Search

SnSe2 is a layered main-group metal dichalcogenide that has exhibited gate-tunable interfacial superconductivity as well as promising optoelectronic applications. Here, we synthesize SnSe2 films by molecular beam epitaxy and investigate their electronic structure with angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES). A comparison between density functional theory calculations and ARPES data from a thick film reveals the importance of spin-orbit coupling and out-of-plane dispersion in the SnSe2 valence bands, which were neglected in previous studies of its electronic structure. We conclude that the conduction band minimum lies along the M-L direction in momentum space, while the valence band maximum lies along Γ−K.

SnSe2 is currently considered a potential two-dimensional material that can form a near-broken gap heterojunction in a tunnel field-effect transistor due to its large electron affinity which is experimentally confirmed in this letter. With the results from internal photoemission and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy performed on Al/Al2O3/SnSe2/GaAs and SnSe2/GaAs test structures where SnSe2 is grown on GaAs by molecular beam epitaxy, we ascertain a (5.2 ± 0.1) eV electron affinity of SnSe2. The band offset from the SnSe2 Fermi level to the Al2O3 conduction band minimum is found to be (3.3 ± 0.05) eV and SnSe2 is seen to have a high level of intrinsic electron (n-type) doping with the Fermi level positioned at about 0.2 eV above its conduction band minimum. It is concluded that the electron affinity of SnSe2 is larger than that of most semiconductors and can be combined with other appropriate semiconductors to form near broken-gap heterojunctions for the tunnel field-effect transistor that can potentially achieve high on-currents.

We report ambient piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) studies of the multiferroic hexagonal manganite HoMnO3 performed on the cleaved (110) surface of a single-crystal specimen. By changing the sample orientation with respect to the cantilever, we observed an unexpected out-of-plane PFM signal at domain walls, which depends on domain wall orientation, in addition to the expected in-plane PFM signal in domains. Further studies confirmed that the domain wall PFM signal results from an out-of-plane displacement, which can be explained by a simple model of local elastic response with the conservation of unit cell volume at head-on domain walls.