Search

Background: Glenohumeral instability is a complex clinical problem with underlying pathology in the bony, labral, and capsular tissues. The rate of specific capsular injuries varies widely in the literature and the clinical importance of these specific injury patterns remains unclear. Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a systematic review was performed of multiple databases for all primary research articles between 2008 and 2023 which included advanced imaging and included rates of capsular injury in patients with glenohumeral instability. Results: Twelve studies met inclusion criteria. The most prevalent capsular injury seen was in the inferior glenohumeral ligament (34.1%) across all studies, followed by anterior labroligamentous periosteal sleeve avulsions with 24.9% prevalence. Humeral avulsions of the glenohumeral ligaments lesions were the least common (6.2%) of subjects, followed closely by capsular tears (8.3%) of subjects. Conclusion: Capsular injury is commonly seen in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with anterior shoulder instability. Significant heterogeneity in language and imaging techniques was found in the existing literature. Further research is needed to explore these specific capsular lesions’ clinical implications and rehabilitation strategies.

Background: Reports of glenohumeral translation in shoulders with traumatic anterior instability have been presented. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate anterior-posterior translation in shoulders with traumatic anterior instability. Methods: This systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies including patients aged ≥15 years with previous traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation or subluxation were included. The outcome was anterior-posterior glenohumeral translation. A search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library was performed on July 17, 2022. Two reviewers individually screened titles and abstracts, reviewed full text, extracted data, and performed quality assessment. Results: Twenty studies (582 unstable shoulders in total) of varying quality were included. There was a lack of standardization and unity across studies. Radiography, ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, motion tracking, instrumentation, and manual testing were used to assess the glenohumeral translation. The glenohumeral translation in unstable shoulders ranged from 0.0 ± 0.8 mm to 11.6 ± 3.7 mm, as measured during various motion tasks, arm positions, and application of external force. The glenohumeral translation was larger or more anteriorly directed in unstable shoulders than in stable when contralateral healthy shoulders or a healthy control group were included in the studies. Several studies found that the humeral head was more anteriorly located on the glenoid in the unstable shoulders. Conclusion: This systematic review provides an overview of the current literature on glenohumeral translation in traumatic anterior shoulder instability. It was not able to identify a threshold for abnormal translation in unstable shoulders, due to the heterogeneity of data. The review supports that not only the range of translation but also the direction hereof as well as the location of the humeral head on the glenoid seem to be part of the pathophysiology. Technical development and increased attention to research methodology in recent years may provide more knowledge and clarity on this topic in the future.

Background: Several reports have shown that shoulder stabilizing procedures lead to postoperative external rotation (ER) deficits. However, no study on arthroscopic Latarjet procedures has investigated the effect on ER when the arm is abducted at 0° (ER0) and 90° (ER90). This study examined the relationship between the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure and the subsequent effect on ER0 and ER90. Methods: Patients who underwent an arthroscopic Latarjet procedure from December 2015 to April 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Preoperative ER0 and ER90 values were obtained from the contralateral shoulder. ER0 and ER90 values from the operative side were collected at both 3 and 6 months postoperatively. A repeated measures ANOVA was performed to assess the mean preoperative and postoperative values. Results: Forty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean ER0 for the 3- and 6-month time frames measured 44.2° and 54.6°, respectively. Mean ER90 for the 3- and 6-month time frames measured 78.4° and 90.4°, respectively. Comparison to the contralateral arm at the 3-month follow-up period showed a deficit of 14.9° (P = .0001) and 17.2° (P = .0001) for ER0 and ER90, respectively. At the 6-month follow-up period, patients demonstrated an average decline in ER0 and ER90 of 4.57° (P = .063) and 5.11° (P = .008), respectively. Conclusion: A nominal deficit in ER occurred for both ER0 and ER90 status post arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. Despite loss of ER90 at 6 months achieving statistical significance, the clinical impact is arguably inconsequential. Such limited loss of ER provides more information regarding bony procedures being a more definitive treatment for glenohumeral instability and the ability to restore native motion.

Background: Anterior and posterior glenoid bone loss morphology have both been individually and morphologically described in previous studies. While there exists substantial literature on anterior bone loss, and emerging evidence describing posterior bone loss, a direct comparison between the two is lacking in the current literature. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively compare the anatomic and morphological differences in glenoid bone loss (GBL) in operative patients with anterior versus posterior glenohumeral instability. Methods: All patients over a 3-year period indicated for operative stabilization with posterior glenohumeral instability and suspected glenoid bone loss who underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan were reviewed. Included patients were then singularly matched by gender, laterality, and age (±3 years) to a collection of patients who presented for operative stabilization of anterior glenohumeral instability. GBL parameters were assessed based on the following characterizing measurements: (1) percentage of GBL, (2) glenoid vault version, (3) slope of the glenoid defect relative to the glenoid surface, (4) superior-inferior defect height, and (5) anterior-posterior defect width. Results: Sixty patients (30 anterior GBL, 30 posterior GBL) were included in the final analysis (60 males), with a mean age of 28.8 ± 8.15 years (range 16.0 to 51.0 years). Patients with anterior instability presented with higher GBL (24.94% ± 7.69 vs. 9.22% ± 5.58, P

Background: Few studies have compared conventional and self-assisted shoulder reduction maneuvers. The goal of this study was to evaluate the results of self-assisted Davos vs. traction/countertraction (T/Ct) techniques in the treatment of acute anterior shoulder dislocations. Methods: This was a single-center, prospective study carried out at a tertiary hospital emergency department. Patients aged 18-69 years old, with radiographic confirmation of anterior glenohumeral dislocations, were consecutively allocated to treatment groups. Recorded data included pain at admission (visual analog scale [VAS] score at admission), analgesia before reduction, maximum pain during reduction (maximum VAS score), demographic characteristics, lesion mechanism, laterality, prior dislocation, and immediate complications. The primary outcomes were reduction success rate and pain. Results: Eighty individuals were included (40/group). Regarding the success rate, no statistically significant differences were found between Davos or T/Ct (87.5% vs. 85%; P = .058). The maximum VAS score was significantly lower in Davos than that in T/Ct (4.18 ± 2.00 vs. 6.30 ± 2.13; P

Historically considered the gold standard technique for glenohumeral instability, the open Bankart repair is being performed at decreased rates because of the current trends favoring arthroscopic Bankart repair and the lack of consistent training of the open technique. However, open Bankart repairs may be more appropriate for certain high-risk populations (ie, high-level collision athletes) because of their reduced recurrent instability rates. Further investigations are needed to identify the indications for arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair and compare their outcomes in high-level athletes. This review highlights the indications, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes following open Bankart repairs in athletes., Competing Interests: Disclosure M.R. Mancini has nothing to disclose. R.A. Arciero has received speaking fees from Arthrex, Inc and consulting fees from Smith & Nephew, Inc., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Posterior glenohumeral instability represents a wide spectrum of pathoanatomic processes. A key consideration is the interplay between the posterior capsulolabral complex and the osseous anatomy of the glenoid and humeral head. Stability is dependent upon both the presence of soft tissue pathology (eg, tears to the posteroinferior labrum or posterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament, glenoid bone loss, reverse Hill Sachs lesions, and pathologic glenoid retroversion or dysplasia) and dynamic stabilizing forces. This review highlights unique pathoanatomic features of posterior shoulder instability and associated biomechanics that may exist in patients with posterior glenohumeral instability., Competing Interests: Disclosure No relevant disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Utilizing fresh distal tibia allograft in anterior glenoid reconstruction has emerged as a highly advantageous approach in addressing instances of failed anterior shoulder stabilization with glenoid bone loss. This procedure offers several benefits, including the absence of donor-site morbidity, restoration of significant glenoid defects, reestablishment of joint congruity with the humeral head, restoration of glenoid biomechanics, and the addition of cartilage to the glenoid. Furthermore, it provides a robust and reliable alternative for managing failed stabilization procedures, leading to improved clinical outcomes and a high graft healing rate, while maintaining a low occurrence of recurrent instability., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare that there are no relevant or material financial interests that directly relate to this work. Outside of this work, Matthew T. Provencher declares royalties from Arthrex, Inc. Arthrosurface, Responsive Arthroscopy (2020), and Anika Therapeutics, Inc.; Consulting fees from Arthrex, Inc., Joint Restoration Foundation (JRF), Zimmer Biomet Holdings, and Arthrosurface; received grants from the Department of Defense, United States (DoD), the National Institutes of Health, United States, (NIH), and the DJO (2020); Honoria from Flexion Therapeutics; is an editorial board or governing board member for SLACK, Inc.; Board or committee member for Arthoscopy Association of North America (AANA), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), ASES, San Diego Shoulder Institute (SDSI), and Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons (SOMOs); serves on the medical board of trustees for the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation (through 2018)., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hypothesis/Background: Shoulder dislocations are common orthopedic injuries due to the mobile nature of the glenohumeral joint. High school and collegiate athletes are at particularly high risk for sustaining a dislocation event. Despite the prevalence of these injuries, there is a paucity in the literature regarding incidence of sports-related shoulder dislocations and mechanism of injury within these populations. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to (1) determine the incidence rate of shoulder dislocations in high school–aged and collegiate-aged athletes presenting to emergency departments (EDs) in the United States; (2) to determine the most common sports associated with shoulder dislocations; and (3) to compare the current rates and risk factors for shoulder dislocation with previous trends. Methods: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System is a statistically validated injury surveillance system that collects data from ED visits as a representative probability sample of hospitals in the United States. We queried the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System for the years 2015-2019 to examine the following variables for sports-related shoulder dislocations: patient age (high school = 13-17 years of age; collegiate = 18-23 years of age), sex, year of admission, and sport type. Using a weighted multiplier, annual incidence rates were estimated based on the US Census estimates and injury rates were compared by sex and age group across the study period. Results: From 2015 to 2019, there were a total of 1329 athletic-related shoulder dislocations that presented to participating EDs. Of these, 698 (52.5%) shoulder dislocations occurred in collegiate athletes, while 631 (47.5%) occurred in high school athletes. Using weighted and adjusted estimates automatically generated by the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database, this translates to 89,511 total athletic-related shoulder dislocations across the United States (95% confidence interval lower bound 68,224; 95% confidence interval upper bound 110,798). Male athletes demonstrated a higher proportion of shoulder dislocations (87%) than female athletes (13%). The most common sport-specific mechanisms of traumatic shoulder dislocation were basketball (24.1%), football (21%), soccer (7.1%), baseball (7.1%), and weightlifting (3.3%). Conclusion: Sports-related shoulder dislocations are frequent in high school–aged and college-aged athletes presenting to the ED. Interventions to reduce incidence of injury should be sport-specific and focus on those participating in contact and noncontact sports. Male athletes have disproportionately higher rates of dislocation. These findings are consistent with the previous epidemiologic trends in the literature that have examined the incidence of shoulder dislocations in this population.

Given the rising incidence and prevalence of shoulder injuries in throwing athletes, this review aims to evaluate management options and outcomes of common shoulder injuries in overhead throwers. Laxity of the glenohumeral joint is often adaptive for overhead athletes to achieve the velocity necessary to compete in the professional ranks. Surgical repair of the stabilizers of the humeral head—specifically the labrum and rotator cuff—often causes inflammation, scarring, and overtensioning of the glenohumeral joint which lead to poor postoperative performance. Thus, nonsurgical management should be exhausted in this population before considering surgical intervention.

Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic labral repair for anteroinferior glenohumeral instability with the use of double-loaded suture anchors. Methods: This study evaluated a series of consecutive patients treated after the senior author changed from single- to double-loaded suture anchors for the treatment of anteroinferior glenohumeral instability with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. We collected the following outcomes at final follow-up: visual analog scale pain score, Simple Shoulder Test score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and instability recurrence data. Results: A total of 41 consecutive patients underwent arthroscopic labral repair with double-loaded anchors, of whom 30 (71%) were able to be contacted at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. These patients included 4 contact or collision athletes (13%). The patients had an average of 12 ± 13 prior dislocations over an average period of 56 ± 57 months preoperatively. Mean glenoid bone loss measured 16% ± 10%, and 67% (18 of 27 patients) had glenoid bone loss ≥ 13.5%. Intraoperatively, 3.2 ± 0.4 anchors were used. No posterior repairs or remplissage procedures were performed. At an average of 6.7 ± 2.7 years' follow-up, the visual analog scale pain score was 0.8 ± 1.4; Simple Shoulder Test score, 11 ± 2; and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 90 ± 14. Patients with bone loss < 13.5% had a 0% redislocation rate and 11% subluxation rate, whereas those with bone loss ≥ 13.5% had a 6% reoperation rate, 22% redislocation rate, and 22% subluxation rate. Conclusion: Arthroscopic labral repair with double-loaded anchors provides satisfactory clinical results at early to mid-term outcome assessment when glenoid bone loss is

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the short-term outcomes for patients who underwent revision surgery for shoulder instability, including both revision arthroscopic repair and Latarjet. Methods: This study included patients who underwent revision of a prior arthroscopic labral repair to arthroscopic labral repair or Latarjet at our institution from 2012 to 2017. After collection of preoperative demographic data, preoperative 3-dimensional imaging was reviewed to determine percent glenoid bone loss (%GBL) and to determine whether each shoulder was on-track or off-track. Patients were contacted to obtain postoperative patient-reported outcome metrics including visual analog scale pain, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and instability recurrence (full dislocation, subluxation, or subjective apprehension) data at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Results: Of 62 patients who met criteria, 45 patients were able to be contacted. Of them, 21 underwent revision arthroscopy and 24 underwent a Latarjet procedure. In the revision arthroscopy group, 5 of 15 had %GBL >20% and 4 of 21 were contact athletes. In the Latarjet group, 11 of 22 had %GBL >20% and 5 of 24 were contact athletes. Of 21 revision arthroscopy patients, 8 underwent concomitant remplissage. Eight of 21 patients in the revision arthroscopy group and 7 of 21 patients in the Latarjet group reported instability postoperatively. Three of 21 patients in the revision arthroscopy group and 2 of 21 patients in the Latarjet group reported full dislocations postoperatively. Zero patients in the revision arthroscopy group and 1 of 21 patients in the Latarjet group underwent reoperation. Conclusion: Our results suggest that both revision Latarjet and arthroscopic stabilization can be of benefit in select circumstances. However, in revision settings, postoperative instability symptoms are common with both procedures.

The glenohumeral joint is intrinsically predisposed to instability because of the bony anatomy but maintained in alignment by many important structures, including the glenoid labrum, glenohumeral ligaments (GHLs), and muscles and tendons. Trauma and overuse can damage these stabilizers, which may then lead to subluxation or dislocation and eventually recurrent instability. This is most common in the anterior direction, which has several recognizable patterns of injury on advanced imaging, including humeral Hill Sachs deformities, bony Bankart lesion of the anteroinferior glenoid, soft tissue Bankart lesions, Bankart variant lesions (Perthes and ALPSA lesions), and HAGL/GAGL lesions. Similar reverse lesions are seen, as well as unique posterior lesions, such as Bennett and Kim's lesions. When symptoms of apprehension and instability in more than one direction are seen, one should consider multidirectional instability, which often presents with a patulous joint capsule. Finally, owing to significant impacts of daily activities and quality of life, surgical correction of labral tears, bony Bankart defects, Hill Sachs defects, and capsular laxity, may be considered., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The manifestation of glenohumeral arthritis in the young adult is a devastating occurrence that can be difficult to manage. This review details the many underlying etiologies including genetic causes, congenital abnormalities, glenohumeral instability, posttraumatic lesions, postcapsulorraphy arthropathy, osteonecrosis, intraarticular pain pump postoperative use, radiofrequency/thermal capsulorraphy treatments, septic arthritis/infection, and inflammatory arthropathies. Although each of these potential causes have been well-studied, their contributions to the development of glenohumeral arthritis in the young person has not been described extensively., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Shoulder instability is common in military populations, and this demographic represents individuals at high risk for recurrence. Surgical management is often indicated, especially in high-demand young individuals, and provides a predictable return to military duties. Accurate recognition of glenoid bone loss and other associated anatomic lesions is of importance for appropriate selection between arthroscopic capsulolabral repair and bony reconstruction procedures. A thorough understanding of underlying pathology, diagnostic testing, and available treatment options provides for optimal care of the unstable shoulder., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Various studies have investigated scapulothoracic muscle activity and recruitment patterns in relation to shoulder complaints in different populations, but a consensus review is lacking., Hypothesis/purpose: To systematically review the state of the art regarding scapulothoracic muscle activity and recruitment timing in subjects with shoulder pain compared to pain free controls., Study Design: Systematic review., Methods: The search for relevant articles was performed in Pubmed and Web of Science, including Web of Knowledge, using key words related to shoulder pain, scapulothoracic muscle activity or recruitment timing. Articles were included till November 2012. Case-control studies concerning the scapulothoracic region and muscle recruitment using electromyography (EMG) were included. Articles regarding rotator cuff muscles or neck-shoulder pathologies or studies handling a treatment outcome, were excluded. The methodological quality of the articles was assessed using appropriate risk of bias criteria for case-control studies., Results: A total of 12 articles were included in the systematic review, containing patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome (SIS) or glenohumeral instability. In patients with SIS 3 out of 6 articles showed increased upper trapezius muscle (UT) activity, 3 out of 5 studies showed decreased lower trapezius muscle (LT) activity and 3 out of 5 articles showed decreased serratus anterior muscle (SA) activity. Patients with glenohumeral instability showed contradictory results on scapulothoracic muscle activity patterns. In both SIS and glenohumeral instability patients, no consensus was found on muscle recruitment timing., Conclusion: Patients with SIS and glenohumeral instability display numerous variations in scapulothoracic muscle activity compared to healthy controls. In the SIS-group, the LT and SA muscle activity is decreased. In addition, the UT muscle activity is increased among the SIS patients, whereas no clear change is seen among patients with glenohumeral instability. Although the scapulothoracic muscle activity changed, no consensus could be made regarding muscle recruitment timing., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)