Search

Background: Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) are often diagnosed in ALK-positive lung cancer although it has not been demonstrated how their co-occurrence affects patients' survival., Methods: The study included patients with ALK-positive lung cancer recognized in metastatic stage in the period 2017-2022. All received treatment with ALK inhibitors at The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Warsaw. The main aim of the study was to assess overall survival (OS) in relation to VTE occurrence. The additional purpose was to define predictors of VTE and OS., Results: The study included 54 patients in median age 60 years, men were a minority (25 / 46.3%). VTE was diagnosed in 12 (22.2%) patients: 9 (16.7%) cases with pulmonary embolism (PE), 2 cases with thrombosis in vena cava superior, one case with deep vein thrombosis and thrombosis in vena cava inferior. Among patients with PE: 2 patients died directly due to the first PE episode and one due to a recurrent PE. Patients with VTE had significantly shorter overall survival (median 11.7 vs. 37.4 months, log-rank test p = 0.003). The risk of all-cause mortality was increased significantly in both: VTE (HR = 3.47; 95%CI: 1.61-7.49; p = 0.0016) or alone PE (HR = 2.41; 95%CI: 1.06-5.50; p = 0.037). The risk of VTE diagnosis was significantly increased during active treatment with crizotinib (HR = 8.72; p = 0.0004) or alectinib (HR = 21.47; p = 0.000002). Metastases to liver and baseline leukocyte count > 11 × 10⁹/L were significant predictors of VTE and OS. Khorana score ≥ 3 points predicted OS (HR = 2,66; 95%CI: 1,05-6,75; p = 0,04), but remained insignificant for VTE., Conclusion: The diagnosis of any type of VTE or alone PE was associated with significantly worse overall survival in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) procedure is considered a cardiovascular burden. This is due to the potentially cardiotoxic cytostatic agents used before and the risks associated with peri-transplant procedures. We designed a pilot study to determine the clinical utility of the new ST2 marker; furthermore, we routinely assessed cardiac parameters in HSCT recipients. Based on previous cardio-oncology experience in lung and prostate cancer, we can confirm the prognostic and predictive value of classic cardiac biomarkers and modern echocardiography parameters such as global longitudinal strain of the left and right ventricle. After conducting this pilot study we can create a predictive and prognostic model for patients undergoing HSCT. This will greatly enrich our clinical practice, especially in treating older people., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Re-allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in delays in care delivery to patients with cardiovascular disease and cancer. The ability of health care providers to provide optimal care in this setting has not been formally evaluated., Objectives: To assess the impact of COVID-19 resource re-allocation on scheduling, testing, elective procedures, telemedicine access, use of new COVID-19 therapies, and providers' opinions on healthcare policies among oncology and cardiology practitioners., Methods: An electronic survey was conducted by a cardio-oncology collaborative network through regional and state chapters of the American College of Cardiology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the International Cardio-Oncology Society. Descriptive statistics were reported by frequency and proportion for analyses, and stratified categorically by geographic region and specialty., Results: One thousand four hundred fifteen providers (43 countries) participated: 986 cardiologists, 306 oncologists, and 118 trainees/internal medicine. 63% (195/306) of oncologists vs 92% (896/976) of cardiologists reported cancellations of treatments/elective procedures (p = 0.01). 46% (442/970) of cardiologists and 25% (76/303) of oncologists modified the scope of their practice (p = < 0.001). Academic physicians (74.5%) felt better supplied with personal protective equipment (PPE) vs non-academic (74.5% vs 67.2%; p = 0.018). Telemedicine was less common in Europe 81% (74/91), and Latin America 64% (101/158), than the United States, 88% (950/1097) (p = < 0.001). 95% of all groups supported more active leadership from medical professional societies., Conclusions: These results support initiatives to promote expanded coverage for telemedicine, increased access to PPE, better testing availability and involvement of medical professional societies to help with preparedness for future health care crisis.