receives as Honoraria for Johnson & Johnson and Intuitive Surgical. He is also a consultant for Medtronic, Intuitive Surgical, and Johnson & Johnson. We thank the patients, investigators, and institutions involved in those two trials. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) is a vasculitic inflammation against blood vessels. Various anticancer therapies can cause vasculitis, but capecitabine-induced LCV is an unusual entity. Here, we describe an LCV case associated with neoadjuvant capecitabine use for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)., Case Report: A 70-year-old man presented with rectal bleeding. A colonoscopic biopsy revealed rectal adenocarcinoma and he was diagnosed with LARC after imaging studies. Capecitabine plus radiation therapy was started as a neoadjuvant treatment., Management and Outcome: Seven days after the first capecitabine dose, the patient was admitted with a rash. The LCV diagnosis was histopathologically proven. Capecitabine was withheld. After the patient's rash began to regress under corticosteroid pressure, capecitabine was started at a lower dose. His treatment was completed successfully with oral corticosteroids plus low-dose capecitabine., Discussion: We aimed to point out a rare and unusual adverse effect of a frequently used drug in oncologic practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

This study examines the effects of comprehensive nursing care on hand-foot syndrome (HFS) in breast cancer patients treated with capecitabine. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 71 patients, divided into a study group receiving comprehensive care and a control group receiving conventional care. Results showed that the study group experienced significant improvements in skin symptoms, self-efficacy, quality of life, and lower anxiety and depression levels compared to the control group. Additionally, patients who were compliant with medications were notably better in the study group. Comprehensive care effectively alleviates the symptoms of hand-foot syndrome in breast cancer patients treated with capecitabine and enhances patient well-being., Competing Interests: The Authors declared no conflict of interest, (African Journal of Reproductive Health © 2024.)

Objectives: This qualitative study explored patients' experiences and perceptions of the SCOPE2 trial. SCOPE2 examined radiotherapy dose escalation in patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT)., Setting: Recruitment at five clinical sites in England and Wales, UK., Participants: SCOPE2 trial participants were invited to take part in interviews from across five clinical sites. Participants self-selected to take part in up to three interviews across four different time points: baseline (before treatment) and at 2-3 months, 3-6 months or 6 months+ after baseline. There were five female and five male interview participants., Interventions: Participants were randomised to standard dose dCRT prescribed carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/capecitabine, or an escalated dose dCRT prescribed carboplatin/paclitaxel or cisplatin/capecitabine., Methods: This qualitative study used semistructured longitudinal interviews to explore the impact of treatment on patient outlook and quality of life and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Interview data were thematically analysed., Results: 10 patients participated in 16 longitudinal interviews. Three participants were accompanied by companions. Participants experienced side-effects from radiotherapy and chemotherapy including nausea, throat pain, difficulties eating and regaining appetite, thrombosis and fatigue, although most of these symptoms gradually improved. Participants required more ongoing information and support regarding treatment side-effects and cancer status in order to improve their overall quality of life. Best practice examples involved key contacts providing practical advice and signposting support., Conclusion: Participants of the SCOPE2 trial reported short and longer-term side-effects from chemoradiotherapy, but these usually lessened over time. Participants attempted to be positive about their survival prospects by readjusting their expectations, priorities and lifestyles. Providing patients with ongoing opportunities to discuss detailed and timely information regarding treatment side-effects, aftercare and cancer status could improve the overall health and well-being of patients during oesophageal cancer trials and pathways., Trial Registration Number: NCT02741856; ISRCTN: 97125464., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

In the randomized, double-blind, multicenter study by Wang et al., 1 the addition of serplulimab (a PD-1 antibody) to anti-VEGF (HLX04; a bevacizumab biosimilar) together with chemotherapy (XELOX) was deemed to be tolerable and safe and may improve progression-free survival. However, even if adverse events were comparable, oncological endpoints including survival need to be confirmed in the next phase 3 study., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The QUATTRO-II trial examined the efficacy and safety of capecitabine+oxaliplatin+irinotecan (CAPOXIRI)+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. 5-fluorouracil+folinic acid+oxaliplatin+irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI)+BEV in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Methods: In this phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04097444; jRCTs041190072), patients were randomized (1:1) to FOLFOXIRI+BEV or CAPOXIRI+BEV. The induction treatment in the FOLFOXIRI+BEV/CAPOXIRI+BEV arms was continued for 8/6 cycles (maximum 12/8 cycles if feasible), and the maintenance treatment was 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin+BEV or capecitabine+BEV at the investigators' discretion. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with the two arms deemed equivalent if the hazard ratio (HR) of the point estimate was 0.80 < HR < 1.25. Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), incidence of adverse events (AEs), and patient-reported outcomes., Findings: Overall, 51 and 52 patients were randomized to FOLFOXIRI+BEV and CAPOXIRI+BEV, respectively. The study met its primary endpoint; PFS at median follow-up of 23.7 months was 10.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-13.3) in the FOLFOXIRI+BEV arm vs. 10.9 months (95% CI, 9.3-14.3) in the CAPOXIRI+BEV arm (HR 1.114 [0.80 < HR < 1.25], p = 0.654). In the FOLFOXIRI+BEV vs. CAPOXIRI+BEV arms, the 2-year OS rate (95% CI) was 65.5% (49.5%-77.6%) vs. 74.3% (59.8%-84.2%), and the ORR (95% CI) was 76.5% (62.5%-87.2%) vs. 84.6% (71.9%-93.1%). Major (grade ≥3) AEs in the FOLFOXIRI+BEV vs. CAPOXIRI+BEV arms were neutropenia (68.6% vs. 40.4%), febrile neutropenia (9.8% vs. 11.5%), diarrhea (7.8% vs. 17.3%), and appetite loss (7.8% vs. 17.3%)., Conclusion: CAPOXIRI+BEV was well tolerated with reduced hematological toxicity and efficacy comparable to those of FOLFOXIRI+BEV, providing a potentially convenient first-line treatment alternative to FOLFOXIRI+BEV in patients with mCRC., Funding: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests H.B. received grants from Ono Pharmaceutical. H.B. also reports honoraria for lectures from Ono Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. D.K. reports honoraria from Takeda Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Seagen, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Merck Biopharma, and Sysmex and research funding from Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Novartis, Servier, Janssen, IQVIA, Syneoshealth, CIMIC, and Cimic Shift Zero. H.S. received grants from Ono Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Sanofi and reports honoraria from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan, Merck Bio Pharma, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Yakult Honsha. T.H. reports honoraria for lectures from Chugai Pharmaceutical. M.S. is on the speakers’ bureau at Johnson & Johnson, Kaken Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Merck Serono, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Yakult Honsha. M.K. reports honoraria for lectures from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Yakult Honsha, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. T. Masuishi reports honoraria from Bayer Yakuhin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, Ono Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Yakult Honsha and reports research funding from Amgen (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), CMIC (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Eli Lilly Japan (Inst), MSD (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), and Syneos Health (Inst). H.Y. reports honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical and Yakult Honsha. Y. Kagawa reports honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical and Yakult Honsha. Y. Komatsu received grants from Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Shionogi, Nippon Zoki Pharmaceutical, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, Nippon Kayaku, Daichi Sankyo, IQVIA Services Japan, MSD, Astellas Pharma, Incyte Corporation, Eisai, National Cancer Center Japan, Syneos Health Clinical, Shift Zero, PARAXEL International, Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization, EPS Holdings, SYSMEX Corporation, Public Health Research Foundation, Aichi Cancer Center, and the Kyushu Study group of Clinical Cancer and reports honoraria for lectures from Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly and Company, Alfresa Pharma Corporation, Astellas Pharma, EA Pharma, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Nippon Zoki Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, NIPRO, MOROO, Boehringer lngelheim, Hakodate National Hospital, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, MSD, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Bayer Yakuhin, Yakult Honsha, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Incyte Corporation, Merck Biopharma, The Japanese Gastroenterological Association, Sapporo Minami Tokushukai Hospital, and Pancan Japan. E.O. is on the speakers’ bureau at Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical and received research funding from Guardant Health. Y.Y. reports honoraria for lectures from Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Yakult, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lily, Bayer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Servier, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Teijin, and Insight. H.K. received grants or contracts from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Eisai and received consulting fees from BMS, Eli Lilly Japan, Ono Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; and has received honoraria from BMS, Bayer Yakuhin, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. T. Misumi reports honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, and Miyarisan. H.T. received lecture fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Merck Biopharma, and Chugai Pharmaceutical and received research funds from Takeda Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, and Ono Pharmaceutical. K.Y. reports honoraria for lectures from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Yakult, Daiichi Sankyo, Merk Serono, Sanofi, MSD, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bayer, Eli Lily, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. K.M. reports honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical; reports a consulting or advisory role at Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Ono Pharmaceutical; and received research funding from Amgen (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), Chugai Pharmaceutical (Inst), Eisai (Inst), MSD (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), and Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst). T.Y. received consulting fees Sumitomo Corporation; received grants from Amgen, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, FALCO biosystems, Genomedia, Molecular Health GmbH, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Sysmex, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; and reports honoraria for presentations from Bayer Yakuhin, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical. T.K. reports honoraria for lectures from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Eli Lilly and Company. A.T. is on the speakers' bureau at Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical and reports research funding from Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), and Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Whether or not the addition of immunotherapy to current standard-of-care treatments can improve efficacy in proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/microsatellite-stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the predominant type of mCRC, is unclear., Methods: This randomized, double-blind, phase 2 part of a phase 2/3 trial was conducted at 23 hospitals across China (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04547166). Patients with unresectable metastatic/recurrent colorectal adenocarcinoma and no prior systemic therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive every-3-weeks intravenous serplulimab (300 mg) plus HLX04 (7.5 mg/kg) and XELOX (serplulimab group) or placebo (300 mg) plus bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) and XELOX (placebo group). The primary endpoint was independent radiology review committee (IRRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included other efficacy endpoints and safety., Findings: Between July 16, 2021, and January 20, 2022, 114 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the serplulimab (n = 57) or placebo (n = 57) group. All patients had stage IV CRC, and 95.7% of the patients with available microsatellite instability (MSI) status were MSS. With a median follow-up duration of 17.7 months, median PFS was prolonged in the serplulimab group (17.2 vs. 10.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-1.14). Although the median overall survival (OS) was not reached for either group, a trend of an OS benefit was observed for the serplulimab group (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.41-1.45). 36 (65.5%) and 32 (56.1%) patients in the serplulimab and placebo groups had grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events, respectively., Conclusions: Serplulimab plus HLX04 and XELOX exhibits promising efficacy and is safe and tolerable in patients with treatment-naive mCRC., Funding: This work was funded by Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Y.K., H.Y., J.L., Q.W., and J. Zhu are employees of Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc. R.-H.X. reported participating on advisory boards for Astellas, MSD, AstraZeneca, Hengrui, BeiGene, Innovent, Hutchison, Junshi, Qilu, CPPC, and Keymed., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Capecitabine is an oral pro-drug of 5-flourouracil used in treatment of different cancers. It has cardiotoxicity incidence of 3-35%, which can be significant enough to cause myocardial infarction. To evaluate the efficacy of glyceryl trinitrate in reducing cardiac events when given concomitantly with capecitabine for at least 3 months in various tumors. A quasi-experimental study was conducted in Hameed Latif Hospital from January 2019 to December 2023. A total of 65 patients with various malignancies and ECOG 0-2 were included. Glyceryl trinitrate was given before capecitabine for at least 3 cycles with 2.6 mg dosage twice a day. Cardiotoxicity was assessed after each 21-days cycle by taking history and ECG. Echocardiogram was done at 3-month follow up Patients aged from 49 to 86 years. Adverse events were noted in 3 (4.6%) patients. Two patients (3.1%) suffered from angina (grade 2 cardiotoxicity) while 1 (1.5%) suffered from a myocardial infarction (grade 3 cardiotoxicity). On stratification, only treatment in adjuvant setting (p<0.001) was found to be a possible risk factor. Glyceryl trinitrate may have potential to be used concomitantly with capecitabine to reduce the frequency of serious cardiac events in cancer patients. However, further studies are needed.

Background: Until recently, treatment options for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and resistance to endocrine therapy were limited to chemotherapy. This real-world study describes treatment patterns and outcomes in patients treated with chemotherapy in the United States before approval of antibody-drug conjugates., Patients and Methods: This retrospective, observational study included adults with HR+/HER2- mBC from the ConcertAI Patient360™ Breast Cancer dataset who initiated their first chemotherapy in the metastatic setting between January 2011 and June 2021. Treatment patterns were described; real-world overall survival, time to next treatment or death, and real-world progression-free survival were evaluated for all eligible patients and patients treated with subsequent chemotherapy. Index dates were the start date of each chemotherapy treatment., Results: Among 1545 eligible patients, 76% were white, 12% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, 38% had de novo mBC, and median age was 61 years (range, 52-69 years). Within the index period, capecitabine was used the most as the first chemotherapy agent and decreased in later treatments, while the use of eribulin increased between first and fourth chemotherapies. Median (95% confidence interval) real-world overall survival was 23.3 months (21.3-25.4 months) from start of first chemotherapy, time to next treatment or death was 6.5 months (5.9-7.1 months), and real-world progression-free survival was 6.9 months (6.4-7.6 months); median times from second, third, and fourth chemotherapies decreased with each additional chemotherapy treatment., Conclusions: This real-world study demonstrates that for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC, chemotherapy provides relatively limited survival benefit which decreases with each additional chemotherapy line, and highlights the need for improved treatment options., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: The efficacy of systemic therapy for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) has not been proven in patients with Child-Pugh (C-P) B cirrhosis. Nevertheless, in real-world these patients are treated both with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and with metronomic capecitabine (MC). This study aimed to compare sorafenib and MC outcomes versus best supportive care (BSC) in C-P B patients., Method: Between 2008 and 2020, among 774 C-P B patients with aHCC not amenable/responsive to locoregional treatments, 410 underwent sorafenib, 62 MC, and 302 BSC. The propensity score matching method was used to correct the baseline unbalanced prognostic factors., Results: In the unmatched population, median OS was 9.7 months in patients treated with sorafenib, 8.0 with MC, and 3.9 months with BSC. In sorafenib vs. BSC-matched patients (135 couples), median OS was 7.3 (4.9-9.6) vs. 3.9 (2.6-5.2) months (p<0.001). ECOG-Performance Status, tumor size, macrovascular invasion, AFP, treatment-naive, and sorafenib were independent predictors of survival. In MC vs. BSC-matched patients (40 couples), median OS was 9.0 (0.2-17.8) vs.3.0 (2.2-3.8) months (p<0.001). Median OS did not differ (p = 0.283) in sorafenib vs. MC-matched patients (55 couples)., Conclusion: C-P B patients with aHCC undergoing BSC have poor survival. Both Sorafenib and MC treatment improve their prognosis., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest GC declares consulting fees from Bayer, Roche, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eisai, and AstraZeneca; FGF (advisory board, consulting fees): AbbVie, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, MSD, and Intercept; EGG (advisory board, consulting fees): Astra Zeneca, Eisai, MSD, and Roche; GR (lectures, advisory board, consulting fees): Gilead, Alfa Wasserman, Intercept, and Eisai; FT (research grant, advisory board, consulting fees): Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Bayer, Eisai, Gilead, MSD, and Roche. All other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Adjuvant chemotherapy has been advised for high-risk stage II and III colon cancer since 2004. After the IDEA study showed no clinically relevant difference in outcome, reduction of adjuvant CAPOX duration from 6 to 3 months was rapidly adopted in the Dutch treatment guideline in 2017. This study investigates the real-world impact of the guideline change on overall survival (OS) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs)., Methods: Patients with high-risk stage II (pT4 +) and III (pN+) colon cancer were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, based on surgical resection and adjuvant CAPOX before (2015-2016) versus after (2018-2019) the guideline change. Both groups were compared on OS, using multivariable Cox regression, and on PROs., Results: Patients treated before (n = 2330) and after (n = 2108) the guideline change showed similar OS (HR 1.02; 95 %CI [0.89-1.16]), also in high-risk stage III (pT4/N2, HR 1.06 [0.89-1.26]). After the guideline change, 90 % of patients were treated for 3 months with no inferior OS to those still receiving 6 months (HR 0.89 [0.66-1.20]). PROs 2 years after CAPOX completion, available for a subset of patients, suggest a lower neuropathy (n = 366; 26.2 [21.3-31.1] to 16.5 [14.4-18.6]) and better quality of life (n = 396; 80.9 [78.6-83.2] to 83.9 [82.8-84.9]), but no significant difference in workability (n = 120; 31.5 [27.9-35.1]) to 35.3 [33.8-36.7]), with reduction from 6 to 3 months of CAPOX., Conclusion: This real-world study confirmed that shorter adjuvant CAPOX did not compromise OS and may improve PROs, complementing the IDEA study and supporting 3 months of adjuvant CAPOX in daily clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: I.A.F: Grant to institution: DoMore Diagnostics. F.H.B: Payment to institution from Personal Genome Diagnostics. G.R.V: Grants to institution and/or nonfinancial support: BMS, Merck, Servier, Personal Genome Diagnostics, Bayer, Sirtex, Pierre Fabre, Lilly, Delfi Diagnostics, Nordic all financial supports transferred to the institute. A.M.M and W.M.U.G: declare no potential conflicts of interests. M.K: advisory role: Eisai, Nordic Farma, Merck-Serono, Pierre Fabre, Servier. Institutional scientific grants: Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Personal Genome Diagnostics (PGDx), Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sirtex, Servier. Non-financial interests: chair of the ESMO RWD-DH working group, co- chair: DCCG, PI PLCRC (national observational cohort study), involved in several clinical trials as PI or co-investigator in CRC. J.M.L.R: institutional financial interests: Bayer, BMS, Merck-Serono, Pierre Fabre, Servier, HUB 4 organoids, Cleara Biotech., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neoadjuvant radiation and oxaliplatin-based systemic therapy (total neoadjuvant therapy-TNT) have been shown to increase response and organ-preservation rates in localized rectal cancer. However, trials have been heterogeneous regarding treatment protocols and few have used a watch-and-wait (WW) approach for complete responders. This trial evaluates if conventional long-term chemoradiation followed by consolidation of FOLFIRINOX increases complete response rates and the number of patients managed by WW., Methods: This was a pragmatic randomized phase II trial conducted in 2 Cancer Centers in Brazil that included patients with T3+ or N+ rectal adenocarcinoma. After completing a long-course 54 Gy chemoradiation with capecitabine patients were randomized 1:1 to 4 cycles of mFOLFIRINOX (Oxaliplatin 85, irinotecan 150, 5-FU 2400)-TNT-arm-or to the control arm, that did not include further neoadjuvant treatment. All patients were re-staged with dedicated pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and sigmoidoscopy 12 weeks after the end of radiation. Patients with a clinical complete response were followed using a WW protocol. The primary endpoint was complete response: clinical complete response (cCR) or pathological response (pCR)., Results: Between April 2021 and June 2023, 55 patients were randomized to TNT and 53 to the control arm. Tumors were 74% stage 3, median distance from the anal verge was 6 cm, 63% had an at-risk circumferential margin, and 33% an involved sphincter. The rates of cCR + pCR were (31%) for TNT versus (17%) for controls (odds ratio 2.19, CI 95% 0.8-6.22 P = .091) and rates of WW were 16% and 9% (P = ns). Median follow-up was 8.1 months and recurrence rates were 16% versus 21% for TNT and controls (P = ns)., Conclusions: TNT with consolidation FOLFIRINOX is feasible and has high response rates, consistent with the current literature for TNT. This trial was supported by a grant from the Brazilian Government (PROADI-SUS - NUP 25000.164382/2020-81)., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The detection rates of early gastric cancer (GC) in China are approximately 20%; upon diagnosis, the majority of patients with GC are identified as having advanced stage disease, and in some cases, even metastatic advanced GC. Currently, the optimal treatment strategy for peritoneal metastasis (PM) in GC remains uncertain, and pathological complete response (pCR) is rare following conversion therapy., Case Presentation: This case report details the management of a 66-year-old patient diagnosed with advanced stage IVB (T4N2M1c) adenocarcinomas of the gastric cardia with PM who received multimodal therapy comprised of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), XELOX chemotherapy, and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) therapy followed by radical gastrectomy. Through the multimodal management, the patient attained PCR and experienced long-term survival., Conclusion: The conversion therapy protocol combined with HIPEC, XELOX chemotherapy, and anti-PD-1 therapy and our scientific, accurate, full-course management strategy may be propagable for potentially curing patients with advanced GC with PM., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: This retrospective study aimed to determine the optimal metronomic chemotherapy duration (MTCD) as adjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC)., Methods: This study involved LANPC patients treated with metronomic chemotherapy (MTC) using a 5-FU prodrug (S1, capecitabine, or tegafur) from May 2013 to September 2020. The optimal MTCD threshold was established using X-tile Bioinformatics software. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were compared between short-term and long-term groups using propensity score matching (PSM)., Results: A total of 546 patients were analyzed. MTCD was an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, and DMFS (all P < 0.05). Patients were categorized into long-term (>3 months) and short-term (≤3 months) MTCD groups. After a median follow-up of 48 months, significant differences were observed in 4-year OS (97.0 % vs. 87.1 %; P < 0.01), PFS (84.6 % vs. 70.9 %; P < 0.01), DMFS (87.3 % vs. 78.8 %; P < 0.01), and LRRFS (95.3 % vs. 87.4 %; P < 0.01) between the long-term and short-term groups. In the PSM-matched cohort of 196 patients per group, the long-term group demonstrated superior 4-year OS and LRRFS (97.3 % vs. 87.1 %, P < 0.01; 95.2 % vs. 90.0 %, P < 0.05). No significant differences in acute toxicities were observed between the groups (P > 0.05)., Conclusion: Extended MTC with a 5-FU prodrug (>3 months) may benefit NPC patients. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Fluorouracil (5FU) and capecitabine are metabolised by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Up to 9% of people have low levels of a working DPD enzyme and are at risk of severe toxicity from 5FU/capecitabine. In April 2020, the EMEA recommended patients undergo prospective screening for DPD deficiency before starting treatment, and this was introduced in our hospital., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of all patients receiving 5FU/capecitabine in a tertiary Irish cancer centre from May 2020 to April 2021 ( n  = 197), and those starting first-line treatment in May 2019-April 2020 ( n  = 97). Our primary outcome was to estimate the prevalence of DPYD variant genes by prospective genotypic screening, with secondary outcomes including variant prevalence by prospective and reactive screening in patients receiving first-line treatment, and 5FU toxicity/tolerability in those with detected variants., Results: In those treated 2020-2021, cancer subtypes included colorectal ( n  = 120, 61%), breast ( n  = 34, 17%), and biliary/pancreatic cancers ( n  = 21, 11%). Median patient age was 62 (range 25-86 years); 40% ( n  = 79) of patients were screened overall, with a prospective-screening deficiency prevalence of 6.8% ( n  = 3 of 44). Three patients had pathogenic DPYD-variants detected by prospective screening and tolerated treatment with 50% up-front dose reduction of 5FU, two had variants of uncertain significance detected by reactive screening., Discussion: Other Irish studies estimated prevalence at 11-12%. As the number of variants detected was small, and screening rates were incomplete, our study may have underestimated prevalence., Conclusions: Approximately 6.8% of Irish patients may carry DPD deficiencies, prospective screening is essential to reduce the risk of life-threatening toxicity in these patients., Competing Interests: Authors contributionRK designed the study, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript, TM, AAlF and AC collected data and proofread the manuscript, CM assisted with data analysis and manuscript editing, JmC was the principal investigator, responsible for study oversight and manuscript editing and approval. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript. Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with high malignancy, poor prognosis, and limited treatment options., Aim: To explore the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic BTCs., Methods: This open-label, non-randomized, double-center, phase II clinical trial recruited systemic therapy-naive patients with unresectable or metastatic BTCs between April 2019 and June 2022 at Beijing Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of China Medical University. Eligible patients were administered nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m 2 , day 1) and capecitabine (2000 mg/m 2 , twice daily, days 1-7) in 14-day cycles until experiencing intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety., Results: A total of 44 patients successfully completed the trial, with a median age of 64.00 years (interquartile range, 35.00-76.00), and 26 (59.09%) were females. Tumor response assessment was impeded for one patient due to premature demise from tumor hemorrhage. Among the remaining 43 patients undergoing at least one imaging assessment, the ORR was 23.26% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.80%-38.60%], and the DCR was 69.77% (95%CI: 53.90%-82.80%). The median OS was 14.1 months (95%CI: 8.3-19.9), and the median PFS was 4.4 months (95%CI: 2.5-6.3). A total of 41 patients (93.18%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with 10 patients (22.73%) encountering grade ≥ 3 AEs, and the most frequent AEs of any grade were alopecia (79.50%), leukopenia (54.55%), neutropenia (52.27%), and liver dysfunction (40.91%), and no treatment-related deaths were documented., Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine may be an effective and safe first-line treatment strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic BTCs., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Preclinical studies suggest that simultaneous HER2/VEGF blockade may have cooperative effects in gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. In a single-arm investigator initiated clinical trial for patients with untreated advanced HER2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, bevacizumab was added to standard of care capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and trastuzumab in 36 patients (NCT01191697). Primary endpoint was objective response rate and secondary endpoints included safety, duration of response, progression free survival, and overall survival. The study met its primary endpoint with an objective response rate of 81% (95% CI 65-92%). Median progression free and overall survival were 14.0 (95% CI, 11.3-36.4) and 23.2 months (95% CI, 16.6-36.4), respectively. The median duration of response was 14.9 months. The regimen was well tolerated without unexpected or severe toxicities. In post-hoc ctDNA analysis, baseline ctDNA features were prognostic: Higher tumor fraction and alternative MAPK drivers portended worse outcomes. ctDNA at resistance identified oncogenic mutations and these were detectable 2-8 cycles prior to radiographic progression. Capecitabine, oxaliplatin, trastuzumab and bevacizumab shows robust clinical activity in HER2+ gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Combination of VEGF inhibitors with chemoimmunotherapy and anti-PD1 regimens is warranted., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is gaining acceptance for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in patients without negative prognostic factors. However, the value of MRI in evaluating tumor response after NCT remains unclear. Purpose To investigate the accuracy of MRI in assessing pathologic complete response in participants with LARC who underwent surgery after NCT without radiation. Materials and Methods A retrospective imaging substudy was conducted within two consecutive prospective clinical trials: the expanded phase II trial (from December 2017 to May 2021) and the COPEC trial (comparison of tumor response to two or four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, ongoing from August 2021). All included participants received four cycles of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin (or CAPOX) before surgery. Three radiologists who were blinded to the clinicopathologic data independently evaluated the tumor response using five methods, namely, MR tumor regression grade (MR-TRG) alone, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) alone, DWI-modified MR-TRG (DWImodMR-TRG), MRI complete response, and radiologic neoadjuvant response score. With pathologic assessment serving as the reference standard, the positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were determined to evaluate the accuracy and performance of these models. The AUCs of the models were compared using the DeLong test. Results A total of 224 participants were included, comprising 119 from the expanded phase II trial (median age, 61 years [IQR, 53-67]; 89 male) and 105 from the COPEC trial (median age, 59 years [IQR, 53-67]; 65 male). MR-TRG, DWI, DWImodMR-TRG, MRI complete response, and the radiologic neoadjuvant response score were associated with pathologic complete response. DWImodMR-TRG achieved the highest AUC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.95), with a specificity of 89% (162 of 182) and a negative predictive value of 93% (162 of 174). Conclusion MRI-based models were accurate for determining pathologic complete response in participants with LARC following NCT. DWI improved the predictive performance of MRI-based assessment. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Santiago and Shur in this issue.

Objective: In this study, we retrospectively analysed the efficacy and safety of three treatment models, namely, short-course radiotherapy sequential XELOX chemotherapy, neoadjuvant mFOLFOX6 concurrent radiotherapy and long-course concurrent radiotherapy with total mesorectal excision (TME) after treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk factors., Methods: We collected clinical data on 177 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3-4 and/or cN+) who were treated at the Department of Abdominal Oncology of the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from December 2017 to December 2022. All patients were associated with 2-3 risk factors [T4b, N2, Extramural Vascular Invasion (EMVI), Mesorectal Fascia (MRF) positivity], positive lateral lymph nodes. Among them, there were 45 cases in the short course radiotherapy sequential XELOX chemotherapy group (RT + XELOX group); 64 cases in the neoadjuvant mFOLFOX6 concurrent radiotherapy group (mFOLFOX6 + CRT group); and 68 cases in the long course concurrent radiotherapy group (CRT group). The RT + XELOX group and mFOLFOX6 + CRT group completed radiotherapy and 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively, and then rested for 1-2 weeks before TME surgery; the CRT group completed concurrent radiotherapy and then rested for 6-8 weeks before TME surgery.Adjuvant chemotherapy was conducted after surgery in each of the three groups: 2 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with XELOX regimen in the RT + XELOX group, 4-6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 in the mFOLFOX6 + CRT group, and 8-12 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 in the CRT group.The pathological complete response rate (pCR rate), tumour downstage rate, tumour complete resection rate (R0 resection rate), local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, overall survival rate, incidence of adverse reactions, surgical complications and completion rate of perioperative systemic chemotherapy were compared among patients in the three groups of cases after TME., Results: The pCR rate (21.95% vs 17.24% vs 5.00%, p = 0.034) and and tumour downstage rate (78.05% vs 68.97% vs 53.33%, p = 0.029) were higher in the RT + XELOX group and mFOLFOX6 + CRT group compared to the CRT group. The RT + XELOX group had a lower 3-year distant metastasis rate (14.63% vs 36.67%, p = 0.048) and improved 3-year overall survival (76.57% vs 48.56%, p < 0.001) compared to the CRT group. There was no significant reduction in the 3-year distant metastasis rate in the mFOLFOX6 + CRT group versus the CRT group (27.59% vs 36.67%, p = 0.719), and the 3-year overall survival was similar (51.23% vs 48.56%, p = 0.35). Multi-logistic regression analysis and stratified analysis showed that patients in the RT + XELOX group and mFOLFOX6 + CRT group were more likely to achieve pCR than the CRT group (RT + XELOX group: OR 7.3, 95% CI [2.6-20.8], p < 0.001; mFOLFOX6 + CRT group OR 2.9, 95% CI [1.1-7.9], p = 0.036). The completion rates of perioperative systemic chemotherapy in the RT + XELOX, mFOLFOX6 + CRT, and CRT groups were 82.93% vs. 84.48% vs. 61.67% (χ 2 =9.95, p = 0.007), respectively. And there were significant differences in grade 3-4 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia (incidence of leukopenia: 15.50% vs. 7.81% vs. 1.47%, p = 0.045; incidence of thrombocytopenia: 13.33% vs 7.81% vs 1.47%, p = 0.027). There was no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications among the three groups (p > 0.05)., Conclusions: RT + XELOX group and mFOLFOX6 + CRT group significantly improved the near-term outcome (e.g., pCR rate) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk factors compared with CRT group. The RT + XELOX group also reduced the 3-year distant metastasis rate, increased the 3-year overall survival rate, and did not increase the incidence of perioperative surgical complications. It provides an effective means for the comprehensive treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer and has important clinical guidance and application value.

Purpose: Several allelic variants of the gene DPYD encoding dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are associated with impaired metabolism of the systemic fluoropyrimidine fluorouracil (5FU) and its oral prodrug, capecitabine, which elevates the risk for severe toxicity. Following a patient death related to capecitabine toxicity in which DPD deficiency was suspected, a multidisciplinary advisory panel was convened to develop an institution-wide approach to future patients planned for a systemic fluoropyrimidine., Methods: The panel selected an opt-out testing strategy which focused on developing reliable processes to collect and report test results and targeted education. An electronic health record-based automated reminder was designed to activate when a 5FU- or capecitabine-containing chemotherapy regimen was ordered for a patient without prior exposure to either agent and without a prior DPYD sequencing test result. DPYD testing was standardized across all sites of care, and a closed loop reporting system for abnormal test results was created. Before implementation, targeted education was provided to providers, pharmacists, and nurses, and a failure mode and effects analysis was performed. Program rollout was staged over a 6-month period., Results: At 10 months, the rate of preemptive testing increased from a baseline of 26% to a sustained rate of >90%. In the six network sites, the testing rate increased from 9% to 96%. A total of 1,043 patients have been tested preemptively; allelic variants have been identified in 43 (4.1%). Among 25 evaluable patients, dose reduction or change to a non-fluoropyrimidine-based regimen was accomplished in 96%., Conclusion: Preemptive DPYD testing is feasible, and high rates of testing can be achieved using an opt-out, reminder-based program. We provide the details of the implementation and encourage others to emulate it.

Introduction: This is the first report of a patient who developed cardiogenic shock after receiving oral chemotherapy with capecitabine and was treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with continuous renal replacement therapy., Clinical Findings: A 58-year-old man developed an arrhythmia that rapidly progressed to cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest after receiving oral capecitabine tablets to treat a rectal malignancy., Interventions: The patient was treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in combination with continuous renal replacement therapy., Outcome: The patient made a full recovery and was discharged from the hospital., Conclusion: The use of comprehensive supportive treatments such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with capecitabine-induced cardiac arrest can rapidly reduce drug concentrations, eliminate harmful substances, and improve the prognosis., (©2024 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.)

Importance: There is limited evidence with regard to the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy chemoradiotherapy in resected gallbladder cancers (GBCs)., Objective: To establish a baseline survival rate for operated GBCs in patients receiving either gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) or capecitabine and capecitabine concurrent with chemoradiation (CCRT)., Design, Setting, and Participants: The GECCOR-GB study was a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 noncomparator "pick the winner" design trial of adjuvant GC and CCRT in patients with resected histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of the gallbladder, (stage II/III) with no local residual tumor (R0) or microscopic residual tumor (R1). The study was carried out in 3 tertiary cancer institutions in India. Patients 18 years or older with adequate end-organ functions, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 1 or lower between May 2019 and February 2022 were enrolled. The cutoff date for data analysis was February 28, 2023., Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either GC every 3 weeks (maximum of 6 cycles) or CCRT comprising capecitabine with concurrent chemoradiation (capecitabine concurrent with radiotherapy) sandwiched between capecitabine chemotherapy., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS) at 1 year in randomized patients. This study was conducted as 2 parallel, single-stage phase 2 clinical trials. Within each treatment arm, a 1-year DFS rate of less than 59% was considered as insufficient activity, whereas a 1-year DFS rate of 77% or higher would be considered as sufficient activity., Results: With a median follow-up of 23 months, 90 patients were randomized, 45 in each arm. Overall, there were 31 women (69%) and 14 men (31%) in the GC arm with a mean (range) age of 56 (33-72) years and 34 women (76%) and 11 men (24%) in the CCRT group with a mean (range) age of 55 (26-69) years. In the GC and CCRT arms, 1-year DFS and estimated 2-year DFS was 88.9% (95% CI, 79.5-98.3) and 74.8% (95% CI, 60.4-89.2), and 77.8% (95% CI, 65.4-90.2) and 74.8% (95% CI, 59.9-86.3), respectively. Completion rates for planned treatment was 82% in the GC arm and 62% in the CCRT arm., Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, GC and CCRT crossed the prespecified trial end points of 1-year DFS in patients with resected stage II/III GBCs. The results set a baseline for a larger phase 3 trial evaluating both regimens in operated GBCs., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: CTRI/2019/05/019323I.

Purpose: The standard treatment of T2-T3 rectal adenocarcinoma is radical proctectomy by total mesorectal excision often combined with some neoadjuvant treatment. To reduce morbidity of this surgery, organ preservation strategy using various combination of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and local excision is gaining interest. Some randomized trials have proven the feasibility of such approaches. The OPERA trial demonstrated, for T2 T3<5cm diameter low-middle rectum, that a contact X-ray brachytherapy boost of 90Gy in three fractions over 4 weeks was able to achieve a planned organ preservation in 81% of patients at 3years with 97% success for tumour smaller than 3cm treated with contact X-ray brachytherapy boost first. To try to expand organ preservation to larger tumours we set up a feasibility trial in T2-T3 tumours using total neoadjuvant treatment and a contact X-ray brachytherapy boost., Material and Method: The trial was approved by the institutional review board of Nice. Inclusion criteria were operable patients, 75years or less, adenocarcinoma of the low-middle rectum staged T2c-T3N0 larger than 3.5cm and less than 6cm in diameter or T2-T3N1 less than 6cm in diameter. Treatment started in all cases with neoadjuvant chemotherapy associating 5-fluoro-uracile, irinotecan and oxaliplatin ('folfirinox' regimen, four to six cycles). In case of good tumour response after four cycles, a contact X-ray brachytherapy boost (delivering 90Gy in three fractions) was given followed by chemoradiotherapy (external beam radiotherapy delivering 50Gy, with concurrent capecitabine). After six cycles if only a partial response (tumour still larger than 3cm) was seen, chemoradiotherapy was given and contact X-ray brachytherapy boost was delivered after that. At the end of this total neoadjuvant treatment a watch and wait strategy was decided in case of clinical complete response or radical proctectomy by total mesorectal excision for partial response., Results: Between July 2019 and October 2022, 14 patients were included; median age was 66years (range: 51-77years), there were nine male and five female, two T2 N1 tumours, seven T3N0, and five T3N1, all were M0. Median tumour diameter was 40mm (range: 11-50mm); three tumours had a circumferential extension greater than 50%. Seven patients received four folfirinox cycles and seven had six cycles. Contact X-ray brachytherapy boost was given during folfirinox chemotherapy before chemoradiotherapy in 11 patients (and after in three). The tolerance was good, with no grade 4-5 toxicity. The main grade 3 early toxicity was in relation with the folfirinox regimen. A clinical complete response was seen in 12 patients at the end of the total neoadjuvant treatment (85%). All these patients are alive and have preserved their rectum with a mean follow-up time of 17.8months (range: 6-48months) and a good bowel function (low anterior rectal resection syndrome score below 30). The main contact X-ray brachytherapy boost toxicity was radiation ulceration in three patients that usually healed within 6 months, sometimes necessitating hyperbaric oxygen., Conclusion: The preliminary results of this feasibility study show that early tolerance of these intensive total neoadjuvant treatment is compatible with an acceptable toxicity. The high rate of organ preservation in this intermediate group of T2-T3 tumours is encouraging and is a good argument to start the next randomized TRESOR trial that will aim at achieving a 65% of 3-year survival with organ preservation in this intermediate tumour group., (Copyright © 2024 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: To explore whether specific clinicopathological covariates are predictive for a benefit from capecitabine maintenance in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the SYSUCC-001 phase III clinical trial., Methods: Candidate covariates included age, menstrual status, type of surgery, postoperative chemotherapy regimen, Ki-67 percentage, histologic grade, primary tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, node status, and capecitabine medication. Their nonlinear effects were modeled by restricted cubic spline. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). A survival prediction model was constructed using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis., Results: All 434 participants (306 in development cohort and 128 in validation cohort) were analyzed. The estimated 5-year DFS in development and validation cohorts were 77.8 % (95 % CI, 72.9%-82.7 %) and 78.2 % (95 % CI, 70.9%-85.5 %), respectively. Age and node status had significant nonlinear effects on DFS. The prediction model constructed using four covariates (node status, lymphovascular invasion, capecitabine maintenance, and age) demonstrated satisfactory calibration and fair discrimination ability, with C-index of 0.722 (95 % CI, 0.662-0.781) and 0.764 (95 % CI, 0.668-0.859) in development and validation cohorts, respectively. Moreover, patient classification was conducted according to their risk scores calculated using our model, in which, notable survival benefits were reported in low-risk subpopulations. An easy-to-use online calculator for predicting benefit of capecitabine maintenance was also designed., Conclusions: The evidence-based prediction model can be readily assessed at baseline, which might help decision making in clinical practice and optimize patient stratification, especially for those with low-risk, capecitabine maintenance might be a potential strategy in the early-disease setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Rational: Patients with gastric cancer show a relatively low incidence of developing secondary myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)., Patient Concerns: A 60-year-old man was admitted because of pain and discomfort in the upper abdomen and intermittent abdominal pain., Diagnoses: Ulcerative moderately poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (pT2N2M0G3, stage IIB) and MDS., Interventions: The patient underwent chemotherapy with oxaliplatin (OXP, intravenously guttae on day 1) plus capecitabine (CAP, bis in die orally on day 1-14). The patient developed degree III myelosuppression after OXP plus CAP chemotherapy and MDS was subsequently confirmed by diagnosis of the bone marrow biopsy. Temporary but significant hematological improvements were observed after the patient received corresponding treatment, which helped achieve remission and improve pancytopenia., Outcomes: The patient presented partial remission after corresponding treatment and no other complications have been recorded., Lessons: Acute MDS is an unusual adverse effect induced by OXP plus CAP chemotherapy. It is urgent to suggest implementing a supplementary assessment or examination for patients receiving these therapies in future cases., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Recent data have demonstrated that in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach improves compliance with chemotherapy and increases rates of tumor response compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) alone. They further indicate that the optimal sequencing of TNT involves consolidation (rather than induction) chemotherapy to optimize complete response rates. Data, largely from retrospective studies, have also shown that patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after TNT may be managed safely with the watch and wait approach (WW) instead of preemptive total mesorectal resection (TME). However, the optimal consolidation chemotherapy regimen to achieve cCR has not been established, and a randomized clinical trial has not robustly evaluated cCR as a primary endpoint. Collaborating with a multidisciplinary oncology team and patient groups, we designed this NCI-sponsored study of chemotherapy intensification to address these issues and to drive up cCR rates, to provide opportunity for organ preservation, improve quality of life for patients and improve survival outcomes., Methods: In this NCI-sponsored multi-group randomized, seamless phase II/III trial (1:1), up to 760 patients with LARC, T4N0, any T with node positive disease (any T, N +) or T3N0 requiring abdominoperineal resection or coloanal anastomosis and distal margin within 12 cm of anal verge will be enrolled. Stratification factors include tumor stage (T4 vs T1-3), nodal stage (N + vs N0) and distance from anal verge (0-4; 4-8; 8-12 cm). Patients will be randomized to receive neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation (LCRT) followed by consolidation doublet (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) or triplet chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX) for 3-4 months. LCRT in both arms involves 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks + 900 cGy boost in 5 fractions with a fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine preferred). Patients will undergo assessment 8-12 (± 4) weeks post-TNT completion. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion will compare cCR between treatment arms. A total number of 312 evaluable patients (156 per arm) will provide statistical power of 90.5% to detect a 17% increase in cCR rate, at a one-sided alpha = 0.048. The primary endpoint for the phase III portion will compare disease-free survival (DFS) between treatment arms. A total of 285 DFS events will provide 85% power to detect an effect size of hazard ratio 0.70 at a one-sided alpha of 0.025, requiring enrollment of 760 patients (380 per arm). Secondary objectives include time-to event outcomes (overall survival, organ preservation time and time to distant metastasis) and adverse event rates. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, plasma and buffy coat, and serial rectal MRIs will be collected for exploratory correlative research. This study, activated in late 2022, is open across the NCTN and had accrued 330 patients as of May 2024. Study support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ., Discussion: Building on data from modern day rectal cancer trials and patient input from national advocacy groups, we have designed The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial studying chemotherapy intensification via a consolidation chemotherapy approach with the intent to enhance cCR and DFS rates, increase organ preservation rates, and improve quality of life for patients with rectal cancer., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05610163; Support includes U10CA180868 (NRG) and U10CA180888 (SWOG)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become the standard of care for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with tumors > 1 cm or positive axillary nodes. Pathologic complete response (pCR) has been used as an endpoint to select patients for treatment scaling. This study aimed to examine the benefit of adding adjuvant capecitabine for TNBC patients who did not achieve pCR after standard NACT in a real-world scenario., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with TNBC who underwent NACT between 2010 and 2020. Clinicopathological data were obtained from the patient records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted at the 5 years follow-up period., Results: We included 153 patients, more than half of whom had stage III (58.2%) and high-grade tumors (60.8%). The overall pCR rate was 34.6%, and 41% of the patients with residual disease received adjuvant capecitabine. Disease-specific survival (DSS) among the patients who achieved pCR was significantly higher (p<0.0001). Residual disease after NACT was associated with detrimental effects on DSS. In this cohort, we did not observe any survival benefit of adding adjuvant capecitabine for patients with TNBC subjected to NACT who did not achieve pCR (p=0.52)., Conclusion: Our study failed to demonstrate a survival benefit of extended capecitabine therapy in patients with TNBC with residual disease after NACT. More studies are warranted to better understand the indication of systemic treatment escalation in this scenario., Competing Interests: Conflicts to interest: none to declare.