1. Optimization of the surveillance strategy in patients with colorectal adenomas: A combination of clinical parameters and index colonoscopy findings.
- Author
-
Park CH, Jung YS, Kim NH, Park JH, Park DI, and Sohn CI
- Subjects
- Age Factors, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Second Primary diagnosis, Neoplasms, Second Primary etiology, Neoplasms, Second Primary pathology, Obesity, Abdominal, Proportional Hazards Models, Risk, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Adenoma diagnosis, Adenoma pathology, Colonoscopy methods, Colorectal Neoplasms diagnosis, Colorectal Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Background and Aim: In addition to index colonoscopy findings, demographic parameters including age are associated with the risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia. Here, we aimed to develop a risk scoring model for predicting advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN) during surveillance using a combination of clinical factors and index colonoscopy findings., Methods: Patients who underwent the removal of one or more adenomas and surveillance colonoscopy were included. A risk scoring model for ACRN was developed using the Cox proportional hazard model. Surveillance interval was determined as a time point exceeding 4% of the cumulative ACRN incidence in each risk group., Results: Of 9591 participants, 4725 and 4866 were randomly allocated to the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. Age, abdominal obesity, advanced adenoma, and ≥ 3 adenomas at index colonoscopy were identified as risk factors for metachronous ACRN. Based on the regression coefficients, point scores were assigned as follows: age, 1 point (per 1 year); abdominal obesity, 10 points; advanced adenoma, 10 points; and ≥ 3 adenomas, 15 points. Patients were classified into high-risk (≥ 80 points), moderate-risk (50-79 points), and low-risk (30-49 points) groups. In the validation cohort, the high-risk and moderate-risk groups showed a higher risk of ACRN than the low-risk group (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 7.11 [4.10-12.32] and 1.58 [1.09-2.30], respectively). Two-, 4-, and 5-year surveillance intervals were recommended for the high-risk, moderate-risk, and low-risk groups, respectively., Conclusions: Our proposed model may facilitate effective risk stratification of ACRN during surveillance and the determination of appropriate surveillance intervals., (© 2020 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF