1. Structural basis for the allosteric behaviour and substrate specificity of Lactococcus lactis Prolidase.
- Author
-
Xu S, Grochulski P, and Tanaka T
- Subjects
- Allosteric Regulation, Substrate Specificity, Models, Molecular, Amino Acids metabolism, Lactococcus lactis genetics, Lactococcus lactis metabolism, Dipeptidases
- Abstract
Prolidase (EC 3.4.13.9) is an enzyme that specifically hydrolyzes Xaa-Pro dipeptides into free amino acids. We previously studied kinetic behaviours and solved the crystal structure of wild-type (WT) Lactococcus lactis prolidase (Llprol), showing that this homodimeric enzyme has unique characteristics: allosteric behaviour and substrate inhibition. In this study, we focused on solving the crystal structures of three Llprol mutants (D36S, H38S, and R293S) which behave differently in v-S plots. The D36S and R293S Llprol mutants do not show allosteric behaviour, and the Llprol mutant H38S has allosteric behaviour comparable to the WT enzyme (Hill constant 1.52 and 1.58, respectively). The crystal structures of Llprol variants suggest that the active site of Llprol formed with amino acid residues from both monomers, i.e., located in an interfacial area of dimer. The comparison between the structure models of Llprol indicated that the two monomers in the dimers of Llprol variants have different relative positions among Llprol variants. They showed different interatomic distances between the amino acid residues bridging the two monomers and varied sizes of the solvent-accessible interface areas in each Llprol variant. These observations indicated that Llprol could adapt to different conformational states with distinctive substrate affinities. It is strongly speculated that the domain movements required for productive substrate binding are restrained in allosteric Llprol (WT and H38S). At low substrate concentrations, only one out of the two active sites at the dimer interface could accept substrate; as a result, the asymmetrical activated dimer leads to allosteric behaviour., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Takuji Tanaka reports financial support was provided by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Shangyi Xu reports financial support was provided by Mitacs Canada. Takuji Tanaka reports equipment, drugs, or supplies was provided by Canadian Light Source Inc. Takuji Tanaka reports a relationship with University of Saskatchewan College of Agriculture and Bioresources that includes: employment. Shangyi Xu reports a relationship with University of Saskatchewan College of Agriculture and Bioresources that includes: funding grants. Pawel Grochulski reports a relationship with Canadian Light Source Inc. that includes: employment. Shangyi Xu reports a relationship with Canadian Light Source Inc. that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF