1. Determination of quality of life-related health utilities for surgical complications in ovarian cancer.
- Author
-
Suidan RS, Sun CC, Schneider AK, Lu KH, Giordano SH, and Meyer LA
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Adult, Case-Control Studies, Ovarian Neoplasms surgery, Ovarian Neoplasms psychology, Quality of Life, Postoperative Complications etiology, Postoperative Complications epidemiology
- Abstract
Objective: To assess the health state utilities of ovarian cancer patients, clinicians, and non-cancer controls regarding surgical complications in ovarian cancer., Methods: Utilities for 14 surgical complications were assessed from patients with recently diagnosed or recurrent ovarian cancer, clinicians, and non-cancer controls using the visual analog scale (VAS) and time trade-off (TTO) methods. Health state utilities were converted to a 0-to-1 scale, where 0 represents the least favorable outcome and 1 represents the most favorable outcome., Results: Fifty patients, 50 clinicians, and 50 controls participated. Median VAS scores were lower than TTO scores across all groups (p < 0.01). Patients viewed 'bleeding requiring transfusion' most favorably (VAS utility 0.75), followed in order by less favorable utility scores for hernia, thromboembolism, pleural effusion, abscess, ileus/bowel obstruction, wound infection, bowel obstruction requiring surgery, anastomotic leak requiring drain, temporary ostomy, anastomotic leak requiring surgery, genito-urinary fistula, permanent ostomy, and genito-intestinal fistula (VAS utility 0.2). Overall, clinicians perceived complications more favorably than patients by VAS (overall utility score 0.49 vs 0.43, p < 0.01), but not by the TTO. There were no differences in overall utility scores between patients and controls. Patients who had not experienced certain surgical complications had less favorable scores than patients who did (utility score for ostomy = 0.2 for patients without ostomy vs. 0.7 for patients with ostomy, p = 0.02)., Conclusions: This study establishes health state utilities for surgical complications associated with ovarian cancer. These utilities can be used in future cost-effectiveness evaluations to determine quality-adjusted outcomes and may help in counseling patients during the shared decision-making process., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest This research was supported in part by the Duncan Family Institute, and the MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH/NCI P30 CA016672). Dr. Suidan received research support from the National Institutes of Health T32 grant (5T32 CA101642). Dr. Meyer received research support from the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas grant (RP140020) and the National Cancer Institute (K07 CA201013). Dr. Giordano received research support from the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas grant (RP160674) and Komen grant (SAC150061)., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF