Search

Background: Primary mediastinal germ-cell tumors (PMGCTs) account for 1%-3% of all germ-cell tumors (GCTs). Non-seminoma have a poorer prognosis compared to their gonadal counterpart and, according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group, they are considered 'poor risk' disease. Medical treatment is the same, with overall survival (OS) being ∼40%, declining to 10%-15% at 3 years in case of lung and non-visceral metastases. Patients failing first-line chemotherapy have a dismal prognosis, with only 5%-10% of cases being cured in the salvage setting. High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been successfully used to treat patients with relapsed or refractory gonadal GCTs., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the value of HDC with ASCT in the whole population and define primary mediastinal non seminoma germ cell tumor (PMNSGCT) patient subgroups, who were registered in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database from January 2000 to January 2018. Sixty-nine adult male patients with PMNSGCT were included. HDC consisted mainly of carboplatin/etoposide doublet, and most patients received HDC as part of a multiple sequential HDC program., Results: OS was 43.3% at 2 years, and 34.7% at 5 and 10 years for the entire cohort. Analysis of outcomes showed that patients undergoing HDC as upfront therapy had a better progression-free survival (PFS) and OS compared to those treated in subsequent relapses (5-year PFS 51.8% versus 26.8% and 5-year OS 51.3% versus 25.9%). Better remission status before transplantation was predictive of the benefit of HDC. Three treatment-related deaths were recorded., Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the most extensive retrospective study of HDC in PMNSGCTs patients and the first to thoroughly investigate potential predictors of benefit from this treatment. HDC with ASCT may well represent a therapeutic option in patients with PMNSGCTs after the first relapse or even as a front-line program., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Cell and gene therapy poses evolving challenges. The current article summarizes the discussions held by European Regional Committee of the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) on the current challenges in this field, focusing on the European setting. This article emphasizes the imperative assessment of real-world cell and gene therapy activity, advocating for expanded registries beyond hematopoietic transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapy. Accreditation's role in ensuring standardized procedures, as exemplified by JACIE (The Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT-Europe and EBMT), is crucial for safety. Access to commercial products and reimbursement variations among countries underscore the need for uniform access to advanced therapy medical products (ATMPs). Academic product development and point-of-care manufacturing face barriers to patient access. Hospital Exemption's potential, demonstrated by some initial experiences, may increase patient accessibility in individual situations. Regulatory challenges, including the ongoing European ATMPs legislation review, necessitate standardized criteria for Hospital Exemption and mandatory reporting within registries. Efforts to combat unproven therapies and fraud involve collaboration between scientific societies, regulatory bodies and patient groups. Finally, is important to highlight the vital role of education and workforce development in meeting the escalating demand for specialized professionals in the ATMP field. Collaboration among scientific societies, academic institutions, industry, regulatory bodies and patient groups is crucial for overcoming all these challenges to increase gene and cell therapy activity in Europe., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest FSG, JV, DF, JJZ and MG are members of the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT-EU) Executive Committee. AR, CC, SC, HD, NG, CH, JHEK, BN, TR, ISG, JAS and AS are members of European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) executive committee or working groups representatives. FSG has received research support from Novartis, Gilead. Honoraria from Novartis, Gilead, Pfizer, BMS-Celgene and Pierre-Fabré. CC has received honoraria (personal and institutional) and travel support from Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, BMS, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kite / Gilead, Novartis and Sanofi SA as a compensation for speaker's bureau and advisory boards. JK was shareholder of Gadeta and is inventor on multiple patents dealing with engineered immune cells, and has received research support from Novartis, Milteny Biotech and Gadeta. JAS has received consultancy honoraria from Kiadis, Medac, Vertex and Jazz. AS has received research support from Takeda and honoraria from Takeda, BMS/Celgene, MSD, Novartis, Gilead Kite, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, Janssen and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have no commercial, proprietary or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The European society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) has a long-standing interest in the evaluation of hematopoietic cell transplantation. More than three decades ago, its members established a continental registry. Today, more than 700,000 patients have been registered, and information has been gathered on more than 800,000 transplants. This huge amount of information has allowed conducting multiple retrospective studies, evaluating changes in practices over time and for different categories of diseases, benchmarking outcome across EBMT affiliated centers, and increasingly serves to build synthetic comparators to evaluate the introduction of therapeutic innovations in the field of hematology. CAR-T cells therapies draw on human and technical resources that are also used to deliver HCT; they elicit side effects that require the implementation of risk mitigation plans; they are living drugs that persist in the body of the recipient and thus deserve prolonged follow-up; the introduction of CAR-T cells in the pharmacopeia is likely to significantly impact on the practice of BMT; for all these reasons and even before the first approvals of CAR-T Cells in Europe, EBMT engaged in a project aiming at complementing the EBMT Registry with a Cellular Therapy Form, with the objective to register CAR-T cells treated patients and collect information on their short-, middle- and long-term outcome. The goal is to provide EBMT investigators with a tool for primary analyses of the collected information and to support secondary use of data transferred at the individual level to Marketing Authorization Holders and other interested parties, to fulfill their obligations to health authorities and further evaluate the actual medical values of CAR-T Cells in different contexts and indications. The EBMT Registry received a positive opinion from the European Medicines agency in 2019, and five years later contains information on more than 9.000 treated patients. This article describes the journey to start this new activity, lessons to be drawn in view of improving the collection of real-world data, and what existing information tells us in terms of patient access., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest AvB, SvdW, AM, ISO, EMG are or have been permanent and paid employees with EBMT. CC, AR, SM, RdlC, PL, MM, NK, AS, CB & JK volunteer part of their professional time to contribute to EBMT missions and tasks, in different and temporary positions. In their different capacities, all co-authors have interacted with Pharma companies (including Novartis, Kite/Gilead, BMS, Janssen) that develop and commercialize CAR-T Cells and other advanced therapies to establish the European CAR-T Cells Registry described in this manuscript, and launch PASS and PAES. Interactions with Pharma companies as well as with other public or private, not-for profit or for-profit organizations is ongoing in the context of the GoCART Coalition. JK received funding from Novartis, Miltenyi Biotech, is a cofounder of Gadeta as well as shareholder of floow-up companies of Gadeta such as Century Therapeutics and Adeta., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several commercial and academic autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) products targeting CD19 have been approved in Europe for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, high-grade B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Products for other diseases such as multiple myeloma and follicular lymphoma are likely to be approved by the European Medicines Agency in the near future., Design: The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)-Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE) and the European Haematology Association collaborated to draft best practice recommendations based on the current literature to support health care professionals in delivering consistent, high-quality care in this rapidly moving field., Results: Thirty-six CAR-T experts (medical, nursing, pharmacy/laboratory) assembled to draft recommendations to cover all aspects of CAR-T patient care and supply chain management, from patient selection to long-term follow-up, post-authorisation safety surveillance and regulatory issues., Conclusions: We provide practical, clinically relevant recommendations on the use of these high-cost, logistically complex therapies for haematologists/oncologists, nurses and other stakeholders including pharmacists and health sector administrators involved in the delivery of CAR-T in the clinic., Competing Interests: Disclosure PJH—Janssen, Takeda, Amgen, Celgene, Alnylam. CR—Novartis, Gilead, BMS. PB—Neovii, Riemser, Medac, Novartis, Gilead, Celgene BMS, Miltenyi, Jazz, Riemser, Amgen, Servier. GWB—Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Celgene/BMS and FamicordTx. HB—Novartis and Celgene. CB—Intellia Therapeutics, TxCell, Novartis, GSK, Molmed, Kite/Gilead, Miltenyi, Kiadis, QuellTx, Janssen, Allogene. CC—Sanofi SA, Miltenyi Biotech, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Novartis, Celgene, Terumo BCT, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Janssen. RE—Kite Gilead, BMS Celgene, Janssen. FSG—Novartis, Kite/Gilead, Celgene/BMS, Pfizer, Incyte, Amgen, Takeda, and Roche. UJ—Novartis, Janssen, Gilead, BMS, Miltenyi. MH—T-CURX GmbH. MJK—BMS/Celgene, Kite/Gilead, Miltenyi Biotec, Novartis, Roche. UK—AstraZeneca, Affimed, Glycostem, GammaDelta, Zelluna. JK—Novartis, Miltenyi Biotech, Gadeta, Gilead/BMS. SM—Celgene/BMS, Novartis, DNA Prime SA, Gilead/KITE, Miltenyi, Immunicum. MM—Sanofi, Jazz, Amgen, Takeda, Novartis, Janssen, Celgene, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Astellas, Pfizer, Stemline, GSK, outside the submitted work. JM—Kite/Gilead, Jazz, Janssen, and Mallinckrodt. CR—Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Celgene/BMS, Janssen. RS—Novartis, Gilead, Janssen. JAS—Gilead, Jazz, Janssen, Mallinckrodt, Medac. JS—MSD, Gilead, Pfizer, Kite, Novartis, TEVA. MS—Amgen, Gilead, Miltenyi Biotec, Morphosys, Roche, Seattle Genetics, BMS, Celgene, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Novartis. CT—BMS/Celgene, Abbvie, Takeda, Roche, Novartis, Gilead/Kyte, Incyte, Novartis, Cellectis, Amgen, Sanofi, Janssen, AstraZeneca, ADC Therapeutics. MT—Gilead/KITE, Regeneron, Roche, Novartis, Janssen, Celgene/BMS. JGG—Abbvie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Morphosys, Novartis, Takeda. NK—AOP Phama, Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi, Neovii, JAZZ, Gilead/Kite, Celgene, Riemser. HE—Janssen, BMS/Celgene, Amgen, Sanofi, GSK, Novartis, Takeda. IY-A—Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Celgene/BMS and Janssen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

CAR-T Cells are gene therapy medicinal products, a subcategory of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products as defined in the EC Regulation 1394/2007. They may represent the first example of such medicinal products that are industry-manufactured and commercialized on a large scale. Their very nature, their manufacturing processes, pricing and conditions upon which they were approved by regulatory agencies, all lead the latter to require long-term follow-up after marketing approval with a view for a better definition of CAR-T Cells safety profile and efficacy profile in real world conditions. Collection and analysis of data over a 15-year period of time represents a technical and political challenge. So does the a priori definition of data to be collected for a wealth of forthcoming analyses that focus on the interests of a variety of stakeholders. EBMT has been collecting and analyzing data on hematopoietic cell transplants for decades. EBMT currently works with many interested parties to collect data on patients treated with CAR-T Cells., (Copyright © 2021 Société Française du Cancer. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The prevention of relapse is the major therapeutic challenge in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have obtained a complete remission (CR) on intensive chemotherapy. In this randomized phase 3 study (HOVON97) in older patients (≥60 years) with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome with refractory anemia with excess of blasts, in CR/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) after at least 2 cycles of intensive chemotherapy, we assessed the value of azacitidine as postremission therapy with respect to disease-free survival (DFS; primary end point) and overall survival (OS; secondary end point). In total, 116 eligible patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to either observation (N = 60) or azacitidine maintenance (N = 56; 50 mg/m 2 , subcutaneously, days 1-5, every 4 weeks) until relapse, for a maximum of 12 cycles. Fifty-five patients received at least 1 cycle of azacitidine, 46 at least 4 cycles, and 35 at least 12 cycles. The maintenance treatment with azacitidine was feasible. DFS was significantly better for the azacitidine treatment group (logrank; P = .04), as well as after adjustment for poor-risk cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis and platelet count at randomization (as surrogate for CR vs CRi; Cox regression; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.95; P = .026). The 12-month DFS was estimated at 64% for the azacitidine group and 42% for the control group. OS did not differ between treatment groups, with and without censoring for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Rescue treatment was used more often in the observation group (n = 32) than in the azacitidine maintenance group (n = 9). We conclude that azacitidine maintenance after CR/CRi after intensive chemotherapy is feasible and significantly improves DFS. The study is registered with The Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR1810) and EudraCT (2008-001290-15)., (© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Clofarabine has demonstrated antileukemic activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but has yet to be critically evaluated in younger adults in the frontline with standard chemotherapy. We compared 2 induction regimens in newly diagnosed patients ages 18 to 65 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, that is, idarubicine-cytarabine (cycle I) and amsacrine-cytarabine (cycle II) without or with clofarabine (10 mg/m 2 on days 1-5 of each of both cycles). Consolidation involved chemotherapy with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Event-free survival (EFS, primary endpoint) and other clinical endpoints and toxicities were assessed. We randomized 402 and 393 evaluable patients to the control or clofarabine induction treatment arms. Complete remission rates (89%) did not differ but were attained faster with clofarabine (66% vs 75% after cycle I). Clofarabine added grades 3 to 4 toxicities and delayed hematological recovery. At a median follow-up of 36 months, the study reveals no differences in overall survival and EFS between the control (EFS, 35% ± 3 [standard error] at 4 years) and clofarabine treatments (38% ± 3) but a markedly reduced relapse rate (44% ± 3 vs 35% ± 3) in favor of clofarabine and an increased death probability in remission (15% ± 2 vs 22% ± 3). In the subgroup analyses, clofarabine improved overall survival and EFS for European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2010 intermediate I prognostic risk AML (EFS, 26% ± 4 vs 40% ± 5 at 4 years; Cox P = .002) and for the intermediate risk genotype NPM1 wild-type/ FLT3 without internal-tandem duplications (EFS, 18% ± 5 vs 40% ± 7; Cox P < .001). Clofarabine improves survival in subsets of intermediate-risk AML only. HOVON-102 study is registered at Netherlands Trial Registry #NTR2187., (© 2017 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is among the most challenging complications in unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The highly polymorphic MHC class I chain-related gene A, MICA, encodes a stress-induced glycoprotein expressed primarily on epithelia. MICA interacts with the invariant activating receptor NKG2D, expressed by cytotoxic lymphocytes, and is located in the MHC, next to HLA-B Hence, MICA has the requisite attributes of a bona fide transplantation antigen. Using high-resolution sequence-based genotyping of MICA, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical effect of MICA mismatches in a multicenter cohort of 922 unrelated donor HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQB1 10/10 allele-matched HCT pairs. Among the 922 pairs, 113 (12.3%) were mismatched in MICA MICA mismatches were significantly associated with an increased incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.50-2.23; P < .001), chronic GVHD (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.45-1.55; P < .001), and nonelapse mortality (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.24-1.46; P < .001). The increased risk for GVHD was mirrored by a lower risk for relapse (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.43-0.59; P < .001), indicating a possible graft-versus-leukemia effect. In conclusion, when possible, selecting a MICA-matched donor significantly influences key clinical outcomes of HCT in which a marked reduction of GVHD is paramount. The tight linkage disequilibrium between MICA and HLA-B renders identifying a MICA-matched donor readily feasible in clinical practice., (© 2016 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Introduction: Previously we developed a weighted amino acid (AA) mismatch score predictive for cytotoxic T cell (CTL) alloreactivity (in vitro CTLp assay) based on the structure of the HLA class I molecule. The aim of this study is to confirm the clinical relevance of the CTLp assay and to validate the AA mismatch score as an alternative and easy to use tool to predict permissible mismatches in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)., Methods: We selected patients transplanted with a 9/10 single HLA class I mismatched graft (n=171) at three Dutch HSCT centers. A CTLp assay was performed in 73 donor-recipient pairs. As a control we selected 168 10/10 HLA matched pairs that were matched to the 9/10 single HLA class I mismatched pairs for HSCT year, donor type, patient age and diagnosis., Results: We observed that pairs with negative a CTLp assay had statistically significant decreased incidence of mortality after HSCT comparable to that of 10/10 HLA matched pairs. However, the weighted AA mismatch score did not significantly predict any HSCT end point of interest., Conclusion: Further investigation is needed to unravel the mechanisms involved in causing the beneficial effect of a negative CTLp assay, before other alternative tools to predict HSCT outcome may be developed., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The clinical value of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT) in the subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with double mutant CEBPA (CEBPAdm) has remained unsettled. Among 2983 patients analyzed for CEBPA mutational status (age 18-60 years) treated on 4 published Dutch-Belgian-Swiss Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON/SAKK) and 3 German-Austrian AML Study Group (AMLSG) protocols (2 published, 1 registered, clinicaltrials.gov NCT00151255), 124 had AML with CEBPAdm and achieved first complete remission (CR1). Evaluation of the clinical impact of alloHSCT and autoHSCT vs chemotherapy was performed by addressing time dependency in the statistical analyses. Thirty-two patients proceeded to alloHSCT from a matched related (MRD, n = 29) or a matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 3), 20 to autoHSCT in CR1 and 72 received chemotherapy. Relapse-free survival was significantly superior in patients receiving an alloHSCT or autoHSCT in CR1 as compared with chemotherapy (P < .001), whereas overall survival was not different (P < .12). Forty-five patients relapsed. Of 42 patients treated with reinduction therapy, 35 achieved a second CR (83%) and most patients (n = 33) received an alloHSCT MRD, n = 11; MUD, n = 19; haplo-identical donor, n = 3). Survival of relapsed patients measured from date of relapse was 46% after 3 years. Adult AML patients with CEBPAdm benefit from alloHSCT and autoHSCT; relapsed patients still have a favorable outcome after reinduction followed by alloHSCT.

Immunotherapy with innate immune cells has recently evoked broad interest as a novel treatment option for cancer patients. γ9δ2T cells in particular are emerging as an innate cell population with high frequency and strong antitumor reactivity, which makes them and their receptors promising candidates for immune interventions. However, clinical trials have so far reported only limited tumor control by adoptively transferred γ9δ2T cells. As a potential explanation for this lack of efficacy, we found unexpectedly high variability in tumor recognition within the physiologic human γ9δ2T-cell repertoire, which is substantially regulated by the CDR3 domains of individual γ9δ2TCRs. In the present study, we demonstrate that the reported molecular requirements of CDR3 domains to interact with target cells shape the physiologic γ9δ2T-cell repertoire and, most likely, limit the protective and therapeutic antitumor efficacy of γ9δ2T cells. Based on these findings, we propose combinatorial-γδTCR-chain exchange as an efficient method for designing high-affinity γ9δ2TCRs that mediate improved antitumor responses when expressed in αβT cells both in vitro and in vivo in a humanized mouse model.

Human peripheral Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are activated by phosphorylated metabolites (phosphoagonists [PAg]) of the mammalian mevalonate or the microbial desoxyxylulose-phosphate pathways accumulated by infected or metabolically distressed cells. The underlying mechanisms are unknown. We show that treatment of nonsusceptible target cells with antibody 20.1 against CD277, a member of the extended B7 superfamily related to butyrophilin, mimics PAg-induced Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell activation and that the Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell receptor is implicated in this effect. Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell activation can be abrogated by exposing susceptible cells (tumor and mycobacteria-infected cells, or aminobisphosphonate-treated cells with up-regulated PAg levels) to antibody 103.2 against CD277. CD277 knockdown and domain-shuffling approaches confirm the key implication of the CD277 isoform BTN3A1 in PAg sensing by Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments support a causal link between intracellular PAg accumulation, decreased BTN3A1 membrane mobility, and ensuing Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell activation. This study demonstrates a novel role played by B7-like molecules in human γδ T-cell antigenic activation and paves the way for new strategies to improve the efficiency of immunotherapies using Vγ9Vδ2 T cells.

Background: The platelet count varies considerably between individuals, but within an individual the platelet count is remarkably stable over time. Mechanisms controlling the platelet count are not yet established., Objective: In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that the liver is important in controlling the circulating platelet count, as the liver is the main producer of thrombopoietin., Methods: We compared the platelet count prior to and after liver transplantation in >250 patients transplanted for familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP). In contrast to most patients undergoing liver transplantation, patients with FAP have normal liver function before transplantation. Furthermore, we compared platelet counts in 89 living liver donors with the platelet count in the recipients of these grafts. Finally we compared platelet counts in donor-recipient pairs of hematopoietic stem cells., Results and Conclusions: The platelet count prior to transplantation correlated with the platelet count at 3 or 12 months after transplantation in patients with FAP (r=0.48, P<0.0001 at 3 months, r=0.39, P<0.0001 at 12 months), whereas the platelet count in a living liver donor did not correlate with the platelet count in the recipient at 3 or 12 months after transplantation (r=0.16, P=0.26 at 3 months, r=0.11, P=0.30 at 12 months). The platelet count of related donors of hematopoietic stem cells correlated with the platelet count in the recipient after transplantation (r=0.25, P=0.011)., Conclusions: These results suggest that the liver, in spite of being the prime producer of thrombopoietin, does not dictate the circulating platelet count, whereas the bone marrow does appear to play a role., (© 2012 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Because information on management and outcome of AML relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) is scarce, a retrospective registry study was performed by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT. Among 2815 RIC transplants performed for AML in complete remission (CR) between 1999 and 2008, cumulative incidence of relapse was 32% ± 1%. Relapsed patients (263) were included into a detailed analysis of risk factors for overall survival (OS) and building of a prognostic score. CR was reinduced in 32%; remission duration after transplantation was the only prognostic factor for response (P = .003). Estimated 2-year OS from relapse was 14%, thereby resembling results of AML relapse after standard conditioning. Among variables available at the time of relapse, remission after HSCT > 5 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.67, P < .001), bone marrow blasts less than 27% (HR = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.40-0.72, P < .001), and absence of acute GVHD after HSCT (HR = 0.67, 95% CI, 0.49-0.93, P = .017) were associated with better OS. Based on these factors, 3 prognostic groups could be discriminated, showing OS of 32% ± 7%, 19% ± 4%, and 4% ± 2% at 2 years (P < .0001). Long-term survival was achieved almost exclusively after successful induction of CR by cytoreductive therapy, followed either by donor lymphocyte infusion or second HSCT for consolidation.

Major limitations of currently investigated αβT cells redirected against cancer by transfer of tumor-specific αβTCR arise from their low affinity, MHC restriction, and risk to mediate self-reactivity after pairing with endogenous α or βTCR chains. Therefore, the ability of a defined γ9δ2TCR to redirect αβT cells selectively against tumor cells was tested and its molecular interaction with a variety of targets investigated. Functional analysis revealed that a γ9δ2TCR efficiently reprograms both CD4(+) and CD8(+) αβT cells against a broad panel of cancer cells while ignoring normal cells, and substantially reduces but does not completely abrogate alloreactivity. γ9δ2TCR-transduced αβT cells reduced colony formation of progenitor cells of primary acute myeloid leukemia blasts and inhibited leukemia growth in a humanized mouse model. Thereby, metabolites of a dysregulated mevalonate pathway are targeted and the additional application of widely used biphosphonates is crucial for in vivo efficacy most likely because of its modulating effect on cytokine secretion of γ9δ2TCR-transduced αβT cells. Expression of NKG2D ligands and F1-ATPase contributed to the activity of γ9δ2TCR-transduced αβT cells but were not mandatory. In summary, γ9δ2 TCRs are an attractive alternative to broadly redirect αβT cells against cancer cells with both an improved efficacy and safety profile compared with currently used αβTCRs.

Transfer of tumor antigen-specific T-cell receptors (TCRs) into human T cells aims at redirecting their cytotoxicity toward tumors. Efficacy and safety may be affected by pairing of natural and introduced TCRalpha/beta chains potentially leading to autoimmunity. We hypothesized that a novel single-chain (sc)TCR framework relying on the coexpression of the TCRalpha constant alpha (Calpha) domain would prevent undesired pairing while preserving structural and functional similarity to a fully assembled double-chain (dc)TCR/CD3 complex. We confirmed this hypothesis for a murine p53-specific scTCR. Substantial effector function was observed only in the presence of a murine Calpha domain preceded by a TCRalpha signal peptide for shuttling to the cell membrane. The generalization to a human gp100-specific TCR required the murinization of both C domains. Structural and functional T-cell avidities of an accessory disulfide-linked scTCR gp100/Calpha were higher than those of a dcTCR. Antigen-dependent phosphorylation of the proximal effector zeta-chain-associated protein kinase 70 at tyrosine 319 was not impaired, reflecting its molecular integrity in signaling. In melanoma-engrafted nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient mice, adoptive transfer of scTCR gp100/Calpha transduced T cells conferred superior delay in tumor growth among primary and long-term secondary tumor challenges. We conclude that the novel scTCR constitutes a reliable means to immunotherapeutically target hematologic malignancies.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a life-threatening complication after solid-organ transplantation, which is mediated by host-reactive donor T cells emigrating from the allograft. We report on two liver transplant recipients who developed an almost complete donor chimerism in peripheral blood and bone marrow-infiltrating T cells during aGVHD. By analyzing these T cells directly ex vivo, we found that they died by apoptosis over time without evidence of rejection by host T cells. The host-versus-donor reactivity was selectively impaired, as anti-third-party and antiviral T cells were still detectable in the host repertoire. These findings support the acquired donor-specific allotolerance concept previously established in animal transplantation studies. We also observed that the resolution of aGVHD was not accompanied by an expansion of circulating immunosuppressive CD4/CD25/FoxP3-positive T cells. In fact, graft-versus-host-reactive T cells were controlled by an alternative negative regulatory pathway, executed by the programmed death (PD)-1 receptor and its ligand PD-L1. We found high PD-1 expression on donor CD4 and CD8 T cells. In addition, blocking PD-L1 on host-derived cells significantly enhanced alloreactivity by CD8 T cells in vitro. We suggest the interference with the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway as a therapeutic strategy to control graft-versus-host-reactive T cells in allograft recipients.

CD137 is a member of the TNFR-family with costimulatory function. Here we show that it also has many favorable characteristics as a surrogate marker for antigen-specific activation of human CD8(+) T cells. Although undetectable on unstimulated CD8(+) T cells, it is uniformly up-regulated 24 hours after stimulation on virtually all responding cells regardless of differentiation stage or profile of cytokine secretion, which circumvents limitations of current surrogate markers for defining the repertoire of responding cells based on only individual functions. Antibody-labeled responding CD137(+) cells can be easily and efficiently isolated by flow sorting or magnetic beads to substantially enrich antigen-specific T cells. To test this approach for epitope discovery, we examined in vitro priming of naive T cells from healthy donors to Wilms tumor antigen 1 (WT1), a protein overexpressed in various malignancies. Two overlapping pentadecamers were identified as immunogenic, and further analysis defined WT1((286-293)) as the minimal amino acid sequence and HLA-Cw07 as the HLA restriction element. In conclusion, this approach appears to be an efficient and sensitive in vitro technique to rapidly identify and isolate antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells present at low frequencies and displaying heterogeneous functional profiles, and does not require prior knowledge of the specific epitopes recognized or the HLA-restricting elements.

Adoptive transfer of T lymphocytes is a promising treatment for a variety of malignancies but often not feasible due to difficulties generating T cells that are reactive with the targeted antigen from patients. To facilitate rapid generation of cells for therapy, T cells can be programmed with genes encoding the alpha and beta chains of an antigen-specific T-cell receptor (TCR). However, such exogenous alpha and beta chains can potentially assemble as pairs not only with each other but also with endogenous TCR alpha and beta chains, thereby generating alphabetaTCR pairs of unknown specificity as well as reducing the number of exogenous matched alphabetaTCR pairs at the cell surface. We demonstrate that introducing cysteines into the constant region of the alpha and beta chains can promote preferential pairing with each other, increase total surface expression of the introduced TCR chains, and reduce mismatching with endogenous TCR chains. This approach should improve both the efficacy and safety of ongoing efforts to use TCR transfer as a strategy to generate tumor-reactive T cells.

Innovations in gene discovery and the analysis of gene expression are facilitating the identification of a growing number of antigens that could potentially be targeted for immunotherapy of tumors. Methods to reliably generate antigen-specific T-cell responses in vitro would be useful not only to screen candidate antigens for immunogenicity prior to embarking on in vivo vaccination trials, but also to generate T-cell lines or clones that could be used directly for adoptive immunotherapy approaches. Although many techniques have proven successful for expanding ex vivo effector cells from antigen-specific memory CD8(+) cells that have been primed in vivo, methods to reliably generate high-avidity CTL clones from the naïve repertoire have not been well described. Various methods for the induction and expansion of antigen-specific CD8(+) CTL clones from healthy A2(+) donors were compared, using WT1 as a model tumor-associated antigen for which there is a low frequency of precursor T cells in naïve individuals. In contrast to the well-studied Melan-A/MART-1 (Melan-A) A2-restricted response, for which the CD8(+) T-cell precursor frequency in the naïve repertoire is unusually high, successful expansion of WT1-specific CD8(+) T cells appeared to be more dependent upon cell culture conditions. In particular, primary stimulation with autologous peptide-loaded monocyte-derived DC generated in 48 h (DC2d) was more effective in expanding WT1-reactive populations of CTL than stimulation with DC generated using the more standard week-long protocol (DC7d). Adding supplemental IL-7 2 to 3 days after initiation of a stimulation cycle expanded antigen-specific cells within CTL lines more efficiently than including the cytokine from the beginning of the cycle. Following primary stimulation with peptide-loaded mature DC, subsequent restimulation with peptide-loaded PBMC as the stimulators was more effective at expanding antigen-specific cells than repeated stimulation with mature DC. Using these techniques, high-avidity CTL clones specific for an A()0201-restricted epitope of WT1 have been generated from nearly all normal A2(+) donors tested. Such clones have been demonstrated to be capable of recognizing and lysing leukemic cells, and will soon be tested for therapeutic activity in clinical trials of adoptive immunotherapy in patients with relapsed leukemia after transplantation.