Search

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor as an attractive drug target with promising antitumor effects has been widely investigated. High quality clinical trial has been conducted in liver transplant (LT) recipients in Western countries. However, the pertinent studies in Eastern world are paucity. Therefore, we designed a clinical trial to test whether sirolimus can improve recurrence-free survival (RFS) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients beyond the Milan criteria after LT. This is an open-labeled, single-arm, prospective, multicenter, and real-world study aiming to evaluate the clinical outcomes of early switch to sirolimus-based regimens in HCC patients after LT. Patients with a histologically proven HCC and beyond the Milan criteria will be enrolled. The initial immunosuppressant regimens are center-specific for the first 4-6 weeks. The following regimens integrated sirolimus into the regimens as a combination therapy with reduced calcineurin inhibitors based on the condition of patients and centers. The study is planned for 4 years in total with a 2-year enrollment period and a 2-year follow-up. We predict that sirolimus conversion regimen will provide survival benefits for patients particular in the key indicator RFS as well as better quality of life. If the trial is conducted successfully, we will have a continued monitoring over a longer follow-up time to estimate indicator of overall survival. We hope that the outcome will provide better evidence for clinical decision-making and revising treatment guidelines based on Chinese population data. Trial register: Trial registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR2100042869., Competing Interests: Competing interest No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Donor shortage is the biggest obstacle in organ transplantation. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been considered as a valuable approach to shortening waiting time. The objectives of this study were to investigate the feasibility of utilizing donors older than 50 years in LDLT and to evaluate the graft function and recipient survival., Methods: All LDLT cases (n=159) were divided into the older (donor age≥50 years, n=10) and younger (donor age<50 years, n=149) donor groups. Donor graft and recipient condition pre-, intra- and post-operation were compared between the two groups. In particular, graft functions and recipient survivals were analyzed., Results: The median donor age was 58.5 (52.5-60.0) years in the older donor group and 25.0 (23.0-32.0) in the younger donor group. There was no significant difference in cold ischemic time, anhepatic phase and operation time between the older and younger donor groups (P>0.05). However, the volume of red blood cell transfused in operation was greater in the older donor group than in the younger donor group (1900 vs 1200 mL, P=0.023). The 1-, 3- and 5-year graft survival rates were 90%, 80% and 80% for the older donor group, and 92%, 87% and 87% for the younger donor group, respectively (P=0.459). The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 100%, 90% and 90% for recipients with older grafts, and 93%, 87% and 87% for those with younger grafts, respectively (P=0.811)., Conclusion: It is safe for a LDLT recipient to receive liver from donors older than 50 years, and there is no significant adverse effect on graft function and long-term patients' survival.

Background: Ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBLs) play an extremely important role in influencing the long-term survival and quality of life of recipients after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Some patients can be cured by interventional therapies, however others lose their grafts at last and receive liver retransplantation (re-OLT). The aim of this study was to analyze the data of 66 patients who had received re-OLT at our center because of ITBL and to discuss the treatment of ITBL after OLT., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 66 re-OLT cases due to ITBL from September 2001 to February 2007 at our center. The Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox-Mantel test were used to identify factors associated with mortality for univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, respectively., Results: Fifty-five of 66 ITBL cases underwent interventional therapies before re-OLT. The actuarial survival at 1 month and 1 year for these patients was 83% and 74%, respectively. Prognostic factors for mortality in univariate analysis were model of end-stage liver disease score (MELD) >16.5 (Chi(2)=5.856, P=0.016), cold ischemia time >8 hours (Chi(2)=6.539, P=0.011), infections (Chi(2)=5.550, P=0.018) and complications (Chi(2)=12.168, P=0.002) after re-OLT. In the multivariate analysis (Cox regression), the risk factors independently associated with mortality were MELD score >16.5 (RR: 3.140; P=0.035), cold ischemia time >8.2 hours (RR: 0.192; P=0.016) and complications (RR: 3.896, P=0.003)., Conclusions: The incidence of ITBL in China is higher than in other countries. Based on our experience, MELD score, cold ischemia time and complications after re-OLT are risk factors independently associated with mortality in retransplanted ITBL patients.

Background: Because the orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) was performed widely in recent 5 years throughout China, the proportion of recipients whose graft function deteriorated to be retransplantation candidates increased gradually. This study was undertaken to analyze clinical experience of orthotopic liver retransplantation (re-OLT) at our center., Methods: The medical records of 80 patients who had undergone liver retransplantation at our center from January 1999 to July 2005 were analyzed retrospectively, including indications and timing of retransplantation, surgical techniques, and the causes of death., Results: The commonest cause leading to hepatic graft loss and subsequent retransplantation was biliary complications in 36 patients (45%). The patients underwent retransplantation more than 30 days after their primary transplant recovered better than those who underwent retransplantation within 8-30 days after primary transplantation (perioperative mortality 19.6% versus 70%). Sepsis (12 of 22 patients, 54.5%) and multiple organ failure (4 of 22 patients, 18.2%) were leading causes of re-OLT recipient deaths., Conclusions: Proper indications and optimal operative time, surgical procedures, perioperative monitoring and appropriate postoperative treatment contribute to the improvement of the survival rate of patients after liver retransplantation.