Search

PURPOSE Tumor-intrinsic features may render large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) insensitive to CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T). We hypothesized that TP53 genomic alterations are detrimental to response outcomes in LBCL treated with CD19-CAR-T. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with LBCL treated with CD19-CAR-T were included. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed on pre–CAR-T tumor samples in a subset of patients. Response and survival rates by histologic, cytogenetic, and molecular features were assessed. Within a cohort of newly diagnosed LBCL with genomic and transcriptomic profiling, we studied interactions between cellular pathways and TP53 status. RESULTS We included 153 adults with relapsed or refractory LBCL treated with CD19-CAR-T (axicabtagene ciloleucel [50%], tisagenlecleucel [32%], and lisocabtagene maraleucel [18%]). Outcomes echoed pivotal trials: complete response (CR) rate 54%, median overall survival (OS) 21.1 months (95% CI, 14.8 to not reached), and progression-free survival 6 months (3.4 to 9.7). Histologic and cytogenetic LBCL features were not predictive of CR. In a subset of 82 patients with next-generation sequencing profiling, CR and OS rates were comparable with the unsequenced cohort. TP53 alterations (mutations and/or copy number alterations) were common (37%) and associated with inferior CR and OS rates in univariable and multivariable regression models; the 1-year OS in TP53-altered LBCL was 44% (95% CI, 29 to 67) versus 76% (65 to 89) in wild-type ( P = .012). Transcriptomic profiling from a separate cohort of patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma (n = 562) demonstrated that TP53 alterations are associated with dysregulation of pathways related to CAR-T-cell cytotoxicity, including interferon and death receptor signaling pathway and reduced CD8 T-cell tumor infiltration. CONCLUSION TP53 is a potent tumor-intrinsic biomarker that can inform risk stratification and clinical trial design in patients with LBCL treated with CD19-CAR-T. The role of TP53 should be further validated in independent cohorts.

PURPOSE Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are standard components of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Prior data suggested that CNI-free approaches using donor T-cell depletion, either by ex vivo CD34 selection or in vivo post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as a single agent, are associated with lower rates of chronic GVHD (cGVHD). METHODS This multicenter phase III trial randomly assigned patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplasia and an HLA-matched donor to receive CD34-selected peripheral blood stem cell, PTCy after a bone marrow (BM) graft, or tacrolimus and methotrexate after BM graft (control). The primary end point was cGVHD (moderate or severe) or relapse-free survival (CRFS). RESULTS Among 346 patients enrolled, 327 received HCT, 300 per protocol. Intent-to-treat rates of 2-year CRFS were 50.6% for CD34 selection (hazard ratio [HR] compared with control, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.15; P = .24), 48.1% for PTCy (HR, 0.86; 0.61 to 1.23; P = .41), and 41.0% for control. Corresponding rates of overall survival were 60.1% (HR, 1.74; 1.09 to 2.80; P = .02), 76.2% (HR, 1.02; 0.60 to 1.72; P = .95), and 76.1%. CD34 selection was associated with lower moderate to severe cGVHD (HR, 0.25; 0.12 to 0.52; P = .02) but higher transplant-related mortality (HR, 2.76; 1.26 to 6.06; P = .01). PTCy was associated with comparable cGVHD and survival outcomes to control, and a trend toward lower disease relapse (HR, 0.52; 0.28 to 0.96; P = .037). CONCLUSION CNI-free interventions as performed herein did not result in superior CRFS compared with tacrolimus and methotrexate with BM. Lower rates of moderate and severe cGVHD did not translate into improved survival.

PURPOSE To compare the outcomes of patients with Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing nonmyeloablative haploidentical or unrelated cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic cell transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively studied 740 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 283, 38%) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 457, 62%) age 18-75 years who received transplantations from 2009 to 2016. Data were reported to the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Eurocord, or Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Of the 526 patients who received haploidentical transplantation, 68% received bone marrow and 32% received peripheral blood. All patients received a uniform transplantation conditioning regimen (2 Gy of total-body irradiation, cyclophosphamide, and fludarabine) and graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis (calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate). In addition, patients who received a haploidentical transplantation received posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. RESULTS Compared with haploidentical bone marrow and peripheral-blood transplantations and adjusted for age, lymphoma subtype, and disease status, survival was lower after UCB transplantation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; P = .001; and HR, 1.59; P = .005, respectively). Similarly, progression-free survival was lower after UCB transplantations compared with haploidentical bone marrow and peripheral-blood transplantations (HR, 1.44; P = .002; and HR, 1.86; P < .0001), respectively. The 4-year overall and progression-free survival rates after UCB transplantation were 49% and 36%, respectively, compared with 58% and 46% after haploidentical bone marrow transplantation and 59% and 52% after peripheral-blood transplantation, respectively. Lower survival was attributed to higher transplantation-related mortality after UCB transplantation compared with haploidentical bone marrow and peripheral-blood transplantation (HR, 1.91; P = .0001; and HR, 2.27; P = .0002, respectively). CONCLUSION When considering HLA-mismatched transplantation for Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the data support haploidentical related donor transplantation over UCB transplantation.

1510 Background: Despite curative or disease-controlling roles in AML/MDS and MM, access to allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) remains far from universal. Socioeconomic status (SES) and geographic distance from SCT centers have been shown to be barriers to SCT access. In 2016, Hartford HealthCare (HHC) and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) pioneered a Shared-Care Model (SCM) to streamline access to allo and auto SCT at MSK, featuring a dedicated nurse SCT coordinator, shared hematology tumor boards, MSK-led didactics for HHC providers, and an electronic health record sharing pipeline. We sought to determine if this has improved access to SCT for HHC patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted of HHC patients aged 18-70 with new diagnoses of AML, MDS, and MM between 2016 and 2020. Socioeconomic status (SES) was estimated by 9-digit zip-code using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), shown to be a surrogate for healthcare access. Referral or not to a SCT center, referral to MSK through the SCM, and reasons for non-referral were abstracted from the medical record. For patients referred for SCT at MSK, we also captured the number of peri-SCT days in New York City (NYC) and number of subsequent MSK and HHC clinic visits/hospitalizations within 1-year post-SCT. Results: A total of 126 patients was included, with 81 (64%) treated for AML/MDS and 45 (36%) for MM. The median age was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 53-66). The majority were white (n = 101, 80%) followed by 10% (n = 13) Black/African American; 10% (n = 12) were of Hispanic ethnicity. The median ADI percentile was 38 (IQR: 20-51; higher percentiles reflect decreased SES). The median ADI for MSK SCT referrals from New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut 2016-2020 for the same indications was 19 (IQR: 10-30, p < 0.001). A total of 90 patients (71%) were referred to SCT centers. Leading reasons for no referral were favorable-risk disease (n = 10), goals of care (n = 9), and death prior to referral (n = 5); 3 patients were not referred due to comorbidities/performance status. No differences were found between patients referred to MSK vs. other centers. Thirty-four HHC patients were referred to MSK (21 AML/MDS, 13 MM), vs. 3 between 2010 and 2015. Twelve patients underwent allo SCT, with median 97 days in NYC (range: 68-247); 8 underwent auto SCT, with median 21 days in NYC (range: 15-48). Conclusions: Our findings show the feasibility of a shared-care model between a non-SCT-providing large regional hospital system and a major academic transplantation center. Close collaboration between institutions may minimize time patients spend away from home. The SES of HHC referrals was lower than the general MSK population, suggesting that a shared-care model may facilitate access to SCT for patients with previous barriers for this potentially curative therapy.

7548 Background: Elderly pts with R/R LBCL are at risk of inferior outcomes, increased toxicity, and inability to tolerate second-line (2L) SOC treatment (Tx) (Di M, et al. Oncologist. 2021). Further 2L SOC Tx is often associated with poor health-related quality of life (QoL) (Lin V, et al. J Clin Oncol . 2020;38:e20070). In the pivotal Phase 3 ZUMA-7 study, we assessed outcomes, including PROs, of 2L axi-cel (an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy) versus SOC in elderly pts with R/R LBCL. Methods: Pts aged ≥65 y were assessed in a planned subgroup analysis. Pts with ECOG PS 0-1 and R/R LBCL ≤12 mo after 1L chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) were randomized 1:1 to axi-cel or SOC (2-3 cycles of platinum-based CIT; pts with partial or complete response [CR] proceeded to HDT-ASCT). PRO instruments, including the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Global Health [GH] and Physical Functioning [PF]) and the EQ-5D-5L VAS, were administered at timepoints including baseline (BL; prior to Tx), Day (D) 50, D100, D150, and Month (M) 9, then every 3 mo up to 24 mo or time of event-free survival event (EFS), whichever occurred first. The QoL analysis set included all pts who had a BL PRO and ≥1 completed measure at D50, D100, or D150. A clinically meaningful change was defined as 10 points for each EORTC QLQ-C30 score, 7 points for EQ-5D-5L VAS score. Results: As of 03/18/2021, 51 and 58 elderly pts were randomized to the axi-cel and SOC arms, respectively, with median ages (range) of 70 y (65-80) and 69 y (65-81). At BL, more axi-cel versus SOC pts had high-risk features, including 2L age-adjusted IPI 2-3 (53% vs 31%) and elevated LDH (61% vs 41%). EFS was superior with axi-cel versus SOC (HR, 0.276, P< 0.0001), with higher CR rates (75% vs 33%). Grade ≥3 Tx-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 94% and 82% of axi-cel and SOC pts, respectively, and Grade 5 Tx-related AEs occurred in 0 and 1 pt. In the QoL analysis set comprising 46 axi-cel and 42 SOC pts, there were statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences in mean change of scores from BL at D100 favoring axi-cel for EORTC QLQ-C30 GH ( P

7555 Background: Quality of life (QoL) post cancer therapy is increasingly important. We conducted a Q-TWiST analysis to compare the quality-adjusted survival of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) versus standard of care (SOC) among relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients enrolled in ZUMA-7 (NCT03391466), a Phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study. ZUMA-7 met its primary endpoint of event-free survival; events were defined as death, progression, or new lymphoma therapy. Methods: Overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) cohort was partitioned into 3 mutually exclusive health states as measured through a median follow-up duration of 23.5 months (m): time with grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) before an event (TOX); time without symptoms from events or toxicity (TWiST); and time after event (REL). Q-TWiST was calculated as the average time spent in each state, weighted by state-specific QoL utility (u, ranging from 0 to 1), assuming a base case u(TOX)=0.5, u(REL)=0.5, u(TWiST)=1. Threshold analyses assessed the mean Q-TWiST differences between axi-cel and SOC by varying u(TOX) and u(REL) from 0 to 1. Relative gains for axi-cel (axi-cel Q-TWIST gain divided by mean SOC OS) ≥15% were considered “clearly clinically important” using published norms. Nonparametric bootstrap 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed. Subgroup analyses were performed for relapse status and age. Sensitivity analyses varying the follow-up duration from 3 to 37.7m were explored. Results: For the ITT cohort (n=359), mean time spent in TOX and TWiST was significantly longer for the axi-cel cohort compared to SOC, and mean time spent in REL was significantly shorter for axi-cel (Table). Using the base case, quality-adjusted survival was significantly longer for axi-cel by 3.7m, representing a 21.9% relative gain. In threshold analyses, the difference in Q-TWiST ranged from 1.2m (u(TOX)=0, u(REL)=1) to 6.2m (u(TOX)=1, u(REL)=0) in favor of axi-cel. Q-TWiST gains favored axi-cel across all subgroup analyses. Q-TWiST gains from axi-cel increased with longer follow-up. Conclusions: Axi-cel was associated with statistically significant and “clearly clinically important” gains in quality-adjusted OS vs. SOC in R/R LBCL, regardless of the relative decline in QoL associated with treatment toxicity, disease progression, or additional cancer treatment.[Table: see text]

6523 Background: Whether patient (pt) ancestry impacts the time to BMT is not established. Methods: We hypothesized that non-European (non-EURO) ancestry AML pts are at increased risk of delayed time to transplant. Thus, we analyzed time to allograft (Allo) by ancestry defining delayed (late) times as: Allo Indication to BMT Consult (Ind. – Consult) > 90 days, Consult – BMT > 120 days & Allo Indication to BMT (Ind. - BMT) > 180 days. We studied pts < 70 yrs transplanted 1/2016-7/2021. Results: In 279 AML pts (median 56 yrs, range 19-69), BMT indication was date of diagnosis if ELN 2017 intermediate/ high risk &/or high risk mutations &/or sAML in 261 (94%) pts, or date of refractory/ relapsed disease in 18 (6%) pts. European (EURO) pts (n = 195, 70%; median 60 yrs) were older than non-EURO pts (n = 84, 30%; median 49 yrs), p

7571 Background: In clinical trials of CAR T-cell therapies and real-world studies published to date, there is a paucity of data on outcomes by race and ethnicity. Here, we examined outcomes by race and ethnicity among LBCL pts who received axi-cel in the real-world setting. Methods: A total of 1389 pts with LBCL were identified from a non-interventional post-authorization safety study with pts receiving commercial axi-cel between 10/2017 and 08/2020. Race (African American or Asian vs White) and ethnicity (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic) were self-reported by pts. Pts with rescinded consent, enrolled in trials, having prior non-HCT cellular therapy, primary CNS lymphoma, unknown comorbidity or data in query were excluded. Median follow-up was 12.7 mo. Outcomes included ORR, CR rate, DOR, PFS and OS, grade ≥ 3 CRS (Lee 2014 criteria) and ICANS (ASTCT consensus grade). ORR and CR were evaluated in pts with ≥ 180 days of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for PFS and OS. Multivariable analyses comparing race and ethnicity were conducted via logistic and Cox regression. Results: Among all, 1127 (81%) were White, 70 (5%) African American and 81 (6%) Asian; 152 (11%) were Hispanic including 104 White, 2 Black, and 1 Asian Hispanic. African Americans, compared to White, were younger (median age 55.5 vs 62.8 years), more likely to have pulmonary impairment (41% vs 28%) and tended to have longer time from diagnosis (≥ 12 mo 71% vs 59%). Hispanic pts were younger (median age 58.5 vs 62.6 years) than non-Hispanic pts. ORR was 74% (CR 57%, 12-mo PFS and OS 48% and 63%) for White, 57% (CR 45%, 12-mo PFS and OS 36% and 62%) for African American, 67% (CR 53%, 12-mo PFS and OS 55% and 65%) for Asian and 73% (CR 55%, 12-mo PFS and OS 50% and 65%) for Hispanic pts. Grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS occurred in 7% and 18% of African American, 10% and 19% of Asian, and 8% and 27% of White pts, respectively. Hispanic pts had lower rates of grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS (4% and 15%) vs non-Hispanic (9% and 27%). African American race was associated with inferior ORR (OR 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.69) and CR rate (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.32-0.93) vs White. Asian pts had favorable DOR compared to both White (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.24-0.87) and African American (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17-0.88). No statistical differences were found in OS and PFS across races, nor in any efficacy outcome between Hispanic and non-Hispanic pts. Asian (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.29-0.96 vs White) and Hispanic pts (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.31-0.85 vs non-Hispanic) had lower risk of grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Conclusions: Overall, axi-cel showed favorable OS, PFS and safety profile regardless of race and ethnicity in the real-world setting. No notable differences in outcomes were observed for Hispanic or Asian pts. Lower response rates in African American pts noted here warrant further investigation including any underrepresentation not explained by a lower incidence rate for DLBCL (SEER), access to care, and disease burden.

Purpose T-cell–replete HLA-haploidentical donor hematopoietic transplantation using post-transplant cyclophosphamide was originally described using bone marrow (BM). With increasing use of mobilized peripheral blood (PB), we compared transplant outcomes after PB and BM transplants. Patients and Methods A total of 681 patients with hematologic malignancy who underwent transplantation in the United States between 2009 and 2014 received BM (n = 481) or PB (n = 190) grafts. Cox regression models were built to examine differences in transplant outcomes by graft type, adjusting for patient, disease, and transplant characteristics. Results Hematopoietic recovery was similar after transplantation of BM and PB (28-day neutrophil recovery, 88% v 93%, P = .07; 100-day platelet recovery, 88% v 85%, P = .33). Risks of grade 2 to 4 acute (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; P < .001) and chronic (HR, 0.35; P < .001) graft-versus-host disease were lower with transplantation of BM compared with PB. There were no significant differences in overall survival by graft type (HR, 0.99; P = .98), with rates of 54% and 57% at 2 years after transplantation of BM and PB, respectively. There were no differences in nonrelapse mortality risks (HR, 0.92; P = .74) but relapse risks were higher after transplantation of BM (HR, 1.49; P = .009). Additional exploration confirmed that the higher relapse risks after transplantation of BM were limited to patients with leukemia (HR, 1.73; P = .002) and not lymphoma (HR, 0.87; P = .64). Conclusion PB and BM grafts are suitable for haploidentical transplantation with the post-transplant cyclophosphamide approach but with differing patterns of treatment failure. Although, to our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive comparison, these findings must be validated in a randomized prospective comparison with adequate follow-up.

Purpose The major causes of mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation (allo-HCT) are relapse, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and infection. We have reported previously that alterations in the intestinal flora are associated with GVHD, bacteremia, and reduced overall survival after allo-HCT. Because intestinal bacteria are potent modulators of systemic immune responses, including antitumor effects, we hypothesized that components of the intestinal flora could be associated with relapse after allo-HCT. Methods The intestinal microbiota of 541 patients admitted for allo-HCT was profiled by means of 16S ribosomal sequencing of prospectively collected stool samples. We examined the relationship between abundance of microbiota species or groups of related species and relapse/progression of disease during 2 years of follow-up time after allo-HCT by using cause-specific proportional hazards in a retrospective discovery-validation cohort study. Results Higher abundance of a bacterial group composed mostly of Eubacterium limosum in the validation set was associated with a decreased risk of relapse/progression of disease (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 per 10-fold increase in abundance; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.95; P = .009). When the patients were categorized according to presence or absence of this bacterial group, presence also was associated with less relapse/progression of disease (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.87; P = .01). The 2-year cumulative incidences of relapse/progression among patients with and without this group of bacteria were 19.8% and 33.8%, respectively. These associations remained significant in multivariable models and were strongest among recipients of T-cell–replete allografts. Conclusion We found associations between the abundance of a group of bacteria in the intestinal flora and relapse/progression of disease after allo-HCT. These might serve as potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets to prevent relapse and improve survival after allo-HCT.

5017 Background: HDCT/ASCT represents a curative salvage treatment for patients with GCT but is rarely used for other solid tumors. Patients undergoing HDCT/ASCT for hematologic neoplasms require revaccination for their childhood immunizations. Whether this is necessary in patients with GCT is unknown. Methods: In this prospective longitudinal study, patients with GCT undergoing HDCT-ASCT from 11/2010 to 5/2018 had serologies for Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Diphtheria, Tetanus, Polio, and Varicella Zoster measured before HDCT and at 3, 6, and in a subset, 12+ months after the last HDCT with results at these timepoints compared using descriptive statistics. In addition, titer levels at ≥6 months post-transplant were matched 1:1 for age and gender with HL patients who underwent HDCT/ASCT during the same time period. Immunity was compared between cohorts using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Results: Of 80 patients with GCT (median age 30, 84% nonseminoma), 91% received 3 sequential transplants and 68 had repeat titers at ≥6 months. Immunity at baseline was >95% for Diphtheria, Tetanus and Polio and 89% for Varicella Zoster but lower for Measles (74%), Mumps (85%), and Rubella (83%) (Table). Compared to baseline, proportional immunity for all infections was similar at 3, 6, and 12 months post-transplant in the GCT population (≥6 months shown in Table). Matching resulted in 58 GCT-HL pairs. One-year immunity was numerically lower for most infections in the HL vs. GCT patients and significantly decreased for Measles and Rubella (Table). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess vaccine titers following HDCT/ASCT for GCT. We demonstrate that HDCT/ASCT does not result in loss of immunity to childhood vaccines and that GCT patients retain protective titers more frequently than those with HL. However, 15-31% of GCT patients lack MMR immunity at baseline and at 1-year post-ASCT. Therefore, we recommend checking MMR titers at 1-year post-ASCT with revaccination of those lacking immunity. Titer evaluation and revaccination is not necessary for other childhood immunizations.[Table: see text]

2538 Background: Allogeneic HCT is a potentially curative therapy for many patients with AML that relies on a graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. Patients who relapse after allogeneic HCT have a poor prognosis and few treatment options. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) can achieve a GvL effect in some patients, however, efficacy is frequently associated with the development graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). There is a substantial need for treatment approaches that enhance the benefit of GVL while decoupling toxicities associated with GVHD. Methods: We report ongoing results from a first-in-human study (NCT04284228) of a non-genetically engineered, donor-derived adoptive cellular therapy product, NEXI-001, which contains multiple populations of CD8+ T cells that recognize different HLA 02.01-restricted peptides from the WT1, PRAME, and Cyclin A1 antigens. NEXI-001 contains T cell memory subtypes that combine anti-tumor potency with long-term persistence. Results: At the time of this analysis, 7 patients with relapsed AML after allogeneic HCT were enrolled. Five Patients were treated with single infusions of NEXI-001 at three different dose levels: 50, 100 and 200 million. Currently, the median follow-up is 5 months. Significantly, GVHD, cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, or NEXI-001-related adverse events were not observed. NEXI-001 treatment resulted in reductions in red blood cell and platelet transfusions and increased donor chimerism. Decreases in myeloblasts in bone marrow and peripheral blood and reduction in the size of an extramedullary myeloid sarcoma were suggestive of an anti-leukemia effect (Table). Correlative studies indicate that NEXI-001 CD8+ cells undergo a rapid proliferation after infusion and are also associated with a robust hostlymphocyte recovery that occurs as quickly Day 3 after infusion. NEXI-001 infused CD8+T cells are detectable by multimer staining in peripheral blood of patients and proliferate over time. TCR sequencing analyses determined that infused NEXI-001 cells contain T cell clones that were undetectable in the peripheral blood of patients at baseline but were detected in blood and bone marrow and persist over time. Conclusions: NEXI-001 has the potential to enhance GvL effect without the associated toxicities of GVHD, cytokine release syndrome, and neurotoxicity. Due to these encouraging results, the trial will proceed with an evaluation of repeated NEXI-001 dosing Clinical trial information: NCT04284228. [Table: see text]

7552 Background: Axi-cel is approved in the US for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory LBCL after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy. Post-market long term follow up study of commercial Axi-cel recipients using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research was recently completed. Methods: From October 2017 to August 2020, 1,500 Axi-cel recipients from 79 centers were enrolled. Of these, 1001 patients with at least 6 months of follow-up were included in this analysis. Outcomes include complete and overall responses rates (CR and ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (Lee D 2014 and American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy [ASTCT]), immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), hematologic recovery and subsequent neoplasm (SN). Subgroup analysis by sensitivity to therapy, defined as responsive to the last line of therapy prior to Axi-cel. Median follow-up was 12 months (range, 6-28 months). Results: The median age overall was 62 years, 37% were ≥ 65 years, 83% with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0-1, 28% with transformed lymphoma, 14% with high grade lymphoma, 29% with prior autologous transplant, and 66% with chemotherapy-resistant disease prior to Axi-cel. The median time from diagnosis to Axi-cel infusion was 15 months. Best ORR was 70% (CR 53%). Landmark analysis of patients in CR at 6 months post Axi-cel demonstrates a low number of subsequent progression/death events. With respect to outcomes for chemotherapy-sensitive disease versus resistant disease, the ORR, CR, 12-month PFS and OS were 78% vs. 66%, 60% vs. 48%, 55% (95% CI, 48-62%) vs. 40% (95% CI, 37-44%), and 70% (95% CI, 63-76%) vs. 54% (95% CI, 50-58%), respectively. CRS of any grade was reported in 83% of patients. Incidence of Grades ≥ 3 CRS was 10% according to Lee et al 2014, and 13% according to ASTCT Consensus Grading. Median time to any grade CRS was 4 days (range, 1-28 days), and 93% of CRS cases resolved with a median duration of 7 days (range, 1-121 days). ICANS were reported in 576 (57%) patients, grade >3 was 26%. The median time to onset of ICANS was 7 days (range, 1-82 days), and 86% resolved with a median duration of 9 days (range, 1 to 115 days). Twenty-nine patients (2.9%) reported SN: hematologic (N = 17), solid tumors (N = 12). Conclusions: This is the largest report on Axi-cel in the real-world setting and demonstrates consistent efficacy outcomes and further characterizes safety outcomes. Patients in CR at 6 months have sustained disease control with low number of relapse events. Although patients with therapy-sensitive disease experience better outcomes than patients with therapy-resistant, the overall outcomes on both groups of patients are favorable.

Purpose To examine the outcomes of patients with chemotherapy-sensitive mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) following a first hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HCT), comparing outcomes with autologous (auto) versus reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic (RIC allo) HCT and with transplantation applied at different times in the disease course. Patients and Methods In all, 519 patients who received transplantations between 1996 and 2007 and were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research were analyzed. The early transplantation cohort was defined as those patients in first partial or complete remission with no more than two lines of chemotherapy. The late transplantation cohort was defined as all the remaining patients. Results Auto-HCT and RIC allo-HCT resulted in similar overall survival from transplantation for both the early (at 5 years: 61% auto-HCT v 62% RIC allo-HCT; P = .951) and late cohorts (at 5 years: 44% auto-HCT v 31% RIC allo-HCT; P = .202). In both early and late transplantation cohorts, progression/relapse was lower and nonrelapse mortality was higher in the allo-HCT group. Overall survival and progression-free survival were highest in patients who underwent auto-HCT in first complete response. Multivariate analysis of survival from diagnosis identified a survival benefit favoring early HCT for both auto-HCT and RIC allo-HCT. Conclusion For patients with chemotherapy-sensitive MCL, the optimal timing for HCT is early in the disease course. Outcomes are particularly favorable for patients undergoing auto-HCT in first complete remission. For those unable to achieve complete remission after two lines of chemotherapy or those with relapsed disease, either auto-HCT or RIC allo-HCT may be effective, although the chance for long-term remission and survival is lower.

7015 Background: Relationships between microbiota composition and clinical outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) have been described in single-center studies. Geographic variations in human microbial communities and differences in clinical practices across institutions raise the question of whether these associations are generalizable. We report the first multi-center study of the intestinal microbiota in allo-HCT. Methods: Intestinal communities in 8,768 fecal samples from 1,362 allo-HCT patients at 4 centers on 3 continents were profiled by 16S sequencing. Associations between microbiota composition and clinical outcomes were analyzed with proportional-hazards analysis in an observational study. Results: We observed reproducible patterns of microbiota injury characterized by loss of diversity and domination by single taxa. Low diversity in the neutrophil engraftment period was reproducibly associated with increased risk of death (multivariate HR 0.48 [0.30-0.77] p = 0.002 in the largest cohort). These reductions in OS were in part due to an increased risk of transplant-related mortality and graft-vs-host disease. Baseline pre-HCT samples already bore evidence of microbiome disruption; low diversity prior to transplantation was associated with poor survival. A bacterial-composition risk score that was trained in one cohort predicted mortality in the other three cohorts (multivariate HR 1.42 [1.04-1.93] p = 0.03), indicating that not only a diversity metric but also a signature of specific bacterial abundances is informative about post-HCT mortality risk across independent institutions. Conclusions: We demonstrate a relationship between microbiota and survival after allo-HCT that is independent of transplant center and geographic location. The diversity of clinical practices across institutions imposed significant heterogeneity in the study, yet we observed reproducible microbiota injury patterns and associations with outcomes. This concordance suggests that approaches to manipulate the intestinal microbiota in allo-HCT may be generalizable.

Purpose Limited data exist regarding the activity of bendamustine in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This phase II study evaluated the efficacy of bendamustine in relapsed and refractory HL. Patients and Methods Patients with relapsed and refractory HL who were ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT), or for whom this treatment failed, received bendamustine 120 mg/m2 as a 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 2 every 28 days with growth factor support. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). A secondary end point was referral rate to allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT) for patients deemed eligible for alloSCT at the time of enrollment. Results Of the 36 patients enrolled, 34 were evaluable for response. Patients had received a median of four prior treatments, and 75% had relapsed after ASCT. The ORR by intent-to-treat analysis was 53%, including 12 complete responses (33%) and seven partial responses (19%). The response rate among evaluable patients was 56%. Responses were seen in patients with prior refractory disease, prior ASCT, and prior alloSCT; however, no responses were seen in patients who relapsed within 3 months of ASCT. The median response duration was 5 months. Five patients (20% of those eligible) proceeded to alloSCT after treatment with bendamustine. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were infrequent and most commonly included thrombocytopenia (20%), anemia (14%), and infection (14%). Conclusion This study confirms the efficacy of bendamustine in heavily pretreated patients with HL. These results support current and future studies evaluating bendamustine combinations in relapsed and refractory HL.

3058 Background: Signaling through GITR (glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor) can abrogate the suppressive effects of CD4+foxp3+ regulatory T cells and co-stimulate activated effector CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. We have previously shown that in vivo GITR ligation using the agonist anti-GITR mAb DTA-1 augments concomitant immunity and immunity generated by active immunization with self- tumor antigens. In the present study, we assessed the activity of anti-GITR mAb used alone, focusing on the effects of GITR ligation on CD8+ T cells during tumor growth. Methods: C57BL/6 mice were injected intradermally with B16 melanoma and received 1mg of DTA-1 or control rat IgG intraperitoneally on various days after tumor injection. In some experiments, naïve, CFSE-labeled pmel-1 CD8+ transgenic T cells (specific for the melanoma antigen gp10025–33 epitope) were transferred into naïve recipients 1 day prior to B16 inoculation. Results: DTA-1 treatment on days 0 and 4 led to tumor rejection in 20–30% and 50–60% of mice, respectively, compared with rejection in 0–5% of mice treated with control IgG (p No significant financial relationships to disclose.

3005 Background: T-cell and antibody responses to self antigens on cancer are usually constrained by immunologic tolerance and ignorance. We found that DNA vaccines encoding xenogeneic differentiation antigens, such as tyrosinase (TYR), can mediate tumor protection and regression in implantable mouse models and dogs with spontaneously arising melanoma. Based on this, we conducted a trial of DNA vaccines encoding mouse and human TYR in patients with AJCC stage III/IV melanoma. Methods: HLA-A*0201+ melanoma patients were randomized to 2 different schedules: one group received 3 injections of mouse TYR DNA followed by 3 injections of human TYR DNA while the other group received 3 injections of human TYR DNA followed by 3 injections with the mouse gene. The study was conducted a three different dose levels: 100, 500 and 1,500 mcg DNA/injection, administered IM every 3 weeks. A total of 18 patients were treated, 6 at each dose level being randomized to one of the two schedules. Anti-TYR antibodies and CD8+ T cells recognizing the native human tyrosinase369-377 (YMDGTMSQV) peptide were measured at fixed time points. T-cell responses were monitored with MHC tetramer and intracytoplasmic IFN-γ staining assays using 10-day in vitro stimulation. Multiparametric flow cytometry was performed to further define the phenotype of responding cells. Results: Most toxicities were transient grade I injection site reactions. Seven patients had CD8+ T cell responses, defined as a >3 standard deviation increase in baseline reactivity to the TYR peptide in either the tetramer or intracellular IFN-γ assay. There was no relationship between dose level or assigned schedule and occurrence of T-cell response. Phenotypic characterization of responding T cells showed that most were consistent with an effector memory phenotype including the expression of granzyme B and surface expression of CD107a. No antibody responses were observed. At a median of 42 months of follow-up, median survival has not been reached and 6/18 patients have died from melanoma (1 in the group of patients who had a T cell response and 5 in the non-responders). Conclusions: Mouse and human TYR DNA vaccines were safe and induced CD8+ T cell responses in 7/18 patients. T cells recognizing a native TYR peptide had a phenotype consistent with that of effector memory cells. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

6502 Background: The need for induction chemotherapy (IC) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) in advanced myelodysplatic syndrome (MDS) remains controversial. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the remission rate in 99 patients with advanced MDS (≥5% marrow blasts) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML, ≥ 20% blasts) evolving from MDS, who were treated with IC before receiving cytoreduction for SCT. These patients were referred to MSKCC for alloSCT from 6/1980 to 10/2004, and subsequently underwent an unmodified or T cell-depleted (TCD) SCT from a matched or mismatched related or unrelated donor after myeloablative cytoreduction in the majority. Results: All patients had MDS at diagnosis: 33% had high risk (HR), 22% intermediate risk (IR) and 42% good risk (GR) cytogenetics; 38% had HR, 32% IR-2 and 25% IR-1 IPSS. The median age was 43 (range 2–66). 76% had primary and 24% had secondary MDS (chemotherapy or radiation). At the time of IC, 64% had frank AML, 33% RAEB-1 and 2, and 3% CMML-2. A combination of an anthracycline (Ac) and standard dose (SD) cytarabine (AraC) was administered to 53% of the patients. Other regimens included Ac with high dose (HD) AraC (15%), Ac with SD AraC and etoposide (15%), HD AraC alone (8%), and HD AraC with etoposide (4%). 26% of patients required a second line regimen and 4% went on to a third. None of the patients died of complications due to IC. CR was achieved in 60% of patients overall (64% in those receiving Ac + SD AraC ± etoposide and 52% for HD AraC ± Ac ± etoposide). The CR rate was 65% in primary and 42% in secondary MDS, and was similar in adults (60%) and children (56%). CR rates were 44% in HR, 68% in IR, and 65% in GR cytogenetics; 58% in HR, 59% in IR-2, and 60% in IR-1 IPSS. According to disease status at IC, the CR rate was 60% for RAEB-1 and 2 and 59% for AML. 12% of complete responders relapsed prior to cytoreduction for SCT. 49% of all patients underwent a TCD SCT from an HLA identical sibling. There are no long term survivors after SCT in patients who did not achieve CR after IC, in contrast to 47% overall survival at 10 years for responders. Conclusions: IC in advanced MDS is associated with a high rate of CR. IC before cytoreduction for SCT is an effective approach to reduce the burden of disease particularly prior to TCD SCT. No significant financial relationships to disclose.